Image

Vogel: "Our backup PG is"....Joe Young?!?

Moderators: pacers33granger, Grang33r, pacerfan, Jake0890, boomershadow

pacers33granger
Forum Mod - Pacers
Forum Mod - Pacers
Posts: 15,079
And1: 6,586
Joined: Sep 26, 2006
 

Re: Vogel: "Our backup PG is"....Joe Young?!? 

Post#41 » by pacers33granger » Sun Nov 1, 2015 7:32 pm

Wizop wrote:Solo would help defense.

Budinger is much better than cj on the break. He makes best passes on the run.


I know that we're trying to run, but honestly how many times in the 12 minutes Bud is in does he actually make those passes? 1, maybe 2 times a game? So I don't think it's that crucial to have Bud out there for that. And I know Bud has been decent from 3 at least so far, but we have plenty of guys for that imo. I'd rather have Solo crashing the glass and cutting like he did last year.

And with Solo, why not give him a shot at being the smallball guy who defends PFs like Randolph? He's never had to before and if he can guard them decently, then he's more likely to be worth keeping if he can defend 1-4 at least adequately and/or he could be better trade bait.

Overall, I get not playing guys like Young, GRIII, etc. due to the lack of experience, but Solo played 400 more minutes than anyone last year on a team that wasn't terrible (not good, but not terrible). And really, our scoring can't get much worse and we can't win while giving up 105 ppg outside of a hot shooting night from someone.
8305
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,486
And1: 632
Joined: Jun 11, 2009
     

Re: Vogel: "Our backup PG is"....Joe Young?!? 

Post#42 » by 8305 » Mon Nov 2, 2015 6:45 pm

pacers33granger wrote:
Wizop wrote:Solo would help defense.

Budinger is much better than cj on the break. He makes best passes on the run.


I know that we're trying to run, but honestly how many times in the 12 minutes Bud is in does he actually make those passes? 1, maybe 2 times a game? So I don't think it's that crucial to have Bud out there for that. And I know Bud has been decent from 3 at least so far, but we have plenty of guys for that imo. I'd rather have Solo crashing the glass and cutting like he did last year.

And with Solo, why not give him a shot at being the smallball guy who defends PFs like Randolph? He's never had to before and if he can guard them decently, then he's more likely to be worth keeping if he can defend 1-4 at least adequately and/or he could be better trade bait.

Overall, I get not playing guys like Young, GRIII, etc. due to the lack of experience, but Solo played 400 more minutes than anyone last year on a team that wasn't terrible (not good, but not terrible). And really, our scoring can't get much worse and we can't win while giving up 105 ppg outside of a hot shooting night from someone.


Decent chance Solo defends 4's better than CJ. The problem comes in when you go to the other end of the floor. That opposing 4 who we are aiming to put into a mismatch now gets to guard Solo and at the end of the day we lose that matchup.
pacers33granger
Forum Mod - Pacers
Forum Mod - Pacers
Posts: 15,079
And1: 6,586
Joined: Sep 26, 2006
 

Re: Vogel: "Our backup PG is"....Joe Young?!? 

Post#43 » by pacers33granger » Mon Nov 2, 2015 6:57 pm

8305 wrote:
pacers33granger wrote:
Wizop wrote:Solo would help defense.

Budinger is much better than cj on the break. He makes best passes on the run.


I know that we're trying to run, but honestly how many times in the 12 minutes Bud is in does he actually make those passes? 1, maybe 2 times a game? So I don't think it's that crucial to have Bud out there for that. And I know Bud has been decent from 3 at least so far, but we have plenty of guys for that imo. I'd rather have Solo crashing the glass and cutting like he did last year.

And with Solo, why not give him a shot at being the smallball guy who defends PFs like Randolph? He's never had to before and if he can guard them decently, then he's more likely to be worth keeping if he can defend 1-4 at least adequately and/or he could be better trade bait.

Overall, I get not playing guys like Young, GRIII, etc. due to the lack of experience, but Solo played 400 more minutes than anyone last year on a team that wasn't terrible (not good, but not terrible). And really, our scoring can't get much worse and we can't win while giving up 105 ppg outside of a hot shooting night from someone.


Decent chance Solo defends 4's better than CJ. The problem comes in when you go to the other end of the floor. That opposing 4 who we are aiming to put into a mismatch now gets to guard Solo and at the end of the day we lose that matchup.


If it's with the second unit though we'll likely have Turner bringing his man outside, so I'm not that concerned with the PF not having to guard Solo outside that closely. And really, for as bad as Solo is at shooting, he still shot 33% from three last year on 2.5 attempts and I'd expect him to get better shots on this team.
8305
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,486
And1: 632
Joined: Jun 11, 2009
     

Re: Vogel: "Our backup PG is"....Joe Young?!? 

Post#44 » by 8305 » Mon Nov 2, 2015 8:54 pm

pacers33granger wrote:
8305 wrote:
pacers33granger wrote:
I know that we're trying to run, but honestly how many times in the 12 minutes Bud is in does he actually make those passes? 1, maybe 2 times a game? So I don't think it's that crucial to have Bud out there for that. And I know Bud has been decent from 3 at least so far, but we have plenty of guys for that imo. I'd rather have Solo crashing the glass and cutting like he did last year.

And with Solo, why not give him a shot at being the smallball guy who defends PFs like Randolph? He's never had to before and if he can guard them decently, then he's more likely to be worth keeping if he can defend 1-4 at least adequately and/or he could be better trade bait.

Overall, I get not playing guys like Young, GRIII, etc. due to the lack of experience, but Solo played 400 more minutes than anyone last year on a team that wasn't terrible (not good, but not terrible). And really, our scoring can't get much worse and we can't win while giving up 105 ppg outside of a hot shooting night from someone.


Decent chance Solo defends 4's better than CJ. The problem comes in when you go to the other end of the floor. That opposing 4 who we are aiming to put into a mismatch now gets to guard Solo and at the end of the day we lose that matchup.


If it's with the second unit though we'll likely have Turner bringing his man outside, so I'm not that concerned with the PF not having to guard Solo outside that closely. And really, for as bad as Solo is at shooting, he still shot 33% from three last year on 2.5 attempts and I'd expect him to get better shots on this team.


Keep in mind the second unit employees both Stuckey and Ellis together while often using the more traditional 4. With Solo that unit would have 3 maybe 4 guys you don't have to follow to the three point line.
pacers33granger
Forum Mod - Pacers
Forum Mod - Pacers
Posts: 15,079
And1: 6,586
Joined: Sep 26, 2006
 

Re: Vogel: "Our backup PG is"....Joe Young?!? 

Post#45 » by pacers33granger » Mon Nov 2, 2015 11:33 pm

8305 wrote:
pacers33granger wrote:
8305 wrote:
Decent chance Solo defends 4's better than CJ. The problem comes in when you go to the other end of the floor. That opposing 4 who we are aiming to put into a mismatch now gets to guard Solo and at the end of the day we lose that matchup.


If it's with the second unit though we'll likely have Turner bringing his man outside, so I'm not that concerned with the PF not having to guard Solo outside that closely. And really, for as bad as Solo is at shooting, he still shot 33% from three last year on 2.5 attempts and I'd expect him to get better shots on this team.


Keep in mind the second unit employees both Stuckey and Ellis together while often using the more traditional 4. With Solo that unit would have 3 maybe 4 guys you don't have to follow to the three point line.


Well I'd obviously prefer we just slot Young in as the PG, so that'd solve that issue. Just absolutely hate that backcourt tandem. I know it won't happen for awhile anyways and it looks like Solo is done since we declined the option. So all a moot point really.
Miller4ever
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,596
And1: 283
Joined: Jun 24, 2005
Location: Location: Location:

Re: Vogel: "Our backup PG is"....Joe Young?!? 

Post#46 » by Miller4ever » Sat Nov 7, 2015 3:12 am

Scoot McGroot wrote:
Miller4ever wrote:
Scoot McGroot wrote:
In pre-season, or during the regular season? I really like the idea of CJ Miles starting, but I could also bring him off the bench and just let his shooters mentality take over.


If I was pressed to answer seriously, I would say later on in the season, perhaps after the all-star break, once everybody's gotten significant time in the system and we've figured out who's real and who's not. So during the regular season. If CJ is turning in another .398 FG/.345 3P year and GRIII is able to get close to replicating his preseason production, it's automatic for me. They function very similarly and I just think the streakier player should be getting his looks bombing away on hapless benches.


Miles started this past season on a horrendous shooting slump. In October/November, he was 23/95 overall, and 9/45 from 3. The rest of the year? 306/732 overall (42%) and 145/401 from 3 (36%). I tend to assume he'll shoot at least at those levels, moreso than his horrendous October/November.

I think we're in agreement though that we see Miles/GR3 as kind of the more intriguing options at SF for this season, though.


Is now a good time to revisit this conversation?
User avatar
Wizop
RealGM
Posts: 18,436
And1: 5,111
Joined: Jun 15, 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Contact:
   

Re: Vogel: "Our backup PG is"....Joe Young?!? 

Post#47 » by Wizop » Sat Nov 7, 2015 3:50 am

How hurt is stuckey?
Please edit long quotes to only show what puts your new message into context.
Miller4ever
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,596
And1: 283
Joined: Jun 24, 2005
Location: Location: Location:

Re: Vogel: "Our backup PG is"....Joe Young?!? 

Post#48 » by Miller4ever » Sat Nov 7, 2015 5:49 am

If X-rays are negative, he could be back by Sunday's game. It just looked like a terrible sprain.

Return to Indiana Pacers