Oct. 15th in the Philippines.
Penn out of main event due to training injury.
UFC FN 97: Lamas vs. TBA (Maybe)
Moderator: lilfishi22
UFC FN 97: Lamas vs. TBA (Maybe)
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,604
- And1: 2,365
- Joined: Feb 28, 2005
Re: UFC FN 97: Lamas vs. TBA (Maybe)
- REDDzone
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,209
- And1: 5,132
- Joined: Oct 06, 2006
- Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
-
Re: UFC FN 97: Lamas vs. TBA (Maybe)
Wasn't he originally scheduled to return in Jan or Feb this year? He will be 38 soon, now injured.
edit: Not to derail the thread.
edit: Not to derail the thread.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
Re: UFC FN 97: Lamas vs. TBA (Maybe)
- REDDzone
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,209
- And1: 5,132
- Joined: Oct 06, 2006
- Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
-
Re: UFC FN 97: Lamas vs. TBA (Maybe)
This is canceled.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
Re: UFC FN 97: Lamas vs. TBA (Maybe)
- Bernman
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,902
- And1: 8,404
- Joined: Aug 05, 2004
-
Re: UFC FN 97: Lamas vs. TBA (Maybe)
You don't see that every day. They almost always have went thru with it anyways. They need to have better backup plans. Could have just had Derrick Lewis or Sam Alvey carry the card. It's only delaying their path of destruction to a title. Guess they and others will bolster subsequent cards.
Re: UFC FN 97: Lamas vs. TBA (Maybe)
- REDDzone
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,209
- And1: 5,132
- Joined: Oct 06, 2006
- Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
-
Re: UFC FN 97: Lamas vs. TBA (Maybe)
I think this is only the third ufc card ever to be canceled. Big shocker that the f*ckin' sport killer Greg Jackson has been in the corner of 2 of the 3 main event guys who have withdrew and caused the cancellation. 

Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
Re: UFC FN 97: Lamas vs. TBA (Maybe)
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,604
- And1: 2,365
- Joined: Feb 28, 2005
Re: UFC FN 97: Lamas vs. TBA (Maybe)
Glad I made the thread before they cancelled it.
Re: UFC FN 97: Lamas vs. TBA (Maybe)
- Cammo101
- Mr. Mock Draft
- Posts: 30,849
- And1: 2,010
- Joined: Feb 11, 2006
- Location: Austin, TX
-
Re: UFC FN 97: Lamas vs. TBA (Maybe)
Not sure why they couldn't have gone forward with the card here. It's not on a network and it is being held in a place that rarely gets any UFC. I'd have to think the fans there would prefer a main event-less card to no card at all. Strange decision.
Re: UFC FN 97: Lamas vs. TBA (Maybe)
- REDDzone
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,209
- And1: 5,132
- Joined: Oct 06, 2006
- Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
-
Re: UFC FN 97: Lamas vs. TBA (Maybe)
Cammo101 wrote:Not sure why they couldn't have gone forward with the card here. It's not on a network and it is being held in a place that rarely gets any UFC. I'd have to think the fans there would prefer a main event-less card to no card at all. Strange decision.
Luke Thomas said that the culture in the Philippines is to walk up and buy tickets at the door, as opposed to buying in advance. So the theory is that the people wouldn't even bother to walk up to the door without Penn.
Still not sure I buy it. They have tv partners there, they paid the fighters anyway, I'm sure they had some deposit style payment to the venue already, pissed off the market, etc. What's the downside? Obviously this event sans Penn doesn't sell any fight pass subscriptions.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
Re: UFC FN 97: Lamas vs. TBA (Maybe)
- High 5
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,666
- And1: 2,206
- Joined: Apr 21, 2006
Re: UFC FN 97: Lamas vs. TBA (Maybe)
Apparently the government over there required all UFC employees to be drug tested. Some people think that has something to do with it.
The idea would be funnier if that country wasn't so messed up.

Re: UFC FN 97: Lamas vs. TBA (Maybe)
- REDDzone
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,209
- And1: 5,132
- Joined: Oct 06, 2006
- Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
-
Re: UFC FN 97: Lamas vs. TBA (Maybe)
Yea maybe they didn't want someone to pop for weed and get murked.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
Re: UFC FN 97: Lamas vs. TBA (Maybe)
- AirCanadaMouse
- Starter
- Posts: 2,215
- And1: 1,857
- Joined: Nov 10, 2014
-
Re: UFC FN 97: Lamas vs. TBA (Maybe)
Love BJ, but I hope he stays retired. I thought he retired too late the last time anyways.

Thank you Clutch0z24
Re: UFC FN 97: Lamas vs. TBA (Maybe)
- REDDzone
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,209
- And1: 5,132
- Joined: Oct 06, 2006
- Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
-
Re: UFC FN 97: Lamas vs. TBA (Maybe)
Just watched an interview with Cole Miller, said he received less than a third of his show money for this event. So the implication that they paid the fighters their show money for this event was unsurprisingly BS.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
Return to Boxing & Mixed Martial Arts