Which player would you take for a single peak season?
Assume your team will play the other player's team in a 7-game playoff series.

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal
Jim Naismith wrote:I posed this "sacrilegious" question with one allegedly correct answer. But remember. . .
Peak Howard is a 3-time DPoY winner.
Peak Howard averaged 27 ppg / 15 rpg / .677 TS% in the playoffs.
In 2009, Howard's Magic eliminated LeBron's heavily favored Cavaliers, despite the Cavs having home-court advantage.
te887848 wrote:When Howard can prove to be 70% as good as 2008, 2009, 2010, 2012, 2013 and 2014 LeBron, then this might be a more appropriate comparison. Until then, LeBron by a landslide.
Quotatious wrote:LeBron, and it's not even close. It's like comparing peak Jordan to Ewing. The center is great, and more impactful defensively than the wing, but the gap on offense is far bigger and more significant, in the wing players' favor.
Dwight was IMO slightly better than LeBron in 2011, but James has 5 or 6 seasons better than Howard's peak (2009-10, 2012-14, arguably also 2008).
Jim Naismith wrote:Every full season that prime Jordan played, he was clearly better than Ewing.
The same cannot be said of LeBron and Dwight because of 2011.
In the language of game theory:
1) Jordan strictly dominates Ewing
2) LeBron does NOT strictly dominate Dwight.
Quotatious wrote:Well, if you wanted to make a case for Howard based on one of LeBron's worst prime seasons, I guess you probably could've named this thread "LeBron vs Dwight in 2011", because 2011 was obviously very far from LeBron's peak. 2009, 2010, 2012 or 2013 LeBron is much better than any version of Dwight.
Devin Booker wrote:Bro.
Jim Naismith wrote:Even in 2009, one of LeBron's peak years, I'd also argue that the LeBron-Dwight gap wasn't huge.
In 2009 despite LeBron's great stats and home-court advantage, the heavily favored Cavs lost against Dwight's Magic.
Dwight had games of 30/13, 27/14, and 40/14 in that series.
Quotatious wrote:Jim Naismith wrote:Even in 2009, one of LeBron's peak years, I'd also argue that the LeBron-Dwight gap wasn't huge.
In 2009 despite LeBron's great stats and home-court advantage, the heavily favored Cavs lost against Dwight's Magic.
Dwight had games of 30/13, 27/14, and 40/14 in that series.
No, 2009 isn't even close, in my opinion. LeBron's '09 season is arguably the greatest peak in NBA history, his numbers were just mind-boggling in the playoffs, especially in that series against Orlando. Howard was fantastic, too, but LeBron was far better, even despite the fact that Cleveland lost the series. James is better in every advanced stat, across the board - both boxscore and RAPM.
Jim Naismith wrote:Quotatious wrote:Jim Naismith wrote:Even in 2009, one of LeBron's peak years, I'd also argue that the LeBron-Dwight gap wasn't huge.
In 2009 despite LeBron's great stats and home-court advantage, the heavily favored Cavs lost against Dwight's Magic.
Dwight had games of 30/13, 27/14, and 40/14 in that series.
No, 2009 isn't even close, in my opinion. LeBron's '09 season is arguably the greatest peak in NBA history, his numbers were just mind-boggling in the playoffs, especially in that series against Orlando. Howard was fantastic, too, but LeBron was far better, even despite the fact that Cleveland lost the series. James is better in every advanced stat, across the board - both boxscore and RAPM.
I'm just making the claim that LeBron's edge over Dwight is clear — but not huge. The Magic's elimination of the overdog Cavs reinforces this.
In a way, it's like Wilt against Bill Russell's Celtics.
JordansBulls wrote:The Warriors are basically a good college team until they meet a team with bigs in the NBA.
Jim Naismith wrote:Quotatious wrote:Jim Naismith wrote:Even in 2009, one of LeBron's peak years, I'd also argue that the LeBron-Dwight gap wasn't huge.
In 2009 despite LeBron's great stats and home-court advantage, the heavily favored Cavs lost against Dwight's Magic.
Dwight had games of 30/13, 27/14, and 40/14 in that series.
No, 2009 isn't even close, in my opinion. LeBron's '09 season is arguably the greatest peak in NBA history, his numbers were just mind-boggling in the playoffs, especially in that series against Orlando. Howard was fantastic, too, but LeBron was far better, even despite the fact that Cleveland lost the series. James is better in every advanced stat, across the board - both boxscore and RAPM.
I'm just making the claim that LeBron's edge over Dwight is clear — but not huge. The Magic's elimination of the overdog Cavs reinforces this.
In a way, it's like Wilt against Bill Russell's Celtics.
“If you're getting stops and you're making threes and the other team's not scoring, that's when you're going to see a huge point difference there,” coach Billy Donovan said.
PaulieWal wrote:How does it reinforce your claim? They play 2 different positions and weren't guarded by each other. The Cavs didn't lose because LeBron underperformed, they lost because Howard played well and his 3 point shooters were even better (40% vs. 32%).