Worst contract so far?

Moderators: KingDavid, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, ken6199, infinite11285, Clav, Dirk, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27

KL78192020
RealGM
Posts: 13,840
And1: 14,789
Joined: Apr 19, 2009

Re: Worst contract so far? 

Post#121 » by KL78192020 » Sat Jul 2, 2016 4:27 pm

The worst is yet to come..."Harrison Barnes signs for 5/$130" realgm in shambles..
DeezRaptors
Junior
Posts: 378
And1: 145
Joined: Nov 15, 2015
     

Re: Re: Worst contract so far? 

Post#122 » by DeezRaptors » Sat Jul 2, 2016 6:01 pm

Veggamattic wrote:I say it's Mozgov. I watched a bunch of film on their rookie Zubac and I think he is already as good as Mozgov who has already started his decline. They didn't need him.

That's false. Mozgov didnt get playing time much last year cause the Cavs used a different style. Hos first year with them he played well. The Lakers hsd to use 90% of the cap space this yesr so they had to sign someone to fill that in so they dont get penalized.
DrClutch
Junior
Posts: 295
And1: 23
Joined: Jul 22, 2013
         

Re: Worst contract so far? 

Post#123 » by DrClutch » Sat Jul 2, 2016 6:39 pm

Duffman100 wrote:I don't get the Derozan. We're getting him from 26-31 (his prime). He's a 23, 4 and 4 guy with a high usage (granted not great efficiency).

The contract isn't great, but it isn't close to the worst contracts being handed out this offseason.


If you saw the playoffs he was a no show, derozan struggles to make shot & play d ... DC benched him couple of times so raps would get back in game... yeah he's still young but we'll see if getting 45 mill extra pays off
User avatar
Duffman100
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 48,329
And1: 73,148
Joined: Jun 27, 2002
   

Re: Worst contract so far? 

Post#124 » by Duffman100 » Sat Jul 2, 2016 7:01 pm

DrClutch wrote:
Duffman100 wrote:I don't get the Derozan. We're getting him from 26-31 (his prime). He's a 23, 4 and 4 guy with a high usage (granted not great efficiency).

The contract isn't great, but it isn't close to the worst contracts being handed out this offseason.


If you saw the playoffs he was a no show, derozan struggles to make shot & play d ... DC benched him couple of times so raps would get back in game... yeah he's still young but we'll see if getting 45 mill extra pays off


He actually improved as the playoffs went on.
Austincys21
Veteran
Posts: 2,613
And1: 733
Joined: Apr 10, 2013
   

Re: Worst contract so far? 

Post#125 » by Austincys21 » Sat Jul 2, 2016 7:10 pm

Grizzles overall... Although if they can finally stay healthy always needed a shooter. Parsons can hurt or really really help them.

Conley
Allen
Parsons
Zbo
Gasol

Can be ok ecspevially with Vogel. But dam that money
GopherIt!
RealGM
Posts: 10,605
And1: 24,752
Joined: Oct 20, 2007
Location: bird watching
Contact:

Re: Worst contract so far? 

Post#126 » by GopherIt! » Sat Jul 2, 2016 9:26 pm

Mike Conley: $153M
NBA free agent contracts: $1.75B
Armchair GM'ing from my mom's basement: priceless
User avatar
Viper1500
Head Coach
Posts: 6,924
And1: 2,801
Joined: Apr 15, 2009
Location: Orlando, FL
   

Re: Worst contract so far? 

Post#127 » by Viper1500 » Sat Jul 2, 2016 9:28 pm

Austincys21 wrote:Grizzles overall... Although if they can finally stay healthy always needed a shooter. Parsons can hurt or really really help them.

Conley
Allen
Parsons
Zbo
Gasol

Can be ok ecspevially with Vogel.
But dam that money

what?
Austincys21
Veteran
Posts: 2,613
And1: 733
Joined: Apr 10, 2013
   

Re: Worst contract so far? 

Post#128 » by Austincys21 » Sun Jul 3, 2016 4:35 am

Viper1500 wrote:
Austincys21 wrote:Grizzles overall... Although if they can finally stay healthy always needed a shooter. Parsons can hurt or really really help them.

Conley
Allen
Parsons
Zbo
Gasol

Can be ok ecspevially with Vogel.
But dam that money

what?



Didn't they hire Vogel. The Pacers ex coach ?
Rapaz
RealGM
Posts: 11,429
And1: 43,573
Joined: Jun 12, 2014

Re: Worst contract so far? 

Post#129 » by Rapaz » Sun Jul 3, 2016 4:51 am

Austincys21 wrote:
Viper1500 wrote:
Austincys21 wrote:Grizzles overall... Although if they can finally stay healthy always needed a shooter. Parsons can hurt or really really help them.

Conley
Allen
Parsons
Zbo
Gasol

Can be ok ecspevially with Vogel.
But dam that money

what?



Didn't they hire Vogel. The Pacers ex coach ?

Orlando hired Vogel. Memphis hired this fine woman's husband:

Image
User avatar
Capn'O
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 90,863
And1: 111,121
Joined: Dec 16, 2005
Location: Bone Goal
 

Re: Worst contract so far? 

Post#130 » by Capn'O » Sun Jul 3, 2016 6:19 am

Doctor MJ wrote:Re: Noah. The size of the contract doesn't bother me, and I totally get why Jackson would want to take a shot at Noah - he's a beautiful passer and Phil loves those...but the way the Knicks basically continue to double down on a core more focused on Melo than KP to me screams that they are about to fall into the same trap they always fall into.

Before KP was such a hit, I would have merely sighed because it's not like I saw anything else enticing to do with the roster. But once you get someone like KP, that's your new franchise. Fine to keep Melo, particularly since you may not have a choice, but working to build around Melo's biological clock is precisely what you don't want your GM to do. It could be Dolan of course, but the additional concerns is that we may end up concluding that as a GM, Phil Jackson is a heck of a coach.

(Of course, a heck of a coach to me seems like he wouldn't be salivating over this team either, but I'll give Phil and his 11 rings the benefit of the doubt on that one.)


What Phil is saying publicly is that he doesn't want to put KP in a losing situation early in his career and have him get accustomed to it. A guy like Noah, in particular, is a winner and is actually a great stylistic fit next to KP as an elite rebounder, defender, and passer. He's a mentor to the Knicks' young slew of bigs as well as a guy that can still anchor a defense. I think there is some merit in that.

That said, Zach Lowe reported yesterday that the Knicks entertained Melo deals but once Cleveland won it all (and will likely stand pat) there really wasn't a destination that he would agree to. So Melo's here and has dug his heels in on that matter. The Rose move is much more of a "Melo timeline" move than the Noah one imo. I can tell you right here that the Knicks successes depend a lot more on Derrick Rose's health than Joakim Noah one way or another. At this point in his career, Joakim can put a good team with scoring over the top but if you don't have elite offensive players with him he's less effective. Without Rose, they will have trouble scoring and particularly so when Melo is on the bench.

At the end of the day, free agency isn't really the place to get KP a running mate on his timeline. You do it through the draft or via trading young players and the Knicks were bereft of their picks this year. Now, they have all their firsts going forward and what projects to be a decent second from the Bulls. So I think Phil figured that you get Rose. If he's healthy, you have a good year. If he's not, you probably don't and maybe you have a chance of getting that guy in next year's stacked draft. If that happens, having a vet like Noah still helps in the long term. Melo's happy because you tried. The environment is good.
BAF Clippers:
UNDER CONSTRUCTION - PLEASE INQUIRE WITHIN

:beer:
User avatar
deanwoof
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,095
And1: 811
Joined: Nov 26, 2008
Location: Portland

Re: Worst contract so far? 

Post#131 » by deanwoof » Sun Jul 3, 2016 6:25 am

Rapaz wrote:
Austincys21 wrote:
Viper1500 wrote:what?



Didn't they hire Vogel. The Pacers ex coach ?

Orlando hired Vogel. Memphis hired this fine woman's husband:

Image

Almost looks like she has a dick or a tail
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,882
And1: 22,820
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: Worst contract so far? 

Post#132 » by Doctor MJ » Sun Jul 3, 2016 7:57 pm

Capn'O wrote:
Doctor MJ wrote:Re: Noah. The size of the contract doesn't bother me, and I totally get why Jackson would want to take a shot at Noah - he's a beautiful passer and Phil loves those...but the way the Knicks basically continue to double down on a core more focused on Melo than KP to me screams that they are about to fall into the same trap they always fall into.

Before KP was such a hit, I would have merely sighed because it's not like I saw anything else enticing to do with the roster. But once you get someone like KP, that's your new franchise. Fine to keep Melo, particularly since you may not have a choice, but working to build around Melo's biological clock is precisely what you don't want your GM to do. It could be Dolan of course, but the additional concerns is that we may end up concluding that as a GM, Phil Jackson is a heck of a coach.

(Of course, a heck of a coach to me seems like he wouldn't be salivating over this team either, but I'll give Phil and his 11 rings the benefit of the doubt on that one.)


What Phil is saying publicly is that he doesn't want to put KP in a losing situation early in his career and have him get accustomed to it. A guy like Noah, in particular, is a winner and is actually a great stylistic fit next to KP as an elite rebounder, defender, and passer. He's a mentor to the Knicks' young slew of bigs as well as a guy that can still anchor a defense. I think there is some merit in that.

That said, Zach Lowe reported yesterday that the Knicks entertained Melo deals but once Cleveland won it all (and will likely stand pat) there really wasn't a destination that he would agree to. So Melo's here and has dug his heels in on that matter. The Rose move is much more of a "Melo timeline" move than the Noah one imo. I can tell you right here that the Knicks successes depend a lot more on Derrick Rose's health than Joakim Noah one way or another. At this point in his career, Joakim can put a good team with scoring over the top but if you don't have elite offensive players with him he's less effective. Without Rose, they will have trouble scoring and particularly so when Melo is on the bench.

At the end of the day, free agency isn't really the place to get KP a running mate on his timeline. You do it through the draft or via trading young players and the Knicks were bereft of their picks this year. Now, they have all their firsts going forward and what projects to be a decent second from the Bulls. So I think Phil figured that you get Rose. If he's healthy, you have a good year. If he's not, you probably don't and maybe you have a chance of getting that guy in next year's stacked draft. If that happens, having a vet like Noah still helps in the long term. Melo's happy because you tried. The environment is good.


Good post.

I think the fundamental issue I have isn't that they should be going after guys in free agency around KP's age because you're right that's not possible, rather it's that if you know KP is your franchise, you need to make sure you're not doing anything that may make it harder to build around him.

If everything goes perfectly with these signings it won't be an issue. You'll have a team that isn't a serious contender, but it's at least good, and that and the draw of New York will help sign other guys to actually help KP when the time comes.

But of course, we haven't seen things go perfectly for the Knicks in a long time for a reason. I look at Rose and Noah and see that at best they help the team still-not-win-titles, and at worst, they continue to leave the team paying too much for guys who aren't helping at all.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
User avatar
Grits n Gravy
General Manager
Posts: 9,627
And1: 1,804
Joined: Feb 22, 2010
Location: New Zealand
 

Re: Worst contract so far? 

Post#133 » by Grits n Gravy » Sun Jul 3, 2016 8:25 pm

Rapaz wrote:
Austincys21 wrote:
Viper1500 wrote:what?



Didn't they hire Vogel. The Pacers ex coach ?

Orlando hired Vogel. Memphis hired this fine woman's husband:

Image

Dam Fizz - Eva Mendes look a like
User avatar
rcfc1
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,043
And1: 1,586
Joined: Oct 16, 2012
     

Re: Worst contract so far? 

Post#134 » by rcfc1 » Sun Jul 3, 2016 8:28 pm

I've basically been projectile vomiting nonstop since free agency opened.
floppymoose wrote:I'm starting to see the value of adding Durant.
User avatar
Capn'O
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 90,863
And1: 111,121
Joined: Dec 16, 2005
Location: Bone Goal
 

Re: Worst contract so far? 

Post#135 » by Capn'O » Sun Jul 3, 2016 9:52 pm

Doctor MJ wrote:
Capn'O wrote:
Doctor MJ wrote:Re: Noah. The size of the contract doesn't bother me, and I totally get why Jackson would want to take a shot at Noah - he's a beautiful passer and Phil loves those...but the way the Knicks basically continue to double down on a core more focused on Melo than KP to me screams that they are about to fall into the same trap they always fall into.

Before KP was such a hit, I would have merely sighed because it's not like I saw anything else enticing to do with the roster. But once you get someone like KP, that's your new franchise. Fine to keep Melo, particularly since you may not have a choice, but working to build around Melo's biological clock is precisely what you don't want your GM to do. It could be Dolan of course, but the additional concerns is that we may end up concluding that as a GM, Phil Jackson is a heck of a coach.

(Of course, a heck of a coach to me seems like he wouldn't be salivating over this team either, but I'll give Phil and his 11 rings the benefit of the doubt on that one.)


What Phil is saying publicly is that he doesn't want to put KP in a losing situation early in his career and have him get accustomed to it. A guy like Noah, in particular, is a winner and is actually a great stylistic fit next to KP as an elite rebounder, defender, and passer. He's a mentor to the Knicks' young slew of bigs as well as a guy that can still anchor a defense. I think there is some merit in that.

That said, Zach Lowe reported yesterday that the Knicks entertained Melo deals but once Cleveland won it all (and will likely stand pat) there really wasn't a destination that he would agree to. So Melo's here and has dug his heels in on that matter. The Rose move is much more of a "Melo timeline" move than the Noah one imo. I can tell you right here that the Knicks successes depend a lot more on Derrick Rose's health than Joakim Noah one way or another. At this point in his career, Joakim can put a good team with scoring over the top but if you don't have elite offensive players with him he's less effective. Without Rose, they will have trouble scoring and particularly so when Melo is on the bench.

At the end of the day, free agency isn't really the place to get KP a running mate on his timeline. You do it through the draft or via trading young players and the Knicks were bereft of their picks this year. Now, they have all their firsts going forward and what projects to be a decent second from the Bulls. So I think Phil figured that you get Rose. If he's healthy, you have a good year. If he's not, you probably don't and maybe you have a chance of getting that guy in next year's stacked draft. If that happens, having a vet like Noah still helps in the long term. Melo's happy because you tried. The environment is good.


Good post.

I think the fundamental issue I have isn't that they should be going after guys in free agency around KP's age because you're right that's not possible, rather it's that if you know KP is your franchise, you need to make sure you're not doing anything that may make it harder to build around him.

If everything goes perfectly with these signings it won't be an issue. You'll have a team that isn't a serious contender, but it's at least good, and that and the draw of New York will help sign other guys to actually help KP when the time comes.

But of course, we haven't seen things go perfectly for the Knicks in a long time for a reason. I look at Rose and Noah and see that at best they help the team still-not-win-titles, and at worst, they continue to leave the team paying too much for guys who aren't helping at all.


I don't disagree. In any event - Melo/KP is the Great Knick Tension right now. In some sense, it's a good problem to have in that it means the Knicks actually drafted a franchise player and plan to keep him and Melo is still a force on offense. They get along really well with KP learning a lot from Melo. But at some point something has to give if it doesn't lead to _some_ on court success. I wonder what happens if/when Rose breaks down. Does Melo make the call then and waive his NTC* or is he hunkering down for the long haul? Stay tuned!

*
Spoiler:
I do like that Clarkson contract. He can be a piece of it :-D
BAF Clippers:
UNDER CONSTRUCTION - PLEASE INQUIRE WITHIN

:beer:
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,882
And1: 22,820
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: Worst contract so far? 

Post#136 » by Doctor MJ » Sun Jul 3, 2016 10:24 pm

Capn'O wrote:
Doctor MJ wrote:
Capn'O wrote:
What Phil is saying publicly is that he doesn't want to put KP in a losing situation early in his career and have him get accustomed to it. A guy like Noah, in particular, is a winner and is actually a great stylistic fit next to KP as an elite rebounder, defender, and passer. He's a mentor to the Knicks' young slew of bigs as well as a guy that can still anchor a defense. I think there is some merit in that.

That said, Zach Lowe reported yesterday that the Knicks entertained Melo deals but once Cleveland won it all (and will likely stand pat) there really wasn't a destination that he would agree to. So Melo's here and has dug his heels in on that matter. The Rose move is much more of a "Melo timeline" move than the Noah one imo. I can tell you right here that the Knicks successes depend a lot more on Derrick Rose's health than Joakim Noah one way or another. At this point in his career, Joakim can put a good team with scoring over the top but if you don't have elite offensive players with him he's less effective. Without Rose, they will have trouble scoring and particularly so when Melo is on the bench.

At the end of the day, free agency isn't really the place to get KP a running mate on his timeline. You do it through the draft or via trading young players and the Knicks were bereft of their picks this year. Now, they have all their firsts going forward and what projects to be a decent second from the Bulls. So I think Phil figured that you get Rose. If he's healthy, you have a good year. If he's not, you probably don't and maybe you have a chance of getting that guy in next year's stacked draft. If that happens, having a vet like Noah still helps in the long term. Melo's happy because you tried. The environment is good.


Good post.

I think the fundamental issue I have isn't that they should be going after guys in free agency around KP's age because you're right that's not possible, rather it's that if you know KP is your franchise, you need to make sure you're not doing anything that may make it harder to build around him.

If everything goes perfectly with these signings it won't be an issue. You'll have a team that isn't a serious contender, but it's at least good, and that and the draw of New York will help sign other guys to actually help KP when the time comes.

But of course, we haven't seen things go perfectly for the Knicks in a long time for a reason. I look at Rose and Noah and see that at best they help the team still-not-win-titles, and at worst, they continue to leave the team paying too much for guys who aren't helping at all.


I don't disagree. In any event - Melo/KP is the Great Knick Tension right now. In some sense, it's a good problem to have in that it means the Knicks actually drafted a franchise player and plan to keep him and Melo is still a force on offense. They get along really well with KP learning a lot from Melo. But at some point something has to give if it doesn't lead to _some_ on court success. I wonder what happens if/when Rose breaks down. Does Melo make the call then and waive his NTC* or is he hunkering down for the long haul? Stay tuned!

*
Spoiler:
I do like that Clarkson contract. He can be a piece of it :-D


The thing about that tension is that it was there even before they got KP. If Phil was really looking to patiently build a healthy context in New York in contrast to what everyone's done in NY for the past decade plus, it didn't make sense to re-sign Melo at all. They re-signed him because they didn't have anything else going for them, and now they are signing more guys basically because otherwise you have to acknowledge re-signing Melo was a mistake.

So yeah, all of this would be true even if KP were a bust, but I had hoped that KP being such a hit would let Phil gracefully pull the franchise away from brink, and instead to me it just looks like they literally weren't prepared to actually capitalize in the event that their high draft picks weren't busts.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
Ballerhogger
RealGM
Posts: 47,741
And1: 17,306
Joined: Jul 06, 2014
       

Re: Worst contract so far? 

Post#137 » by Ballerhogger » Sun Jul 3, 2016 10:26 pm

i think Noah is the worst. He's a older defender with no offensive at all. Mosgov is pretty bad but i think he can have good year as starting player.
User avatar
Capn'O
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 90,863
And1: 111,121
Joined: Dec 16, 2005
Location: Bone Goal
 

Re: Worst contract so far? 

Post#138 » by Capn'O » Sun Jul 3, 2016 10:27 pm

Doctor MJ wrote:
Capn'O wrote:
Doctor MJ wrote:
Good post.

I think the fundamental issue I have isn't that they should be going after guys in free agency around KP's age because you're right that's not possible, rather it's that if you know KP is your franchise, you need to make sure you're not doing anything that may make it harder to build around him.

If everything goes perfectly with these signings it won't be an issue. You'll have a team that isn't a serious contender, but it's at least good, and that and the draw of New York will help sign other guys to actually help KP when the time comes.

But of course, we haven't seen things go perfectly for the Knicks in a long time for a reason. I look at Rose and Noah and see that at best they help the team still-not-win-titles, and at worst, they continue to leave the team paying too much for guys who aren't helping at all.


I don't disagree. In any event - Melo/KP is the Great Knick Tension right now. In some sense, it's a good problem to have in that it means the Knicks actually drafted a franchise player and plan to keep him and Melo is still a force on offense. They get along really well with KP learning a lot from Melo. But at some point something has to give if it doesn't lead to _some_ on court success. I wonder what happens if/when Rose breaks down. Does Melo make the call then and waive his NTC* or is he hunkering down for the long haul? Stay tuned!

*
Spoiler:
I do like that Clarkson contract. He can be a piece of it :-D


The thing about that tension is that it was there even before they got KP. If Phil was really looking to patiently build a healthy context in New York in contrast to what everyone's done in NY for the past decade plus, it didn't make sense to re-sign Melo at all. They re-signed him because they didn't have anything else going for them, and now they are signing more guys basically because otherwise you have to acknowledge re-signing Melo was a mistake.

So yeah, all of this would be true even if KP were a bust, but I had hoped that KP being such a hit would let Phil gracefully pull the franchise away from brink, and instead to me it just looks like they literally weren't prepared to actually capitalize in the event that their high draft picks weren't busts.


They were definitely not ready for him to be this good this fast.
BAF Clippers:
UNDER CONSTRUCTION - PLEASE INQUIRE WITHIN

:beer:
SF_Warriors
General Manager
Posts: 7,507
And1: 3,795
Joined: Jul 12, 2012

Re: Worst contract so far? 

Post#139 » by SF_Warriors » Sun Jul 3, 2016 11:59 pm

Roy The Natural wrote:
James40 wrote:
Roy The Natural wrote:
Ummm... Turner played really well with the Celts and won them quite a few games. He's not a franchise player, but he's a better player than he was with the 76ers.


A broken clock is right twice a day.


Except he was good all season.....


Ive been down on turner his career thus far, but he had a respectable season

Was especially impressed with his rebounding and assists #s although he was always a good rebounder for his size.

The contract is absolutely disgusting however
suntzuballin
Head Coach
Posts: 6,807
And1: 2,770
Joined: Feb 07, 2011
   

Re: Worst contract so far? 

Post#140 » by suntzuballin » Mon Jul 4, 2016 12:27 am

A majority of them and more to come .NBA is gonna have a real rude awaking soon.

Sent from my SGH-I337M using RealGM mobile app

Return to The General Board