MaxRider wrote:
my rank Harrell > Capela > Dekker > McDaniels
Man, you really have Harrell rated high. I just cannot see it, although I do like him a ton.
Dekker > Capela > McDaniels > Harrell
MaxRider wrote:
my rank Harrell > Capela > Dekker > McDaniels
Nebula1 wrote:MaxRider wrote:my rank Harrell > Capela > Dekker > McDaniels
Man, you really have Harrell rated high. I just cannot see it, although I do like him a ton.
Dekker > Capela > McDaniels > Harrell
moofs wrote:Nebula1 wrote:MaxRider wrote:my rank Harrell > Capela > Dekker > McDaniels
Man, you really have Harrell rated high. I just cannot see it, although I do like him a ton.
Dekker > Capela > McDaniels > Harrell
Whoa! Probably because he's 6'7" with a 9'1" standing reach.
Sounds like Shawn Marion without a J.
From what I've seen of Montrezl so far, I'ma go with Max on this.
Nebula1 wrote:MaxRider wrote:
my rank Harrell > Capela > Dekker > McDaniels
Man, you really have Harrell rated high. I just cannot see it, although I do like him a ton.
Dekker > Capela > McDaniels > Harrell
MaxRider wrote:he's shorter than most PF
but he has long reach and high motor (he's always active)
Dekker back injury is already scaring me
Capela needs to gain some muscle first
out of those four
i believe Harrell is the one that can crack the rotation now
Nebula1 wrote:MaxRider wrote:he's shorter than most PF
but he has long reach and high motor (he's always active)
Dekker back injury is already scaring me
Capela needs to gain some muscle first
out of those four
i believe Harrell is the one that can crack the rotation now
Capela has already cracked the rotation and will a primary backup. Harrell will be behind both Jones/Motiejunas regardless of his motor.
A sore back for Dekker is no big deal.
Harrell is a monster dunker though. I do like that.
Nebula1 wrote:DonHouston wrote:1.Harden
2.Howard
3.Ariza
4.Montijunas
5.Lawson
6.Brewer
7.Beverely
8.Jones
What about Dekker and/or Capela?
Nebula1 wrote:You guys do realize Dekker is actually taller than Harrell right? And Dekker can shoot and handle.
Dekker and Capela are easily better prospects than Harrell although I do love his energy and aggression.
Mr. E wrote:Has there been anything else about Dekker's back injury?
MaxRider wrote:Nebula1 wrote:You guys do realize Dekker is actually taller than Harrell right? And Dekker can shoot and handle.
Dekker and Capela are easily better prospects than Harrell although I do love his energy and aggression.
height is overrated
bb iq is more important
Dekker is rank top 15
Harrell is rank top 30
of course Dekker is better
i mention above Dekker recent back injury scare me a little
since we got Ariza/Brewer good for next 3 years so i'm more worry about PF position than SF
MaxRider wrote:height is overrated because people has problem with 6'8" PF with 7'5" wingspan but not with 6'11" PF with 6'11" wingspan
the 6'8" PF actually has higher standing reach
i'm talking about Elton Brand and Troy Murphy here
Nebula1 wrote:MaxRider wrote:height is overrated because people has problem with 6'8" PF with 7'5" wingspan but not with 6'11" PF with 6'11" wingspan
the 6'8" PF actually has higher standing reach
i'm talking about Elton Brand and Troy Murphy here
I'm talking about a player with no offensive game, undersized and works strictly on hustle versus a taller guy, with a ton of game and the potential to be a PF in the NBA. I don't think it's even close.
In this exercise, I think you keep your 8 most valuable assets and both Capela and Dekker are two of those.