ImageImageImageImage

The Tobias Harris Situation

Moderators: Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior, UCFJayBird, UCF, Knightro

Nyce_1
RealGM
Posts: 12,969
And1: 6,114
Joined: Jun 29, 2009
Location: Tampa
 

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#2061 » by Nyce_1 » Sat Jun 27, 2015 2:39 am

Rob was on the radio today (ESPN 580; replay is out there somewhere) and he said his usual no scenario where Tobias isn't coming back. Sounded different this time; sounded like it was true. Hopefully we negotiate with him and not allow him to get to those offer sheets and just negotiate in good faith for something starting at $12m like Vuc.
Skin
RealGM
Posts: 18,516
And1: 8,806
Joined: Jul 03, 2009
   

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#2062 » by Skin » Sat Jun 27, 2015 2:50 am

floppymoose wrote:Now you've really got me curious. Who are SF's 1-20 in your opinion?

I'll throw out a list of how I see the SF's next year. this is rough and I'm not sure about how some of them will bounce back from injuries etc:

Kevin Durant
LeBron James
Kawhi Leonard
Paul George
Gordon Hayward
Luol Deng
Carmelo Anthony
Michael Kidd-Gilchrist
Chandler Parsons
Tony Allen
Trevor Ariza
Danilo Gallinari
Giannis Antetokounmpo
Nicolas Batum
Matt Barnes
Mike Dunleavy
Robert Covington
Al-Farouq Aminu
Joe Johnson
Thaddeus Young
DeMarre Carroll
Andrew Wiggins
Harrison Barnes
Paul Pierce
Rudy Gay
Jabari Parker
PJ Tucker
Tobias Harris
Terrence Ross
Marco Belinelli
Jeff Green

There are 5 guys I'd rather have than Tobe. LBJ, Durant, Kawhi, George, and Wiggins. ...and from that only 1 makes under $15M.

Your list proved to me even more that we need to keep him cause I'm not satisfied with those others.

How many on that list are VFs? Versatile Forwards? The elite VFs must be able to score and rebound. They must also be able to shoot 3s. This season, only six players averaged at least 15 points and 6 rebounds per game, while also shooting 35% (on at least two 3-point attempts per game). Only six VFs met these minimum requirements. They were Love, Millsap, Bosh, Durant, LeBron, and... Tobias.

According to Synergy, Harris had 106 post up possessions and averaged 1.04 points per possession (PPP). He was the most efficient post up player in the NBA (among players with at least 100 post up possessions).

Check out how Harris’s post efficiency compared with some of the game’s elite post players.

Image

Read more if you're interested.
http://www.basketballanalyticsbook.com/2015/05/06/the-nbas-most-underrated-player/
User avatar
fendilim
RealGM
Posts: 31,940
And1: 5,505
Joined: Jun 11, 2002
Location: 孫悟空, 时间太?!

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#2063 » by fendilim » Sat Jun 27, 2015 3:13 am

Hilarious how most guys want him gone.
Image
Edual
Sophomore
Posts: 156
And1: 64
Joined: Jan 07, 2015
     

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#2064 » by Edual » Sat Jun 27, 2015 3:13 am

Kevin Durant
Kawhi Leonard
LeBron James
Carmelo Anthony
Paul George
Tobias Harris
Gordon Hayward

My top 7, maybe not in order of best to worse, but in order of who id rather have right now
User avatar
floppymoose
Senior Mod - Warriors
Senior Mod - Warriors
Posts: 59,424
And1: 17,554
Joined: Jun 22, 2003
Location: Trust your election workers

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#2065 » by floppymoose » Sat Jun 27, 2015 3:19 am

I had already seen the analytics article on Tobes. I was wondering how long it would be before it came up after I said he was a not a good defender.

The synergy stats are tricky to use. For instance, another way in which you could end up giving up fewer points from your man is if your coach always hides you on defense. I'm not saying that's what is happening here, it's just illustrating how tricky it is to use synergy information.

I strongly prefer on/off analysis that looks at how you affect team defense in the whole. And by that standard Harris doesn't fare very well at all.
mojosodope
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,739
And1: 459
Joined: Apr 29, 2011
     

The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#2066 » by mojosodope » Sat Jun 27, 2015 3:27 am

floppymoose wrote:I had already seen the analytics article on Tobes. I was wondering how long it would be before it came up after I said he was a not a good defender.

The synergy stats are tricky to use. For instance, another way in which you could end up giving up fewer points from your man is if your coach always hides you on defense. I'm not saying that's what is happening here, it's just illustrating how tricky it is to use synergy information.

I strongly prefer on/off analysis that looks at how you affect team defense in the whole. And by that standard Harris doesn't fare very well at all.


I'm not opposed to on/off analysis, but I do not believe it holds as much relevance to a ranking team, let alone a team that substituted and played the way we played the past 3 seasons.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums mobile app
User avatar
NavalAviator94
Analyst
Posts: 3,495
And1: 1,471
Joined: Jul 24, 2014
Location: Frisco, TX
     

The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#2067 » by NavalAviator94 » Sat Jun 27, 2015 3:34 am

He will come back at any price. He's 22, will get better and he can play the 3 or 4(versatility.). With the cap going up, every team will have money next year. Those that have money this year will spend it. If he decided to wait a year his value would go up further next year. No way they don't match any offer.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
User avatar
eyriq
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 34,470
And1: 9,779
Joined: Mar 25, 2008
Location: #TheLab
Contact:
 

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#2068 » by eyriq » Sat Jun 27, 2015 3:50 am

This versatile forward bit is too much. So a tweener that doesn't play defense or have a passing game but can rebound ok and hit the three (contract year spike anyone?) is now "versatile".... It's a rebranding attempt. He's a tweener with a 16.5 per and a DRPM that would embarrass d-leaguers. He's not even in the same universe as Bosh, Lebron, Durant, Millsap, and Love! I cannot believe that article has gotten so much play and that Tobias was silly enough to base an infographic off it.....

Edit: if he gets a max contract he and his agency need to get into politics after his NBA career cause this will have been some impressive campaigning.
User avatar
tiderulz
RealGM
Posts: 36,951
And1: 14,874
Joined: Jun 16, 2010
Location: Atlanta
 

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#2069 » by tiderulz » Sat Jun 27, 2015 4:01 am

floppymoose wrote:I had already seen the analytics article on Tobes. I was wondering how long it would be before it came up after I said he was a not a good defender.

The synergy stats are tricky to use. For instance, another way in which you could end up giving up fewer points from your man is if your coach always hides you on defense. I'm not saying that's what is happening here, it's just illustrating how tricky it is to use synergy information.

I strongly prefer on/off analysis that looks at how you affect team defense in the whole. And by that standard Harris doesn't fare very well at all.


when team defense as a whole is bad, individual players will look bad whether they are or not
User avatar
tiderulz
RealGM
Posts: 36,951
And1: 14,874
Joined: Jun 16, 2010
Location: Atlanta
 

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#2070 » by tiderulz » Sat Jun 27, 2015 4:08 am

eyriq wrote:This versatile forward bit is too much. So a tweener that doesn't play defense or have a passing game but can rebound ok and hit the three (contract year spike anyone?) is now "versatile".... It's a rebranding attempt. He's a tweener with a 16.5 per and a DRPM that would embarrass d-leaguers. He's not even in the same universe as Bosh, Lebron, Durant, Millsap, and Love! I cannot believe that article has gotten so much play and that Tobias was silly enough to base an infographic off it.....

Edit: if he gets a max contract he and his agency need to get into politics after his NBA career cause this will have been some impressive campaigning.


this old argument again. He does play defense and does it decently. I guess we have a center that doesnt play defense either, no teams usually win with that formula either.

I wont say Harris is "versatile", but he showed this year he can be a full time SF, and a very good one. dont know why people want to throw out the "tweener" label, unless they dont have other valid arguments
mojosodope
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,739
And1: 459
Joined: Apr 29, 2011
     

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#2071 » by mojosodope » Sat Jun 27, 2015 4:22 am

eyriq wrote:This versatile forward bit is too much. So a tweener that doesn't play defense or have a passing game but can rebound ok and hit the three (contract year spike anyone?) is now "versatile".... It's a rebranding attempt. He's a tweener with a 16.5 per and a DRPM that would embarrass d-leaguers. He's not even in the same universe as Bosh, Lebron, Durant, Millsap, and Love! I cannot believe that article has gotten so much play and that Tobias was silly enough to base an infographic off it.....

Edit: if he gets a max contract he and his agency need to get into politics after his NBA career cause this will have been some impressive campaigning.


It would be a contract year spike if he didn't take nearly double the amount of 3's he took the previously year. You keep clinging on to DRPM like we were remotely a good defensive team that played with effective lineups that won more than 25 games.
User avatar
doct3r dr3
RealGM
Posts: 12,535
And1: 2,574
Joined: Oct 21, 2004
Location: Florouqaminu
 

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#2072 » by doct3r dr3 » Sat Jun 27, 2015 4:33 am

floppymoose wrote:I had already seen the analytics article on Tobes. I was wondering how long it would be before it came up after I said he was a not a good defender.

The synergy stats are tricky to use. For instance, another way in which you could end up giving up fewer points from your man is if your coach always hides you on defense. I'm not saying that's what is happening here, it's just illustrating how tricky it is to use synergy information.

I strongly prefer on/off analysis that looks at how you affect team defense in the whole. And by that standard Harris doesn't fare very well at all.


There are other synergy stats that can help suss out how much "hiding" is going on, like this page.

The FG% column shows the normal FG% of the players that player X is defending, and then the other stats show the difference in those players' percentages when player X now guards them. We see that Tobias is right around the middle of the team in "FG%", which makes sense for a SF. His assignments are guys who normally shoot about the same percantage as our other SFs' assignments (Aaron Gordon, Maurice Harkless, Devyn Marble).
Image
BadMofoPimp wrote:Reached for a 2nd round talent in Nicholson.
User avatar
floppymoose
Senior Mod - Warriors
Senior Mod - Warriors
Posts: 59,424
And1: 17,554
Joined: Jun 22, 2003
Location: Trust your election workers

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#2073 » by floppymoose » Sat Jun 27, 2015 4:44 am

As I said before, the hiding was just an example. Even if it is true that Harris is good at suppressing shots (which is a valuable skill), it doesn't answer the question "is he a good defender?". The only way to answer that is to see what impact does he have on the team's overall defense. Because that's what ultimately matters. If your guy never scores, but your team does worse with you on the floor anyway, then it's a Pyrrhic victory.
User avatar
tiderulz
RealGM
Posts: 36,951
And1: 14,874
Joined: Jun 16, 2010
Location: Atlanta
 

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#2074 » by tiderulz » Sat Jun 27, 2015 5:17 am

floppymoose wrote:As I said before, the hiding was just an example. Even if it is true that Harris is good at suppressing shots (which is a valuable skill), it doesn't answer the question "is he a good defender?". The only way to answer that is to see what impact does he have on the team's overall defense. Because that's what ultimately matters. If your guy never scores, but your team does worse with you on the floor anyway, then it's a Pyrrhic victory.


not having horrible post defense is more important than Harris defense, and our post defense was abysmal. our team lost when Harris was on the floor and when he wasnt. But i believe we had a better winning % with him than without him.
User avatar
DontPushMe
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,353
And1: 21
Joined: Mar 16, 2004
Location: Clearwater, FL

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#2075 » by DontPushMe » Sat Jun 27, 2015 5:20 am

Skin wrote:
floppymoose wrote:Now you've really got me curious. Who are SF's 1-20 in your opinion?

I'll throw out a list of how I see the SF's next year. this is rough and I'm not sure about how some of them will bounce back from injuries etc:

Kevin Durant
LeBron James
Kawhi Leonard
Paul George
Gordon Hayward
Luol Deng
Carmelo Anthony
Michael Kidd-Gilchrist
Chandler Parsons
Tony Allen
Trevor Ariza
Danilo Gallinari
Giannis Antetokounmpo
Nicolas Batum
Matt Barnes
Mike Dunleavy
Robert Covington
Al-Farouq Aminu
Joe Johnson
Thaddeus Young
DeMarre Carroll
Andrew Wiggins
Harrison Barnes
Paul Pierce
Rudy Gay
Jabari Parker
PJ Tucker
Tobias Harris
Terrence Ross
Marco Belinelli
Jeff Green

There are 5 guys I'd rather have than Tobe. LBJ, Durant, Kawhi, George, and Wiggins. ...and from that only 1 makes under $15M.

Your list proved to me even more that we need to keep him cause I'm not satisfied with those others.

How many on that list are VFs? Versatile Forwards? The elite VFs must be able to score and rebound. They must also be able to shoot 3s. This season, only six players averaged at least 15 points and 6 rebounds per game, while also shooting 35% (on at least two 3-point attempts per game). Only six VFs met these minimum requirements. They were Love, Millsap, Bosh, Durant, LeBron, and... Tobias.

According to Synergy, Harris had 106 post up possessions and averaged 1.04 points per possession (PPP). He was the most efficient post up player in the NBA (among players with at least 100 post up possessions).

Check out how Harris’s post efficiency compared with some of the game’s elite post players.

Image

Read more if you're interested.
http://www.basketballanalyticsbook.com/2015/05/06/the-nbas-most-underrated-player/

Tobias that low on his list has to be a joke.

He's not a max player IMO but he's much higher than where you have him.

Aminu? Covington? Tucker? You're having a laugh..

Those who want him gone, who would we honestly replace him with? We can't attract a max player.
You know the boy posts on realgm. The boy definitly posts on realgm.
User avatar
floppymoose
Senior Mod - Warriors
Senior Mod - Warriors
Posts: 59,424
And1: 17,554
Joined: Jun 22, 2003
Location: Trust your election workers

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#2076 » by floppymoose » Sat Jun 27, 2015 5:39 am

tiderulz wrote:
floppymoose wrote:I had already seen the analytics article on Tobes. I was wondering how long it would be before it came up after I said he was a not a good defender.

The synergy stats are tricky to use. For instance, another way in which you could end up giving up fewer points from your man is if your coach always hides you on defense. I'm not saying that's what is happening here, it's just illustrating how tricky it is to use synergy information.

I strongly prefer on/off analysis that looks at how you affect team defense in the whole. And by that standard Harris doesn't fare very well at all.


when team defense as a whole is bad, individual players will look bad whether they are or not


The 6th best DRPM for SFs was posted by Aminu, who played for a poor defensive team. Thad Young was well above average and he split his season between the Wolves and the Nets, two of the worst defensive teams in the league. Lebron was 7th and while the Cavs defense was good at the end of the season, for the bulk of the year it was poor.

RPM, by it's nature, is looking at who you play with and against and adjusting for that. It can't do it perfectly. But it does it pretty well. Well enough that we can't blame Harris's poor showing on the rest of the team. DRPM is already ranking Vucevic as the 60th best center defensively. It's already giving him a ton of blame. And it still doesn't like Harris.
MagicFan32
RealGM
Posts: 14,953
And1: 790
Joined: Jun 13, 2004
     

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#2077 » by MagicFan32 » Sat Jun 27, 2015 5:46 am

oh god we are back on this RPM garbage?
the same stat people used to hype channing frye a year ago.

the whole magic team was terrible defensively last year, let's wait and see what the roster looks like, and how skiles system impacts things here. lettting tobes go for nothing is stupid, when his next contract under the new cap coming won't really be an issue, especially given teams have to meet a cap floor
aol4532 on bill russell
I think if you put McGee back then, he would get those blocks just as easily as Russell did. Russell's athleticism was well ahead of the players of his time, and that's about it.
Edual
Sophomore
Posts: 156
And1: 64
Joined: Jan 07, 2015
     

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#2078 » by Edual » Sat Jun 27, 2015 5:57 am

seems as most players with high drpm are on good teams, I mean well I thought most considered andrew wiggins a good defender yet he is right next to harris on drpm on an equally bad team
User avatar
drsd
RealGM
Posts: 39,296
And1: 8,987
Joined: Mar 16, 2003
     

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#2079 » by drsd » Sat Jun 27, 2015 6:37 am

floppymoose wrote:Clearly Tobias is still young and could improve. The question is do you want to spend 15 million a year to find out?


The point publicly made by Harris' agent is that in two years, a 15M contract will not be very large.

..
407Junkie
Starter
Posts: 2,120
And1: 603
Joined: Dec 15, 2010
         

Re: The Tobias Harris Situation 

Post#2080 » by 407Junkie » Sat Jun 27, 2015 7:29 am

tiderulz wrote:
LBPTarHeel27 wrote:
SOUL wrote:Still not sure what to feel. I don't think Tobias sucks at all, but I don't think losing him would be the worst thing either. If he doesn't get max I think we should match, if it's to the point where its like "ehh.." then I'm okay with losing him.


This is pretty much how I feel. I just don't see Harris as a guy that has a big impact on w/l record. With or without him, I see us right around 35 wins.


there is no one on our roster right now that has an impact on our W/L yet.
So why pay one 15 mil a year to have no impact on winning?

Return to Orlando Magic