ImageImageImage

Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

truth18
RealGM
Posts: 38,601
And1: 42,854
Joined: Apr 17, 2011
Location: CELTICS NIGHTMARE

Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)  

Post#121 » by truth18 » Sat Apr 2, 2016 3:03 am

Brun, your boy Varejao has a wack ass spray tan.
YOU LOSE
SMTBSI
RealGM
Posts: 15,920
And1: 25,281
Joined: Jun 27, 2014
 

Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)  

Post#122 » by SMTBSI » Sat Apr 2, 2016 3:05 am

Man, if Crowder was playing, is there another team in the league that's better equipped to take away what they do well? I feel like have just the right defense to match up with their small ball death squad.


sdfgsdfgsdfgsdfg No, bad Marcus, no threes, Marcus.
Smitty731
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,397
And1: 25,002
Joined: Feb 09, 2014
       

Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)  

Post#123 » by Smitty731 » Sat Apr 2, 2016 3:05 am

ICYMI: Hawks lost. Nets lost. Suns are up early.

On the down side Hornets won and Heat are up, despite Wade not playing.
User avatar
Parliament10
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 52,200
And1: 61,503
Joined: Jul 24, 2009
       

Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)  

Post#124 » by Parliament10 » Sat Apr 2, 2016 3:05 am

Rozier in
"You have to put the work in.
Nothing is given."

~ Jayson Tatum
OFWGKTA
General Manager
Posts: 9,014
And1: 12,141
Joined: May 20, 2011

Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)  

Post#125 » by OFWGKTA » Sat Apr 2, 2016 3:05 am

Great my streams behind so I already know Bradleys gonna miss these
Froob wrote:Friends is like Kyle Lowry, everyone says it's amazing but you sit down and watch it and you're just like meh...


GuyClinch wrote: Regulation is mostly to blame - also excessive medical costs.
OFWGKTA
General Manager
Posts: 9,014
And1: 12,141
Joined: May 20, 2011

Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)  

Post#126 » by OFWGKTA » Sat Apr 2, 2016 3:06 am

Great my streams behind so I already know Bradleys gonna miss these
Froob wrote:Friends is like Kyle Lowry, everyone says it's amazing but you sit down and watch it and you're just like meh...


GuyClinch wrote: Regulation is mostly to blame - also excessive medical costs.
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,675
And1: 70,636
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)  

Post#127 » by Celts17Pride » Sat Apr 2, 2016 3:06 am

What is Smart doing?
Smitty731
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,397
And1: 25,002
Joined: Feb 09, 2014
       

Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)  

Post#128 » by Smitty731 » Sat Apr 2, 2016 3:06 am

With the team winning and so many guys giving Bradley props for his defense, Bradley should make an appearance on one of the All-Defense teams.
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,847
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)  

Post#129 » by SmartWentCrazy » Sat Apr 2, 2016 3:07 am

My God is Smart dumb
User avatar
Bar Fight
RealGM
Posts: 12,934
And1: 17,257
Joined: Sep 30, 2013
 

Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)  

Post#130 » by Bar Fight » Sat Apr 2, 2016 3:07 am

Smart is literally so garbage I can't stand the sight of him.
User avatar
Shak_Celts
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 50,798
And1: 64,763
Joined: Feb 07, 2016
     

Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)  

Post#131 » by Shak_Celts » Sat Apr 2, 2016 3:07 am

nice help ko... not...
NAME ON THE FRONT OF THE JERSEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(!)
User avatar
LarryBirdsFingr
RealGM
Posts: 12,377
And1: 18,686
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
     

Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)  

Post#132 » by LarryBirdsFingr » Sat Apr 2, 2016 3:07 am

what in the good jesus is this
I don't believe in statistics. There are too many factors that can't be measured. You can't measure a ballplayer's heart. -Red Auerbach

Marcus Smart is an underrated shooter
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
User avatar
Bar Fight
RealGM
Posts: 12,934
And1: 17,257
Joined: Sep 30, 2013
 

Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)  

Post#133 » by Bar Fight » Sat Apr 2, 2016 3:07 am

They commit like 10 turnovers in the quarter and still lead. :lol: We suck.
Smitty731
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,397
And1: 25,002
Joined: Feb 09, 2014
       

Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)  

Post#134 » by Smitty731 » Sat Apr 2, 2016 3:07 am

Celtics played well. Warriors did not. Warriors are winning. That is why this team is so tough. And near impossible to beat at home.
PierceFan4ever
RealGM
Posts: 35,807
And1: 41,926
Joined: Dec 17, 2011

Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)  

Post#135 » by PierceFan4ever » Sat Apr 2, 2016 3:08 am

Ughhh Smart just gifted Curry three points. Disappointing quarter, Warriors played like ass yet we played garbage ourselves.
CelticsLV
Head Coach
Posts: 6,731
And1: 6,662
Joined: Jan 08, 2016
 

Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)  

Post#136 » by CelticsLV » Sat Apr 2, 2016 3:08 am

My hate on Smart is going off the charts!
User avatar
ConstableGeneva
RealGM
Posts: 50,565
And1: 101,356
Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Location: Parody Account
 

Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)  

Post#137 » by ConstableGeneva » Sat Apr 2, 2016 3:08 am

Use your damn brain, Marcus!! **** annoying.
░N░0░0░D░S░ ░I░N░ ░B░I░O░
User avatar
Shak_Celts
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 50,798
And1: 64,763
Joined: Feb 07, 2016
     

Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)  

Post#138 » by Shak_Celts » Sat Apr 2, 2016 3:09 am

calm down guys, believe or at least wish on a star! :)
NAME ON THE FRONT OF THE JERSEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(!)
User avatar
TMU
Forum Mod - Rockets
Forum Mod - Rockets
Posts: 30,188
And1: 10,413
Joined: Jan 02, 2005
Location: O.R.
       

Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)  

Post#139 » by TMU » Sat Apr 2, 2016 3:09 am

Is Smart always this wreckless? Not a bad start from the Celtics, need to start hitting their shots.
SMTBSI
RealGM
Posts: 15,920
And1: 25,281
Joined: Jun 27, 2014
 

Re: Celtics (43-32) @ Warriors (68-7)  

Post#140 » by SMTBSI » Sat Apr 2, 2016 3:09 am

Smitty731 wrote:Celtics played well. Warriors did not. Warriors are winning. That is why this team is so tough. And near impossible to beat at home.

That's one way of looking at it.

The other is that we found a way to stay close through the first quarter. Now we need to find another way to stay close in the 2nd. Doesn't have to be the same way.

Return to Boston Celtics