ImageImageImage

2016 draft thread: Part 2

Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts

Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,042
And1: 6,061
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#581 » by Devilzsidewalk » Sat May 21, 2016 12:00 am

bwright213 wrote:
john2jer wrote:I'm very high on the Jamal Murray train.

Jamal Murray scored 20ppg on great percentages as a freshman.

There have been 22 seasons in NCAA History scoring 20ppg, taking more than 7.5 3s a game, hitting on better than 40% of 3s and better than 45% from the field. Only 2 were freshman. Steph Curry is the only one who put up a better season than Jamal Murray as a freshman. Murray was 12th no matter the class.

Imagine if he stayed through his senior year.

Other guys I like are Skal Labissiere, Marquese Chriss, Deyonta Davis, Denzel Valentine, Timothe Luwawu, Furkan Korkmaz, Wade Baldwin, and Ben Bentil. not necessarily that order.


I am on the same page, Murray is my top realistic choice (I don't see Bender making it past PHX). I just think his skill set and versatility, especially at his age, is too good pass up. It's too bad that the PF's in this draft class are weak on top end talent.



that physical profile worries me a little bit - I prefer Hield for that reason
Image
User avatar
john2jer
RealGM
Posts: 15,304
And1: 452
Joined: May 26, 2006
Location: State Of Total Awesomeness
 

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#582 » by john2jer » Sat May 21, 2016 12:48 am

Devilzsidewalk wrote:
bwright213 wrote:
john2jer wrote:I'm very high on the Jamal Murray train.

Jamal Murray scored 20ppg on great percentages as a freshman.

There have been 22 seasons in NCAA History scoring 20ppg, taking more than 7.5 3s a game, hitting on better than 40% of 3s and better than 45% from the field. Only 2 were freshman. Steph Curry is the only one who put up a better season than Jamal Murray as a freshman. Murray was 12th no matter the class.

Imagine if he stayed through his senior year.

Other guys I like are Skal Labissiere, Marquese Chriss, Deyonta Davis, Denzel Valentine, Timothe Luwawu, Furkan Korkmaz, Wade Baldwin, and Ben Bentil. not necessarily that order.


I am on the same page, Murray is my top realistic choice (I don't see Bender making it past PHX). I just think his skill set and versatility, especially at his age, is too good pass up. It's too bad that the PF's in this draft class are weak on top end talent.



that physical profile worries me a little bit - I prefer Hield for that reason


Murray's vs Hield's physical profile? I'm baffled by that one considering there isn't much difference, especially considering the 3 year age difference.
basketball royalty wrote:Is Miami considered a big city in the States? I thought guys just went there because of the weather and the bitches?
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,042
And1: 6,061
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#583 » by Devilzsidewalk » Sat May 21, 2016 1:16 am

john2jer wrote:
Devilzsidewalk wrote:
bwright213 wrote:
I am on the same page, Murray is my top realistic choice (I don't see Bender making it past PHX). I just think his skill set and versatility, especially at his age, is too good pass up. It's too bad that the PF's in this draft class are weak on top end talent.



that physical profile worries me a little bit - I prefer Hield for that reason


Murray's vs Hield's physical profile? I'm baffled by that one considering there isn't much difference, especially considering the 3 year age difference.


Hield has 4 inches of reach on him and a ripped sexy body.
Image
User avatar
john2jer
RealGM
Posts: 15,304
And1: 452
Joined: May 26, 2006
Location: State Of Total Awesomeness
 

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#584 » by john2jer » Sat May 21, 2016 1:31 am

Just wait until Jamal Murray goes through puberty.
basketball royalty wrote:Is Miami considered a big city in the States? I thought guys just went there because of the weather and the bitches?
Raymond437
Junior
Posts: 281
And1: 37
Joined: Jul 01, 2013

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#585 » by Raymond437 » Sat May 21, 2016 4:38 am

How about #5 for Noel?
User avatar
Saltine
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,396
And1: 1,002
Joined: Jul 20, 2003
Location: Land o' Lakes
     

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#586 » by Saltine » Sat May 21, 2016 4:53 am

vagelis
Starter
Posts: 2,363
And1: 1,111
Joined: Jan 04, 2015

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#587 » by vagelis » Sat May 21, 2016 9:03 pm

My choices at the fifth selection pick

1)Kris Dunn or Jaylen Brown
3)Buddy Hield
4)Marquesse Chriss
5)Jamal Murray


[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCS5qxOzYa8[/youtube]
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#588 » by Krapinsky » Sat May 21, 2016 11:14 pm

I think Dunn is an average PG prospect that is getting hyped up by being in a weak PG class. No way i take him top 5 and then have him split minutes playing SG. I'd even take Valentine over Dunn.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,474
And1: 12,340
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#589 » by Worm Guts » Sat May 21, 2016 11:59 pm

The only real concern I have with Dunn at SG is the shooting, otherwise he compares favorably to Hield Murray, and Valentine defensively and ability to get to the rim. Of course the Wolves probably need to put extra emphasis on shooting.
User avatar
Takingbaconback
Head Coach
Posts: 6,952
And1: 2,625
Joined: Jun 22, 2013
   

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#590 » by Takingbaconback » Sun May 22, 2016 12:04 am

Dunn is a PG. if he gets drafted by the wolves, he's going to supplant tyus immediately and will look to take over for Rubio in a year or two
vagelis
Starter
Posts: 2,363
And1: 1,111
Joined: Jan 04, 2015

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#591 » by vagelis » Sun May 22, 2016 12:30 am

I agree, Dunn is clear a pg and a good pg.
He is a two way player with offense and defense.
I think that Dunn is a better version of Mudiay and he has some similarities with D.Wade's athleticism.
Jamal Murray is very talented in offence but because of lack of athleticism he seems a mediocre or bad defender.

If we draft Kris Dunn, I think he will start in the lineup from the first year.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,512
And1: 22,900
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#592 » by Klomp » Sun May 22, 2016 2:02 am

If Dunn was better as a shooter, would everyone still insist he is a PG only? I guess I still don't understand why the general consensus is that he's incapable of playing SG.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
C.lupus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,827
And1: 8,857
Joined: Nov 02, 2007

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#593 » by C.lupus » Sun May 22, 2016 2:09 am

Klomp wrote:If Dunn was better as a shooter, would everyone still insist he is a PG only? I guess I still don't understand why the general consensus is that he's incapable of playing SG.

Because A. The 'S' in SG stands for shooting and he's very inconsistent at that, and B. He's undersized - shorter than "undesized" Buddy Hield. He'd probably be fine defensively at either position, though.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,512
And1: 22,900
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#594 » by Klomp » Sun May 22, 2016 2:23 am

C.lupus wrote:
Klomp wrote:If Dunn was better as a shooter, would everyone still insist he is a PG only? I guess I still don't understand why the general consensus is that he's incapable of playing SG.

Because A. The 'S' in SG stands for shooting and he's very inconsistent at that, and B. He's undersized - shorter than "undesized" Buddy Hield. He'd probably be fine defensively at either position, though.

He's the same size as Tony Allen. I guess NBA teams don't know as much as experts here, because apparently Tony Allen should be only capable of playing PG as well. And yet, he's somehow carved out a 12-year career as a SG/SF.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Murphs56
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,699
And1: 1,250
Joined: Nov 13, 2012
       

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#595 » by Murphs56 » Sun May 22, 2016 2:27 am

vagelis wrote:I agree, Dunn is clear a pg and a good pg.
He is a two way player with offense and defense.
I think that Dunn is a better version of Mudiay and he has some similarities with D.Wade's athleticism.
Jamal Murray is very talented in offence but because of lack of athleticism he seems a mediocre or bad defender.

If we draft Kris Dunn, I think he will start in the lineup from the first year.


Agreed. Dunn is the pick for me. Of the 3, Hield/Murray/Dunn, I think he'll be the most coveted. He's got all the measurables you want, and definitely has the most potential to be a 2 way player at the next level. Like you said, Murray's lack of lateral quickness and athleticism scares me about his ability to guard at the next level.
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,474
And1: 12,340
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#596 » by Worm Guts » Sun May 22, 2016 2:34 am

C.lupus wrote:
Klomp wrote:If Dunn was better as a shooter, would everyone still insist he is a PG only? I guess I still don't understand why the general consensus is that he's incapable of playing SG.

Because A. The 'S' in SG stands for shooting and he's very inconsistent at that, and B. He's undersized - shorter than "undesized" Buddy Hield. He'd probably be fine defensively at either position, though.


He has the same wingspan and I would think he's a better defensive prospect even viewed strictly against SG's. He's also the same height as Murray with a much bigger wingspan.
Crazy-Canuck
RealGM
Posts: 29,905
And1: 7,895
Joined: Nov 24, 2003

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#597 » by Crazy-Canuck » Sun May 22, 2016 3:05 am

Watching cojo lockdown irving, i think dunn could bring the same energy and defensive presence.

As bad as the starting unit were defensively this year, the core unit (kat/rubio/wiggs) was also one of the best to start the year. Dunn could be the guy to give us better balance. Murray, hield or elleson would give us more offense, but dunn would help get more wins.

I think dunn and lavine would give us a good 2 headed monster at sg where their games dont overlap.
User avatar
Takingbaconback
Head Coach
Posts: 6,952
And1: 2,625
Joined: Jun 22, 2013
   

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#598 » by Takingbaconback » Sun May 22, 2016 3:16 am

You mean Dunn and Rubio will give us a good 2 headed monster at PG lul. Listening to Dunn talk, the guy is very proud of who he is, and he will be the first one to say that he is a PG. Why would you put Rubio and Dunn together when you can just put Rubio or Dunn with somebody who can flat out shoot the ball?
Murphs56
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,699
And1: 1,250
Joined: Nov 13, 2012
       

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#599 » by Murphs56 » Sun May 22, 2016 3:27 am

Crazy-Canuck wrote:Watching cojo lockdown irving, i think dunn could bring the same energy and defensive presence.

As bad as the starting unit were defensively this year, the core unit (kat/rubio/wiggs) was also one of the best to start the year. Dunn could be the guy to give us better balance. Murray, hield or elleson would give us more offense, but dunn would help get more wins.

I think dunn and lavine would give us a good 2 headed monster at sg where their games dont overlap.


Dunn could help a ton with LaVine's defensive deficiencies. He'll probably be able to guard both positions from day 1.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,512
And1: 22,900
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#600 » by Klomp » Sun May 22, 2016 3:29 am

Takingbaconback wrote:You mean Dunn and Rubio will give us a good 2 headed monster at PG lul. Listening to Dunn talk, the guy is very proud of who he is, and he will be the first one to say that he is a PG. Why would you put Rubio and Dunn together when you can just put Rubio or Dunn with somebody who can flat out shoot the ball?

A Rubio/Dunn backcourt would be a defensive nightmare for other teams to score on. We are capable to score plenty of points. What we need to improve is our defense.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves