fatlever wrote:steady wrote:fatlever wrote:If NBA every player was judged against their best 2-week span in their career, there would be nothing but disappointment for everyone. Do you know how many guys have had their own versions of statistical "purple patches" only to come back to being a level of player below that moment?
Not because I disagree with what you are saying, but because it always irks me when people refer to "2 weeks" like Lin just stopped playing after the 7 game win streak ended ...
Feb 4 - Nets game - Lin's breakout game
Feb 16 - last game in Knicks 7 game win streak
March 15 - D'Antoni resigned as coach
April 1 - Lin's knee surgery was announced
Lin started for Knicks for almost 2 months - 25 games total. Even counting 10 other games when he was playing spot minutes off the bench, his averages per game for the Knicks that year were:
14.6 points, 6.2 assists, 3.1 rebounds, and 1.6 steals. (Yeah, and also 3.6 TOs)
Knicks were prepared to pay him well over the $25 million/3 yrs he got from Houston to keep him. It is just that the poison pill put them in crazy territory in terms of the luxury tax bill.
He was not some 2 week wonder.
I definitely was not suggesting he was a two week wonder. That's not at all what my post is about. You can pick the time frame - one game, two weeks, two months, one year etc... the point remains the same. If players were always judged against their best run as a pro, then every player would have a disappointed fan base.
I knew that you were not suggesting that. And I agree with your point.
Just ranting at the world at large
Appreciate your thoughtful posts about Lin.












