pcbothwel wrote:Your right, the Bulls are better off watching Wade play less than 60 games, with a TS of 51%, a WS/48 of less than 0.10, with a usage of 30%... After that amazing display the Bulls can then earn the right to pay a 36 y/o Wade 25M in 2017.
You realize he is getting 10M more than Gasol each of the next two years, and Gasol is a far superior player at this point.
Who says I thought they should sign Wade. Still, you do need to sign players. Otherwise your stuck signing players the next year. The Bulls have never signed a bigtime free agent - Wade is the first even if he's pretty washed up at this point. Everyone thinks it's a good idea to chase Westbrook and Curry, but really, how good of an idea is it? The Lakers are the one team that has really managed to pull it off over the years, and they just whiffed on Love and are really very bad right now, having just signed Mozgov and Deng, and having traded for Jose Calderon. The Lakers might have the hometown advantage on Westbrook, but life is tough when you have a really bad team.
When you're the Bulls and don't have really anything on those players, taking the year off and missing the playoffs for a second year in a row, basically giving up before the season even starts, likely puts you in a scenario where you're treadmilling just outside the playoffs for 5 years or more. As it stands, the Bulls could still be players in free agency next offseason. Even for two max contracts, they'd just need to find somebody willing to take on Rondo and McDermott, and they'd need to find a taker for Rondo if Westbrook was coming anyway, because those two guys on the same team would be a terrible idea. It's a lot easier to sell stars on a winning team than it is on a losing one. And I'm not saying the Bulls are necessarily a winning team, but they'd have been much worse if they didn't sign players to multi-year deals this offseason.

















