sc8581 wrote:I know, Hayward is an all-star. Burke is awful though, we don't want or have a need for him. Hood #12 for #8 I might do though.
Really? I don't recall Hayward having made an all-star game
Moderators: dVs33, Cowology, theBigLip, Snakebites
sc8581 wrote:I know, Hayward is an all-star. Burke is awful though, we don't want or have a need for him. Hood #12 for #8 I might do though.
coordinator0 wrote:Catchall wrote:The idea here is that I think the Jazz will value Porzingis and maybe Johnson more than Detroit does, and that might motivate a deal both ways. Guys like Portis, Lyles or possibly Kaminsky would be good fits with Drummond. Whereas they'd be back-ups with the Jazz. I think the Jazz would part with Burke, future 1st (though these will probably be in the teens or 20s), a 2nd-rd pick, and be willing to take salary.
Are you guys optimistic about Jennings making it back?
Detroit does need a power forward to pair with Drummond, but small forward is an even bigger priority. The Pistons need real wing talent to go with Jackson at the point and Drummond in the middle. There are a few interesting free agent options at power forward butthe available small forwards are downright abysmal outside of Carroll.
I think the general consensus on Jenning is that it will be a little ways into the season before he's able to contribute and even then he probably won't be nearly as effective. Achilles injuries are pretty bad and even a full year isn't enough time to come back completely healthy (if that happens at all). It's not that big of a deal though when Jackson is more than likely going to be signed to a long-term contract.
bkseven wrote:sc8581 wrote:I know, Hayward is an all-star. Burke is awful though, we don't want or have a need for him. Hood #12 for #8 I might do though.
Really? I don't recall Hayward having made an all-star game
Catchall wrote:Jazz fan here. If Detroit isn't interested in Porzingis, Johnson or whomever else is available at 8, would they consider trading down to 12 for Kaminsky, Turner, Portis or Lyles if the Jazz offered Burke and/or a future pick? The idea is that Detroit would get a developing young PG effectively replacing Augustine and a PF to help replace Monroe. Jazz maybe take back a bit of salary.
HomoSapien wrote:Warspite, the greatest poster in the history of realgm.
Pharaoh wrote:Hood & #12 for #8 would be my demand as well.
Up to the Jazz if they accept.
With Gobert, Favors, Hayward & Exum they guarantee themselves Booker...
He might be there at 12 but Charlotte, Miami & Indiana are all probably looking at him too
We could draft Portis (assuming he's there @ 12) while picking up Hood in the process
stitches wrote:Pharaoh wrote:Hood & #12 for #8 would be my demand as well.
Up to the Jazz if they accept.
With Gobert, Favors, Hayward & Exum they guarantee themselves Booker...
He might be there at 12 but Charlotte, Miami & Indiana are all probably looking at him too
We could draft Portis (assuming he's there @ 12) while picking up Hood in the process
The thing is... Hood by himself is very likely to be better than Booker, let alone if we add #12. I would NOT trade up for Booker. The only trade up that's worth it for me is Hezonja and if he was there, you would probably prefer to just pick him, instead of trade back. I would also prefer to add 2 future firsts instead of Hood, to be fair...
stitches wrote:Pharaoh wrote:Hood & #12 for #8 would be my demand as well.
Up to the Jazz if they accept.
With Gobert, Favors, Hayward & Exum they guarantee themselves Booker...
He might be there at 12 but Charlotte, Miami & Indiana are all probably looking at him too
We could draft Portis (assuming he's there @ 12) while picking up Hood in the process
The thing is... Hood by himself is very likely to be better than Booker, let alone if we add #12. I would NOT trade up for Booker. The only trade up that's worth it for me is Hezonja and if he was there, you would probably prefer to just pick him, instead of trade back. I would also prefer to add 2 future firsts instead of Hood, to be fair...
stitches wrote:We have other teams' first, those are the ones I mean... OKC 2018 and GSW 2017.
tmorgan wrote:It's not guaranteed forever, certainly, but I wouldn't bet on their 2017 pick being very good. That, by itself, wouldn't be enough.