ImageImageImageImageImage

Can Trump wiggle out of this one?

Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

User avatar
Rasho Brezec
RealGM
Posts: 61,959
And1: 18,587
Joined: Mar 12, 2008
Contact:
   

Re: Can Trump wiggle out of this one? 

Post#1161 » by Rasho Brezec » Wed Oct 19, 2016 7:39 pm

This is actually good.

Image
Image
CJackson
General Manager
Posts: 9,584
And1: 5,221
Joined: Mar 05, 2016

Re: Can Trump wiggle out of this one? 

Post#1162 » by CJackson » Wed Oct 19, 2016 7:41 pm

earthmansurfer wrote:
Bro, sometimes more is less.
And your negative talking about Trump, is well, a bit ironic.


Bro, you have been devoid of original thought since you started posting on the thread.

You have provided less, not more, because you push pre-packaged mush and have yet to detail anything with your own words.

And now you say talking negative about Trump = what? Negativity? That's not an insight
CJackson
General Manager
Posts: 9,584
And1: 5,221
Joined: Mar 05, 2016

Re: Can Trump wiggle out of this one? 

Post#1163 » by CJackson » Wed Oct 19, 2016 7:45 pm

Rasho Brezec wrote:This is actually good.

Image


It does sound good, but it is toothless since it conveniently side-steps campaign finance reform.

So it is really only intended to look brave without sticking their necks out to do the one thing that would actually make these clauses effective.

It is extremely easy to work around every provision on the list as long as there is Super-PAC money to spend.

Banning foreign lobbyists? Right. So there will still be massive slush funds. It doesn't talk about the one core issue that drives all of these other factors.

This is called putting the cart before the horse.
User avatar
K_ick_God
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 80,879
And1: 43,336
Joined: Oct 10, 2003
   

Re: Can Trump wiggle out of this one? 

Post#1164 » by K_ick_God » Wed Oct 19, 2016 7:54 pm

CJackson wrote:
Rasho Brezec wrote:This is actually good.

Image


It does sound good, but it is toothless since it conveniently side-steps campaign finance reform.

So it is really only intended to look brave without sticking their necks out to do the one thing that would actually make these clauses effective.

It is extremely easy to work around every provision on the list as long as there is Super-PAC money to spend.

Banning foreign lobbyists? Right. So there will still be massive slush funds. It doesn't talk about the one core issue that drives all of these other factors.

This is called putting the cart before the horse.


And what does it say about T's judgment that he waited this long to start running on precisely the issues that could have at least kept him close against H? Well I'm not sure how a substantive campaign would have held up against the charges of the women who came forward, but it would have at least helped give him a shot at surviving.

And it's not like he's abandoning his other tactics. He has O's half-brother at the debate tonight. Just foolish.
User avatar
Capn'O
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 90,736
And1: 110,912
Joined: Dec 16, 2005
Location: Bone Goal
 

Re: Can Trump wiggle out of this one? 

Post#1165 » by Capn'O » Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:04 pm

Rasho Brezec wrote:This is actually good.

Image


Yeah. I'll give credit where due. I agree with CJ that finance reform (overturning Citizens United and beyond) is a greater need but those are decent suggestions.
BAF Clippers:
UNDER CONSTRUCTION - PLEASE INQUIRE WITHIN

:beer:
CJackson
General Manager
Posts: 9,584
And1: 5,221
Joined: Mar 05, 2016

Re: Can Trump wiggle out of this one? 

Post#1166 » by CJackson » Wed Oct 19, 2016 9:37 pm

Will watch the game tonight

TV schedule has PBS rebroadcasting the debate at 1 a.m. so I'll watch it then or earlier if it is posted on YouTube
reub
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,044
And1: 2,309
Joined: Aug 18, 2015
 

Re: Can Trump wiggle out of this one? 

Post#1167 » by reub » Wed Oct 19, 2016 9:53 pm

IBD/TIPP poll which is the most accurate over the past few elections has Trump 41% Hillary 40%.

http://www.investors.com/politics/trump-leads-clinton-by-one-point-going-into-debate-in-ibdtipp-tracking-poll/
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,546
And1: 62,686
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Can Trump wiggle out of this one? 

Post#1168 » by HarthorneWingo » Wed Oct 19, 2016 10:22 pm

KnicksGod wrote:
Read on Twitter



I just heard about this McMullen guy in Utah. But is he on all 50 state ballots? I'm guessing he isn't.
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 67,006
And1: 45,776
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: Can Trump wiggle out of this one? 

Post#1169 » by GONYK » Wed Oct 19, 2016 10:23 pm

ClydeRules wrote:IBD/TIPP poll which is the most accurate over the past few elections has Trump 41% Hillary 40%.

http://www.investors.com/politics/trump-leads-clinton-by-one-point-going-into-debate-in-ibdtipp-tracking-poll/


By what measure?
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,546
And1: 62,686
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Can Trump wiggle out of this one? 

Post#1170 » by HarthorneWingo » Wed Oct 19, 2016 10:24 pm

CJackson wrote:Will watch the game tonight

TV schedule has PBS rebroadcasting the debate at 1 a.m. so I'll watch it then or earlier if it is posted on YouTube


Game comes first. Besides, it's not like we're going to find out anything new from these two. It's more about watching the train wreck.
CJackson
General Manager
Posts: 9,584
And1: 5,221
Joined: Mar 05, 2016

Re: Can Trump wiggle out of this one? 

Post#1171 » by CJackson » Wed Oct 19, 2016 10:27 pm

HarthorneWingo wrote:
CJackson wrote:Will watch the game tonight

TV schedule has PBS rebroadcasting the debate at 1 a.m. so I'll watch it then or earlier if it is posted on YouTube


Game comes first. Besides, it's not like we're going to find out anything new from these two. It's more about watching the train wreck.


My conclusion as well
NBA Fan 1234
RealGM
Posts: 48,653
And1: 28,365
Joined: Jul 16, 2009

Re: Can Trump wiggle out of this one? 

Post#1172 » by NBA Fan 1234 » Wed Oct 19, 2016 10:28 pm

CJackson wrote:Will watch the game tonight

TV schedule has PBS rebroadcasting the debate at 1 a.m. so I'll watch it then or earlier if it is posted on YouTube


Not going to watch both? If I didn't wake up at 5AM to go to the gym, I would have both on. As it is, I'll watch clips of the debate in the morning / read about it before class and then watch the game in the afternoon probably if I have time.
CJackson
General Manager
Posts: 9,584
And1: 5,221
Joined: Mar 05, 2016

Re: Can Trump wiggle out of this one? 

Post#1173 » by CJackson » Wed Oct 19, 2016 10:33 pm

Knickstape1214 wrote:
CJackson wrote:Will watch the game tonight

TV schedule has PBS rebroadcasting the debate at 1 a.m. so I'll watch it then or earlier if it is posted on YouTube


Not going to watch both? If I didn't wake up at 5AM to go to the gym, I would have both on. As it is, I'll watch clips of the debate in the morning / read about it before class and then watch the game in the afternoon probably if I have time.


I considered that, but with the possibility of auditory confusion with Clyde rhyming about penetration while Trump stalks Hillary on the stage could give me nightmares
User avatar
K_ick_God
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 80,879
And1: 43,336
Joined: Oct 10, 2003
   

Re: Can Trump wiggle out of this one? 

Post#1174 » by K_ick_God » Wed Oct 19, 2016 10:37 pm

HarthorneWingo wrote:
KnicksGod wrote:
Read on Twitter



I just heard about this McMullen guy in Utah. But is he on all 50 state ballots? I'm guessing he isn't.


10 states in addition to Utah: Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Minnesota, New Mexico, South Carolina and Virginia.
NBA Fan 1234
RealGM
Posts: 48,653
And1: 28,365
Joined: Jul 16, 2009

Re: Can Trump wiggle out of this one? 

Post#1175 » by NBA Fan 1234 » Wed Oct 19, 2016 10:43 pm

CJackson wrote:
Knickstape1214 wrote:
CJackson wrote:Will watch the game tonight

TV schedule has PBS rebroadcasting the debate at 1 a.m. so I'll watch it then or earlier if it is posted on YouTube


Not going to watch both? If I didn't wake up at 5AM to go to the gym, I would have both on. As it is, I'll watch clips of the debate in the morning / read about it before class and then watch the game in the afternoon probably if I have time.


I considered that, but with the possibility of auditory confusion with Clyde rhyming about penetration while Trump stalks Hillary on the stage could give me nightmares


I just got a visual of Clyde being one of the moderators wearing a red, white, and blue jacket and it's glorious.
CJackson
General Manager
Posts: 9,584
And1: 5,221
Joined: Mar 05, 2016

Re: Can Trump wiggle out of this one? 

Post#1176 » by CJackson » Wed Oct 19, 2016 10:44 pm

KnicksGod wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:
KnicksGod wrote:
Read on Twitter



I just heard about this McMullen guy in Utah. But is he on all 50 state ballots? I'm guessing he isn't.


10 states in addition to Utah: Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Minnesota, New Mexico, South Carolina and Virginia.


Former CIA operative
User avatar
K_ick_God
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 80,879
And1: 43,336
Joined: Oct 10, 2003
   

Re: Can Trump wiggle out of this one? 

Post#1177 » by K_ick_God » Wed Oct 19, 2016 10:44 pm

Trump now firing off one Tweet after another with government-reform-type ideas. Too late. But also it looks like he's lost control. Spamming followers is not the way to win now -- and he's always preaching to the choir on Twitter. Few swing voters are reading that.
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,546
And1: 62,686
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Can Trump wiggle out of this one? 

Post#1178 » by HarthorneWingo » Wed Oct 19, 2016 11:21 pm

CJackson wrote:
KnicksGod wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:

I just heard about this McMullen guy in Utah. But is he on all 50 state ballots? I'm guessing he isn't.


10 states in addition to Utah: Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Minnesota, New Mexico, South Carolina and Virginia.


Former CIA operative


What's the point of running if you're only on the ballots in 10 states? Is he an intelligent and reasonable person?
User avatar
Mike Breen
Analyst
Posts: 3,555
And1: 2,093
Joined: Nov 06, 2013
Location: In your glazed donut face ass
 

Re: Can Trump wiggle out of this one? 

Post#1179 » by Mike Breen » Wed Oct 19, 2016 11:25 pm

ClydeRules wrote:IBD/TIPP poll which is the most accurate over the past few elections has Trump 41% Hillary 40%.

http://www.investors.com/politics/trump-leads-clinton-by-one-point-going-into-debate-in-ibdtipp-tracking-poll/


Honest question: Do you really believe the things you write?
And just like that, the lead has been cut to 8!

-Mike Breen
User avatar
aq_ua
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,756
And1: 7,789
Joined: May 08, 2002
Location: Optimistic but realistic

Re: Can Trump wiggle out of this one? 

Post#1180 » by aq_ua » Wed Oct 19, 2016 11:30 pm

KnicksGod wrote:
CJackson wrote:
Rasho Brezec wrote:This is actually good.

Image


It does sound good, but it is toothless since it conveniently side-steps campaign finance reform.

So it is really only intended to look brave without sticking their necks out to do the one thing that would actually make these clauses effective.

It is extremely easy to work around every provision on the list as long as there is Super-PAC money to spend.

Banning foreign lobbyists? Right. So there will still be massive slush funds. It doesn't talk about the one core issue that drives all of these other factors.

This is called putting the cart before the horse.


And what does it say about T's judgment that he waited this long to start running on precisely the issues that could have at least kept him close against H? Well I'm not sure how a substantive campaign would have held up against the charges of the women who came forward, but it would have at least helped give him a shot at surviving.

And it's not like he's abandoning his other tactics. He has O's half-brother at the debate tonight. Just foolish.

This. Trump had a chance to go full angry Bernie and appeal to the disapassionate youth of America. These are the kinds of messages that appeal best (impossibility of actually accomplishing them aside). He could have held a positive change image, enough of which could have sheltered him from p*ssy-gate. Poor tactics.

Return to New York Knicks