ImageImageImageImageImage

Rose found not liable: Update pg. 62

Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23

Carl_Karlson
Head Coach
Posts: 6,814
And1: 3,165
Joined: Dec 18, 2014
     

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#61 » by Carl_Karlson » Mon Sep 26, 2016 7:53 pm

So does Noah get mad when we let Rose's contract expire?
WTF Post of 2017:

If Phil pulled that off, I would put a put a paper bag over my head, paste a picture of Jeannie on it, poke a hole through the mouth, and give Phil the best BJ he's ever had in his entire life.[/quote]
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,242
And1: 25,698
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#62 » by moocow007 » Mon Sep 26, 2016 9:47 pm

Knickerbock wrote:It doesn't matter who did what.. It only matters what you can prove.. Right now.. There is no proof of anything from either side..

To me.. Jane Doe side looks very prepared, but they look desperate.. Only looking for a money grab.. Doing whatever they can to make rose settle before it goes to trial..


Other than Derrick Rose himself talking about what happened. As has been said, it's been 3 years, all Rose needed to say is to alternate between "it was consensual" (when asked about whether it was consensual or not) and "I don't recall" (when asked about any details about it). But I believe he's said more than he should have.

As most every (good) lawyer would advise, no matter how much you may think it may seem like it could make you sound guilty by not talking, no matter how much good you think talking might do for you and/or your situation, no matter if you're really innocent or not...ALWAYS keep your mouth shut and lawyer up. Let the lawyers figure out what you should say or shouldn't say. It's why they get paid so much money for...regardless of how sure you are that you are innocent. This is especially true if you can afford lawyers and/or are a minority (and especially black or Hispanic) male. Don't even say "I don't know ****" cause that can be turned against you as an attempt to lie to the po po. Only things you need to say is "I need my lawyer" and "thank you". And the last part is optional and only if you want to be polite.
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,546
And1: 62,685
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#63 » by HarthorneWingo » Mon Sep 26, 2016 9:57 pm

Did she ever file a criminal complaint over this alleged incident?

How long after the night in question did she complain to anyone of record (911, police officers, emergency room, doctor, hospital, lawyer, etc.) that she had been raped?
User avatar
dakomish23
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 58,776
And1: 48,745
Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Location: Empire State
     

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#64 » by dakomish23 » Mon Sep 26, 2016 10:01 pm

moocow007 wrote:For the Negative Nancies, Debbie Downers and Chicken Littles of the board: On the positive side, this is a great draft for PG's and talented wings so...if Rose get's the Bob Barker treatment...at least well have a top draft pick.


And that is why nyk fans should have zero apprehension about this season. I'm ready for any outcome. The only reason I want a great season, besides the obvious, is to ram this down the throat of all the media "experts" and morons who come on this board trashing the team with hot takes they didn't come up with.
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor


#FreeJimmit
User avatar
dakomish23
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 58,776
And1: 48,745
Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Location: Empire State
     

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#65 » by dakomish23 » Mon Sep 26, 2016 10:03 pm

Carl_Karlson wrote:So does Noah get mad when we let Rose's contract expire?


He'll be too busy celebrating his first championship. :D
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor


#FreeJimmit
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,242
And1: 25,698
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#66 » by moocow007 » Mon Sep 26, 2016 10:04 pm

dakomish23 wrote:
moocow007 wrote:For the Negative Nancies, Debbie Downers and Chicken Littles of the board: On the positive side, this is a great draft for PG's and talented wings so...if Rose get's the Bob Barker treatment...at least well have a top draft pick.


And that is why nyk fans should have zero apprehension about this season. I'm ready for any outcome. The only reason I want a great season, besides the obvious, is to ram this down the throat of all the media "experts" and morons who come on this board trashing the team with hot takes they didn't come up with.


Yep, I'm going in there with the notion that I'm heading into a nudist colony filled with beautiful women as far as the eye can see. If they first one isn't impressed with my package, chances are someone will and moo's gonna score!
taikibansei
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,981
And1: 11,312
Joined: Jul 17, 2008
     

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#67 » by taikibansei » Mon Sep 26, 2016 10:34 pm

moocow007 wrote:What's the league policy for a team paying off the plaintiff in this case?


Seemed to work out fine with Kobe....
RIP magnumt--you're literally why I'm still here on these boards.
RIP The Hater--keep up the good fight in the great beyond.
taikibansei
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,981
And1: 11,312
Joined: Jul 17, 2008
     

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#68 » by taikibansei » Mon Sep 26, 2016 10:49 pm

That said, is everybody here referring to this statement in this article?
This note is to clarify any misconception that the Los Angeles Police Department does not have a current and open criminal investigation pending that names the same suspects as the defendants in the current civil case being handled by your office (Case No. CV 15-7503-MWF (JCx). When filing the crime report, the victim in this case exercised her right to confidentiality as outlined in California Penal Code section 293.5. (a). Her identity will continue to remain confidential throughout the criminal investigation being handled by the Los Angeles Police Department.

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/lapd-confirms-theres-an-open-criminal-investigation-in-the-derrick-rose-rape-case-170306724.html

If so, that statement doesn't suggest to me that criminal charges are imminent. It just says that the LAPD is doing its job. As the plaintiff finally filed a criminal complaint two weeks ago, the LAPD has to investigate...and two weeks is not nearly long enough to finish such an investigation. No story here (yet), in my opinion.

Of course, with Rose on the witness stand (and Laurel and Hardy apparently as his defense team), I can certainly imagine multiple scenarios where he accidentally makes a full confession under oath during the civil trial--which is one of several reasons why this case needs to be settled quickly.
RIP magnumt--you're literally why I'm still here on these boards.
RIP The Hater--keep up the good fight in the great beyond.
taikibansei
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,981
And1: 11,312
Joined: Jul 17, 2008
     

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#69 » by taikibansei » Mon Sep 26, 2016 10:52 pm

HarthorneWingo wrote:Did she ever file a criminal complaint over this alleged incident?


Yes, two weeks ago:

http://www.complex.com/sports/2016/09/derrick-rose-accuser-criminal-charges-civil-case
RIP magnumt--you're literally why I'm still here on these boards.
RIP The Hater--keep up the good fight in the great beyond.
CJackson
General Manager
Posts: 9,584
And1: 5,221
Joined: Mar 05, 2016

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#70 » by CJackson » Mon Sep 26, 2016 11:21 pm

moocow007 wrote:
dakomish23 wrote:
moocow007 wrote:For the Negative Nancies, Debbie Downers and Chicken Littles of the board: On the positive side, this is a great draft for PG's and talented wings so...if Rose get's the Bob Barker treatment...at least well have a top draft pick.


And that is why nyk fans should have zero apprehension about this season. I'm ready for any outcome. The only reason I want a great season, besides the obvious, is to ram this down the throat of all the media "experts" and morons who come on this board trashing the team with hot takes they didn't come up with.


Yep, I'm going in there with the notion that I'm heading into a nudist colony filled with beautiful women as far as the eye can see. If they first one isn't impressed with my package, chances are someone will and moo's gonna score!


Image

NSFW Spoilers

Moo Lounging for the Bovine Ladies

Spoiler:
Image

Moo Working It

Spoiler:
Image
Carl_Karlson
Head Coach
Posts: 6,814
And1: 3,165
Joined: Dec 18, 2014
     

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#71 » by Carl_Karlson » Mon Sep 26, 2016 11:26 pm

dakomish23 wrote:
Carl_Karlson wrote:So does Noah get mad when we let Rose's contract expire?


He'll be too busy celebrating his first championship. :D


Image
WTF Post of 2017:

If Phil pulled that off, I would put a put a paper bag over my head, paste a picture of Jeannie on it, poke a hole through the mouth, and give Phil the best BJ he's ever had in his entire life.[/quote]
KayCSmooth
Sophomore
Posts: 202
And1: 139
Joined: Jul 11, 2016
   

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#72 » by KayCSmooth » Tue Sep 27, 2016 12:31 am

moocow007 wrote:
Knickerbock wrote:It doesn't matter who did what.. It only matters what you can prove.. Right now.. There is no proof of anything from either side..

To me.. Jane Doe side looks very prepared, but they look desperate.. Only looking for a money grab.. Doing whatever they can to make rose settle before it goes to trial..


Other than Derrick Rose himself talking about what happened. As has been said, it's been 3 years, all Rose needed to say is to alternate between "it was consensual" (when asked about whether it was consensual or not) and "I don't recall" (when asked about any details about it). But I believe he's said more than he should have.

As most every (good) lawyer would advise, no matter how much you may think it may seem like it could make you sound guilty by not talking, no matter how much good you think talking might do for you and/or your situation, no matter if you're really innocent or not...ALWAYS keep your mouth shut and lawyer up. Let the lawyers figure out what you should say or shouldn't say. It's why they get paid so much money for...regardless of how sure you are that you are innocent. This is especially true if you can afford lawyers and/or are a minority (and especially black or Hispanic) male. Don't even say "I don't know ****" cause that can be turned against you as an attempt to lie to the po po. Only things you need to say is "I need my lawyer" and "thank you". And the last part is optional and only if you want to be polite.

Totally agree with you both. I just wish if this woman is caught lying about the whole case just for money, they throw the book at her. I'm tired of seeing people manipulate the system for their own selfish goals while real victims end up being scrutinized & ignored.
Juggynaut
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,947
And1: 2,817
Joined: Feb 14, 2010
       

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#73 » by Juggynaut » Tue Sep 27, 2016 1:06 am

Don't they need physical evidence for it to be a criminal case? I thought the whole reason y she filed a civil case was because of the lack of evidence. Idk it seems like she wants to pressure him to pay her and get this over with already.
Image
Knickerbock
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,699
And1: 897
Joined: Feb 12, 2016
 

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#74 » by Knickerbock » Tue Sep 27, 2016 2:35 am

Juggynaut wrote:Don't they need physical evidence for it to be a criminal case? I thought the whole reason y she filed a civil case was because of the lack of evidence. Idk it seems like she wants to pressure him to pay her and get this over with already.


And that might happen.. if this gets noisy.. Adam Silver will step in and pressure rose and the Knicks to end this.. He doesn't want NBA to look bad.
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,546
And1: 62,685
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#75 » by HarthorneWingo » Tue Sep 27, 2016 3:52 am

taikibansei wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:Did she ever file a criminal complaint over this alleged incident?


Yes, two weeks ago:

http://www.complex.com/sports/2016/09/derrick-rose-accuser-criminal-charges-civil-case


This Cosby case is setting a precedent where women can come back years later and claim rape. Meanwhile, unless she went to a hospital after the incident, there will likely be no physical evidence available to convict beyond a reasonable doubt or to fully exonerate.
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,546
And1: 62,685
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#76 » by HarthorneWingo » Tue Sep 27, 2016 4:05 am

KayCSmooth wrote:
moocow007 wrote:
Knickerbock wrote:It doesn't matter who did what.. It only matters what you can prove.. Right now.. There is no proof of anything from either side..

To me.. Jane Doe side looks very prepared, but they look desperate.. Only looking for a money grab.. Doing whatever they can to make rose settle before it goes to trial..


Other than Derrick Rose himself talking about what happened. As has been said, it's been 3 years, all Rose needed to say is to alternate between "it was consensual" (when asked about whether it was consensual or not) and "I don't recall" (when asked about any details about it). But I believe he's said more than he should have.

As most every (good) lawyer would advise, no matter how much you may think it may seem like it could make you sound guilty by not talking, no matter how much good you think talking might do for you and/or your situation, no matter if you're really innocent or not...ALWAYS keep your mouth shut and lawyer up. Let the lawyers figure out what you should say or shouldn't say. It's why they get paid so much money for...regardless of how sure you are that you are innocent. This is especially true if you can afford lawyers and/or are a minority (and especially black or Hispanic) male. Don't even say "I don't know ****" cause that can be turned against you as an attempt to lie to the po po. Only things you need to say is "I need my lawyer" and "thank you". And the last part is optional and only if you want to be polite.

Totally agree with you both. I just wish if this woman is caught lying about the whole case just for money, they throw the book at her. I'm tired of seeing people manipulate the system for their own selfish goals while real victims end up being scrutinized & ignored.


The accuser's ex roommate and co-worker has said that this lawsuit is sham to extort money from Rose and supposedly there are text messages that support this. Plus, no physical evidence. The criminal case is going nowhere. If I'm Rose, I hold tight and not give in. This case is not a vocabulary test, it's about whether he raped this woman. A very serious charge.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-derrick-rose-sexual-assault-case-met-20160210-story.html
CJackson
General Manager
Posts: 9,584
And1: 5,221
Joined: Mar 05, 2016

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#77 » by CJackson » Tue Sep 27, 2016 4:18 am

Roses low IQ is making this extra unsettling. It actually makes it more difficult to parse out what happened. I mean who doesn't understand the meaning of the word "consent"? This is so messy and his stupidity is not only making it more difficult to establish intent, but could also result in criminal proceedings even if he didn't force himself on her.
User avatar
RHODEY
RealGM
Posts: 25,229
And1: 22,746
Joined: May 18, 2007
Location: Straight out of a comic book

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#78 » by RHODEY » Tue Sep 27, 2016 4:31 am

CJackson wrote:Roses low IQ is making this extra unsettling. It actually makes it more difficult to parse out what happened. I mean who doesn't understand the meaning of the word "consent"? This is so messy and his stupidity is not only making it more difficult to establish intent, but could also result in criminal proceedings even if he didn't force himself on her.


Ignorant perhaps, not necessarily stupid. The word consent might not come up in his everyday conversation. And like many young people nowadays he might not be a big reader. But whatever you want to call it, It definitely makes him a target to be manipulated into a bad situation
CJackson
General Manager
Posts: 9,584
And1: 5,221
Joined: Mar 05, 2016

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#79 » by CJackson » Tue Sep 27, 2016 4:41 am

RHODEY wrote:
CJackson wrote:Roses low IQ is making this extra unsettling. It actually makes it more difficult to parse out what happened. I mean who doesn't understand the meaning of the word "consent"? This is so messy and his stupidity is not only making it more difficult to establish intent, but could also result in criminal proceedings even if he didn't force himself on her.


Ignorant perhaps, not necessarily stupid. The word consent might not come up in his everyday conversation. And like many young people nowadays he might not be a big reader. But whatever you want to call it, It definitely makes him a target to be manipulated into a bad situation


Well there are street smart people who would not be called literate. But even if he is functionally illiterate his judgment still comes into play and it sounds like it is lacking.

Though I don't see how he could not have been prepared for the meaning of the word consent by his counsel considering it is probably the one word guaranteed to come up in proceedings. If they did not discuss it with him that is practically malpractice. It does sound like he has terrible representation for this case

But even counsel can't hide a client's ignorance when they say stuff like hey we're men. It is basically like putting your neck on the guillotine and saying off with my head please
User avatar
Kampuchea
RealGM
Posts: 11,342
And1: 9,284
Joined: Oct 20, 2010
Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrFOb_f7ubw
       

Re: Rose may face Criminal Charges 

Post#80 » by Kampuchea » Tue Sep 27, 2016 5:01 am

I can't wait until this guy is off the team. Keep KP with dad Melo as the influence and get We Men Illiterate Orgy boy the hell out.
Image

Return to New York Knicks