ImageImageImage

Lets say the Jazz offer 12 + Burke for 8...

Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites

bkseven
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,667
And1: 235
Joined: Jun 01, 2012

Re: Lets say the Jazz offer 12 + Burke for 8... 

Post#21 » by bkseven » Wed Jun 3, 2015 5:00 am

sc8581 wrote:I know, Hayward is an all-star. Burke is awful though, we don't want or have a need for him. Hood #12 for #8 I might do though.

Really? I don't recall Hayward having made an all-star game
joseph mamah
Starter
Posts: 2,073
And1: 180
Joined: Jul 06, 2012

Re: Lets say the Jazz offer 12 + Burke for 8... 

Post#22 » by joseph mamah » Wed Jun 3, 2015 5:58 am

coordinator0 wrote:
Catchall wrote:The idea here is that I think the Jazz will value Porzingis and maybe Johnson more than Detroit does, and that might motivate a deal both ways. Guys like Portis, Lyles or possibly Kaminsky would be good fits with Drummond. Whereas they'd be back-ups with the Jazz. I think the Jazz would part with Burke, future 1st (though these will probably be in the teens or 20s), a 2nd-rd pick, and be willing to take salary.

Are you guys optimistic about Jennings making it back?


Detroit does need a power forward to pair with Drummond, but small forward is an even bigger priority. The Pistons need real wing talent to go with Jackson at the point and Drummond in the middle. There are a few interesting free agent options at power forward butthe available small forwards are downright abysmal outside of Carroll.

I think the general consensus on Jenning is that it will be a little ways into the season before he's able to contribute and even then he probably won't be nearly as effective. Achilles injuries are pretty bad and even a full year isn't enough time to come back completely healthy (if that happens at all). It's not that big of a deal though when Jackson is more than likely going to be signed to a long-term contract.


looking at this shoddy free agent crop, im starting to think overpaying Carroll 25% on a 3 year deal might be their best bet this off season. if hes looking at 8 per year, offer him 10, for example. there really isnt anything worth spending money on in this group, other than rfa's and the upper tier guys they have no shot at.
sc8581
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,876
And1: 766
Joined: Jul 22, 2013

Re: Lets say the Jazz offer 12 + Burke for 8... 

Post#23 » by sc8581 » Wed Jun 3, 2015 9:08 am

bkseven wrote:
sc8581 wrote:I know, Hayward is an all-star. Burke is awful though, we don't want or have a need for him. Hood #12 for #8 I might do though.

Really? I don't recall Hayward having made an all-star game


He will next year, the only reason he didn't this year was because the Jazz didn't have a good record before the break but they did in the second half and I expect that to continue into next season.
User avatar
Pharaoh
RealGM
Posts: 16,443
And1: 4,742
Joined: Aug 10, 2001

 

Post#24 » by Pharaoh » Wed Jun 3, 2015 11:01 am

Hood & #12 for #8 would be my demand as well.

Up to the Jazz if they accept.

With Gobert, Favors, Hayward & Exum they guarantee themselves Booker...

He might be there at 12 but Charlotte, Miami & Indiana are all probably looking at him too

We could draft Portis (assuming he's there @ 12) while picking up Hood in the process
princeofpalace
RealGM
Posts: 21,982
And1: 1,636
Joined: Aug 01, 2006

Re: Lets say the Jazz offer 12 + Burke for 8... 

Post#25 » by princeofpalace » Wed Jun 3, 2015 1:46 pm

I wouldn't hesitate to do Hood/12 for 8. Hood is very promising- he plays a position of need and can really shoot the ball, hes also got a nice handle and an adequate defeder. He showed more in his freshman year than KCP did.

Hood's Post AS Break on a better team than Detroit in a better conference: 12 points/2 boards/2 assists in 24mpg on 46% FG, 42% 3pt
Hood as a starter 13 points/3 boards/2 assists in 27mpg, on 46% FG, 38% from 3

I would take Hood and run because although 26 games is a small sample size, its clear that the talent and ability is there. The kid got better every month of the season. I think he will put it together and become a Khris Middleton caliber player. Getting a G/F like Hood while still being able to take a guy like Oubre or Portis at 12 would be the best case scenario
Redeemed
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,519
And1: 419
Joined: Apr 06, 2012
     

Re: Lets say the Jazz offer 12 + Burke for 8... 

Post#26 » by Redeemed » Wed Jun 3, 2015 1:52 pm

Catchall wrote:Jazz fan here. If Detroit isn't interested in Porzingis, Johnson or whomever else is available at 8, would they consider trading down to 12 for Kaminsky, Turner, Portis or Lyles if the Jazz offered Burke and/or a future pick? The idea is that Detroit would get a developing young PG effectively replacing Augustine and a PF to help replace Monroe. Jazz maybe take back a bit of salary.


For Trey Burke? We just traded away Burke's ceiling (DJ Augustin) who has had a stronger command of running a team and keeping a system under control. I certainly hope we wouldn't go after Trey Burke.
User avatar
ComboGuardCity
RealGM
Posts: 25,970
And1: 4,896
Joined: Jul 10, 2010

Lets say the Jazz offer 12 + Burke for 8... 

Post#27 » by ComboGuardCity » Wed Jun 3, 2015 2:23 pm

Hood is a beast


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Notanoob
Analyst
Posts: 3,475
And1: 1,223
Joined: Jun 07, 2013

Re: Lets say the Jazz offer 12 + Burke for 8... 

Post#28 » by Notanoob » Wed Jun 3, 2015 5:37 pm

You should just stay where you are and draft Delon Wright. You were sunk by injuries and awful PG play, Wright will be a huge improvement right away and hopefully you'll stay healthy.
Warspite
RealGM
Posts: 13,521
And1: 1,226
Joined: Dec 13, 2003
Location: Surprise AZ
Contact:
       

Re: Lets say the Jazz offer 12 + Burke for 8... 

Post#29 » by Warspite » Thu Jun 4, 2015 4:19 am

Its possible to trade to 12 and still get Johnson. Still I would think the Jazz as some point have to stop taking a lottery pick every yr and trading the RFA to be at the deadline. In a way they are using the 76ers strategy or at worst using the Donald Sterling strategy of cheap NBA labor.
HomoSapien wrote:Warspite, the greatest poster in the history of realgm.
User avatar
stitches
RealGM
Posts: 14,462
And1: 6,912
Joined: Jul 14, 2014
 

Re: 

Post#30 » by stitches » Thu Jun 4, 2015 5:37 am

Pharaoh wrote:Hood & #12 for #8 would be my demand as well.

Up to the Jazz if they accept.

With Gobert, Favors, Hayward & Exum they guarantee themselves Booker...

He might be there at 12 but Charlotte, Miami & Indiana are all probably looking at him too

We could draft Portis (assuming he's there @ 12) while picking up Hood in the process

The thing is... Hood by himself is very likely to be better than Booker, let alone if we add #12. I would NOT trade up for Booker. The only trade up that's worth it for me is Hezonja and if he was there, you would probably prefer to just pick him, instead of trade back. I would also prefer to add 2 future firsts instead of Hood, to be fair...
tmorgan
RealGM
Posts: 14,268
And1: 9,760
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
   

Re: Re: 

Post#31 » by tmorgan » Thu Jun 4, 2015 12:41 pm

stitches wrote:
Pharaoh wrote:Hood & #12 for #8 would be my demand as well.

Up to the Jazz if they accept.

With Gobert, Favors, Hayward & Exum they guarantee themselves Booker...

He might be there at 12 but Charlotte, Miami & Indiana are all probably looking at him too

We could draft Portis (assuming he's there @ 12) while picking up Hood in the process

The thing is... Hood by himself is very likely to be better than Booker, let alone if we add #12. I would NOT trade up for Booker. The only trade up that's worth it for me is Hezonja and if he was there, you would probably prefer to just pick him, instead of trade back. I would also prefer to add 2 future firsts instead of Hood, to be fair...


I'd have to accept that, too... assuming you're talking about Utah picks in 2016 and 2018. I like the future in Utah as well as most young teams, but you're still one injury to Gobert away from going backwards. That chance is worth the 4 spots in the draft if SVG has settled on some guy(s) that'll be there at 12. Hezonja doesn't excite me... too risky.
User avatar
Pharaoh
RealGM
Posts: 16,443
And1: 4,742
Joined: Aug 10, 2001

Re: Re: Re: 

Post#32 » by Pharaoh » Thu Jun 4, 2015 1:12 pm

stitches wrote:
Pharaoh wrote:Hood & #12 for #8 would be my demand as well.

Up to the Jazz if they accept.

With Gobert, Favors, Hayward & Exum they guarantee themselves Booker...

He might be there at 12 but Charlotte, Miami & Indiana are all probably looking at him too

We could draft Portis (assuming he's there @ 12) while picking up Hood in the process

The thing is... Hood by himself is very likely to be better than Booker, let alone if we add #12. I would NOT trade up for Booker. The only trade up that's worth it for me is Hezonja and if he was there, you would probably prefer to just pick him, instead of trade back. I would also prefer to add 2 future firsts instead of Hood, to be fair...


2 future firsts would be too much IMO, especially when you're only jumping 4 spots.

Let's call it fair with #8 for #12 & the Jazz top 5 protected pick in 2017 Draft.

I'd happily take that.

Draft Portis at #12 - maybe even Johnson if we're lucky and pocket a extra pick for later.
User avatar
stitches
RealGM
Posts: 14,462
And1: 6,912
Joined: Jul 14, 2014
 

Re: Lets say the Jazz offer 12 + Burke for 8... 

Post#33 » by stitches » Thu Jun 4, 2015 1:31 pm

We have other teams' first, those are the ones I mean... OKC 2018 and GSW 2017.
User avatar
Pharaoh
RealGM
Posts: 16,443
And1: 4,742
Joined: Aug 10, 2001

Re: Re: Lets say the Jazz offer 12 + Burke for 8... 

Post#34 » by Pharaoh » Thu Jun 4, 2015 2:06 pm

stitches wrote:We have other teams' first, those are the ones I mean... OKC 2018 and GSW 2017.


I'll take the Warriors 2017 pick thanks.

I think their continued success isn't guaranteed.

A lot hinges on Bogut, Barnes and their bench (Iggy & Livingston)

Even a pick in the early 20s is valuable - cheap labor for 4 years if you trust your scouts to do their job properly
tmorgan
RealGM
Posts: 14,268
And1: 9,760
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
   

Re: Lets say the Jazz offer 12 + Burke for 8... 

Post#35 » by tmorgan » Thu Jun 4, 2015 8:11 pm

It's not guaranteed forever, certainly, but I wouldn't bet on their 2017 pick being very good. That, by itself, wouldn't be enough.
Catchall
RealGM
Posts: 20,476
And1: 11,054
Joined: Jul 06, 2008
     

Re: Lets say the Jazz offer 12 + Burke for 8... 

Post#36 » by Catchall » Thu Jun 4, 2015 11:28 pm

My personal view as a Jazz fan is that the Jazz really like the Euros in this draft, but assuming they're gone by 7, the Jazz probably like Turner and Johnson. The way things are shaking out, one of those guys may well slip to 12. It really depends on whether Payne, Lyles or Kaminsky shake things up. But I think the Jazz would offer a gentleman's deal to move up to 9 (CHA) or 8 (you guys) to ensure they get one of those players. Charlotte would do well to pick up Booker or Hunter and add another asset in the process.

Just FYI, Bobby Portis worked out in Utah today and said he has a workout coming up for Detroit. I think Portis is a good fit for the Pistons, but I think 8 is a few slots above where he should get drafted. If he wows the Pistons, they could look at trade-down scenarios into the Jazz's range.
Catchall
RealGM
Posts: 20,476
And1: 11,054
Joined: Jul 06, 2008
     

Re: Lets say the Jazz offer 12 + Burke for 8... 

Post#37 » by Catchall » Thu Jun 4, 2015 11:32 pm

tmorgan wrote:It's not guaranteed forever, certainly, but I wouldn't bet on their 2017 pick being very good. That, by itself, wouldn't be enough.


That GS pick is unprotected. It has value if Bogut or Curry miss significant time, basically.

Return to Detroit Pistons