Nigel Hayes

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Duke4life831, Marcus

reanimator
Analyst
Posts: 3,387
And1: 1,448
Joined: Jan 31, 2014
     

Re: Nigel Hayes 

Post#21 » by reanimator » Thu Jan 28, 2016 6:36 pm

I think he will be fine at the next level. Just being played in a role not meant for him.
No-Man
RealGM
Posts: 14,879
And1: 3,480
Joined: Feb 11, 2012

Re: Nigel Hayes 

Post#22 » by No-Man » Thu Jan 28, 2016 6:55 pm

Exactly, he is not suppose to be a 1st option, neither a 2nd for that matter, he will be good even as a starter in the right fit for him.
He might chose to stay, although it would be a mistake, next year's class is much more stronger.
User avatar
Cammo101
Mr. Mock Draft
Posts: 30,867
And1: 2,012
Joined: Feb 11, 2006
Location: Austin, TX
     

Re: Nigel Hayes 

Post#23 » by Cammo101 » Thu Jan 28, 2016 7:37 pm

Fischella wrote:Exactly, he is not suppose to be a 1st option, neither a 2nd for that matter, he will be good even as a starter in the right fit for him.
He might chose to stay, although it would be a mistake, next year's class is much more stronger.


Agree 100%.
Coeur
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,805
And1: 669
Joined: Jan 18, 2016

Re: Nigel Hayes 

Post#24 » by Coeur » Thu Apr 14, 2016 4:16 am

Nigel is one of the most underrated guys in this draft. At the 3 he might be the fourth best after Simmons, Ingram, Chriss. That's 1,2 and top 10. Imo Nigel could be a pick in the 20's.

I don't know why so many list him as a pf. I think he'll fit the NBA 3 well.
Johnlac1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,326
And1: 1,605
Joined: Jan 21, 2012
 

Re: Nigel Hayes 

Post#25 » by Johnlac1 » Thu Apr 14, 2016 11:48 pm

Nigel just recently said his plan is to come back to Wisconsin.
Coeur
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,805
And1: 669
Joined: Jan 18, 2016

Re: Nigel Hayes 

Post#26 » by Coeur » Thu Apr 21, 2016 10:12 pm

Nigel is back. No agent so he's not committed but he will be. This guy is a small forward. I think Simmons is a SF and so is Chriss. Both could. Be used as pf's Though. So Nigel is #4 SF, but might be #2 after Ingram if teams consider Simmons and Chriss PF's.

This guy is a stud. I hope one of my teams gets him.

Comments above about Nigel not being the guy to be in a #1 option role are right. But this guy will be a demaree carrol only better.
User avatar
Dr Positivity
RealGM
Posts: 62,959
And1: 16,437
Joined: Apr 29, 2009
       

Re: Nigel Hayes 

Post#27 » by Dr Positivity » Fri Apr 22, 2016 4:05 am

Why is he such a bad rebounder? 6.5 reb/40 for a PF prospect is not just bad, it's hideous
Liberate The Zoomers
Coeur
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,805
And1: 669
Joined: Jan 18, 2016

Re: Nigel Hayes 

Post#28 » by Coeur » Fri Apr 22, 2016 10:25 am

Dr Positivity wrote:Why is he such a bad rebounder? 6.5 reb/40 for a PF prospect is not just bad, it's hideous

He's not a pf in the NBA. Look at him. Watch how much value guys his size and athletic ability on the wing are worth.


Where did you get PF?
User avatar
Moooose
Starter
Posts: 2,362
And1: 203
Joined: Apr 13, 2010
Location: From Way Downtown
 

Re: Nigel Hayes 

Post#29 » by Moooose » Sun Apr 24, 2016 5:00 am

I have a feeling that Hayes will somehow be one of the best bang-for-the-buck players in the NBA. Not necessarily that he becomes an All-Star or anything near that, but this guy will thrive even in limited minutes.
doordoor123
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,776
And1: 1,234
Joined: Jul 23, 2013

Re: Nigel Hayes 

Post#30 » by doordoor123 » Sun Apr 24, 2016 3:25 pm

Moooose wrote:I have a feeling that Hayes will somehow be one of the best bang-for-the-buck players in the NBA. Not necessarily that he becomes an All-Star or anything near that, but this guy will thrive even in limited minutes.


I have the opposite feeling. I have a feeling he's never going to develop much more and be somewhat of a bust. I think he's going to be a career 30% shooter from 3 and he's going to be an average wing defender/average post defender. When I see Hayes play, I think he plays in his head and I think it's going to be a huge detriment to his career. I just don't think he's ever going to have it all there mentally to be consistent or hustle enough on defense. I don't think he's enough of a scorer, enough of a defender and I don't think he's a student of the game enough. I love his tools, but he really needs the perfect coach and environment to reach the most of his ability IMO.
Johnlac1
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,326
And1: 1,605
Joined: Jan 21, 2012
 

Re: Nigel Hayes 

Post#31 » by Johnlac1 » Sun Apr 24, 2016 3:51 pm

While I think he's better off playing another year of college ball, I think Nigel can make it in the pros. For all the criticism he took from Badger fans last year for his poor outside shooting, he was still the best all-around Badger. Easily in my opinion. A number of fans thought Happ came on to overtake him in importance, but Hayes did so many things for the Badgers including things that Happ couldn't do.
I think fiddling with his outside shot during the previous summer threw his shot off. He still looks better shooting a three than Dekker. Compared to Dekker he doesn't quite have Dekker's explosiveness or strength (I don't know about length), but he's close. And he's a smarter player than Dekker. And again despite his poor shooting last year his outside shot doesn't look bad. He just didn't put the ball in hole like he did his first two years.

Return to NBA Draft