ImageImage

Green bay @ Washington

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
DigitalFool
Veteran
Posts: 2,573
And1: 152
Joined: Jul 13, 2006

Re: Green bay @ Washington 

Post#441 » by DigitalFool » Mon Jan 11, 2016 1:06 am

Iheartfootball wrote:
WiscoKing13 wrote:Wow lacey just wow


To be fair. The refs really shoulda blown the whistle well before that.

He was still Going forward
User avatar
Iheartfootball
Head Coach
Posts: 6,612
And1: 5,601
Joined: May 09, 2014
     

Re: Green bay @ Washington 

Post#442 » by Iheartfootball » Mon Jan 11, 2016 1:07 am

DigitalFool wrote:
Iheartfootball wrote:
WiscoKing13 wrote:Wow lacey just wow


To be fair. The refs really shoulda blown the whistle well before that.

He was still Going forward


Felt like he was stopped well before that and they let it keep going.
Everybody wants to go to heaven but nobody wants to die.
WiscoKing13
RealGM
Posts: 11,976
And1: 1,441
Joined: Jan 03, 2009
     

Re: Green bay @ Washington 

Post#443 » by WiscoKing13 » Mon Jan 11, 2016 1:07 am

Why is clay even out there?
DanoMac wrote:
bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.


I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
User avatar
MartyConlonOnTheRun
RealGM
Posts: 27,336
And1: 13,171
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Section 212 - Raising havoc in Squad 6

Re: Green bay @ Washington 

Post#444 » by MartyConlonOnTheRun » Mon Jan 11, 2016 1:09 am

Why aren't they just flinging it into the endzone every play. They don't have time to mess around.
User avatar
Bernman
RealGM
Posts: 27,843
And1: 8,361
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
     

Re: Green bay @ Washington 

Post#445 » by Bernman » Mon Jan 11, 2016 1:09 am

I think Aaron was just tanking the previous games because he didn't want to play in cold weather, which neutered the passing offense, the primary reason we've been contenders in recent years.
User avatar
BigDee
RealGM
Posts: 16,175
And1: 1,381
Joined: Jul 11, 2006
Location: Wisconsin
     

Re: Green bay @ Washington 

Post#446 » by BigDee » Mon Jan 11, 2016 1:10 am

How about that.
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,493
And1: 4,430
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: Green bay @ Washington 

Post#447 » by Kerb Hohl » Mon Jan 11, 2016 1:13 am

***** alert*

I seem to remember somebody saying that the offense was at least decent letting Rodgers sling it with some tempo on offense...and that they should throw caution to the wind in the playoffs.

Nah, probably no one.
RRyder823
General Manager
Posts: 8,874
And1: 4,929
Joined: May 06, 2014
   

Re: Green bay @ Washington 

Post#448 » by RRyder823 » Mon Jan 11, 2016 1:26 am

Big games out if Neal, Tretter, Mathews, Hayward and Perry. Honorable mention to the rest of the CBs.

Still got some drops to clean up and Rodgers did miss a few early to Cobb but overall this game can hopefully be the confidence boost this offense needs to catch lightning in a bottle.

Let's hope we "shock the world" and knock off the big bad Cardinals team. I know lots wanted to avoid them but at this point in the season it's put up or shut up time. Bring em on
bizarro
RealGM
Posts: 14,778
And1: 7,290
Joined: Jul 13, 2005

Re: Green bay @ Washington 

Post#449 » by bizarro » Mon Jan 11, 2016 1:33 am

I never doubted this team for a second. They've been toughin' em' out all year. Led by that gritty ol' timer from Pittsburgh and our innovative GM, I knew we had what it took!

Let's be real. Has Washington beat a team with a winning record? Big wake up call next week. At least Tretter settled in real nicely. This wasn't the Cardinals. But, hell, they are coming off a blow-out at home by a division rival and had a Bye week. Who knows?

Simply put: I am content with the quality of football I witnessed today. It's been 11 weeks but I'll take it.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 101,784
And1: 54,927
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Green bay @ Washington 

Post#450 » by MickeyDavis » Mon Jan 11, 2016 1:37 am

Playing with house money now. Nothing to lose.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
RRyder823
General Manager
Posts: 8,874
And1: 4,929
Joined: May 06, 2014
   

Re: RE: Re: Green bay @ Washington 

Post#451 » by RRyder823 » Mon Jan 11, 2016 1:51 am

MickeyDavis wrote:Playing with house money now. Nothing to lose.


Agreed. I'll say this though. "IF" they pull off the upset in Arizona they won't lose again this year
User avatar
Bernman
RealGM
Posts: 27,843
And1: 8,361
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
     

Re: Green bay @ Washington 

Post#452 » by Bernman » Mon Jan 11, 2016 2:02 am

I think we have something to lose. Rodgers is 32 now, we only have 1 Super Bowl in the bank, and the defense this year has actually been pretty good. Don't know if it will falter in subsequent years, and then how much longer A-Rodg can be an MVP on a Super Bowl caliber team. If we don't get at least another one during his career, you'd have to consider it a failure of putting together supporting casts, and a considerable disappointment. I'm not saying it's easy, but getting there already in 2010, we should have won 3 by the end, or at least 2. We've still only even been there once. New England has already gotten to six and won four with Brady. We back doored our only one as the sixth seed in 2010. We can't just keep letting these opportunities slip by year-by-year.
El Duderino
RealGM
Posts: 20,545
And1: 1,328
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: Working on pad level

Re: Green bay @ Washington 

Post#453 » by El Duderino » Mon Jan 11, 2016 5:05 am

rilamann wrote:Where the hell has that been the past 2 and a half months?

Refreshing as **** to see it.


Yea, isn't it pretty strange how when the players execute a play well, that play call turns out good and when they don't execute a play well, the play call turns out poorly?

Take the running game today. It was so weird how in the first half, the line blocked poorly so the called running plays went nowhere, but then for some very odd reason when the guys all blocked better in the second half, the called running plays were very productive.

Hmmmmm
RRyder823
General Manager
Posts: 8,874
And1: 4,929
Joined: May 06, 2014
   

Re: RE: Re: Green bay @ Washington 

Post#454 » by RRyder823 » Mon Jan 11, 2016 6:19 am

El Duderino wrote:
rilamann wrote:Where the hell has that been the past 2 and a half months?

Refreshing as **** to see it.


Yea, isn't it pretty strange how when the players execute a play well, that play call turns out good and when they don't execute a play well, the play call turns out poorly?

Take the running game today. It was so weird how in the first half, the line blocked poorly so the called running plays went nowhere, but then for some very odd reason when the guys all blocked better in the second half, the called running plays were very productive.

Hmmmmm


Right.

It's amazing how that works
User avatar
Kerb Hohl
RealGM
Posts: 35,493
And1: 4,430
Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Location: Hmmmm...how many 1sts would Jason Richardson cost...?

Re: Green bay @ Washington 

Post#455 » by Kerb Hohl » Mon Jan 11, 2016 1:30 pm

Also, they **** ran their offense through a tempo passing game. That helped everything else.

Return to Green Bay Packers