Orlando early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Smitty731/HowardMass)

Moderators: Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers

Grade the Orlando offseason

A
9
8%
A-
8
7%
B+
25
21%
B
19
16%
B-
10
8%
C+
8
7%
C
7
6%
C-
15
13%
D
8
7%
F
9
8%
 
Total votes: 118

Skin
RealGM
Posts: 18,514
And1: 8,804
Joined: Jul 03, 2009
   

Re: Orlando early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Smitty731/HowardMass) 

Post#381 » by Skin » Mon Aug 8, 2016 7:51 pm

Colbinii wrote:Okay, I know Vuc is starting, and I never said otherwise. I have read posts about Ibaka and Biyombo being on the court together and "defending the rim", but when you look at the line-up at a whole, including offense, it isn't very pretty.

The Magic aren't a finished product. Nobody is arguing that they are contenders. However, this team is clearly trying to take the next step and are no longer interested in being a lottery team. In order to do that, they had to begin to seriously address their weaknesses. Interior defense was one of if not their biggest problems. You can point to "yeah, but their offense looks bad", and you wouldn't be wrong. But it's still a positive step towards getting better and the Magic didn't fail to recognize that they needed to add shooters. Incoming - Augustin, Meeks, Wilcox. ~40% shooters from 3. Plus they are moving Fournier in as our starting 2 which is a shooting upgrade over Oladipo. Yes, they are still heavily reliant on Payton and Gordon stepping up and those 2 have not yet proven they can do it. So there is some blind faith there. But are they doing a bad job of putting them in an environment to succeed?

Colbinii wrote:They still have a flaw on the roster which is lack of outside shooting.

Now you're just moving goalposts.

Colbinii wrote:I can't seem to remember ever bringing up $17 million is bad or that it is bad for him to come off the bench.

Maybe not you, but it's a frequent mention.

Colbinii wrote:I don't know what these stats mean or indicate.

That a team can grow to be a contender with such a player.
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,858
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: Orlando early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Smitty731/HowardMass) 

Post#382 » by Colbinii » Mon Aug 8, 2016 8:04 pm

Skin wrote:
Colbinii wrote:Okay, I know Vuc is starting, and I never said otherwise. I have read posts about Ibaka and Biyombo being on the court together and "defending the rim", but when you look at the line-up at a whole, including offense, it isn't very pretty.

The Magic aren't a finished product. Nobody is arguing that they are contenders. However, this team is clearly trying to take the next step and are no longer interested in being a lottery team. In order to do that, they had to begin to seriously address their weaknesses. Interior defense was one of if not their biggest problems. You can point to "yeah, but their offense looks bad", and you wouldn't be wrong. But it's still a positive step towards getting better and the Magic didn't fail to recognize that they needed to add shooters. Incoming - Augustin, Meeks, Wilcox. ~40% shooters from 3. Plus they are moving Fournier in as our starting 2 which is a shooting upgrade over Oladipo. Yes, they are still heavily reliant on Payton and Gordon stepping up and those 2 have not yet proven they can do it. So there is some blind faith there. But are they doing a bad job of putting them in an environment to succeed?
Payton hasn't shown me what I want to see out of a PG that makes me think he is going to take his game to the level that is needed to make the playoffs. Some teams can get away with having a weak PG if they have other playmakers, go-to scorers, and good 3+D players. The problem I see with the magic is that they addressed 3 pt shooting by adding players who shouldn't play more than 10-15 MPG.

Now you're just moving goalposts.
No i'm not. This thread is to discuss the Orlando Magic as a whole, not just the Orlando Magic's interior defense. Once we have discussed the interior defense (which we both agree upon is improved), we can move onto the next thing they need to work on as a team to make the playoffs, which is spreading the floor, more importantly, 3 PT shooting.

Maybe not you, but it's a frequent mention.

shifting goal posts

Colbinii wrote:I don't know what these stats mean or indicate.


That a team can grow to be a contender with such a player.
When they have offensive weapons like Kyle Lowry, Demar Derozan, Valanciunas; role-players like DeMarre Carroll, Cory Joseph, Patrick Patterson, and Terrance Ross. That team was a team with both top end talent and shooters around them. The Magic are built nothing like the 2016 Toronto Raptors.
Skin
RealGM
Posts: 18,514
And1: 8,804
Joined: Jul 03, 2009
   

Re: Orlando early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Smitty731/HowardMass) 

Post#383 » by Skin » Mon Aug 8, 2016 8:29 pm

Colbinii wrote:
Skin wrote:
Colbinii wrote:Okay, I know Vuc is starting, and I never said otherwise. I have read posts about Ibaka and Biyombo being on the court together and "defending the rim", but when you look at the line-up at a whole, including offense, it isn't very pretty.

The Magic aren't a finished product. Nobody is arguing that they are contenders. However, this team is clearly trying to take the next step and are no longer interested in being a lottery team. In order to do that, they had to begin to seriously address their weaknesses. Interior defense was one of if not their biggest problems. You can point to "yeah, but their offense looks bad", and you wouldn't be wrong. But it's still a positive step towards getting better and the Magic didn't fail to recognize that they needed to add shooters. Incoming - Augustin, Meeks, Wilcox. ~40% shooters from 3. Plus they are moving Fournier in as our starting 2 which is a shooting upgrade over Oladipo. Yes, they are still heavily reliant on Payton and Gordon stepping up and those 2 have not yet proven they can do it. So there is some blind faith there. But are they doing a bad job of putting them in an environment to succeed?
Payton hasn't shown me what I want to see out of a PG that makes me think he is going to take his game to the level that is needed to make the playoffs. Some teams can get away with having a weak PG if they have other playmakers, go-to scorers, and good 3+D players. The problem I see with the magic is that they addressed 3 pt shooting by adding players who shouldn't play more than 10-15 MPG.

Now you're just moving goalposts.
No i'm not. This thread is to discuss the Orlando Magic as a whole, not just the Orlando Magic's interior defense. Once we have discussed the interior defense (which we both agree upon is improved), we can move onto the next thing they need to work on as a team to make the playoffs, which is spreading the floor, more importantly, 3 PT shooting.

Maybe not you, but it's a frequent mention.

shifting goal posts

Colbinii wrote:I don't know what these stats mean or indicate.


That a team can grow to be a contender with such a player.
When they have offensive weapons like Kyle Lowry, Demar Derozan, Valanciunas; role-players like DeMarre Carroll, Cory Joseph, Patrick Patterson, and Terrance Ross. That team was a team with both top end talent and shooters around them. The Magic are built nothing like the 2016 Toronto Raptors.

I haven't seen it out of Payton either and I have my doubts as well. But since the Magic used their 1st in a trade to upgrade interior defense, I didn't see another opportunity to upgrade Payton. The FA class was Conley or bust. So yeah, they did only make modest additions to address their shooting. In theory, those are sound moves. Every bench player can shoot. The future is not roadblocked. Cap flexibility is still in tact going forward.

Magic don't have a Lowry and that's a big deal. But there are some decent comparisons between Derozan ~ Fournier, Valanciunas ~ Vucevic, Carroll ~ Gordon, Joseph ~ Augustin, Patterson ~ Ibaka, Ross ~ Meeks/Hezonja.
User avatar
pelifan
RealGM
Posts: 14,237
And1: 21,691
Joined: Aug 12, 2014
Location: Small market
 

Re: Orlando early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Smitty731/HowardMass) 

Post#384 » by pelifan » Mon Aug 8, 2016 11:12 pm

haha could someone give me a summary of what went down for this to go 20 pages?
Image
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,858
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: Orlando early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Smitty731/HowardMass) 

Post#385 » by Colbinii » Mon Aug 8, 2016 11:51 pm

pelifan wrote:haha could someone give me a summary of what went down for this to go 20 pages?

Some Magic fan's think that all of their young players are going to reach full potential, their defense is going to be largely improved, and they could finish as a 5 seed.
Some Magic fan's think that the team will improve in the interior defense, some of the young players will improve, but they have a lot of question marks, finishing 6th-10th in the East.

Most outsiders see them as a 8-11 seed.
orlando_joe
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,893
And1: 1,910
Joined: Dec 27, 2015
     

Re: Orlando early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Smitty731/HowardMass) 

Post#386 » by orlando_joe » Tue Aug 9, 2016 12:15 am

Colbinii wrote:
pelifan wrote:haha could someone give me a summary of what went down for this to go 20 pages?

Some Magic fan's think that all of their young players are going to reach full potential, their defense is going to be largely improved, and they could finish as a 5 seed.
Some Magic fan's think that the team will improve in the interior defense, some of the young players will improve, but they have a lot of question marks, finishing 6th-10th in the East.

Most outsiders see them as a 8-11 seed.

or...some outsiders think all magic moves are the worst thing any gm has ever done...all there young players will only be worse..and are doomed to be worst team in nba ..well other then nets..and maybe lakers..all there trades and signings make no sense at all...but when you look at the votes....way ...way...way...more votes are above avg...hmmmmm :banghead:
wise1-2
Senior
Posts: 523
And1: 116
Joined: Jul 09, 2016

Re: Orlando early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Smitty731/HowardMass) 

Post#387 » by wise1-2 » Tue Aug 9, 2016 12:47 am

Colbinii wrote:
pelifan wrote:haha could someone give me a summary of what went down for this to go 20 pages?

Some Magic fan's think that all of their young players are going to reach full potential, their defense is going to be largely improved, and they could finish as a 5 seed.
Some Magic fan's think that the team will improve in the interior defense, some of the young players will improve, but they have a lot of question marks, finishing 6th-10th in the East.

Most outsiders see them as a 8-11 seed.

You realise that the east is so deep that only a few wins will separate the 5th and the 8th seed? It was only a 4 game difference last season, and could be closer this season.
jayjaysee
King of the Trade Board
Posts: 20,989
And1: 7,905
Joined: Aug 05, 2012

Re: Orlando early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Smitty731/HowardMass) 

Post#388 » by jayjaysee » Tue Aug 9, 2016 1:31 am

wise1-2 wrote:
Colbinii wrote:
pelifan wrote:haha could someone give me a summary of what went down for this to go 20 pages?

Some Magic fan's think that all of their young players are going to reach full potential, their defense is going to be largely improved, and they could finish as a 5 seed.
Some Magic fan's think that the team will improve in the interior defense, some of the young players will improve, but they have a lot of question marks, finishing 6th-10th in the East.

Most outsiders see them as a 8-11 seed.

You realise that the east is so deep that only a few wins will separate the 5th and the 8th seed? It was only a 4 game difference last season, and could be closer this season.


This further pushes what pages 5-18 talked about that Orlando didn't improve as much as the teams they are chasing or even two of the teams that were behind them last season. Its very circular. The East being deep doesn't mean Orlando is closer to the top, the two have nothing to do with each other.

Most fans of rebuilding teams would be happy with other fans complimenting their prospects and the future, despite not liking the offseason...like some Orlando fans have reacted in this thread. But some fans haven't accepted those responses

Thus this thread keeps going. It's beautiful. I feel like this thread has more posts than all of last August in this forum.
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,858
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: RE: Re: Orlando early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Smitty731/HowardMass) 

Post#389 » by Colbinii » Tue Aug 9, 2016 1:31 am

orlando_joe wrote:
Colbinii wrote:
pelifan wrote:haha could someone give me a summary of what went down for this to go 20 pages?

Some Magic fan's think that all of their young players are going to reach full potential, their defense is going to be largely improved, and they could finish as a 5 seed.
Some Magic fan's think that the team will improve in the interior defense, some of the young players will improve, but they have a lot of question marks, finishing 6th-10th in the East.

Most outsiders see them as a 8-11 seed.

or...some outsiders think all magic moves are the worst thing any gm has ever done...all there young players will only be worse..and are doomed to be worst team in nba ..well other then nets..and maybe lakers..all there trades and signings make no sense at all...but when you look at the votes....way ...way...way...more votes are above avg...hmmmmm :banghead:

I don't think anyone thinks that. If so, then why do a lot of us outsiders think they will finish between 8-11 in a competitive east?
I think they had a decent off-season and should be improved over last years squad. That said, they are relying on Payton making a big step, something he hasn't shown but could with Dipo gone, and Gordon growing, which seems much more likely than an improved payton product.
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,858
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: RE: Re: Orlando early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Smitty731/HowardMass) 

Post#390 » by Colbinii » Tue Aug 9, 2016 1:32 am

wise1-2 wrote:
Colbinii wrote:
pelifan wrote:haha could someone give me a summary of what went down for this to go 20 pages?

Some Magic fan's think that all of their young players are going to reach full potential, their defense is going to be largely improved, and they could finish as a 5 seed.
Some Magic fan's think that the team will improve in the interior defense, some of the young players will improve, but they have a lot of question marks, finishing 6th-10th in the East.

Most outsiders see them as a 8-11 seed.

You realise that the east is so deep that only a few wins will separate the 5th and the 8th seed? It was only a 4 game difference last season, and could be closer this season.

I do, and it is why I think the Veteran teams will squeeze into the 4-7 seeds.
wise1-2
Senior
Posts: 523
And1: 116
Joined: Jul 09, 2016

Re: Orlando early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Smitty731/HowardMass) 

Post#391 » by wise1-2 » Tue Aug 9, 2016 3:09 am

jayjaysee wrote:
wise1-2 wrote:
Colbinii wrote:Some Magic fan's think that all of their young players are going to reach full potential, their defense is going to be largely improved, and they could finish as a 5 seed.
Some Magic fan's think that the team will improve in the interior defense, some of the young players will improve, but they have a lot of question marks, finishing 6th-10th in the East.

Most outsiders see them as a 8-11 seed.

You realise that the east is so deep that only a few wins will separate the 5th and the 8th seed? It was only a 4 game difference last season, and could be closer this season.


This further pushes what pages 5-18 talked about that Orlando didn't improve as much as the teams they are chasing or even two of the teams that were behind them last season. Its very circular. The East being deep doesn't mean Orlando is closer to the top, the two have nothing to do with each other.

Most fans of rebuilding teams would be happy with other fans complimenting their prospects and the future, despite not liking the offseason...like some Orlando fans have reacted in this thread. But some fans haven't accepted those responses

Thus this thread keeps going. It's beautiful. I feel like this thread has more posts than all of last August in this forum.

No the whole east improved, but I think the Magic improved a lot. Just because I said the east is deep doesn't mean the Magic didn't improve as much as other teams. I dont know how you came to that conclusion. On paper the Magic definitely improved. I dont know how anyone can claim otherwise. I also don't know what you're complaining about. You can just press the little "x" if this thread bothers you. Then, you can be done with this thread. I'm trying to show people a different point of view of what they perceive as mistakes. Factors they haven't considered. Which I did multiple times in this thread. Its like you just want everyone to post their opinion in one post and agree to disagree with others. There's enough of that in this forum.
wise1-2
Senior
Posts: 523
And1: 116
Joined: Jul 09, 2016

Re: RE: Re: Orlando early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Smitty731/HowardMass) 

Post#392 » by wise1-2 » Tue Aug 9, 2016 3:14 am

Colbinii wrote:
wise1-2 wrote:
Colbinii wrote:Some Magic fan's think that all of their young players are going to reach full potential, their defense is going to be largely improved, and they could finish as a 5 seed.
Some Magic fan's think that the team will improve in the interior defense, some of the young players will improve, but they have a lot of question marks, finishing 6th-10th in the East.

Most outsiders see them as a 8-11 seed.

You realise that the east is so deep that only a few wins will separate the 5th and the 8th seed? It was only a 4 game difference last season, and could be closer this season.

I do, and it is why I think the Veteran teams will squeeze into the 4-7 seeds.

Veteran teams dont always make the play offs just because they're veterans. The Pistons made the play offs over the Bulls last year. You could be right, we'll see.
What I'm pointing out with my post is that if most outsiders think they'll get the 8-11th seed, then its possible the Magic get a few extra wins and secure the 5th seed. I'm not saying they'll be the 5th seed, but its not that farfetched if you think they'll be an 8th seed. I sensed a little sarcasm in this part: "Some Magic fan's think that all of their young players are going to reach full potential". Not one magic fan said all the Magic players are going to reach their full potential this season.
User avatar
Viper1500
Head Coach
Posts: 6,923
And1: 2,801
Joined: Apr 15, 2009
Location: Orlando, FL
   

Re: Orlando early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Smitty731/HowardMass) 

Post#393 » by Viper1500 » Tue Aug 9, 2016 3:24 am

I gave them a C+, I really was not overly impressed with anything besides the Fournier contract. I think some solid moves were made, but nothing that generates a high grade. We overpaid for Ibaka, Biz, Green and Augustin. It could very well payoff but as of right now.. it's just a giant question mark.
Statlanta
RealGM
Posts: 13,869
And1: 10,500
Joined: Mar 06, 2016

Re: Orlando early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Smitty731/HowardMass) 

Post#394 » by Statlanta » Tue Aug 9, 2016 5:04 pm

Looks like the way the thread length turned out you would think that either the Orlando RealGM user base was as big as Toronto/New York or that there would be more F and D grades(11) than A and A- grades(15).
The Greatest of All Time debate in basketball is essentially who has the greatest basketball resume of the player who has the best highlights instead of who is the best player
User avatar
bondom34
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 66,716
And1: 50,290
Joined: Mar 01, 2013

Re: Orlando early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Smitty731/HowardMass) 

Post#395 » by bondom34 » Tue Aug 9, 2016 5:09 pm

OrlandoTill wrote:Looks like the way the thread length turned out you would think that either the Orlando RealGM user base was as big as Toronto/New York or that there would be more F and D grades(11) than A and A- grades(15).

Or that a lot of Magic fans frequent the trade board.
MyUniBroDavis wrote: he was like YALL PEOPLE WHO DOUBT ME WILL SEE YALLS STATS ARE WRONG I HAVE THE BIG BRAIN PLAYS MUCHO NASTY BIG BRAIN BIG CHUNGUS BRAIN YOU BOYS ON UR BBALL REFERENCE NO UNDERSTANDO
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,858
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: Orlando early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Smitty731/HowardMass) 

Post#396 » by Colbinii » Tue Aug 9, 2016 5:15 pm

OrlandoTill wrote:Looks like the way the thread length turned out you would think that either the Orlando RealGM user base was as big as Toronto/New York or that there would be more F and D grades(11) than A and A- grades(15).

It is actually just a lot of people questioning the line of thinking that the Magic aren't the only team to improve.
wise1-2
Senior
Posts: 523
And1: 116
Joined: Jul 09, 2016

Re: Orlando early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Smitty731/HowardMass) 

Post#397 » by wise1-2 » Wed Aug 10, 2016 4:52 am

pelifan wrote:haha could someone give me a summary of what went down for this to go 20 pages?

Oladipo is suddenly a better player than Ibaka. The Magic got robbed on that trade, and an 11th round pick in a weak draft is very valuable and franchise altering.

Gordon can't do anything but play defense, and his best case scenario is serge ibaka, even thought their play styles are totally different.

The Magic will average 70 PPG because no one can score. even though the 10 win sixers averaged 98 PPG this past season. They're going to be much worse now that they lost the scoring champ victor oladipo.

The Magic dumped Harris only to replace him with Green. Not Biyombo. Not the guy on a long term deal. Nope. They replaced him with Green, the expiring contract. That was Robs plan all along. The FO saying they wanted cap space in 2017 means nothing. The fact that they can chase a prime FA next year also means nothing. Nothing at all.

Biyombo and Ibaka are going to be so bad together they wont be able to stay on the court at all.
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,858
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: RE: Re: Orlando early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Smitty731/HowardMass) 

Post#398 » by Colbinii » Wed Aug 10, 2016 5:02 am

wise1-2 wrote:
pelifan wrote:haha could someone give me a summary of what went down for this to go 20 pages?

Oladipo is suddenly a better player than Ibaka. The Magic got robbed on that trade, and an 11th round pick in a weak draft is very valuable and franchise altering.

Gordon can't do anything but play defense, and his best case scenario is serge ibaka, even thought their play styles are totally different.

The Magic will average 70 PPG because no one can score. even though the 10 win sixers averaged 98 PPG this past season. They're going to be much worse now that they lost the scoring champ victor oladipo.

The Magic dumped Harris only to replace him with Green. Not Biyombo. Not the guy on a long term deal. Nope. They replaced him with Green, the expiring contract. That was Robs plan all along. The FO saying they wanted cap space in 2017 means nothing. The fact that they can chase a prime FA next year also means nothing. Nothing at all.

Biyombo and Ibaka are going to be so bad together they wont be able to stay on the court at all.

When was this posted? I haven't seen it since I joined the discussion.
tmorgan
RealGM
Posts: 14,298
And1: 9,794
Joined: Feb 04, 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
   

Re: Orlando early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Smitty731/HowardMass) 

Post#399 » by tmorgan » Wed Aug 10, 2016 7:15 am

Does "wise" mean "sarcastic" in a language I don't know?

Good lord, man, settle it down. Outsiders don't like the moves as much as insiders. How is this the least bit shocking? Keep the faith.
HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,322
And1: 20,917
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Re: Orlando early offseason in review (HW/bondom34/dbrandon/Smitty731/HowardMass) 

Post#400 » by HartfordWhalers » Wed Aug 10, 2016 1:27 pm

As long as we are back to saying that Harris was dumped to be replaced by someone they already had cap space for, I'm going to go back to ignoring the rest of the equally bad points.

Return to Trades and Transactions


cron