This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft
Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman
Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft
- 
               London2Boston
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,128
- And1: 13,003
- Joined: Apr 14, 2014
- 
                        
Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft
I think it is likely it is more than a 2 player draft. Hell the consensus top 2 May not even be the best two players in the end...the problem is that it is an absolute crapshoot outside of the top 2 as to who will end up being THAT guy.
            
                                    
                                    
                        Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft
- 
               RajonsGotARondo
- Junior
- Posts: 428
- And1: 305
- Joined: Feb 16, 2010
- Location: Lincoln, Rhode Island
Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft
Buddy will be the best from this draft class. Rather keep pick draft him...
            
                                    
                                    Miami Heat 2014-2015
Pg: Noris Cole
Sg:
Sf:
Pf:
C: Justin Hamilton
                        Pg: Noris Cole
Sg:
Sf:
Pf:
C: Justin Hamilton
Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft
- Ed Pinkney
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,084
- And1: 5,250
- Joined: Jun 23, 2007
- Location: Australia
- 
                    
Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft
What is the success rate of pre-draft prognostications over the last 30 years?  About 5%?  Maybe less?
I have posted this before, but the lottery is not the ping pong balls, it is the actual draft night itself. The problem is that it usually takes a couple of years to find out if your ticket had the lucky numbers on it or not.
I personally never understand the number of black and white definitive statements that get thrown around at this time of year, Player X is going to be a multiple All Star, Player Y is going to be a bust, Player Z cant do a particular skill at the NBA level etc.
            
                                    
                                    
                        I have posted this before, but the lottery is not the ping pong balls, it is the actual draft night itself. The problem is that it usually takes a couple of years to find out if your ticket had the lucky numbers on it or not.
I personally never understand the number of black and white definitive statements that get thrown around at this time of year, Player X is going to be a multiple All Star, Player Y is going to be a bust, Player Z cant do a particular skill at the NBA level etc.
Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft
- Parliament10
- Forum Mod - Celtics 
- Posts: 51,979
- And1: 61,252
- Joined: Jul 24, 2009
- 
                          
Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft
Ed Pinkney wrote:What is the success rate of pre-draft prognostications over the last 30 years? About 5%? Maybe less?
I have posted this before, but the lottery is not the ping pong balls, it is the actual draft night itself. The problem is that it usually takes a couple of years to find out if your ticket had the lucky numbers on it or not.
I personally never understand the number of black and white definitive statements that get thrown around at this time of year, Player X is going to be a multiple All Star, Player Y is going to be a bust, Player Z cant do a particular skill at the NBA level etc.
You have a very good point.
We have a #60 Draftee, who is our best player.
And a #2 Draftee, who is his backup.
You never know about prospects, until they are actually applied.
"You have to put the work in. 
Nothing is given."
~ Jayson Tatum
                        Nothing is given."
~ Jayson Tatum
Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft
- 
               The Rondo Show
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,588
- And1: 327
- Joined: Mar 16, 2006
Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft
I share your Buddy Hield optimism, though I wouldn't quite put him up there with the top 2 (especially Simmons, not quite as sold on Ingram because I think there's more risk there, but his ceiling is at another level than Hield's).  I do think he's better than the guys he gets lumped in with though and he'd be my clear cut choice at #3 with the possible exception of Bender who I'm not going to pretend I know a lot about, so I'll defer to Ainge on him.
Give me Hield over Murray though, age gap or not. Hield is just the better athlete with the quicker release and will have an easier time creating his shot in the NBA. Think he's got more defensive upside too due to the athleticism advantage, but not sure either will be a real asset at that end. I'm not a huge Kris Dunn fan either, least of all for the Celtics. We have enough young guards with questionable jumpers, and I think Dunn is closer to Smart athletically than he is some of the generational type athletes he sometimes gets compared to like Westbrook or Wall.
Like I said, don't think Hield has the ceiling of a Simmons or Ingram, but his ceiling is still pretty damn high, and I think his ridiculous shooting ability, lightning quick release, solid athleticism and his work ethic/competitiveness give him an extremely high floor. If we can't find a trade for a star at a reasonable price, and if Bender isn't Porzingis 2.0, Hield should definitely be the pick.
            
                                    
                                    
                        Give me Hield over Murray though, age gap or not. Hield is just the better athlete with the quicker release and will have an easier time creating his shot in the NBA. Think he's got more defensive upside too due to the athleticism advantage, but not sure either will be a real asset at that end. I'm not a huge Kris Dunn fan either, least of all for the Celtics. We have enough young guards with questionable jumpers, and I think Dunn is closer to Smart athletically than he is some of the generational type athletes he sometimes gets compared to like Westbrook or Wall.
Like I said, don't think Hield has the ceiling of a Simmons or Ingram, but his ceiling is still pretty damn high, and I think his ridiculous shooting ability, lightning quick release, solid athleticism and his work ethic/competitiveness give him an extremely high floor. If we can't find a trade for a star at a reasonable price, and if Bender isn't Porzingis 2.0, Hield should definitely be the pick.
Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft
- 
               DavorFanCroatia
- Senior
- Posts: 569
- And1: 691
- Joined: Feb 17, 2015
- Location: Varazdin, Croatia
- 
                              
Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft
OldCeltics wrote:Rentier wrote:Bender looks bad to me, how is he better than Zeller or Olynyk in any way? He averaged 3.1 points a game, has limited rebounding and defense, I am obviously missing something.
Bender is not better than Zeller or Olynyk. He is very slow, no fluidity, no touch. Bender's only advantage is his size, and in NBA that means 0.
Man, you are way, way, way off
There's only one statistics that's important: who won...Bill Russell
                        Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft
- 
               jirrit
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,169
- And1: 4,663
- Joined: Mar 01, 2011
- Location: Belgium
Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft
At 28 points per-40, with a 67% TS%, only Doug McDermott can boast having as prolific and efficient season as Hield has in the last 20 years of college basketball.
Hield's perimeter shooting is as good of a place as any to start the conversation about his offensive game. His 147 3-pointers made (in 37 games) was by far the highest mark among all college players this year, and is tied for the highest total mark any college basketball player has achieved since Steph Curry made 162 back in 2008.
I like this about Hield. Maybe I'm more on the Hield-train. Problem is our backcourt is pretty set?
            
                                    
                                    
                        Hield's perimeter shooting is as good of a place as any to start the conversation about his offensive game. His 147 3-pointers made (in 37 games) was by far the highest mark among all college players this year, and is tied for the highest total mark any college basketball player has achieved since Steph Curry made 162 back in 2008.
I like this about Hield. Maybe I'm more on the Hield-train. Problem is our backcourt is pretty set?
Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft
- 
               Ben-N1ce
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,785
- And1: 20,162
- Joined: Jul 18, 2009
- 
                          
Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft
jirrit wrote:At 28 points per-40, with a 67% TS%, only Doug McDermott can boast having as prolific and efficient season as Hield has in the last 20 years of college basketball.
Hield's perimeter shooting is as good of a place as any to start the conversation about his offensive game. His 147 3-pointers made (in 37 games) was by far the highest mark among all college players this year, and is tied for the highest total mark any college basketball player has achieved since Steph Curry made 162 back in 2008.
I like this about Hield. Maybe I'm more on the Hield-train. Problem is our backcourt is pretty set?
I don't see the back court set at all. Avery is the only one that can shoot. I don't know Hield ceiling and I guess that is the problem. The one trait I like is that he does ludicrous work ethic by all accounts. They type of player that can reach whatever ceiling he has. That can minimize screwing up the pick. On top of he obviously can flat out shoot and he has to try to carry an offense and the other team knows that and he still lit them up. I'm anti Bender so for me it's Dunn, Hield or Murray.
Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft
- KFL
- Junior
- Posts: 301
- And1: 300
- Joined: Sep 25, 2006
- 
                            
Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft
I like Hield and Dunn.  I just feel the C's are in a tough position since they really need front court help and well there really isnt any where they are picking.  Hield or Dunn would be good adds but not sure how much they would help right away with so many backcourt players already on this team.
            
                                    
                                    
                        Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft
- 
               jirrit
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,169
- And1: 4,663
- Joined: Mar 01, 2011
- Location: Belgium
Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft
Ben-N1ce wrote:jirrit wrote:At 28 points per-40, with a 67% TS%, only Doug McDermott can boast having as prolific and efficient season as Hield has in the last 20 years of college basketball.
Hield's perimeter shooting is as good of a place as any to start the conversation about his offensive game. His 147 3-pointers made (in 37 games) was by far the highest mark among all college players this year, and is tied for the highest total mark any college basketball player has achieved since Steph Curry made 162 back in 2008.
I like this about Hield. Maybe I'm more on the Hield-train. Problem is our backcourt is pretty set?
I don't see the back court set at all. Avery is the only one that can shoot. I don't know Hield ceiling and I guess that is the problem. The one trait I like is that he does ludicrous work ethic by all accounts. They type of player that can reach whatever ceiling he has. That can minimize screwing up the pick. On top of he obviously can flat out shoot and he has to try to carry an offense and the other team knows that and he still lit them up. I'm anti Bender so for me it's Dunn, Hield or Murray.
IT, Smart, AB, Hield, Rozier.
That's Turner gone I guess (I'm a fan
 ).
).That backcourt gives you defense and offense, no?
Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft
- DakoBarr
- Junior
- Posts: 407
- And1: 151
- Joined: Jun 22, 2010
Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft
I'd rather take the 7' shooter than the 6'4 one.
            
                                    
                                    "That part of the game, that 15-18 foot shot, has virtually disappeared. But this guy, DeRozan, has made it a career." - Tommy Heinsohn
                        Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft
- chakdaddy
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,378
- And1: 1,420
- Joined: Nov 24, 2006
Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft
Parliament10 wrote:Ed Pinkney wrote:What is the success rate of pre-draft prognostications over the last 30 years? About 5%? Maybe less?
I have posted this before, but the lottery is not the ping pong balls, it is the actual draft night itself. The problem is that it usually takes a couple of years to find out if your ticket had the lucky numbers on it or not.
I personally never understand the number of black and white definitive statements that get thrown around at this time of year, Player X is going to be a multiple All Star, Player Y is going to be a bust, Player Z cant do a particular skill at the NBA level etc.
You have a very good point.
We have a #60 Draftee, who is our best player.
And a #2 Draftee, who is his backup.
You never know about prospects, until they are actually applied.
And both are garbage as far as building a team
Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft
- 
               Fencer reregistered
- RealGM
- Posts: 41,075
- And1: 27,938
- Joined: Oct 25, 2006
Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft
jirrit wrote:At 28 points per-40, with a 67% TS%, only Doug McDermott can boast having as prolific and efficient season as Hield has in the last 20 years of college basketball.
Hield's perimeter shooting is as good of a place as any to start the conversation about his offensive game. His 147 3-pointers made (in 37 games) was by far the highest mark among all college players this year, and is tied for the highest total mark any college basketball player has achieved since Steph Curry made 162 back in 2008.
I like this about Hield. Maybe I'm more on the Hield-train. Problem is our backcourt is pretty set?
We could trade one of Bradley or Smart without nuking team chemistry, as long as we keep Thomas and Crowder. And Rozier et al. haven't proved enough to keep us from trading for a star guard or drafting a potential star.
Besides, as others have noted -- all our main guards have contracts that run out in 2 years or less. Crowders the only one of that -- er, of that crowd, who's locked up for a long time.
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
                        Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft
- 
               DarkAzcura
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,876
- And1: 7,337
- Joined: Apr 21, 2006
Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft
chakdaddy wrote:Parliament10 wrote:Ed Pinkney wrote:What is the success rate of pre-draft prognostications over the last 30 years? About 5%? Maybe less?
I have posted this before, but the lottery is not the ping pong balls, it is the actual draft night itself. The problem is that it usually takes a couple of years to find out if your ticket had the lucky numbers on it or not.
I personally never understand the number of black and white definitive statements that get thrown around at this time of year, Player X is going to be a multiple All Star, Player Y is going to be a bust, Player Z cant do a particular skill at the NBA level etc.
You have a very good point.
We have a #60 Draftee, who is our best player.
And a #2 Draftee, who is his backup.
You never know about prospects, until they are actually applied.
And both are garbage as far as building a team
Garbage? Okaaaaay, bud.
Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft
- Parliament10
- Forum Mod - Celtics 
- Posts: 51,979
- And1: 61,252
- Joined: Jul 24, 2009
- 
                          
Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft
DarkAzcura wrote:chakdaddy wrote:Parliament10 wrote:You have a very good point.
We have a #60 Draftee, who is our best player.
And a #2 Draftee, who is his backup.
You never know about prospects, until they are actually applied.
And both are garbage as far as building a team
Garbage? Okaaaaay, bud.
Let me get this Straight. Chakdaddy.
Isaiah Thomas, All-Star
& Evan Turner, 6th-Man
Those two are garbage?
"You have to put the work in. 
Nothing is given."
~ Jayson Tatum
                        Nothing is given."
~ Jayson Tatum
Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft
- chakdaddy
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,378
- And1: 1,420
- Joined: Nov 24, 2006
Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft
Parliament10 wrote:DarkAzcura wrote:chakdaddy wrote:
And both are garbage as far as building a team
Garbage? Okaaaaay, bud.
Let me get this Straight. Chakdaddy.
Isaiah Thomas, All-Star
& Evan Turner, 6th-Man
Those two are garbage?
Scrap heap role players. That's where we got them right? They're treadmill shackles.








