ImageImageImageImageImage

The Next Coach (SCOTT BROOKS HIRED pg.13)

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

80sballboy
RealGM
Posts: 24,159
And1: 5,861
Joined: Jul 15, 2006
       

Re: The Next Coach Thread 

Post#201 » by 80sballboy » Wed Apr 20, 2016 11:59 pm

And yes, I've heard about the bad out of bounds plays and wanting to stay with a 9-10 man rotation without change. HOWEVER, Billy Donovan has been looser with his rotations, but his teams have blown countless fourth quarter leads.'

Of course, this is the Wizards and EG and he could be flaying back from Cali with no deal, no Brooks and no Plan B (Horny?). :noway:
JWizmentality
RealGM
Posts: 14,114
And1: 5,128
Joined: Nov 21, 2004
Location: Cosmic Totality
   

Re: The Next Coach Thread 

Post#202 » by JWizmentality » Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:00 am

If we really are shutting out other candidates, Ernie better goddamn know something we don't or.....wait, who the f*ck am I kidding. :nonono:
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,919
And1: 7,906
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: The Next Coach Thread 

Post#203 » by FAH1223 » Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:01 am

I hope Brooks rejects Ernie and goes to Houston once the Rockets are eliminated and Bickerstaff is let go.
Image
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: The Next Coach Thread 

Post#204 » by bondom34 » Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:34 am

Take care of Brooks guys, I miss him. Rather you get him than Houston.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
JWizmentality
RealGM
Posts: 14,114
And1: 5,128
Joined: Nov 21, 2004
Location: Cosmic Totality
   

Re: The Next Coach Thread 

Post#205 » by JWizmentality » Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:45 am

bondom34 wrote:Take care of Brooks guys, I miss him. Rather you get him than Houston.


I'd rather Houston get him than us. If there was ever a time I wanted Morey to be the ultimate ****, it would be now. :lol:
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: The Next Coach Thread 

Post#206 » by bondom34 » Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:47 am

JWizmentality wrote:
bondom34 wrote:Take care of Brooks guys, I miss him. Rather you get him than Houston.


I'd rather Houston get him than us. :lol:

Nah, he's good. Ask the OKC board if you'd like,but we all miss him. You could do so much worse.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
80sballboy
RealGM
Posts: 24,159
And1: 5,861
Joined: Jul 15, 2006
       

Re: The Next Coach Thread 

Post#207 » by 80sballboy » Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:51 am

Seems like Wiz really want him. They are ponying up 5 years, $30-35M according to reports.
80sballboy
RealGM
Posts: 24,159
And1: 5,861
Joined: Jul 15, 2006
       

Re: The Next Coach Thread 

Post#208 » by 80sballboy » Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:52 am

bondom34 wrote:
JWizmentality wrote:
bondom34 wrote:Take care of Brooks guys, I miss him. Rather you get him than Houston.


I'd rather Houston get him than us. :lol:

Nah, he's good. Ask the OKC board if you'd like,but we all miss him. You could do so much worse.


I know Jim Traber (former native of Columbia,Md, ex-Oriole) hated him. Was he overstating things or is he just better than Donovan?
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,919
And1: 7,906
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: The Next Coach Thread 

Post#209 » by FAH1223 » Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:54 am

bondom34 wrote:
JWizmentality wrote:
bondom34 wrote:Take care of Brooks guys, I miss him. Rather you get him than Houston.


I'd rather Houston get him than us. :lol:

Nah, he's good. Ask the OKC board if you'd like,but we all miss him. You could do so much worse.


Our issue is Ernie is hiring him and there's been no interviewing of other candidates like the TWolves just did.

And there's this:

[tweet]https://twitter.com/timbontemps/status/722920618673467392[/tweet]
[tweet]https://twitter.com/adammcginnis/status/722925983213355008[/tweet]

Ernie is never getting fired. I hate this.
Image
JWizmentality
RealGM
Posts: 14,114
And1: 5,128
Joined: Nov 21, 2004
Location: Cosmic Totality
   

Re: The Next Coach Thread 

Post#210 » by JWizmentality » Thu Apr 21, 2016 1:09 am

bondom34 wrote:
JWizmentality wrote:
bondom34 wrote:Take care of Brooks guys, I miss him. Rather you get him than Houston.


I'd rather Houston get him than us. :lol:

Nah, he's good. Ask the OKC board if you'd like,but we all miss him. You could do so much worse.


Oh I'm quite confident he's a massive upgrade over Wittless and a good coach, but it's all about fit and need. I don't believe he's the right fit for our situation. The one flaw I keep hearing over and over, even from you guys is unimaginative. And quite frankly that scares the holy sacrament sh*t out of me. Wittman could coach defense but his offensive schemes were kindergarten. His coaching led to some of the most pitiful, eye gouging quarters of basketball you could ever imagine. Long durations of offensive futility where you literally sit on your couch in utter disbelief at what you're witnessing. We have one of the, if not the most gifted pure PG in the game, yet some of Wittman's offensive schemes involved Bradley Beal initiating the offense and having Wall play off guard!!

This was hair pulling madness because 1) Wall is terrible playing off the ball. He's not a SG and his instincts as such are non-existent and 2) While Beal can be a decent passer at times, his ball handing is rubbish and he's a turnover machine when he has the ball for any extended period of time. Yet Wittman would break out this routine seemingly on a whim which would almost always lead to a Beal turnover before any offense was even initiated. Under no circumstance on God's green earth should you be taking the ball out of Wall's hands as PG. None! Mofo broken hand and all!

This was also the coach who couldn't formulate a single play to get our best 3pt shooter open. Granted, Beal has a lot of deficiencies in that area as well, but Wittman's best solution to this was to have Gortat and Beal play this comical give and go screen at the top of the 3pt line which led to one of two things...a contested Beal mid range which he's terrible at or a turnover which is usually accented with Beal falling over and hurting himself. That was Wittman ball. So when I hear Brooks can't run an offense...I want to cry. :cry:
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: The Next Coach Thread 

Post#211 » by bondom34 » Thu Apr 21, 2016 1:28 am

80sballboy wrote:
bondom34 wrote:
JWizmentality wrote:
I'd rather Houston get him than us. :lol:

Nah, he's good. Ask the OKC board if you'd like,but we all miss him. You could do so much worse.


I know Jim Traber (former native of Columbia,Md, ex-Oriole) hated him. Was he overstating things or is he just better than Donovan?

I'd no doubt take him over Donovan.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: The Next Coach Thread 

Post#212 » by bondom34 » Thu Apr 21, 2016 1:28 am

JWizmentality wrote:
bondom34 wrote:
JWizmentality wrote:
I'd rather Houston get him than us. :lol:

Nah, he's good. Ask the OKC board if you'd like,but we all miss him. You could do so much worse.


Oh I'm quite confident he's a massive upgrade over Wittless and a good coach, but it's all about fit and need. I don't believe he's the right fit for our situation. The one flaw I keep hearing over and over, even from you guys is unimaginative. And quite frankly that scares the holy sacrament sh*t out of me. Wittman could coach defense but his offensive schemes were kindergarten. His coaching led to some of the most pitiful, eye gouging quarters of basketball you could ever imagine. Long durations of offensive futility where you literally sit on your couch in utter disbelief at what you're witnessing. We have one of the, if not the most gifted pure PG in the game, yet some of Wittman's offensive schemes involved Bradley Beal initiating the offense and having Wall play off guard!!

This was hair pulling madness because 1) Wall is terrible playing off the ball. He's not a SG and his instincts as such are non-existent and 2) While Beal can be a decent passer at times, his ball handing is rubbish and he's a turnover machine when he has the ball for any extended period of time. Yet Wittman would break out this routine seemingly on a whim which would almost always lead to a Beal turnover before any offense was even initiated. Under no circumstance on God's green earth should you be taking the ball out of Wall's hands as PG. None! Mofo broken hand and all!

This was also the coach who couldn't formulate a single play to get our best 3pt shooter open. Granted, Beal has a lot of deficiencies in that area as well, but Wittman's best solution to this was to have Gortat and Beal play this comical give and go screen at the top of the 3pt line which led to one of two things...a contested Beal mid range which he's terrible at or a turnover which is usually accented with Beal falling over and hurting himself. That was Wittman ball. So when I hear Brooks can't run an offense...I want to cry. :cry:

I'd still say there's a shot you end up w/ an assistant who can do just that, while Brooks takes care of the rest.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
JWizmentality
RealGM
Posts: 14,114
And1: 5,128
Joined: Nov 21, 2004
Location: Cosmic Totality
   

Re: RE: Re: The Next Coach Thread 

Post#213 » by JWizmentality » Thu Apr 21, 2016 1:51 am

bondom34 wrote:
JWizmentality wrote:
bondom34 wrote:Nah, he's good. Ask the OKC board if you'd like,but we all miss him. You could do so much worse.


Oh I'm quite confident he's a massive upgrade over Wittless and a good coach, but it's all about fit and need. I don't believe he's the right fit for our situation. The one flaw I keep hearing over and over, even from you guys is unimaginative. And quite frankly that scares the holy sacrament sh*t out of me. Wittman could coach defense but his offensive schemes were kindergarten. His coaching led to some of the most pitiful, eye gouging quarters of basketball you could ever imagine. Long durations of offensive futility where you literally sit on your couch in utter disbelief at what you're witnessing. We have one of the, if not the most gifted pure PG in the game, yet some of Wittman's offensive schemes involved Bradley Beal initiating the offense and having Wall play off guard!!

This was hair pulling madness because 1) Wall is terrible playing off the ball. He's not a SG and his instincts as such are non-existent and 2) While Beal can be a decent passer at times, his ball handing is rubbish and he's a turnover machine when he has the ball for any extended period of time. Yet Wittman would break out this routine seemingly on a whim which would almost always lead to a Beal turnover before any offense was even initiated. Under no circumstance on God's green earth should you be taking the ball out of Wall's hands as PG. None! Mofo broken hand and all!

This was also the coach who couldn't formulate a single play to get our best 3pt shooter open. Granted, Beal has a lot of deficiencies in that area as well, but Wittman's best solution to this was to have Gortat and Beal play this comical give and go screen at the top of the 3pt line which led to one of two things...a contested Beal mid range which he's terrible at or a turnover which is usually accented with Beal falling over and hurting himself. That was Wittman ball. So when I hear Brooks can't run an offense...I want to cry. :cry:

I'd still say there's a shot you end up w/ an assistant who can do just that, while Brooks takes care of the rest.

Ha! In a perfect world but ain't no Walgreens around here buddy. We are most likely f*cked.

Sent from my ASUS_Z00AD using Tapatalk
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 26,428
And1: 10,129
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: The Next Coach Thread 

Post#214 » by payitforward » Thu Apr 21, 2016 2:21 am

If Ernie thinks that hiring Brooks is going to bring Durant here, he is nuts.

Of course, I could also say that if Durant comes here because we've hired Brooks, then *Durant* is nuts!
CobraCommander
RealGM
Posts: 26,510
And1: 17,396
Joined: May 01, 2014
       

Re: The Next Coach Thread 

Post#215 » by CobraCommander » Thu Apr 21, 2016 2:25 am

FAH1223 wrote:
bondom34 wrote:
JWizmentality wrote:
I'd rather Houston get him than us. :lol:

Nah, he's good. Ask the OKC board if you'd like,but we all miss him. You could do so much worse.


Our issue is Ernie is hiring him and there's been no interviewing of other candidates like the TWolves just did.

And there's this:

[tweet]https://twitter.com/timbontemps/status/722920618673467392[/tweet]
[tweet]https://twitter.com/adammcginnis/status/722925983213355008[/tweet]

Ernie is never getting fired. I hate this.



PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE tell me Teds people know that Erine is sharing an agent with Brooks? When you only interview one candidate...you are not interviewing the candidate- the candidate is interviewing you. The Wiz have all the leverage here and yet the reports are the Wiz are acting like we NEED Brooks. :nonono:
80sballboy
RealGM
Posts: 24,159
And1: 5,861
Joined: Jul 15, 2006
       

Re: The Next Coach Thread 

Post#216 » by 80sballboy » Thu Apr 21, 2016 3:15 am

payitforward wrote:If Ernie thinks that hiring Brooks is going to bring Durant here, he is nuts.

Of course, I could also say that if Durant comes here because we've hired Brooks, then *Durant* is nuts!


Again, why do people keep putting all of this on Ernie. He's only the f-ing puppet for Ted, whose only plan is to do everything to get KD to come here. None of this coaching carousel matters if they don't improve their roster. As great as Thibs apparently was, he couldn't beat the great Randall Wittman in the playoffs. Hell, we could get the re-incarnation of Red Auerbach, Red Holtzman, Jack Ramsey, Chuck Daily and a young Phil Jackson, Lenny Wilkens and Pat Riley and people would still squash the move. I don't love it but it's definitely an upgrade if it happens, which if course, may not.
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: RE: Re: The Next Coach Thread 

Post#217 » by bondom34 » Thu Apr 21, 2016 4:18 am

JWizmentality wrote:
bondom34 wrote:
JWizmentality wrote:
Oh I'm quite confident he's a massive upgrade over Wittless and a good coach, but it's all about fit and need. I don't believe he's the right fit for our situation. The one flaw I keep hearing over and over, even from you guys is unimaginative. And quite frankly that scares the holy sacrament sh*t out of me. Wittman could coach defense but his offensive schemes were kindergarten. His coaching led to some of the most pitiful, eye gouging quarters of basketball you could ever imagine. Long durations of offensive futility where you literally sit on your couch in utter disbelief at what you're witnessing. We have one of the, if not the most gifted pure PG in the game, yet some of Wittman's offensive schemes involved Bradley Beal initiating the offense and having Wall play off guard!!

This was hair pulling madness because 1) Wall is terrible playing off the ball. He's not a SG and his instincts as such are non-existent and 2) While Beal can be a decent passer at times, his ball handing is rubbish and he's a turnover machine when he has the ball for any extended period of time. Yet Wittman would break out this routine seemingly on a whim which would almost always lead to a Beal turnover before any offense was even initiated. Under no circumstance on God's green earth should you be taking the ball out of Wall's hands as PG. None! Mofo broken hand and all!

This was also the coach who couldn't formulate a single play to get our best 3pt shooter open. Granted, Beal has a lot of deficiencies in that area as well, but Wittman's best solution to this was to have Gortat and Beal play this comical give and go screen at the top of the 3pt line which led to one of two things...a contested Beal mid range which he's terrible at or a turnover which is usually accented with Beal falling over and hurting himself. That was Wittman ball. So when I hear Brooks can't run an offense...I want to cry. :cry:

I'd still say there's a shot you end up w/ an assistant who can do just that, while Brooks takes care of the rest.

Ha! In a perfect world but ain't no Walgreens around here buddy. We are most likely f*cked.

Sent from my ASUS_Z00AD using Tapatalk

I know darn well plenty of Walgreens in VA.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
User avatar
BigA
Analyst
Posts: 3,091
And1: 999
Joined: Oct 05, 2005
Location: Arlington, VA
 

Re: The Next Coach Thread 

Post#218 » by BigA » Thu Apr 21, 2016 10:46 am

CobraCommander wrote:PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE tell me Teds people know that Erine is sharing an agent with Brooks? When you only interview one candidate...you are not interviewing the candidate- the candidate is interviewing you. The Wiz have all the leverage here and yet the reports are the Wiz are acting like we NEED Brooks. :nonono:

All the indications are that the Wizards have NO leverage here. Ernie and/or Ted have locked in on Brooks and will do whatever it takes to get him. Short of Ernie giving up any authority.
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 25,904
And1: 5,125
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: The Next Coach Thread 

Post#219 » by closg00 » Thu Apr 21, 2016 12:12 pm

BigA wrote:
CobraCommander wrote:PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE tell me Teds people know that Erine is sharing an agent with Brooks? When you only interview one candidate...you are not interviewing the candidate- the candidate is interviewing you. The Wiz have all the leverage here and yet the reports are the Wiz are acting like we NEED Brooks. :nonono:

All the indications are that the Wizards have NO leverage here. Ernie and/or Ted have locked in on Brooks and will do whatever it takes to get him. Short of Ernie giving up any authority.


OMG the Wizards are a pathetic organization with no ability to remain cool during these events. Coming to Brooks like a deparate woman wanting marriage, bringing the ring AND dress and telling the guy "there is no one else" FML, Ted and Ernie are THE WORST.
Wait til FA.
80sballboy
RealGM
Posts: 24,159
And1: 5,861
Joined: Jul 15, 2006
       

Re: The Next Coach Thread 

Post#220 » by 80sballboy » Thu Apr 21, 2016 1:16 pm

The Wiz may look desperate, because they are - to get KD in a last-ditch effort. If they wait a few more days, Houston will be out of the playoffs and they could be an option for Brooks (though I'm guessing they completely rebuild around Harden). Lakers also may dump Scott and that's always an elite job even if they are in rebuild mode.

Return to Washington Wizards