ImageImageImage

This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

London2Boston
RealGM
Posts: 10,128
And1: 13,003
Joined: Apr 14, 2014
     

Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft 

Post#41 » by London2Boston » Wed May 18, 2016 4:18 am

I think it is likely it is more than a 2 player draft. Hell the consensus top 2 May not even be the best two players in the end...the problem is that it is an absolute crapshoot outside of the top 2 as to who will end up being THAT guy.
RajonsGotARondo
Junior
Posts: 428
And1: 305
Joined: Feb 16, 2010
Location: Lincoln, Rhode Island

Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft 

Post#42 » by RajonsGotARondo » Wed May 18, 2016 4:21 am

Buddy will be the best from this draft class. Rather keep pick draft him...
Miami Heat 2014-2015

Pg: Noris Cole
Sg:
Sf:
Pf:
C: Justin Hamilton
User avatar
Ed Pinkney
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,084
And1: 5,250
Joined: Jun 23, 2007
Location: Australia
 

Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft 

Post#43 » by Ed Pinkney » Wed May 18, 2016 4:25 am

What is the success rate of pre-draft prognostications over the last 30 years? About 5%? Maybe less?

I have posted this before, but the lottery is not the ping pong balls, it is the actual draft night itself. The problem is that it usually takes a couple of years to find out if your ticket had the lucky numbers on it or not.

I personally never understand the number of black and white definitive statements that get thrown around at this time of year, Player X is going to be a multiple All Star, Player Y is going to be a bust, Player Z cant do a particular skill at the NBA level etc.
User avatar
Parliament10
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 51,978
And1: 61,244
Joined: Jul 24, 2009
       

Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft 

Post#44 » by Parliament10 » Wed May 18, 2016 4:34 am

Ed Pinkney wrote:What is the success rate of pre-draft prognostications over the last 30 years? About 5%? Maybe less?

I have posted this before, but the lottery is not the ping pong balls, it is the actual draft night itself. The problem is that it usually takes a couple of years to find out if your ticket had the lucky numbers on it or not.

I personally never understand the number of black and white definitive statements that get thrown around at this time of year, Player X is going to be a multiple All Star, Player Y is going to be a bust, Player Z cant do a particular skill at the NBA level etc.

You have a very good point.
We have a #60 Draftee, who is our best player.
And a #2 Draftee, who is his backup.

You never know about prospects, until they are actually applied.
"You have to put the work in.
Nothing is given."

~ Jayson Tatum
The Rondo Show
Analyst
Posts: 3,588
And1: 327
Joined: Mar 16, 2006

Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft 

Post#45 » by The Rondo Show » Wed May 18, 2016 5:08 am

I share your Buddy Hield optimism, though I wouldn't quite put him up there with the top 2 (especially Simmons, not quite as sold on Ingram because I think there's more risk there, but his ceiling is at another level than Hield's). I do think he's better than the guys he gets lumped in with though and he'd be my clear cut choice at #3 with the possible exception of Bender who I'm not going to pretend I know a lot about, so I'll defer to Ainge on him.

Give me Hield over Murray though, age gap or not. Hield is just the better athlete with the quicker release and will have an easier time creating his shot in the NBA. Think he's got more defensive upside too due to the athleticism advantage, but not sure either will be a real asset at that end. I'm not a huge Kris Dunn fan either, least of all for the Celtics. We have enough young guards with questionable jumpers, and I think Dunn is closer to Smart athletically than he is some of the generational type athletes he sometimes gets compared to like Westbrook or Wall.

Like I said, don't think Hield has the ceiling of a Simmons or Ingram, but his ceiling is still pretty damn high, and I think his ridiculous shooting ability, lightning quick release, solid athleticism and his work ethic/competitiveness give him an extremely high floor. If we can't find a trade for a star at a reasonable price, and if Bender isn't Porzingis 2.0, Hield should definitely be the pick.
DavorFanCroatia
Senior
Posts: 569
And1: 691
Joined: Feb 17, 2015
Location: Varazdin, Croatia
         

Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft 

Post#46 » by DavorFanCroatia » Wed May 18, 2016 10:41 am

OldCeltics wrote:
Rentier wrote:Bender looks bad to me, how is he better than Zeller or Olynyk in any way? He averaged 3.1 points a game, has limited rebounding and defense, I am obviously missing something.


Bender is not better than Zeller or Olynyk. He is very slow, no fluidity, no touch. Bender's only advantage is his size, and in NBA that means 0.


Man, you are way, way, way off
There's only one statistics that's important: who won...Bill Russell
jirrit
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,169
And1: 4,663
Joined: Mar 01, 2011
Location: Belgium

Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft 

Post#47 » by jirrit » Wed May 18, 2016 11:39 am

At 28 points per-40, with a 67% TS%, only Doug McDermott can boast having as prolific and efficient season as Hield has in the last 20 years of college basketball.


Hield's perimeter shooting is as good of a place as any to start the conversation about his offensive game. His 147 3-pointers made (in 37 games) was by far the highest mark among all college players this year, and is tied for the highest total mark any college basketball player has achieved since Steph Curry made 162 back in 2008.

I like this about Hield. Maybe I'm more on the Hield-train. Problem is our backcourt is pretty set?
Ben-N1ce
RealGM
Posts: 21,785
And1: 20,162
Joined: Jul 18, 2009
       

Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft 

Post#48 » by Ben-N1ce » Wed May 18, 2016 11:51 am

jirrit wrote:At 28 points per-40, with a 67% TS%, only Doug McDermott can boast having as prolific and efficient season as Hield has in the last 20 years of college basketball.


Hield's perimeter shooting is as good of a place as any to start the conversation about his offensive game. His 147 3-pointers made (in 37 games) was by far the highest mark among all college players this year, and is tied for the highest total mark any college basketball player has achieved since Steph Curry made 162 back in 2008.

I like this about Hield. Maybe I'm more on the Hield-train. Problem is our backcourt is pretty set?


I don't see the back court set at all. Avery is the only one that can shoot. I don't know Hield ceiling and I guess that is the problem. The one trait I like is that he does ludicrous work ethic by all accounts. They type of player that can reach whatever ceiling he has. That can minimize screwing up the pick. On top of he obviously can flat out shoot and he has to try to carry an offense and the other team knows that and he still lit them up. I'm anti Bender so for me it's Dunn, Hield or Murray.
User avatar
KFL
Junior
Posts: 301
And1: 300
Joined: Sep 25, 2006
       

Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft 

Post#49 » by KFL » Wed May 18, 2016 11:59 am

I like Hield and Dunn. I just feel the C's are in a tough position since they really need front court help and well there really isnt any where they are picking. Hield or Dunn would be good adds but not sure how much they would help right away with so many backcourt players already on this team.
jirrit
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,169
And1: 4,663
Joined: Mar 01, 2011
Location: Belgium

Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft 

Post#50 » by jirrit » Wed May 18, 2016 12:22 pm

Ben-N1ce wrote:
jirrit wrote:At 28 points per-40, with a 67% TS%, only Doug McDermott can boast having as prolific and efficient season as Hield has in the last 20 years of college basketball.


Hield's perimeter shooting is as good of a place as any to start the conversation about his offensive game. His 147 3-pointers made (in 37 games) was by far the highest mark among all college players this year, and is tied for the highest total mark any college basketball player has achieved since Steph Curry made 162 back in 2008.

I like this about Hield. Maybe I'm more on the Hield-train. Problem is our backcourt is pretty set?


I don't see the back court set at all. Avery is the only one that can shoot. I don't know Hield ceiling and I guess that is the problem. The one trait I like is that he does ludicrous work ethic by all accounts. They type of player that can reach whatever ceiling he has. That can minimize screwing up the pick. On top of he obviously can flat out shoot and he has to try to carry an offense and the other team knows that and he still lit them up. I'm anti Bender so for me it's Dunn, Hield or Murray.


IT, Smart, AB, Hield, Rozier.

That's Turner gone I guess (I'm a fan ;)).

That backcourt gives you defense and offense, no?
User avatar
DakoBarr
Junior
Posts: 407
And1: 151
Joined: Jun 22, 2010

Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft 

Post#51 » by DakoBarr » Wed May 18, 2016 7:49 pm

I'd rather take the 7' shooter than the 6'4 one.
"That part of the game, that 15-18 foot shot, has virtually disappeared. But this guy, DeRozan, has made it a career." - Tommy Heinsohn
User avatar
chakdaddy
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,378
And1: 1,420
Joined: Nov 24, 2006

Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft 

Post#52 » by chakdaddy » Wed May 18, 2016 7:52 pm

Parliament10 wrote:
Ed Pinkney wrote:What is the success rate of pre-draft prognostications over the last 30 years? About 5%? Maybe less?

I have posted this before, but the lottery is not the ping pong balls, it is the actual draft night itself. The problem is that it usually takes a couple of years to find out if your ticket had the lucky numbers on it or not.

I personally never understand the number of black and white definitive statements that get thrown around at this time of year, Player X is going to be a multiple All Star, Player Y is going to be a bust, Player Z cant do a particular skill at the NBA level etc.

You have a very good point.
We have a #60 Draftee, who is our best player.
And a #2 Draftee, who is his backup.

You never know about prospects, until they are actually applied.


And both are garbage as far as building a team
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 41,070
And1: 27,934
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft 

Post#53 » by Fencer reregistered » Wed May 18, 2016 8:31 pm

jirrit wrote:At 28 points per-40, with a 67% TS%, only Doug McDermott can boast having as prolific and efficient season as Hield has in the last 20 years of college basketball.


Hield's perimeter shooting is as good of a place as any to start the conversation about his offensive game. His 147 3-pointers made (in 37 games) was by far the highest mark among all college players this year, and is tied for the highest total mark any college basketball player has achieved since Steph Curry made 162 back in 2008.

I like this about Hield. Maybe I'm more on the Hield-train. Problem is our backcourt is pretty set?


We could trade one of Bradley or Smart without nuking team chemistry, as long as we keep Thomas and Crowder. And Rozier et al. haven't proved enough to keep us from trading for a star guard or drafting a potential star.

Besides, as others have noted -- all our main guards have contracts that run out in 2 years or less. Crowders the only one of that -- er, of that crowd, who's locked up for a long time.
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
DarkAzcura
General Manager
Posts: 8,876
And1: 7,337
Joined: Apr 21, 2006

Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft 

Post#54 » by DarkAzcura » Wed May 18, 2016 8:35 pm

chakdaddy wrote:
Parliament10 wrote:
Ed Pinkney wrote:What is the success rate of pre-draft prognostications over the last 30 years? About 5%? Maybe less?

I have posted this before, but the lottery is not the ping pong balls, it is the actual draft night itself. The problem is that it usually takes a couple of years to find out if your ticket had the lucky numbers on it or not.

I personally never understand the number of black and white definitive statements that get thrown around at this time of year, Player X is going to be a multiple All Star, Player Y is going to be a bust, Player Z cant do a particular skill at the NBA level etc.

You have a very good point.
We have a #60 Draftee, who is our best player.
And a #2 Draftee, who is his backup.

You never know about prospects, until they are actually applied.


And both are garbage as far as building a team


Garbage? Okaaaaay, bud.
User avatar
Parliament10
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 51,978
And1: 61,244
Joined: Jul 24, 2009
       

Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft 

Post#55 » by Parliament10 » Wed May 18, 2016 8:41 pm

DarkAzcura wrote:
chakdaddy wrote:
Parliament10 wrote:You have a very good point.
We have a #60 Draftee, who is our best player.
And a #2 Draftee, who is his backup.

You never know about prospects, until they are actually applied.


And both are garbage as far as building a team


Garbage? Okaaaaay, bud.

Let me get this Straight. Chakdaddy.

Isaiah Thomas, All-Star
& Evan Turner, 6th-Man

Those two are garbage?
"You have to put the work in.
Nothing is given."

~ Jayson Tatum
User avatar
chakdaddy
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,378
And1: 1,420
Joined: Nov 24, 2006

Re: This is a 3 player draft, not a 2 player draft 

Post#56 » by chakdaddy » Thu May 19, 2016 4:44 am

Parliament10 wrote:
DarkAzcura wrote:
chakdaddy wrote:
And both are garbage as far as building a team


Garbage? Okaaaaay, bud.

Let me get this Straight. Chakdaddy.

Isaiah Thomas, All-Star
& Evan Turner, 6th-Man

Those two are garbage?


Scrap heap role players. That's where we got them right? They're treadmill shackles.

Return to Boston Celtics