Scoot McGroot wrote:Or, we re-sign Scola for those few games a year.
Anyone in Indy hearing anything about Scola? I heard earlier in the off-season that he was continuing to work out in Indy. That would seem to spell Scola's return.
Moderators: pacers33granger, Grang33r, pacerfan, Jake0890, boomershadow
Scoot McGroot wrote:Or, we re-sign Scola for those few games a year.
Scoot McGroot wrote:8305 wrote:Scoot McGroot wrote:I'd rather have Hill/Monta/Miles/Paul George on the court than have to bench one of them for Tayshaun Prince.Honestly, Paul George is going to be bigger than most PF's he matches up against. And, unless we play PG at the PF position for 15-20 minutes a night (I don't think anyone is suggesting that he plays purely at the PF position yet, but unless you want to permanently bench one or more of Stuckey, Miles, and Solo, you have to play Paul at the PF position, at least a good amount.
No disagreement that at games end you want those 4 guys on the floor with whoever manning the 5. But let's say your are playing Toronto (or any team who has a strong wing scorer) and a less threatening guy at the 4. Do you take one of the best lock wing defenders and assign him to guard the 4 while that teams wings go to work on Miles and either Hill or Monta? Or do you roll with Prince who can still spread the floor, guard the 4 allowing you to use George to his best advantage?
Or say you are playing one of the teams that have big 4's. Do you want see PG getting beat up by the likes of Zack Randolph or Lemarcus Aldridge.
No. I have PG defend the strong wing scorer and have Miles defend the non-threatening 4. For Toronto, I have Solo or Miles guard Demarre Carroll or Patrick Patterson and have PG guard Demar. I don't see much of an issue here. Don't think of it as much of "Paul George must play the 4 and if he's doing so he can only defend the other team's 4, no matter the situation". We'll probably play more fluid and free of form than that. Theoretically, I don't bench CJ Miles or Monta Ellis to play Tayshaun Prince major minutes. No matter how you shake that out, you're going to be much worse on the court.
As for the teams that have big 4's? Check out my run down in the "starting PF" thread. I went team by team. There's really not a single one in the Eastern Conference (especially not in our division), so there's 52 games a year we don't have to worry about that. As for essentially San Antonio, Memphis, Sacramento and maybe Utah? Well, there's 8 total games a year we have to worry about. But, we have to worry about them anyway. Otherwise, the NBA has gone to much more of "Paul George's" at the 4. I'm not going to play a different style of basketball all season long just to worry about 8 games a year. If we were, we would've plead with Roy Hibbert to come back, and David West likely wouldn't have opted out. We'd be able to continue that style of play. Or, we re-sign Scola for those few games a year.
8305 wrote:So let's take it entirely different direction, what about Glen Robinson III? If this is a transition year get a young player who could be a good piece moving forward. If PG is full time 4 or said another way we simply don't ever employ one get another potential multi skilled athlete?
8305 wrote:I always thought Luc Richard Mbah a Moute was a solid role player. There was a time when he could guard three positions including the 4. I recall he could take Danny Granger out of a game. But I haven't seen enough of him to know if he's still got that drive and skill. He's been on really bad teams lately so it's hard to tell. Assuming he can still play, can we sell him on the notion that there's a place for him here similar to Rodney Stuckey last year, get him at the vet minimum for one year? Good teams can always use a solid defensive specialist.