ImageImageImage

The Trade Thread: All Eyes Toward The Offseason

Moderators: bwgood77, lilfishi22, Qwigglez

Gorilla Warfare
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,787
And1: 2,326
Joined: Jun 18, 2008
   

Re: The Trade Thread: All Eyes Toward The Offseason 

Post#1741 » by Gorilla Warfare » Tue May 24, 2016 11:21 pm

rsavaj wrote:Lakers fan in the Randle thread on the trade board suggested 13/28/Chandler for Randle.

Yay or nay? I'm thinking yay at this point...not a slam dunk, but he's 21, he's already averaging a double double, and we don't have any long-term prospects at PF. Plus we get out of Chandler's contract.

That extra pick(28) is kind of bothering me, but those late picks rarely pan out anyways, and at least this way you have a young guy you know is productive at the NBA level. Booker/Warren/Randle/Len is a nice young core.


Lakers include #2 pick and I still only say "maybe".
letsgosuns
Veteran
Posts: 2,885
And1: 2,167
Joined: Jan 28, 2014

Re: The Trade Thread: All Eyes Toward The Offseason 

Post#1742 » by letsgosuns » Tue May 24, 2016 11:39 pm

John Gambadoro ‏@Gambo987 1h1 hour ago
For teams interested in moving up for a guard (Dunn/Murray/Hield) expect the Suns to put a high price tag on trading 4 - young star in prime

John Gambadoro ‏@Gambo987 1h1 hour ago
Suns targets in free agency likely to include Al Horford, Nicolas Batum and restricted free agent Harrison Barnes.

Gambo said on the radio the Suns will not trade down and will only trade the pick for a young star in his prime.
User avatar
rsavaj
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,863
And1: 2,767
Joined: May 09, 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

Re: The Trade Thread: All Eyes Toward The Offseason 

Post#1743 » by rsavaj » Tue May 24, 2016 11:40 pm

Gorilla Warfare wrote:
rsavaj wrote:Lakers fan in the Randle thread on the trade board suggested 13/28/Chandler for Randle.

Yay or nay? I'm thinking yay at this point...not a slam dunk, but he's 21, he's already averaging a double double, and we don't have any long-term prospects at PF. Plus we get out of Chandler's contract.

That extra pick(28) is kind of bothering me, but those late picks rarely pan out anyways, and at least this way you have a young guy you know is productive at the NBA level. Booker/Warren/Randle/Len is a nice young core.


Lakers include #2 pick and I still only say "maybe".


lol you wouldn't trade 13/28/Chandler for the #2 pick?

okay sure
User avatar
RaisingArizona
RealGM
Posts: 15,788
And1: 7,669
Joined: Apr 23, 2009
 

Re: The Trade Thread: All Eyes Toward The Offseason 

Post#1744 » by RaisingArizona » Tue May 24, 2016 11:41 pm

letsgosuns wrote:John Gambadoro ‏@Gambo987 1h1 hour ago
For teams interested in moving up for a guard (Dunn/Murray/Hield) expect the Suns to put a high price tag on trading 4 - young star in prime

John Gambadoro ‏@Gambo987 1h1 hour ago
Suns targets in free agency likely to include Al Horford, Nicolas Batum and restricted free agent Harrison Barnes.

Gambo said on the radio the Suns will not trade down and will only trade the pick for a young star in his prime.

I feel like McD is going to totally redeem himself this offseason.
Image
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The Trade Thread: All Eyes Toward The Offseason 

Post#1745 » by WeekapaugGroove » Tue May 24, 2016 11:56 pm

bwgood77 wrote:
rsavaj wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:Swap 28 for 34.


I'd rather have 34 TBH. I know that 6 spots is not an insignificant difference but that 2nd rounder is gonna be on a non-guaranteed deal which is nice.


Not necessarily. It also gives them a chance to leave sooner if they perform well because you don't hold bird rights and might not be able to match an offer that another team gives them. Late picks in THIS draft are gold because they will be among the cheapest contracts in the league and you hold their rights for 4 (and really most likely 8). Also, with first rounders you have team option in the 3rd and 4th years.

People need to get out of the early second is better than a late first mindset. With the new CBA teams have option years now with 1st rounders so they can cut bait quickly (like the suns did with Marshall). Plus getting rid of those picks was popular back when the cap growth was stagnant and almost every team at the end of the draft was up against the luxury tax but with the spike in the cap money isn't a problem anymore so teams actually want these young controlable guys at the end of the first round.
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
jredsaz
General Manager
Posts: 8,898
And1: 3,150
Joined: May 25, 2012
         

Re: Re: Re: The Trade Thread: All Eyes Toward The Offseason 

Post#1746 » by jredsaz » Wed May 25, 2016 12:15 am

letsgosuns wrote:John Gambadoro ‏@Gambo987 1h1 hour ago
For teams interested in moving up for a guard (Dunn/Murray/Hield) expect the Suns to put a high price tag on trading 4 - young star in prime

John Gambadoro ‏@Gambo987 1h1 hour ago
Suns targets in free agency likely to include Al Horford, Nicolas Batum and restricted free agent Harrison Barnes.

Gambo said on the radio the Suns will not trade down and will only trade the pick for a young star in his prime.


Ah, mastering the obvious one segment at a time. Thank you John Gambadoro!

I think Batum is in the teams cross hairs. I just don't think he can turn down a max offer from Charlotte.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,163
And1: 61,009
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: The Trade Thread: All Eyes Toward The Offseason 

Post#1747 » by bwgood77 » Wed May 25, 2016 12:40 am

ginobiliflops wrote:
letsgosuns wrote:John Gambadoro ‏@Gambo987 1h1 hour ago
For teams interested in moving up for a guard (Dunn/Murray/Hield) expect the Suns to put a high price tag on trading 4 - young star in prime

John Gambadoro ‏@Gambo987 1h1 hour ago
Suns targets in free agency likely to include Al Horford, Nicolas Batum and restricted free agent Harrison Barnes.

Gambo said on the radio the Suns will not trade down and will only trade the pick for a young star in his prime.

I feel like McD is going to totally redeem himself this offseason.


You expect one of those free agents to sign with us? I guess since he said "is likely to include" he really doesn't have a clue. I don't want Barnes, and really think Horford is too old and is declining, but kind of fits a need. However, he will have better options and likely stays in Atlanta where they've had a nice team that has gotten to the ECF and second round the last two years and he can get the most money. Then you have Charlotte, who just made the playoffs for the first time in a while, and Batum played a big part and will likely get his max, so I don't see any of those guys going anywhere.

GS seems likely to keep Barnes....at this point I can't really see Durant jumping ship to go there at all, which was the one scenario where they might let Barnes go...I certainly wouldn't throw max money at a guy like that.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,163
And1: 61,009
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: The Trade Thread: All Eyes Toward The Offseason 

Post#1748 » by bwgood77 » Wed May 25, 2016 12:43 am

rsavaj wrote:
Gorilla Warfare wrote:
rsavaj wrote:Lakers fan in the Randle thread on the trade board suggested 13/28/Chandler for Randle.

Yay or nay? I'm thinking yay at this point...not a slam dunk, but he's 21, he's already averaging a double double, and we don't have any long-term prospects at PF. Plus we get out of Chandler's contract.

That extra pick(28) is kind of bothering me, but those late picks rarely pan out anyways, and at least this way you have a young guy you know is productive at the NBA level. Booker/Warren/Randle/Len is a nice young core.


Lakers include #2 pick and I still only say "maybe".


lol you wouldn't trade 13/28/Chandler for the #2 pick?

okay sure


He's joking. Though I don't know if that means he would do the Randle deal and doesn't realize he can't play D and has a terrible shot...mostly shoots from short range and still under 43%.
User avatar
thamadkant
Suns Forum Picker of Cherries
Posts: 16,916
And1: 8,599
Joined: Jan 06, 2007
 

Re: The Trade Thread: All Eyes Toward The Offseason 

Post#1749 » by thamadkant » Wed May 25, 2016 1:01 am

That McD Gambo piece about pick 4 for star in his prime...

Paul George
Jimmy Butler
Demarcus Cousins


comes to mind.

I think Kings are going for a fast tempo run and gun 3pt shooting team.... so they will be interested in Jamal Murray.
carey
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,192
And1: 1,941
Joined: Feb 12, 2009
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana
     

Re: Re: Re: The Trade Thread: All Eyes Toward The Offseason 

Post#1750 » by carey » Wed May 25, 2016 1:04 am

jredsaz wrote:
Suns targets in free agency likely to include Al Horford, Nicolas Batum and restricted free agent Harrison Barnes.

Gambo said on the radio the Suns will not trade down and will only trade the pick for a young star in his prime.


Ah, mastering the obvious one segment at a time. Thank you John Gambadoro!

I think Batum is in the teams cross hairs. I just don't think he can turn down a max offer from Charlotte.


Here's a list of guys that will be UFAs or have a player option they will likely turn down to become a UFA.

Durant, LBJ, Whiteside, DeRozan, Conley, Horford, Howard, Wade, Gasol, Parsons, Dirk, Rondo, Batum, Big Al, Ryno, Noah, Biyombo, E. Turner, Lin, Bazemore, and Deng.

The only guys that we could potentially get that make sense for the team are Horford, Batum (maybe not that much sense though,) and Ryno.

Here's a list of RFAs.

Drummond, Beal, Barnes, Clarkson, Ezili, Fournier, and Sullinger.

Barnes is the only guy on that list that is gettable, and really you can argue on whether or not he makes sense.

So I doubt Gambo has any sources on this one, just a cursory glance at the list of FAs and you can make your own conclusions.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,163
And1: 61,009
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: The Trade Thread: All Eyes Toward The Offseason 

Post#1751 » by bwgood77 » Wed May 25, 2016 1:27 am

1UPZ wrote:That McD Gambo piece about pick 4 for star in his prime...

Paul George
Jimmy Butler
Demarcus Cousins


comes to mind.

I think Kings are going for a fast tempo run and gun 3pt shooting team.... so they will be interested in Jamal Murray.


Yeah, but are you sure Cousins is enough for #4? Maybe they should also throw in #8? And why haven't you added all the other all stars to your list yet?
letsgosuns
Veteran
Posts: 2,885
And1: 2,167
Joined: Jan 28, 2014

Re: The Trade Thread: All Eyes Toward The Offseason 

Post#1752 » by letsgosuns » Wed May 25, 2016 1:36 am

I think the only guy realistically available is Jimmy Butler. It would probably take the first or second pick of the draft to get George and the Suns do not have that. I do not really care what it would take to get Cousins because I do not want him anyway.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,163
And1: 61,009
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: The Trade Thread: All Eyes Toward The Offseason 

Post#1753 » by bwgood77 » Wed May 25, 2016 1:58 am

letsgosuns wrote:I think the only guy realistically available is Jimmy Butler. It would probably take the first or second pick of the draft to get George and the Suns do not have that. I do not really care what it would take to get Cousins because I do not want him anyway.


I agree Butler is the only one.

I was also just looking at Barnes #s. The guy averaged less than 12 pts, 5 rebounds per game this year. It's not like he was lights out from 3 either...he shot 38%. I know PER isn't a great advanced metric, but 15 is supposed to be an avg player and he had a 12.3 PER this year. He played a little under 31 minutes a game. He also started 59 games, and was probably more wide open for shots due to the attention others get...also had good passers finding him in Curry and Green. He also shot 46% from the field.

Conversely, TJ Warren played a little under 23 minutes per game. He scored 11 pts, over 3 boards a game. Over 50% from the field and 40% from 3. PER of 15.9.

TJ Warren has played a year and a half, and not much his first year, and of course injured most of his second, and Barnes has played 4, and arguably TJ is already better. The numbers point to that.

Plus, I don't think Barnes will be as good if he's not playing with Curry, Thompson and Green. Warren is only going to get better with more minutes and more refining of his game and defense.

If we go after a guy like Barnes, first of all I think it's a mistake and would likely be a massive overpay, but it's also kind of unfair to Warren, who has earned his chance and is already just about as good, if not better.

Here are their side by side #s this year.

http://bkref.com/tiny/RQwUX
User avatar
saintEscaton
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,996
And1: 2,865
Joined: Jan 31, 2015
Location: The Sonoran
         

Re: The Trade Thread: All Eyes Toward The Offseason 

Post#1754 » by saintEscaton » Wed May 25, 2016 2:15 am

how much meaningful ball has TJ played ? Althoug he shown a knack for lighting up the Dubs in garbage time when the game gets outta hand. Comparing them is laughable at this point, but I agree bwgood that he will be a roadblock . Barnes is a glue guy/product of the system undeserving of a max.
Jonestown Suicide Squad

[. Sign the Petition To Force Sarver Into Selling Our Team

https://www.change.org/p/robert-sarver-sell-the-phoenix-suns-basketball-team-2

Image
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,163
And1: 61,009
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: The Trade Thread: All Eyes Toward The Offseason 

Post#1755 » by bwgood77 » Wed May 25, 2016 2:39 am

saintEscaton wrote:how much meaningful ball has TJ played ? Althoug he shown a knack for lighting up the Dubs in garbage time when the game gets outta hand. Comparing them is laughable at this point, but I agree bwgood that he will be a roadblock . Barnes is a glue guy/product of the system undeserving of a max.


I don't know, but I certainly wouldn't count him out yet. Even if GMAT's and later your comparison to him becoming a Ceballos type player comes to fruition, I'll take it. But he already is a better long range shooter than Ced ever was. Ceballos did average over 21 and 8 one year, and hovered around 20 and 7 for a few years.

Now I could see Warren doing that, and if he can get there, he could probably do it for awhile.

But comparisons are probably bit early. That was kind of the point though...I'd like to see what he can do...we are young and if Sarver can accept it, rebuilding. Booker looked great for awhile and everyone is excited because he got an opportunity to start for awhile.

I'd like to see TJ get that chance so we can see what he can do. He was drafted in the same spot in a better draft...or I guess maybe a spot later.

But I really just don't want to vastly overpay guys who are average at best, like Barnes.
Cactus Jack
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Posts: 32,928
And1: 16,515
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
Location: The Last of Us Part II
       

Re: Re: Re: The Trade Thread: All Eyes Toward The Offseason 

Post#1756 » by Cactus Jack » Wed May 25, 2016 3:21 am

letsgosuns wrote:John Gambadoro ‏@Gambo987 1h1 hour ago
For teams interested in moving up for a guard (Dunn/Murray/Hield) expect the Suns to put a high price tag on trading 4 - young star in prime

Gambo said on the radio the Suns will not trade down and will only trade the pick for a young star in his prime.

Good.
Dominater wrote:Damn Cactus jack takin over
Cactus Jack
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Posts: 32,928
And1: 16,515
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
Location: The Last of Us Part II
       

Re: Re: Re: The Trade Thread: All Eyes Toward The Offseason 

Post#1757 » by Cactus Jack » Wed May 25, 2016 3:22 am

rsavaj wrote:
Gorilla Warfare wrote:
rsavaj wrote:Lakers fan in the Randle thread on the trade board suggested 13/28/Chandler for Randle.

Yay or nay? I'm thinking yay at this point...not a slam dunk, but he's 21, he's already averaging a double double, and we don't have any long-term prospects at PF. Plus we get out of Chandler's contract.

That extra pick(28) is kind of bothering me, but those late picks rarely pan out anyways, and at least this way you have a young guy you know is productive at the NBA level. Booker/Warren/Randle/Len is a nice young core.


Lakers include #2 pick and I still only say "maybe".


lol you wouldn't trade 13/28/Chandler for the #2 pick?

okay sure

He's bluffing. :lol:
Dominater wrote:Damn Cactus jack takin over
Gorilla Warfare
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,787
And1: 2,326
Joined: Jun 18, 2008
   

Re: The Trade Thread: All Eyes Toward The Offseason 

Post#1758 » by Gorilla Warfare » Wed May 25, 2016 3:32 am

Give me Jimmy Butler and Al Horford and call it an offseason.
OGBAH
Senior
Posts: 551
And1: 312
Joined: May 25, 2016
   

Re: The Trade Thread: All Eyes Toward The Offseason 

Post#1759 » by OGBAH » Wed May 25, 2016 4:20 am

Chandler
Horford
Tucker
Knight
Bledsoe

3 defensive players 3 scorers...maybe it could work
TeamTragic
General Manager
Posts: 9,000
And1: 7,028
Joined: Feb 18, 2015
 

Re: The Trade Thread: All Eyes Toward The Offseason 

Post#1760 » by TeamTragic » Wed May 25, 2016 4:22 am

OGBAH wrote:Chandler
Horford
Tucker
Knight
Bledsoe

3 defensive players 3 scorers...maybe it could work


Sure. Just remove Knight/Tucker and it will work perfectly.

Return to Phoenix Suns