Rose found not liable: Update pg. 62

[moocow007]

What is going on here?

The pic is of a former Knicks board poster named Q2N8. He decided that it was a good idea to share his life In pictures with the board.

I don't see how that is much different than you posting selfies like this during your periodic drinking binges

[iLLSonChandla]

Rose had 16 & 5 in limited minutes in his first preseason game. We absolutely need him Rose is gonna easily average 20 & 7 & 4 this year with a all star selection. I love Jennings just like the rest of you but he's best in his current role and makes our team way better as a spark plug off the bench. Really hope this case wraps up soon

[RealNy]

Rose in court today?


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

[HEZI]

Rose in court today?


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

In Court vs. On Court

The story continues

[el13adnino]

Rose in court today?


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

nah, wont be back with the team until his case is over

[Newyorknick94]

Rose in court today?


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

nah, wont be back with the team until his case is over

he meant the courtroom wasn't the trial today?

[AmazingJason]

Who the hell commits suicide by shooting yourself in the chest? Doesn't sound right.

with a shotgun you go for the chest.

but it could be a religious thing. i recall reading somewhere that certain people (or religion, again i don't recall) won't shoot themselves in the face/head for funeral purposes (the open casket).

not saying that it should be dismissed as nothing, but there are reasons people don't. i don't understand it. if i go, it's head.

I was thinking the same thing. Plus, to expect logic from someone committing suicide is likely a wast of time. Those saying you wouldn't shoot yourself in the chest are applying LOGIC to an illogical situation.

Those declaring that this was a suicide are applying logic to an illogical situation

Once you enter the world of guys running trains, girls crying rape and gold digging for $20M, all logic goes out the window.

I have almost zero doubt in my mind that the detective was killed, and done so by a professional that made it look like a suicide. Who called the hit? I have no idea. It could be Rose. It could be the plaintiff. It could be someone related to them.

[trophywinner]

with a shotgun you go for the chest.

but it could be a religious thing. i recall reading somewhere that certain people (or religion, again i don't recall) won't shoot themselves in the face/head for funeral purposes (the open casket).

not saying that it should be dismissed as nothing, but there are reasons people don't. i don't understand it. if i go, it's head.

I was thinking the same thing. Plus, to expect logic from someone committing suicide is likely a wast of time. Those saying you wouldn't shoot yourself in the chest are applying LOGIC to an illogical situation.

Those declaring that this was a suicide are applying logic to an illogical situation

Once you enter the world of guys running trains, girls crying rape and gold digging for $20M, all logic goes out the window.

I have almost zero doubt in my mind that the detective was killed, and done so by a professional that made it look like a suicide. Who called the hit? I have no idea. It could be Rose. It could be the plaintiff. It could be someone related to them.

dat tinfoil hat

but here's some facts:
1. there's absolutely zero motive for rose to have called a hit. you can't charge someone based on nothing. there was never any real possibility of criminal charges. zero evidence, same reason why patrick kane wasn't charged with rape last fall, police had nothing.

2. detective wasn't even a part of the civil trial. her letter was dismissed and admonished by the judge. she wasn't a witness, wasn't scheduled to testify, nothing.

3. she died at the hospital. police got a call about a suicide attempt, emphasis on "attempt". i'm sure police by now know who placed the call, whether it was the detective herself, friend, neighbor, since it's been investigated from the beginning as a suicide by LAPD.

[AmazingJason]

I was thinking the same thing. Plus, to expect logic from someone committing suicide is likely a wast of time. Those saying you wouldn't shoot yourself in the chest are applying LOGIC to an illogical situation.

Those declaring that this was a suicide are applying logic to an illogical situation

Once you enter the world of guys running trains, girls crying rape and gold digging for $20M, all logic goes out the window.

I have almost zero doubt in my mind that the detective was killed, and done so by a professional that made it look like a suicide. Who called the hit? I have no idea. It could be Rose. It could be the plaintiff. It could be someone related to them.

dat tinfoil hat

but here's some facts:
1. there's absolutely zero motive for rose to have called a hit. you can't charge someone based on nothing. rose was never any real possibility of criminal charges. zero evidence, same reason why patrick kane wasn't charged with rape last fall, police had nothing.

2. detective wasn't even a part of the civil trial. her letter was dismissed and admonished by the judge. she wasn't a witness, wasn't scheduled to testify, nothing.

3. she died at the hospital. police got a call about a suicide attempt, emphasis on "attempt". i'm sure police by now know who placed the call, whether it was the detective herself, friend, neighbor, since it's been investigated from the beginning as a suicide by LAPD.

Your facts are based on what we know.

There is something that we quite possibly DON'T KNOW that the detective may have uncovered that could have been bad for Rose or bad for the plaintiff. Heck, maybe they weren't the ones who called the hit. Maybe it was a friend or relative that also has a stake in them.

[GONYK]

Why are you guys even entertaining this line of conversation? AJ is trolling you

[CJackson]

Those declaring that this was a suicide are applying logic to an illogical situation

Once you enter the world of guys running trains, girls crying rape and gold digging for $20M, all logic goes out the window.

I have almost zero doubt in my mind that the detective was killed, and done so by a professional that made it look like a suicide. Who called the hit? I have no idea. It could be Rose. It could be the plaintiff. It could be someone related to them.

dat tinfoil hat

but here's some facts:
1. there's absolutely zero motive for rose to have called a hit. you can't charge someone based on nothing. rose was never any real possibility of criminal charges. zero evidence, same reason why patrick kane wasn't charged with rape last fall, police had nothing.

2. detective wasn't even a part of the civil trial. her letter was dismissed and admonished by the judge. she wasn't a witness, wasn't scheduled to testify, nothing.

3. she died at the hospital. police got a call about a suicide attempt, emphasis on "attempt". i'm sure police by now know who placed the call, whether it was the detective herself, friend, neighbor, since it's been investigated from the beginning as a suicide by LAPD.

Your facts are based on what we know.

There is something that we quite possibly DON'T KNOW that the detective may have uncovered that could have been bad for Rose or bad for the plaintiff. Heck, maybe they weren't the ones who called the hit. Maybe it was a friend or relative that also has a stake in them.

The only truth we can be certain about is you don't know squat about whodunnit Jack

[blueNorange]

im ready to roll with jennings personally.

you'll regret this the moment you find out that ennings can't go to his right or misses a wide open shot by 5 feet

still better than what we had...

nope, it's still the same crap.

this is what brandon ennings does on a regular basis, he can't go right



and his 28% fg shooting this preseason, and 38% fg for his career isn't an aberration. the boy is just a terrible shooter.



ennings always wears out his welcome because he's a bad basketball player that thinks he's good.

[JXL]

Read on Twitter

Seems if the jury is going to side with Doe, the masseuse testimony would hurt Rose's lawyers.

[F N 11]

http://www.cbssports.com/nba/news/knicks-carmelo-anthony-sound-naive-to-realities-of-derrick-roses-trial/

"I think it makes it harder," Carmelo Anthony said. "But at the same time for him, it should excite him to see kind of what we're doing without those two guys so far. So I'm pretty sure if I was [Hornacek], I'd be calling Derrick and telling him, 'Hurry up. Figure it out and hurry up back.' Just because the way the team is starting to jell together and come together, the camaraderie we're starting to create with one another, we don't want him missing out on that."

Media is pissed because the knicks seem to not care about this civil case. That's because they probably got word of how much of a money grab this is so they jst want their guy back. I think us fans feel that way too.

Media so mad we not spiraling out of control but staying focused lol

[MP4LIFE]

Rose missing the entire preseason for this is such a detriment. Terrible.

[JXL]

Dissin' the toxicologist? Weak.

Read on Twitter

[iAdoreeKnicks]

Read on Twitter

Read on Twitter

[Drun53]

Read on Twitter

Seems if the jury is going to side with Doe, the masseuse testimony would hurt Rose's lawyers.

Women also judge other women harsher than men do, so it could go both ways.

I'd still prefer a different jury demographic for Rose, though.

[CJackson]

Read on Twitter

Read on Twitter

I just read the whole statement. That was what Rose needed. I cannot see how she can win a judgment against him with that testimony.

[JXL]

Read on Twitter

Read on Twitter

I just read the whole statement. That was what Rose needed. I cannot see how she can win a judgment against him with that testimony.

I agree, but looking at Doe's toxicologist witness' report, it seems that if she drank a lot, either by her own will or by Rose and his friends, her testimony could have holes in it.

Not 100% (at least I hope not), but it's possible.