ImageImageImageImageImage

Hypothetical: Would you take the guaranteed #3 pick?

Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb

Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,128
And1: 33,799
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: Hypothetical: Would you take the guaranteed #3 pick? 

Post#21 » by Slava » Mon Jan 25, 2016 5:10 am

moonpie wrote:I would probably take the gurantee and go with Kris Dunn at 3.


Dragan Bender might be a pretty good fit, another unselfish player who can shoot and likes to pass the ball forward or locate shooters. Ofcourse having missed out on Zingis this year, plenty of GMs will jump all over him but he lacks the frame for a professional basketball player.
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:
User avatar
Sofa King
RealGM
Posts: 19,352
And1: 3,044
Joined: Jul 27, 2003
Contact:
 

Re: Hypothetical: Would you take the guaranteed #3 pick? 

Post#22 » by Sofa King » Mon Jan 25, 2016 5:22 am

dockingsched wrote:
Sofa King wrote:Depends on who you have at #3, but I would roll the dice to try to get Ingram or Simmons.



Same, gotta risk for the game changer. i haven't the college ranks too closely but is it fair to say that simmons and ingram have separated themselves from the rest of the pack?


Ingram reminds me a lot of Kevin Durant. He might not be as polished as Durant when Durant was still dominating it in Texas, but he has the similar build and length and would be perfect 2 to 3 years in the league with our young core. Perfect SF with range and can play the stretch PF when needed.

Simmons would also be good but his shot will take time to develop.

I'm interested in Dragan Bender's stock. If he has the same work ethic, it would be interesting. The difference between Zingis and Darko is personality and work ethic. If Darko had the same approach to the game as Zingis, Darko would still be in the league instead of getting knocked out in the ring.
LApwnd
Banned User
Posts: 20,606
And1: 1,146
Joined: Jul 09, 2008

Re: Hypothetical: Would you take the guaranteed #3 pick? 

Post#23 » by LApwnd » Mon Jan 25, 2016 6:04 am

Slava wrote:
moonpie wrote:I would probably take the gurantee and go with Kris Dunn at 3.


Dragan Bender might be a pretty good fit, another unselfish player who can shoot and likes to pass the ball forward or locate shooters. Ofcourse having missed out on Zingis this year, plenty of GMs will jump all over him but he lacks the frame for a professional basketball player.


could be a great stretch 5 for Randle pairing. I don't know how his D is like but if he can block shots on sheer height alone like Porzingis we could have a decent combo bigs. I wonder if we could trade down to get him and get something else if we did get stuck with 3rd pick. I don't like the guy currently projected at 3 (Brown), not a good shooter for a wing, just athletic. His description sounds just like Stanley Johnson and everybody all over his jock during summer league and now that ver. is no where to be seen.
Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,128
And1: 33,799
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: Hypothetical: Would you take the guaranteed #3 pick? 

Post#24 » by Slava » Mon Jan 25, 2016 6:27 am

LApwnd wrote:
Slava wrote:
moonpie wrote:I would probably take the gurantee and go with Kris Dunn at 3.


Dragan Bender might be a pretty good fit, another unselfish player who can shoot and likes to pass the ball forward or locate shooters. Ofcourse having missed out on Zingis this year, plenty of GMs will jump all over him but he lacks the frame for a professional basketball player.


could be a great stretch 5 for Randle pairing. I don't know how his D is like but if he can block shots on sheer height alone like Randle we could have a decent combo bigs. I wonder if we could trade down to get him and get something else if we did get stuck with 3rd pick. I don't like the guy currently projected at 3 (Brown), not a good shooter for a wing, just athletic. His description sounds just like Stanley Johnson and everybody all over his jock during summer league and now that ver. is no where to be seen.


Draft Express has Bender at #3 and Brown at #6 or 7. So it wouldn't surprise me if Bender goes top 3.

To me its 1. Simmons 2. Ingram 3. Bender. After that there's not many players that you could consider developing into #1 or 2 options on a contending team, which is why I'm more than comfortable delivering that Philly pick this year and keep our own for next season when the draft is much deeper.
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:
User avatar
Westbreezy
Pro Prospect
Posts: 970
And1: 951
Joined: Nov 17, 2012

Re: Hypothetical: Would you take the guaranteed #3 pick? 

Post#25 » by Westbreezy » Mon Jan 25, 2016 9:04 am

Slava wrote:
moonpie wrote:I would probably take the gurantee and go with Kris Dunn at 3.


Dragan Bender might be a pretty good fit, another unselfish player who can shoot and likes to pass the ball forward or locate shooters. Ofcourse having missed out on Zingis this year, plenty of GMs will jump all over him but he lacks the frame for a professional basketball player.


Doesn't Bender have a problem with the buyout situation with his team in Europe? I recall reading that he won't be able to come over for at least another 2 years
dub81 wrote:Byron had to do one of two things this year: Either win games or develop the youth. Swung and missed wildly on both.

Lakers 2015-16 Season in a Nutshell
Lakers24gm
Junior
Posts: 418
And1: 125
Joined: Jun 15, 2015
     

Re: Hypothetical: Would you take the guaranteed #3 pick? 

Post#26 » by Lakers24gm » Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:25 pm

Spens1 wrote:
Lakers24gm wrote:Thing is with this draft is drafting Simmons kind of makes trading Randle a must right? Or do you keep both and try to play one at the 3? With Ingram he fits a need right away at the 3. So with the 3rd pick you can get someone with upside like Bender who is really starting to get some hype to watch out for him. Or Jaylen Brown who is athletic freak but needs more consistency. Hield will be a lottery pick you can book that shooting is whats in in the NBA and he can flat out shoot. So guaranteeing we get the 3rd pick atleast makes this season worth something but gambling for Simmons or Ingram could pay off bigger in long run such a tough decision.


Simmons most likely would be a 3 in the league, pretty sure for the boomers he has played Small Forward most of the time


Really most of the games I've seen he's definitely played the 4 for his team. Even so being 6'10 and the more he grows into his body and adds muscle it will be harder for him to play the 3. Im still curious about his jump shot he just never shoots and I understand he can get to the basket most of the time but that will change in the nba.
LApwnd
Banned User
Posts: 20,606
And1: 1,146
Joined: Jul 09, 2008

Re: Hypothetical: Would you take the guaranteed #3 pick? 

Post#27 » by LApwnd » Mon Jan 25, 2016 7:35 pm

Westbreezy wrote:
Slava wrote:
moonpie wrote:I would probably take the gurantee and go with Kris Dunn at 3.


Dragan Bender might be a pretty good fit, another unselfish player who can shoot and likes to pass the ball forward or locate shooters. Ofcourse having missed out on Zingis this year, plenty of GMs will jump all over him but he lacks the frame for a professional basketball player.


Doesn't Bender have a problem with the buyout situation with his team in Europe? I recall reading that he won't be able to come over for at least another 2 years

perfect candidate for another Sixer high pick :lol:
User avatar
ArC_man
Veteran
Posts: 2,982
And1: 910
Joined: Oct 28, 2012
Location: UCLA
   

Re: Hypothetical: Would you take the guaranteed #3 pick? 

Post#28 » by ArC_man » Mon Jan 25, 2016 9:31 pm

I'd keep the 3rd pick and go with my boy Bender, he can be our enforcer

Image
User avatar
Edrees
RealGM
Posts: 17,213
And1: 12,426
Joined: May 12, 2009
Contact:
         

Re: Hypothetical: Would you take the guaranteed #3 pick? 

Post#29 » by Edrees » Mon Jan 25, 2016 9:57 pm

I would definitely take the #3. Heck, I would probably take #4 or #5 even.
Spens1
RealGM
Posts: 13,865
And1: 3,879
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
     

Re: Hypothetical: Would you take the guaranteed #3 pick? 

Post#30 » by Spens1 » Tue Jan 26, 2016 5:06 am

Lakers24gm wrote:
Spens1 wrote:
Lakers24gm wrote:Thing is with this draft is drafting Simmons kind of makes trading Randle a must right? Or do you keep both and try to play one at the 3? With Ingram he fits a need right away at the 3. So with the 3rd pick you can get someone with upside like Bender who is really starting to get some hype to watch out for him. Or Jaylen Brown who is athletic freak but needs more consistency. Hield will be a lottery pick you can book that shooting is whats in in the NBA and he can flat out shoot. So guaranteeing we get the 3rd pick atleast makes this season worth something but gambling for Simmons or Ingram could pay off bigger in long run such a tough decision.


Simmons most likely would be a 3 in the league, pretty sure for the boomers he has played Small Forward most of the time


Really most of the games I've seen he's definitely played the 4 for his team. Even so being 6'10 and the more he grows into his body and adds muscle it will be harder for him to play the 3. Im still curious about his jump shot he just never shoots and I understand he can get to the basket most of the time but that will change in the nba.


think LSU are playing him at 4 because he just kinda fits there right now (he's tall, can't shoot that great from range right now) but honestly he would kinda be wasted as a P.F, he has all the tools to be a star S.F like a Lebron or Durant (maybe not quiet as good, but pretty damn close)
Up-And-Coming
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,668
And1: 4,010
Joined: Jul 21, 2015
       

Re: Hypothetical: Would you take the guaranteed #3 pick? 

Post#31 » by Up-And-Coming » Tue Jan 26, 2016 5:26 am

I would probably take the #3 pick. However, I would try to trade it along with Randle and even Clarkson to get the #1.
User avatar
Westbreezy
Pro Prospect
Posts: 970
And1: 951
Joined: Nov 17, 2012

Re: Hypothetical: Would you take the guaranteed #3 pick? 

Post#32 » by Westbreezy » Tue Jan 26, 2016 5:39 am

Edrees wrote:I would definitely take the #3. Heck, I would probably take #4 or #5 even.


I mean I would understand your viewpoint in a vacuum but if we lose the pick this year, we'll keep our pick next year in a deeper draft. Cant imagine we're a playoff team next year either to be honest.
dub81 wrote:Byron had to do one of two things this year: Either win games or develop the youth. Swung and missed wildly on both.

Lakers 2015-16 Season in a Nutshell
User avatar
Edrees
RealGM
Posts: 17,213
And1: 12,426
Joined: May 12, 2009
Contact:
         

Re: Hypothetical: Would you take the guaranteed #3 pick? 

Post#33 » by Edrees » Tue Jan 26, 2016 6:24 am

Westbreezy wrote:
Edrees wrote:I would definitely take the #3. Heck, I would probably take #4 or #5 even.


I mean I would understand your viewpoint in a vacuum but if we lose the pick this year, we'll keep our pick next year in a deeper draft. Cant imagine we're a playoff team next year either to be honest.


Once Byron Scott is fired, that alone will boost our win total by 20. I'd still rather have this year's 5 than next year's 16th.

If Byron Scott is still the coach next year, I won't be watching any Lakers games next season so at that point it wont matter to me. :lol:

Return to Los Angeles Lakers