Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
-
truth18
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,601
- And1: 42,854
- Joined: Apr 17, 2011
- Location: CELTICS NIGHTMARE
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
-
SMTBSI
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,920
- And1: 25,281
- Joined: Jun 27, 2014
-
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
Man, if Crowder was playing, is there another team in the league that's better equipped to take away what they do well? I feel like have just the right defense to match up with their small ball death squad.
sdfgsdfgsdfgsdfg No, bad Marcus, no threes, Marcus.
sdfgsdfgsdfgsdfg No, bad Marcus, no threes, Marcus.
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
-
Smitty731
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 21,397
- And1: 25,002
- Joined: Feb 09, 2014
-
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
ICYMI: Hawks lost. Nets lost. Suns are up early.
On the down side Hornets won and Heat are up, despite Wade not playing.
On the down side Hornets won and Heat are up, despite Wade not playing.
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
- Parliament10
- Forum Mod - Celtics

- Posts: 52,200
- And1: 61,506
- Joined: Jul 24, 2009
-
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
Rozier in
"You have to put the work in.
Nothing is given."
~ Jayson Tatum
Nothing is given."
~ Jayson Tatum
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
-
OFWGKTA
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,014
- And1: 12,141
- Joined: May 20, 2011
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
Great my streams behind so I already know Bradleys gonna miss these
Froob wrote:Friends is like Kyle Lowry, everyone says it's amazing but you sit down and watch it and you're just like meh...
GuyClinch wrote: Regulation is mostly to blame - also excessive medical costs.
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
-
OFWGKTA
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,014
- And1: 12,141
- Joined: May 20, 2011
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
Great my streams behind so I already know Bradleys gonna miss these
Froob wrote:Friends is like Kyle Lowry, everyone says it's amazing but you sit down and watch it and you're just like meh...
GuyClinch wrote: Regulation is mostly to blame - also excessive medical costs.
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
- Celts17Pride
- RealGM
- Posts: 68,677
- And1: 70,637
- Joined: Nov 27, 2005
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
What is Smart doing?
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
-
Smitty731
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 21,397
- And1: 25,002
- Joined: Feb 09, 2014
-
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
With the team winning and so many guys giving Bradley props for his defense, Bradley should make an appearance on one of the All-Defense teams.
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
-
SmartWentCrazy
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 20,749
- And1: 34,847
- Joined: Dec 29, 2014
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
My God is Smart dumb
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
- Bar Fight
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,934
- And1: 17,257
- Joined: Sep 30, 2013
-
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
Smart is literally so garbage I can't stand the sight of him.
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
- Shak_Celts
- Forum Mod - Celtics

- Posts: 50,798
- And1: 64,763
- Joined: Feb 07, 2016
-
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
nice help ko... not...
NAME ON THE FRONT OF THE JERSEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(!)
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
- LarryBirdsFingr
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,377
- And1: 18,686
- Joined: Jan 27, 2012
-
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
what in the good jesus is this
I don't believe in statistics. There are too many factors that can't be measured. You can't measure a ballplayer's heart. -Red Auerbach
Marcus Smart is an underrated shooter
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Marcus Smart is an underrated shooter
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
- Bar Fight
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,934
- And1: 17,257
- Joined: Sep 30, 2013
-
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
They commit like 10 turnovers in the quarter and still lead.
We suck.
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
-
Smitty731
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 21,397
- And1: 25,002
- Joined: Feb 09, 2014
-
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
Celtics played well. Warriors did not. Warriors are winning. That is why this team is so tough. And near impossible to beat at home.
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
-
PierceFan4ever
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,807
- And1: 41,926
- Joined: Dec 17, 2011
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
Ughhh Smart just gifted Curry three points. Disappointing quarter, Warriors played like ass yet we played garbage ourselves.
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
-
CelticsLV
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,731
- And1: 6,662
- Joined: Jan 08, 2016
-
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
My hate on Smart is going off the charts!
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
- ConstableGeneva
- RealGM
- Posts: 50,565
- And1: 101,356
- Joined: Sep 22, 2012
- Location: Parody Account
-
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
Use your damn brain, Marcus!! **** annoying.
░N░0░0░D░S░ ░I░N░ ░B░I░O░
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
- Shak_Celts
- Forum Mod - Celtics

- Posts: 50,798
- And1: 64,763
- Joined: Feb 07, 2016
-
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
calm down guys, believe or at least wish on a star! 
NAME ON THE FRONT OF THE JERSEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(!)
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
- TMU
- Forum Mod - Rockets

- Posts: 30,188
- And1: 10,413
- Joined: Jan 02, 2005
- Location: O.R.
-
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
Is Smart always this wreckless? Not a bad start from the Celtics, need to start hitting their shots.
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
-
SMTBSI
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,920
- And1: 25,281
- Joined: Jun 27, 2014
-
Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)
Smitty731 wrote:Celtics played well. Warriors did not. Warriors are winning. That is why this team is so tough. And near impossible to beat at home.
That's one way of looking at it.
The other is that we found a way to stay close through the first quarter. Now we need to find another way to stay close in the 2nd. Doesn't have to be the same way.









