ImageImageImageImageImage

Kings Vs Denver

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

User avatar
SactoKingsFan
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,236
And1: 2,760
Joined: Mar 15, 2014
       

Re: Kings Vs Denver 

Post#61 » by SactoKingsFan » Sat Feb 20, 2016 6:06 am

Maybe Karl was right about catching the Blazers. Lillard and McCollum is a really nice backcourt, peaking at right time of season and they just blew out the Warriors.
User avatar
blind prophet
RealGM
Posts: 10,574
And1: 3,306
Joined: Dec 08, 2011
 

Re: Kings Vs Denver 

Post#62 » by blind prophet » Sat Feb 20, 2016 6:12 am

SacKingZZZ wrote:
benchmobbin02 wrote:Hey... we got the W!



Yeah, and now it's time to worry about the next W and that most likely calls for some more adjustment. There were some good changes in this game, but at the same token there was regression as well. Time to start building on the good changes.


The ball pressure early in the clock is something we should do more of provided Rondo/Collison/Ben/Anderson can stay in front of their man.

Especially if we have WCS on the floor.
User avatar
City of Trees
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,851
And1: 5,511
Joined: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Roseville, CA
   

Re: RE: Re: Kings Vs Denver 

Post#63 » by City of Trees » Sat Feb 20, 2016 6:13 am

SacKingZZZ wrote:The question now is have things changed?

Another win another INHUMAN game. Cuz with the near 40 and 20 game, and the Kings still watch it come down to the wire.


Kings have their blueprint.

Sent from my Z970 using Tapatalk
Prethia
Freshman
Posts: 93
And1: 4
Joined: Dec 07, 2015
   

Re: Kings Vs Denver 

Post#64 » by Prethia » Sat Feb 20, 2016 6:15 am

One question.Why does James Anderson play 24 minutes and Seth plays 1 minute?
User avatar
blind prophet
RealGM
Posts: 10,574
And1: 3,306
Joined: Dec 08, 2011
 

Re: Kings Vs Denver 

Post#65 » by blind prophet » Sat Feb 20, 2016 6:16 am

Prethia wrote:One question.Why does James Anderson play 24 minutes and Seth plays 1 minute?


Mudiay is a pretty big guard, and Anderson does a decent job pressuring the ball.
benchmobbin02
Veteran
Posts: 2,976
And1: 364
Joined: May 28, 2015
     

Re: Kings Vs Denver 

Post#66 » by benchmobbin02 » Sat Feb 20, 2016 7:15 am

So happy with the W! On the the next...
MAKE IT MAKE SENSE!
KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,434
And1: 5,537
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

Re: Kings Vs Denver 

Post#67 » by KF10 » Sat Feb 20, 2016 1:36 pm

The turnover issues has been constant all season long. Can they clean that up or is it ingrained in their DNA? lol
KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,434
And1: 5,537
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

Re: Kings Vs Denver 

Post#68 » by KF10 » Sat Feb 20, 2016 1:37 pm

Lets see if the Kings can handle the game-play adjustments when they play the Nuggets again at Denver.
KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,434
And1: 5,537
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

Re: Kings Vs Denver 

Post#69 » by KF10 » Sat Feb 20, 2016 1:41 pm

Prethia wrote:One question.Why does James Anderson play 24 minutes and Seth plays 1 minute?


Defense, probably?

I don't get it. Anderson is barely a NBA-level player. Supposedly, his defense is his calling card and to be honest, he isn't THAT bad on doing that but the rest of his game is pretty pathetic though, imo. He makes one of the worst TOs I've seen by the Kings.

According to Karl, Seth is the Kings' best perimeter defender but he rarely plays at all. Confusing stuff.
teerfour+40LG
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,468
And1: 2,129
Joined: Feb 28, 2012
 

Re: Kings Vs Denver 

Post#70 » by teerfour+40LG » Sat Feb 20, 2016 6:41 pm

Willie Cauley-Stein outscored Ben McLemore again.
Prethia
Freshman
Posts: 93
And1: 4
Joined: Dec 07, 2015
   

Re: Kings Vs Denver 

Post#71 » by Prethia » Sat Feb 20, 2016 7:19 pm

Everytime he plays I saw the defensive effort from Seth and he forces opposition to make some bad choices which results in TOs or bad shot attempts and he can score unlike Anderson.The only time he played bad was his post injury.Before his post injury he was producing even in the limited minutes he got.Now I am sure he is healthy,I hope he plays more.Even in the worst case scenario it cant get worse than Anderson(for offence)and Belinelli(for defence)
benchmobbin02
Veteran
Posts: 2,976
And1: 364
Joined: May 28, 2015
     

Re: Kings Vs Denver 

Post#72 » by benchmobbin02 » Sat Feb 20, 2016 9:10 pm

Great W! One and counting...
MAKE IT MAKE SENSE!
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: Kings Vs Denver 

Post#73 » by SacKingZZZ » Sat Feb 20, 2016 9:19 pm

KF10 wrote:
Prethia wrote:One question.Why does James Anderson play 24 minutes and Seth plays 1 minute?


Defense, probably?

I don't get it. Anderson is barely a NBA-level player. Supposedly, his defense is his calling card and to be honest, he isn't THAT bad on doing that but the rest of his game is pretty pathetic though, imo. He makes one of the worst TOs I've seen by the Kings.

According to Karl, Seth is the Kings' best perimeter defender but he rarely plays at all. Confusing stuff.



Look at this way, when was the last time you said to yourself, "man, Anderson is getting killed out there by his man!". Anderson hustles on D and the more he plays him, Acy, and Willie, the better this team will be. I can't say how much better but if he says playing his better defensive players is the answer then he needs to play those 3. Curry is in a tough spot because there just isn't enough minutes at PG and playing small, as perfectly evidenced by the 2nd and 4th quarters in this game alone, means the defensive emphasis goes out the window.

On that note, I did like Willie coming off the bench more for a specific reason. That allowed the Kings to go big up front with a capable line of Willie and Cuz (Koufos and Cuz isn't capable in pick and roll defense or weak side shot blocking) when they also went small at PG/SG. Then Koufos came in and for the same reasons Wille and Koufos are a more complimentary duo than KK and Cuz. That PF spot belongs to Acy and Willie.
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: Kings Vs Denver 

Post#74 » by SacKingZZZ » Sat Feb 20, 2016 9:24 pm

teerfour+40LG wrote:Willie Cauley-Stein outscored Ben McLemore again.



Yeah, and also technically had more plays called too. Rondo is responsible for almost all of Willie's points it would seem. Ben started forcing it in the 2nd half and that's not the answer. They need to call more plays for Ben if they want him to be a part of the offense, but when Cuz and Rudy are rolling like that, the reality is the others have to take a back seat. Ben then has to impact the game in a different way, not just as a scorer. He shot the ball 0 times in the first half IIRC. That's not his fault, if anything good for him just D'ing up and staying out of the way.

On the topic of play calling, and I think it was somewhat confirmed by that interview with Walberg, apparently there aren't a lot of play calls period. Remember the players complaining in the media about wanting to be coached? Yeah, it makes a ton of sense now doesn't it.
User avatar
Kings2013
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,829
And1: 932
Joined: Jul 18, 2013
Location: The beautiful capital of California

Re: Kings Vs Denver 

Post#75 » by Kings2013 » Sun Feb 21, 2016 1:43 am

Karl's systems may not have been distorting the image of just our best player (Cousins), second best player (Gay), it might have even been distorting the image of maybe, possibly, our third best player (Rondo).

When you see a game like this, you wonder if there was a more defensive minded coach, if Rondo's focus and the betterment of the scheme can make Rondo defensively more acceptable? His shooting is getting better..

This is probably going to be the main question for me going forward, is Rondo a fit playing more off Cousins and Gay in the half court. And with an increased detail in defense can his defense be masked?
benchmobbin02
Veteran
Posts: 2,976
And1: 364
Joined: May 28, 2015
     

Re: Kings Vs Denver 

Post#76 » by benchmobbin02 » Sun Feb 21, 2016 1:47 am

Great points guys. Great W as well!
MAKE IT MAKE SENSE!
bleeds_purple
Analyst
Posts: 3,530
And1: 1,809
Joined: May 22, 2014

Re: Kings Vs Denver 

Post#77 » by bleeds_purple » Sun Feb 21, 2016 9:48 pm

KF10 wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/mr_jasonjones/status/700468670082854913[/tweet]

Is Karl THAT out of touch with reality?

Blazer's record, according to Karl that "will be difficult to catch"

27 - 27

Utah's record, according to Karl that they "have to focus on"

26 - 26

Both records are virtually identical and are at .500 and yet, they are quite different according to Karl. Utah is getting healthier and gaining ground from their injury woes earlier in the season.


It's just a stupid answer to begin with. The correct response is simple - "we are focused on our schedule and winning one game at a time". In these situations its simple just ask what would Pop/Belichick say?
benchmobbin02
Veteran
Posts: 2,976
And1: 364
Joined: May 28, 2015
     

Re: Kings Vs Denver 

Post#78 » by benchmobbin02 » Mon Feb 22, 2016 1:13 am

Pretty easy to see that the context isn't done justice with statement. But paint it how you will. The W gets us closer than an L would have. Great W!
MAKE IT MAKE SENSE!

Return to Sacramento Kings