moocow007 wrote:Knickerbock wrote:Where are all those idiots who were talking down rose now...
Here's one of them...
under a rock and eating a plate of crow....
Moderators: mpharris36, Jeff Van Gully, Deeeez Knicks, HerSports85, j4remi, NoLayupRule, dakomish23, GONYK
moocow007 wrote:Knickerbock wrote:Where are all those idiots who were talking down rose now...
Here's one of them...

Gonna be some crickets in here, I know that much....

iLLSonChandla wrote:20, 7, and 4 coming up for our all star PG


Phish Tank wrote:
Greed wrote:Rose will lose this trial
Frankly he **** up bad in his disposition when he outright stated he didnt know what consent was. You just can't do that in a CIVIL case, where the burden of proof is substantially lower than a criminal one. Despite Los Rios' team making many blunders and it being very obvious she's after money, that's not enough to rule out that sexual assault could've happened, which in a civil case all you need is enough evidence to make it likely that it did
There's also the timing, which is really bad for Rose. A presidential candidate is making everyone hyper aware and sensitive to sexual assault. Before him Nate Parker did it also. Before him Bill Cosby. Then with Brock Turner getting off and embarrassing the system, I can't imagine this jury would want to be known for propagating sexual assault to the masses.
The jury is 6 women, 2 men. Apparently most of them are white, and more than once some of them have been described as looking hurt by the accuer's testimony/tears and one of the males were outright described as looking uncomfortable/disturbed when Randall Hamtpon described using lube.
Rose will lose this trial, unfortunately. I also see them giving her the full 21m she requested


Johnny Hoops wrote:moocow007 wrote:Thank goodness.
Juror -- only described as BNO delivered the lone guilty vote on jury...and could be heard screaming "NOOOOOOOO!!!!!" as the verdict was read.