tiderulz wrote:floppymoose wrote:As I said before, the hiding was just an example. Even if it is true that Harris is good at suppressing shots (which is a valuable skill), it doesn't answer the question "is he a good defender?". The only way to answer that is to see what impact does he have on the team's overall defense. Because that's what ultimately matters. If your guy never scores, but your team does worse with you on the floor anyway, then it's a Pyrrhic victory.
not having horrible post defense is more important than Harris defense, and our post defense was abysmal. our team lost when Harris was on the floor and when he wasnt. But i believe we had a better winning % with him than without him.
I beg to differ , I really think it was more split. Meaning it made no difference. I started to look into it but said f it, I had to go to work. but it seemed split.
































