UtahJazzFan88 wrote:Meh, I'd rather be a Sixers fan (even if this tanking plan turns to crap and Embidd can't hit the court) right now than a Suns fan.
said no one ever
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
UtahJazzFan88 wrote:Meh, I'd rather be a Sixers fan (even if this tanking plan turns to crap and Embidd can't hit the court) right now than a Suns fan.
Mr-Al wrote:UtahJazzFan88 wrote:Meh, I'd rather be a Sixers fan (even if this tanking plan turns to crap and Embidd can't hit the court) right now than a Suns fan.
said no one ever
JDizzel3000 wrote:Jarlaxle0204 wrote:JDizzel3000 wrote:as well as salary dumping young talent
Who is this young talent we dumped? Marcus Morris?
Now I'm no fan of the Suns and I obviously don't have the inside info that their fans may have on their players but looking at Marcus' age his advanced stats and his small cap hit ...it seems as though you gave up something of value for absolutely nothing out of desperation ...which is generally not consistent with good decision making in NBA terms
Snotbubbles wrote:loserX wrote:BNelley24 wrote:I don't care if this 76ers rebuild takes 5+ years, which in undoubtedly will
That's totally fine, and it's your right. The problem is that a lot of people do care. From the article:Philly needs to nail the draft, because big-time free agents don’t appear willing to consider the Sixers until they start winning a respectable number of games. Some agents have even called around to other teams, trying to ignite trade talks that would get their players out of Philadelphia, according to several league sources.
Some fans may be willing to wait forever. Some fans are surely not. But if the *players* aren't willing to put up with it then that strategy may be asking for trouble.
The Knicks already have a star, and the Lakers are still the Lakers...and we've seen what's happened to those teams in free agency this year. The Sixers (or any other team) can still try to build by losing, but the margin of error gets a lot smaller in an NBA where every team has cap space and players want to win.
I'm trying hard to understand your point. The whole point of Philly's rebuild is to land a star. There are three ways to land a star: 1.) Free agency; 2.) Trade; or 3.) Draft.
Start with #1. If LA and NY couldn't land a star player in FA, why would Philly want to rely on that avenue being in a less attractive market? I love Philly, but being realistic, it's not LA, NY or Miami. So it would be absolutely foolish for Philly to try and build a team on the hopes of landing a star through Free Agency. I won't say impossible, but probably extremely difficult.
Next is #2. If the Sixers want to land a star through a trade they are going to need certain things. Those things are called assets. Assets can be players, picks or cap space. So wouldn't it make sense for a team who is trying to acquire a star through trade to accumulate assets so that when a star becomes available they can make the best offer?
Finally #3. If the Sixers want to land a star, the most probable way to do it is to draft that star.
QRich3 wrote:miltk wrote:this is so not true, and philly is literally proving the point as we speak. minnie and the cklips have already created a model for failure
Didn't the Clips actually prove the success of it? tank as many years as you need, maybe it takes 10 or 12 if your draft picks don't pan out, as soon as you're lucky to get one star (Griffin) it will be a lot easier to get a second (Paul) and build a contender from there.
SF_Warriors wrote:The #3 pick in two consecutive drafts while developing a promising prospect like Noel is a huge win in my book.
The ability to absorb contracts to reach the cap floor is also an underrated part of their strategy. Look at what they got from the kings. They gave up zero assets other than some cap space.
So far, it has been two drafts since the tanking began. I do not consider the mcw/noel draft as a tank year, more like a "treadmill" year.
Next draft, looks like two more lotto picks, and hopfully a healthy embiid for the season.
Noel is already a double double player and a mean rim protector.
Not sure about the list of total picks/tpes that sixers have next season, can someone post?
Personally, I would give Hinkie two more drafts and seasons and see where the team is at.
If by end of year 4 season of tanking the team is not in the playoff picture, I would call the strategy a huge failure.
But so far, other than the Embiid snag, I cant see how anyone can call it a failure. It just does not look good right now due to the injury.
It may seem like they are rolling the dice, but if i was an owner and you told me that during the first two years of rebuilding I would get the #3 pick in two consecutive drafts and in addition to that also having a 21 year old double double machine averaging 2blocks/2steals per game, I would be happy.
miltk wrote:QRich3 wrote:miltk wrote:this is so not true, and philly is literally proving the point as we speak. minnie and the cklips have already created a model for failure
Didn't the Clips actually prove the success of it? tank as many years as you need, maybe it takes 10 or 12 if your draft picks don't pan out, as soon as you're lucky to get one star (Griffin) it will be a lot easier to get a second (Paul) and build a contender from there.
i wouldn't say so. this is a decades old frachise's worth of futility in which they have become the poster child for incompetence. a few good years has not really changed that because what did everyone say last year vs houston?...."same old clips"
immortalone23 wrote:miltk wrote:immortalone23 wrote:There's a difference between a treadmill team and an up-and-coming team. Treadmill is when a team is capped out with vets and have little to no young talent that could develop. Teams like OKC, Indy, and Chicago(pre Rose injury) had gotten the 8th seed, but they had the young talent that made major improvement.
gee really. treadmill - running but staying in place. i don't think that has anything to do with the factors you mentioned.
What I'm trying to point out is that the team is running, but won't get anywhere.
KramerDSP wrote:SF_Warriors wrote:The #3 pick in two consecutive drafts while developing a promising prospect like Noel is a huge win in my book.
The ability to absorb contracts to reach the cap floor is also an underrated part of their strategy. Look at what they got from the kings. They gave up zero assets other than some cap space.
So far, it has been two drafts since the tanking began. I do not consider the mcw/noel draft as a tank year, more like a "treadmill" year.
Next draft, looks like two more lotto picks, and hopfully a healthy embiid for the season.
Noel is already a double double player and a mean rim protector.
Not sure about the list of total picks/tpes that sixers have next season, can someone post?
Personally, I would give Hinkie two more drafts and seasons and see where the team is at.
If by end of year 4 season of tanking the team is not in the playoff picture, I would call the strategy a huge failure.
But so far, other than the Embiid snag, I cant see how anyone can call it a failure. It just does not look good right now due to the injury.
It may seem like they are rolling the dice, but if i was an owner and you told me that during the first two years of rebuilding I would get the #3 pick in two consecutive drafts and in addition to that also having a 21 year old double double machine averaging 2blocks/2steals per game, I would be happy.
The Sixers have the following picks/assets:
- Jahlil Okafor
- Nerlens Noel
- Joel Embiid (if healthy)
- The Rights to Dario Saric (2016 or 2017 stateside arrival)
- Sixers 2016 1st (right to swap with Kings 1st unprotected)
- Lakers 2016 1st (top 3 protected until 2018 when it becomes unprotected)
- Miami 2016 1st (top 10 protected, then unprotected 2017)
- OKC 2016 1st (top 15 protected)
- Sixers 2017 1st (right to swap 1st with Kings unprotected)
- Sixers 2018 1st
- Kings 2018 1st (top 10 protected, then unprotected 2019)
- numerous second rounders
- young talent with upside and team friendly contracts (Covington, etc)
- and tens of millions of dollars in cap space.
BNelley24 wrote:madmaxmedia wrote:If Philly is really willing to do this for five, six, or seven seasons, it almost cannot fail. It will either land a superstar or draft so many good players that they will gather a solid NBA team.
This part I disagree with. You can build a solid NBA team in much less than 5 years, if that's what the Sixers end up with then the whole thing was a failure.
The goal is not to have a solid team. The goal is to have a TITLE CONTENDING TEAM.
BNelley24 wrote:Exactly, look, every fan has a right to defend their teams and enjoy watching their hometown team hit the court, but I honestly feel bad for Phoenix fans. They were in a great spot to continue building a good team through the draft. Now they've hit that spot where they are good enough to contend for a playoff spot but miles away from contending. You could praise the Suns FO for signing a guy liek Chandler to help make their team better, but honestly I'd ridicule them, because adding Chandler does nothing to make them a contender and only worstens their future draft position. I don't necessarily blame the Suns FO because this is just how the NBA works.
JDizzel3000 wrote:Yup ...good read ....just like I've been saying for the past year ...everyone praised the Suns for "almost getting there" a few seasons ago and now ..a blown draft pick (lakers pick) and two strike outs in a Free Agency later as well as salary dumping young talent ..it has become clear that their team is going no where fast ....
Give Me
OK4
Saric
Noel
5 First round picks (two of which will be top 5)
Over whatever hell PHX thinks their doing ....looks to me that team is on the path of treadmillville
SF_Warriors wrote:cool. thank you.
Looks like they are going to get LA's, MIA's and OKC's picks next draft. Don't see them swapping picks with the kings but nice option to have considering they gave up nothing for that option.
I am rooting for the lakers to miss the playoffs but also not get a top 3 pick hope you guys get that one!!
I dont hate the lakers but they are a western conf and pacific div opponent
BNelley24 wrote:I think other execs don't like what Philly is doing because they like to pull the wool over their fans eyes by makign their teams perennial 8-5 seeds, with no hope to win anything except some extra revenue in the playoffs. Good luck Phoenix Sun execs & fans, you have no shot to be a contender down the line because you rushed the process and now have little means to finding a superstar.
KingOfTheCourt wrote:The most miraculous thing that Heinke has done isn't that he convinced the owner to follow his plan, but that he's completely brainwashed the fans.... It's actually incredible how he's been able to accomplish that, and with that comes consistent job security! I bet every GM wishes they could accomplish what Heinke has with their teams stakeholders.
Mr-Al wrote:JDizzel3000 wrote:Jarlaxle0204 wrote:
Who is this young talent we dumped? Marcus Morris?
Now I'm no fan of the Suns and I obviously don't have the inside info that their fans may have on their players but looking at Marcus' age his advanced stats and his small cap hit ...it seems as though you gave up something of value for absolutely nothing out of desperation ...which is generally not consistent with good decision making in NBA terms
lol lol lol lol
Marcus Morris was terrible. Absolutely terrible for ball movement, detrimental for the locker room, bad influence on his brother, and he also beat the **** out of a guy and might go to prison
Dominater wrote:I love what the Lakers are quietly doing. They have a young core of russell/Clarkson/Randle Which has insane potential IMO and built that in 1 years time and didn't tank nearly as hard as Philly. They hopped on the tank after the Kobe injuries, but I don't believe that they went into the last 2 seasons or this upcoming one, thinking "must suck hard"
They still will have plenty of cap coming and will be much more attractive if that core shows blossom. If I was a GM, I take that over sixers/suns anyday
CoreyGallagher wrote:I hope the Cavs don't take Embiid because then we'll take Embiid.
bwgood77 wrote:JDizzel3000 wrote:Yup ...good read ....just like I've been saying for the past year ...everyone praised the Suns for "almost getting there" a few seasons ago and now ..a blown draft pick (lakers pick) and two strike outs in a Free Agency later as well as salary dumping young talent ..it has become clear that their team is going no where fast ....
Give Me
OK4
Saric
Noel
5 First round picks (two of which will be top 5)
Over whatever hell PHX thinks their doing ....looks to me that team is on the path of treadmillville
There are a ton of teams on the treadmill though. The Bulls and Clippers are on the second round treadmill with some aging players as some of their key pieces, you have others on the first round treadmill, etc.
At least for the Suns, all of their key players except for two have been in the league five years or less and are still improving. They are in a tough position, as the best teams in the west are REALLY good, and the worst teams in the west have some great young assets. Denver and LAL might be in trouble unless Mudiay and Russell/Randle become superstuds though.
But most of the times Phx broke out it came out of nowhere. They once traded all star Larry Nance for a rookie pg and signed journeyman Tom Chambers and went from 28 to 55 wins. They once traded one of their best players for cap space, signed Nash because Cuban thought he was too injury prone and went from 29 to 62 wins. Two years ago they were projected to win 17 and won 48. The Suns kind of have a history of coming out of nowhere, so nothing would shock me. They have a pretty solid roster with a lot of depth and most of the key pieces are young.
You simply never know which approach is going to work out best.