Iheartfootball wrote:WiscoKing13 wrote:Wow lacey just wow
To be fair. The refs really shoulda blown the whistle well before that.
He was still Going forward
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
Iheartfootball wrote:WiscoKing13 wrote:Wow lacey just wow
To be fair. The refs really shoulda blown the whistle well before that.
DigitalFool wrote:Iheartfootball wrote:WiscoKing13 wrote:Wow lacey just wow
To be fair. The refs really shoulda blown the whistle well before that.
He was still Going forward
DanoMac wrote:bullox wrote:That phone number was an asset to you. You had a direct line to the gm. You've squandered it.
I squandered an asset? Then Hammond taught me well.
MickeyDavis wrote:Playing with house money now. Nothing to lose.
rilamann wrote:Where the hell has that been the past 2 and a half months?
Refreshing as **** to see it.
El Duderino wrote:rilamann wrote:Where the hell has that been the past 2 and a half months?
Refreshing as **** to see it.
Yea, isn't it pretty strange how when the players execute a play well, that play call turns out good and when they don't execute a play well, the play call turns out poorly?
Take the running game today. It was so weird how in the first half, the line blocked poorly so the called running plays went nowhere, but then for some very odd reason when the guys all blocked better in the second half, the called running plays were very productive.
Hmmmmm