jredsaz wrote:AtheJ415 wrote:jredsaz wrote:
They are rookies who haven't got any run/opportunity to "show something". McLemore has been in the league three years, recieved ample opportunity, AND he was drafted in the worst draft in a decade.
More importantly, the possible opportunity cost of trading a lottery pick is much larger than that of tading Morris, Tucker, and Teletovic.
That comparison sucks.
The bolded is exactly my point. Rookies who can't make the rotation because they aren't good enough yet to overtake regular role players don't retain value. Also, McLemore may have been in a supposed bad draft (which it really wasn't--see Gobert, McCollum, etc.), but he's still every bit as highly thought of as RJ freaking Hunter, a super late first rounder in a not special draft.
How about Vonleh? How about Thomas Robinson? There are countless, and I mean countless, examples of this. You have to be living on the moon to miss them. Draft picks simply do not hold value when the guy plays 10 minutes a game in a season and shoots 33% from the field and 24.5% from 3. That scenario simply does not exist.
Yeah. You don't get it. I'm done
Yup. Exactly. RJ Hunter is a desired commodity around this league. Easily worth a late first today. You're exactly right.

















