ImageImage

Signed By Indiana - The Jeremy Lamb Thread

Moderators: yosemiteben, fatlever, JDR720, Diop, BigSlam

UNCNYC
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,790
And1: 986
Joined: Jun 09, 2014

Re: Rustler - The Jeremy Lamb Thread 

Post#621 » by UNCNYC » Mon Dec 14, 2015 5:48 pm

LamarMatic7 wrote:
UNCNYC wrote:I think Lamb has been overpaid. He is too raw and not a player that plays within structure. I think cliff knew what he was doing by bringing him off the bench. I think what we see from him is as good as its going to get. I do think PJ will or can improve a bit. I like Lamb on this team but I think he is being overpaid by at least half of what hes getting... but at the same time for us we needed that extra punch...

Next year, it will be like a $4.9 million per year deal (if we look at it from the prism of the 2014-15 season) when looked at from the percentage of salary cap it takes up. The year after that, it will be even less.

Do you think that's too much?



No thats about right. I actually understand us taking the gamble on him tho. I like Lamb because he does have the potential to give us points in any given game. he is probably not the long term solution that he was sorta hyped to be tho.
UPDATED `10-22-2025



These are who I want with our picks in order



THEM - Michael Jordan, Scottie Pippen

UNCNYC - Arthur Agee, William Gates
TTNN
Junior
Posts: 325
And1: 168
Joined: Aug 16, 2015
 

Re: Rustler - The Jeremy Lamb Thread 

Post#622 » by TTNN » Mon Dec 14, 2015 8:18 pm

yosemiteben wrote:Makes sense, didn't realize they were different. Honestly I kind of like BK Ref's net rating formulation better, since pure +/- is obviously flawed due to improper attribution. Like you said, I like the idea of tying net rating to production.

I think Lamb's defense has improved a bit (pure eyeball test), but I don't think one can look at his terrible offensive efficiency and lack of creating offense for others and say he's been a major net positive on offense lately. Totally agree with your final sentence, that seems to be the situation.

With that said, it's just six games and it's been against elite defenses (except for MEM, they're pretty average), so I'm not all that worried about it. Given how hot he was to kick off the season I'm sure that got some attention from opposing coaches as well, so it wouldn't surprise me if he is a part of game plans of teams we face. My biggest issue is his insistence on going into iso situations, think he needs to move the ball more.


The NBA.com rating were team rating, basically for 100 possession when he is on the floor, how the team performed. Thus it is positive netrating.

The Basketball-reference rating is individual rating, it calculate based on 100 possession for each player had, how much offense it end up with, thus no surprising it is not good when he was shooting not good.

I think either way is useful depends on what you are really looking for.
KDATX
Junior
Posts: 259
And1: 26
Joined: Feb 20, 2014

Re: Rustler - The Jeremy Lamb Thread 

Post#623 » by KDATX » Thu Dec 17, 2015 4:43 am

Lamb is our 2 guard. Lets get this rotation together. Move Al, put Batum at 4.
Elden Payton
RealGM
Posts: 14,899
And1: 2,592
Joined: Apr 23, 2009

Re: Rustler - The Jeremy Lamb Thread 

Post#624 » by Elden Payton » Thu Dec 17, 2015 7:58 am

I think Lamb will be inconsistent for a fair while yet.

He's not exactly had the PT and consistency that many young players get.

If he's still so up and down next season, then I'll believe he's best suited off the bench (for his career) but I think he just needs time to fulfil his potential.
DY_nasty
General Manager
Posts: 9,369
And1: 4,947
Joined: Apr 14, 2010

Re: Rustler - The Jeremy Lamb Thread 

Post#625 » by DY_nasty » Fri Dec 18, 2015 1:06 pm

When he's not on fire, he's rarely doing anything well though. That's my thing. He hasn't any improvement in that regard... ever, either. Even back in OKC.

I hope he picks it up, but there is no excuse to be as bad as he is defensively night in and night out. He just rolls over on D.
bws94
Head Coach
Posts: 6,993
And1: 1,222
Joined: Jan 08, 2014

Re: Rustler - The Jeremy Lamb Thread 

Post#626 » by bws94 » Fri Dec 18, 2015 4:32 pm

I think he needs to get going and the coaching staff needs to figure out how to do so. He's an essential part of bench force one, the first scoring option. He needs to get his minutes back right, only 15 minutes in an OT game isn't enough. He had a nice game against the Magic but he hasn't had the impact games he's been having earlier in the season lately.
TinmanZBoy
General Manager
Posts: 7,821
And1: 5,135
Joined: Jul 11, 2015
         

Re: Rustler - The Jeremy Lamb Thread 

Post#627 » by TinmanZBoy » Fri Dec 18, 2015 4:37 pm

DY_nasty wrote:When he's not on fire, he's rarely doing anything well though. That's my thing. He hasn't any improvement in that regard... ever, either. Even back in OKC.

I hope he picks it up, but there is no excuse to be as bad as he is defensively night in and night out. He just rolls over on D.


I like his rebounding ability though...
Hi Clutchie, I love you... :kiss
DY_nasty
General Manager
Posts: 9,369
And1: 4,947
Joined: Apr 14, 2010

Re: Rustler - The Jeremy Lamb Thread 

Post#628 » by DY_nasty » Fri Dec 18, 2015 5:06 pm

TinmanZBoy wrote:
DY_nasty wrote:When he's not on fire, he's rarely doing anything well though. That's my thing. He hasn't any improvement in that regard... ever, either. Even back in OKC.

I hope he picks it up, but there is no excuse to be as bad as he is defensively night in and night out. He just rolls over on D.


I like his rebounding ability though...

guards getting defensive rebounds is pretty much pointless

especially when it leads to him taking a healthy trot up the floor instead of attacking a defense that's not set :banghead:
TTNN
Junior
Posts: 325
And1: 168
Joined: Aug 16, 2015
 

Re: Rustler - The Jeremy Lamb Thread 

Post#629 » by TTNN » Sat Dec 19, 2015 1:23 pm

DY_nasty wrote:
TinmanZBoy wrote:
DY_nasty wrote:When he's not on fire, he's rarely doing anything well though. That's my thing. He hasn't any improvement in that regard... ever, either. Even back in OKC.

I hope he picks it up, but there is no excuse to be as bad as he is defensively night in and night out. He just rolls over on D.


I like his rebounding ability though...

guards getting defensive rebounds is pretty much pointless

especially when it leads to him taking a healthy trot up the floor instead of attacking a defense that's not set :banghead:


yeah, I don't like him walk up with the ball either. He should try to leak out and look for transition opportunity, let Lin give him a long pass.
RevolDas
Sophomore
Posts: 113
And1: 22
Joined: Jul 17, 2015
   

Re: Rustler - The Jeremy Lamb Thread 

Post#630 » by RevolDas » Sat Dec 19, 2015 2:19 pm

He is always gonna be streaky on scoring I'm afriad, that's just who he is, a spark off the bench, sometimes works but sometimes doesn't. One thing I think he should be able to improve on is the defense, that way even when his shots are not falling he can still contribute to the team. Unlike offense, defense is where you can improve upon as long as you put your effort into.

我從使用 Tapatalk 的 SM-G900I 發送
bws94
Head Coach
Posts: 6,993
And1: 1,222
Joined: Jan 08, 2014

Re: Rustler - The Jeremy Lamb Thread 

Post#631 » by bws94 » Sun Dec 20, 2015 10:43 pm

He just needs to get his rhythm offensively. His shooting groove will come back as well. Defensively, needs to do a lot of work in the off-season.
phillycheese
Junior
Posts: 484
And1: 82
Joined: Nov 09, 2015
         

Re: Rustler - The Jeremy Lamb Thread 

Post#632 » by phillycheese » Mon Dec 21, 2015 1:46 am

Lamb's one of those players whose body language is deceiving. He's so smooth that it looks like he's not trying. He takes a long stride covers a lot of ground but it looks like he's loafing. Motor needs some work, especially on the defensive end. Wing defenders are so important in today's game, with all the schemes and such. Lamb just needs to be coached more, as he's never been a rotation player on any team except this year. I hope he gets there.
User avatar
steady
Veteran
Posts: 2,638
And1: 1,351
Joined: Jul 13, 2015
 

Re: Rustler - The Jeremy Lamb Thread 

Post#633 » by steady » Mon Dec 21, 2015 2:10 am

phillycheese wrote:Lamb's one of those players whose body language is deceiving. He's so smooth that it looks like he's not trying. He takes a long stride covers a lot of ground but it looks like he's loafing. Motor needs some work, especially on the defensive end. Wing defenders are so important in today's game, with all the schemes and such. Lamb just needs to be coached more, as he's never been a rotation player on any team except this year. I hope he gets there.


This
Didn't Clifford say Lamb arrived in Charlotte 3 weeks after the trade and he never left. He was in the gym all summer, working with coaching staff. The guy cares and is intense in his own way.
bigbob
Banned User
Posts: 552
And1: 52
Joined: Dec 13, 2015

Re: Rustler - The Jeremy Lamb Thread 

Post#634 » by bigbob » Mon Dec 21, 2015 5:45 pm

hopefully cliff plays him alot tonight. If kemba playing terrible again, sub him out and put in lamb. If lin/batuum then do the same thing. Damn it cliff, get the kembastick out of ur rear and do ur damn job!!
Braggins
RealGM
Posts: 14,689
And1: 9,410
Joined: Jan 05, 2014

Re: Rustler - The Jeremy Lamb Thread 

Post#635 » by Braggins » Tue Dec 22, 2015 11:54 pm

Is it possible that his defensive issues could be somewhat masked by placing him in the starting lineup? I know that sounds a bit counter intuitive, but since we are no longer starting Al we have a nice defensive core with Kemba, Batum, Marv, and Cody, but our offense seems to be struggling. Starting Lamb would take some of the offensive pressure of Batum, which would allow him to focus more on defense. Batum could check the best offensive wing and not have to worry about having the offense run through him as much.

Placing Lamb in the starting lineup would also force him to play off the ball more and score more on spot ups and catch and shoot situations after coming off a screen. It could kind of save him from himself by preventing him from going one on one and handling the ball too much since Kemba and Batum handle the ball so much in the first unit. I think this could have a positive effect on his efficiency, which has been seeing a decline in the last month.

I'm pretty confident that if Lamb was getting the looks that PJ is getting with the starting unit that he would be much more efficient and our offense would be a lot harder to defend. I'm not sure that we would even see that much of a drop off on defense with Batum taking on the role of our go to wing defender. I feel like if we can hide Al on defense then we should easily be able to hide Lamb.

I know a lot of people are getting hard ons for PJ because for the first time in his career he strung together a handful of games where he wasn't one of the most inefficient players in the league, but lets face it, the dude is terrible and not an NBA rotation player. Even after his "good" month he is shooting 34% from the field and 31% from deep with a 7.0 PER.
User avatar
yosemiteben
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 22,515
And1: 15,713
Joined: Mar 20, 2013
   

Re: Rustler - The Jeremy Lamb Thread 

Post#636 » by yosemiteben » Wed Dec 23, 2015 12:09 am

Braggins wrote:I know a lot of people are getting hard ons for PJ because for the first time in his career he strung together a handful of games where he wasn't one of the most inefficient players in the league, but lets face it, the dude is terrible and not an NBA rotation player.

You said the same thing about Hawes. I think you throw that around way too easily.

You can't complain about our lack of player development, then at the same time bash a young second year player who we have worked very hard to develop and who is starting to show some consistency.
Braggins
RealGM
Posts: 14,689
And1: 9,410
Joined: Jan 05, 2014

Re: Rustler - The Jeremy Lamb Thread 

Post#637 » by Braggins » Wed Dec 23, 2015 12:19 am

yosemiteben wrote:
Braggins wrote:I know a lot of people are getting hard ons for PJ because for the first time in his career he strung together a handful of games where he wasn't one of the most inefficient players in the league, but lets face it, the dude is terrible and not an NBA rotation player.

You said the same thing about Hawes. I think you throw that around way too easily.

You can't complain about our lack of player development, then at the same time bash a young second year player who we have worked very hard to develop and who is starting to show some consistency.

PJ has a career PER of 8.2 and TS% of 45.5 (33%fg/30%3pt). Hawes was at least good for a couple of full seasons and has shown that he has the capability of being an NBA rotation player and it only took him a month or two to get his stuff together. I actually expected a lot from Hawes coming into this season and actually made some posts this summer about him potentially being a better starting center option than Al. I admit that I overreacted to his early season suckiness. I was mostly concerned with the fact that he seemed unwilling to shoot 3s and was a turnover machine, which was kind of shocking since he was supposed to be a stretch big with high IQ and good passing.

I really don't know what any of the PJ supporters are banking on that makes them see a solid NBA player in him. His career best month brought his fg% up to a super impressive 34%. I don't really know what could possibly make you be disappointed in a player if PJ's season so far is giving you hope.

As per usual when I disagree with you, I really hope you are right. However, at what point are you willing to say enough is enough with PJ? Are you going to be happy with him if after another "good" month he raises his fg% to 36%?
User avatar
yosemiteben
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 22,515
And1: 15,713
Joined: Mar 20, 2013
   

Re: RE: Re: Rustler - The Jeremy Lamb Thread 

Post#638 » by yosemiteben » Wed Dec 23, 2015 12:42 am

Braggins wrote:However, at what point are you willing to say enough is enough with PJ? Are you going to be happy with him if after another "good" month he raises his fg% to 36%?

If he shoots 38-40% from three over the next month and maintains his solid defensive play, I'll be very happy.

I don't care at all about his career FG% or his overall FG% this season. All I want is for him to play solid D and to be a legitimate threat from the perimeter, and he's done both very well recently. It just feels like you're a few weeks late if you want to make the argument that there's no way he'll ever be a rotation worthy player.
uballer
Sophomore
Posts: 174
And1: 34
Joined: Oct 09, 2015

Re: RE: Re: Rustler - The Jeremy Lamb Thread 

Post#639 » by uballer » Wed Dec 23, 2015 1:15 am

yosemiteben wrote:
Braggins wrote:However, at what point are you willing to say enough is enough with PJ? Are you going to be happy with him if after another "good" month he raises his fg% to 36%?

If he shoots 38-40% from three over the next month and maintains his solid defensive play, I'll be very happy.

I don't care at all about his career FG% or his overall FG% this season. All I want is for him to play solid D and to be a legitimate threat from the perimeter, and he's done both very well recently. It just feels like you're a few weeks late if you want to make the argument that there's no way he'll ever be a rotation worthy player.


Agree. PJ at least has played solid D. But, Lam's D was not very good.
uballer
Sophomore
Posts: 174
And1: 34
Joined: Oct 09, 2015

Re: RE: Re: Rustler - The Jeremy Lamb Thread 

Post#640 » by uballer » Wed Dec 23, 2015 1:18 am

uballer wrote:
yosemiteben wrote:
Braggins wrote:However, at what point are you willing to say enough is enough with PJ? Are you going to be happy with him if after another "good" month he raises his fg% to 36%?

If he shoots 38-40% from three over the next month and maintains his solid defensive play, I'll be very happy.

I don't care at all about his career FG% or his overall FG% this season. All I want is for him to play solid D and to be a legitimate threat from the perimeter, and he's done both very well recently. It just feels like you're a few weeks late if you want to make the argument that there's no way he'll ever be a rotation worthy player.


Agree. PJ at least has played solid D. But, Lam's D was not very good.

Sorry, I meant Lamb.

Return to Charlotte Hornets