Russell/Clarkson
Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb
Russell/Clarkson
-
- Junior
- Posts: 427
- And1: 78
- Joined: Dec 13, 2012
Russell/Clarkson
Do Lakers start Russell at the 1 or Clarkson? The Tony Parker/Manu Ginobili comparison does seem similiar.
Re: Russell/Clarkson
- moonpie
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,017
- And1: 2,692
- Joined: Dec 14, 2010
-
Re: Russell/Clarkson
I say Russell will be slotted as PG, but it won't matter too much IMO since both of them will start and they'll both play interchangeable roles.
Re: Russell/Clarkson
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,140
- And1: 6,789
- Joined: Jan 02, 2012
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
-
Re: Russell/Clarkson
Not sure. At the moment i would expect them to start Russell at the 1 and Clarkson at the 2 but it would not be surprising for those roles to change while on the floor. Either way, the Lakers can try any type of offense they want but with the players on the floor this is going to be primarily an ISO team.
Re: Russell/Clarkson
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 931
- And1: 77
- Joined: Aug 08, 2015
Re: Russell/Clarkson
Players who have the superstar potential should be starting... Russell is the best passing PG coming out of college since Magic. his passes I have seen look amazingly smooth and crisp I don't think you can mess with a great talent coming off the bench he needs every confidence to become the next franchise player.
Re: Russell/Clarkson
- iamworthy
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,137
- And1: 8,916
- Joined: Jul 20, 2007
- Location: Ring City!!!
-
Re: Russell/Clarkson
There are two different train of thought. The first is to play DLo at SG to let him ease into the NBA. Let Clarkson, the more seasoned of the two carry the load at PG. The second thought is to play DLo at PG and throw him into the fire. IMO the kid has enough fire to play him at PG. From everything Ive read, nothing can shake this kids confidence. Its not like the lakers are making a serious run so let him run the PG and let him make all his mistakes over the next couple of years.

Re: Russell/Clarkson
- ArC_man
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,982
- And1: 910
- Joined: Oct 28, 2012
- Location: UCLA
-
Re: Russell/Clarkson
Does it really matter? They're both just gonna bring the ball up the court and pass it to Kobe anyways.
Re: Russell/Clarkson
- dAdo dA dEvil
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,630
- And1: 508
- Joined: Jun 27, 2013
-
Re: Russell/Clarkson
Start them together to make sure Kobe plays at 3.
It seems that DLo is the better passer so let him handle the point. If it doesn't work out well Clarkson can take over the point guard duties anytime.

It seems that DLo is the better passer so let him handle the point. If it doesn't work out well Clarkson can take over the point guard duties anytime.
Re: Russell/Clarkson
- EArl
- RealGM
- Posts: 49,975
- And1: 13,473
- Joined: Mar 14, 2012
- Location: Columbus
-
Re: Russell/Clarkson
Clarkson will play the second guard slot.
Deep into that darkness peering, long I stood there wondering, fearing, Doubting, dreaming dreams no mortal ever dared to dream before;
Re: Russell/Clarkson
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,680
- And1: 1,758
- Joined: Feb 21, 2015
-
Re: Russell/Clarkson
very curious to see how Russell does against NBA pace and athleticism. (there's no question about his quick release and range.)
Re: Russell/Clarkson
-
- Junior
- Posts: 384
- And1: 68
- Joined: Nov 06, 2013
-
Re: Russell/Clarkson
Russell is not ready.
Re: Russell/Clarkson
- Westbreezy
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 970
- And1: 951
- Joined: Nov 17, 2012
Re: Russell/Clarkson
Hank7 wrote:Russell is not ready.
Lets hope the Summer league for Russell works like when teachers would give you a practice test before the real one and everyone would fail cause they weren't prepared but then studied really hard after that
dub81 wrote:Byron had to do one of two things this year: Either win games or develop the youth. Swung and missed wildly on both.
Lakers 2015-16 Season in a Nutshell
Re: Russell/Clarkson
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 20
- And1: 4
- Joined: Sep 03, 2015
Re: Russell/Clarkson
Russell might be a better fit with the scorers on your team. I hope Clarkson doesn't get lost in the shuffle with all the volume scorers on the team, because that kid can go.
Re: Russell/Clarkson
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,782
- And1: 423
- Joined: Jan 10, 2009
Re: Russell/Clarkson
FrozenIceCubes wrote:Players who have the superstar potential should be starting... Russell is the best passing PG coming out of college since Magic. his passes I have seen look amazingly smooth and crisp I don't think you can mess with a great talent coming off the bench he needs every confidence to become the next franchise player.
lol since magic? ive seen better passes from kendall marshall.
Re: Russell/Clarkson
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 931
- And1: 77
- Joined: Aug 08, 2015
Re: Russell/Clarkson
Tee212 wrote:FrozenIceCubes wrote:Players who have the superstar potential should be starting... Russell is the best passing PG coming out of college since Magic. his passes I have seen look amazingly smooth and crisp I don't think you can mess with a great talent coming off the bench he needs every confidence to become the next franchise player.
lol since magic? ive seen better passes from kendall marshall.
Read Rick Pitinos article abou D'Angelo Russell... And don't even make me laugh.. Marshall? He was always turning the ball over... You seem to have a agenda against Russell...
Re: Russell/Clarkson
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,782
- And1: 423
- Joined: Jan 10, 2009
Re: Russell/Clarkson
FrozenIceCubes wrote:Tee212 wrote:FrozenIceCubes wrote:Players who have the superstar potential should be starting... Russell is the best passing PG coming out of college since Magic. his passes I have seen look amazingly smooth and crisp I don't think you can mess with a great talent coming off the bench he needs every confidence to become the next franchise player.
lol since magic? ive seen better passes from kendall marshall.
Read Rick Pitinos article abou D'Angelo Russell... And don't even make me laugh.. Marshall? He was always turning the ball over... You seem to have a agenda against Russell...
youre soo cute
Re: Russell/Clarkson
- Westbreezy
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 970
- And1: 951
- Joined: Nov 17, 2012
Re: Russell/Clarkson
I don't think Russell is tall enough to play SG. He's listed as 6"3.25 without shoes so I think he's more of a 6"4.
A 6"4 SG is fine if you're an athletic freak like Dwyane Wade. But hey what do I know
A 6"4 SG is fine if you're an athletic freak like Dwyane Wade. But hey what do I know
dub81 wrote:Byron had to do one of two things this year: Either win games or develop the youth. Swung and missed wildly on both.
Lakers 2015-16 Season in a Nutshell
Re: Russell/Clarkson
- iamworthy
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,137
- And1: 8,916
- Joined: Jul 20, 2007
- Location: Ring City!!!
-
Re: Russell/Clarkson
Westbreezy wrote:I don't think Russell is tall enough to play SG. He's listed as 6"3.25 without shoes so I think he's more of a 6"4.
A 6"4 SG is fine if you're an athletic freak like Dwyane Wade. But hey what do I know
Isnt Steph curry 6'3?

Re: Russell/Clarkson
- DrazenPetrovic3
- Ballboy
- Posts: 39
- And1: 6
- Joined: Aug 27, 2015
Re: Russell/Clarkson
iamworthy wrote:Westbreezy wrote:I don't think Russell is tall enough to play SG. He's listed as 6"3.25 without shoes so I think he's more of a 6"4.
A 6"4 SG is fine if you're an athletic freak like Dwyane Wade. But hey what do I know
Isnt Steph curry 6'3?
Isn't Klay SG?
Re: Russell/Clarkson
- iamworthy
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,137
- And1: 8,916
- Joined: Jul 20, 2007
- Location: Ring City!!!
-
Re: Russell/Clarkson
DrazenPetrovic3 wrote:iamworthy wrote:Westbreezy wrote:I don't think Russell is tall enough to play SG. He's listed as 6"3.25 without shoes so I think he's more of a 6"4.
A 6"4 SG is fine if you're an athletic freak like Dwyane Wade. But hey what do I know
Isnt Steph curry 6'3?
Isn't Klay SG?
True, but do the warriors really have positions slot 1-3


Re: Russell/Clarkson
- DrazenPetrovic3
- Ballboy
- Posts: 39
- And1: 6
- Joined: Aug 27, 2015
Re: Russell/Clarkson
iamworthy wrote:DrazenPetrovic3 wrote:iamworthy wrote:
Isnt Steph curry 6'3?
Isn't Klay SG?
True, but do the warriors really have positions slot 1-3
True. I, myself, don't believe in positions anymore. I accepted the position-less basketball.