LamarMatic7 wrote:
Restricted Free Agency: We had the LeBron dilemma last year. Chabber's Straw Hats might have over-spent a few dollars since we didn't have specific rules about the money teams are allowed to throw at other restricted free agents. I think the discussion was about other teams going over the cap to possibly pump up the price when they know Team X is signing Player Y no matter what. What do we do here?
One suggestion...
If and owner was to place a bid for a free agent (not their own), that is greater than their cap space, that owner must nominate the player or players they would cut in order to get below the salary cap. Those nominations would be binding if they won the bid for the free agent. Basically, put up or shut up - Example: you want to go 15 mil over the cap to place a bid for Lebron, you have to tell us that you will cut Bosh worth 20 mil (15 mil, + 5 mil penalty because he has 2 years on contract)... or something along those lines. It won't completely stop people from places bids to increase value, but it will at least make people present a plan before doing so.