cdubbz wrote:Left*My*Heart wrote:cdubbz wrote:
Well technically David West took a pay cut to play for the Spurs. Doubt he had a market for him this season, but yeah I definitely thought about that. Messed up to lure West here with Championship hopes to trade him in December (but if ya don't do ya job ya gots to go)
Anderson Varajao can be substituted in the trade however, but trade checker said he has to approve of a deal first.
West had a player option with the Spurs and declined it to sign with the Warriors. You still want to trade him?
He has had his struggles, but I think it has to do with grasping the system he is in(even if it is somewhat familiar to him) and just chemistry playing with new teammates. I think he will be fine in the role the Warriors want him in.
Looked at 2-3 articles and never seen where it said he had a player option with the spurs. He signed a one year minimum contract with them and signed a minimum contract with us.
http://www.hoopsrumors.com/2016/07/warriors-to-sign-david-west.html
West, 35, harbored no regrets about turning down a more lucrative financial situation with the Pacers to join the Spurs.
West played just nine minutes during San Antonio's final game of the postseason. He had a $1.5 million player option for the 2016-17 season, which he declined.
ESPN.com's Michael C. Wright contributed to this report.
http://www.mysanantonio.com/sports/spurs/article/Warriors-9297225.php
Not sure where you are reading, but that part of the West story is sort of hidden, but it is there.
West signed a two year deal with the Spurs with a player option for the second, 2016/17 season.




















