ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI

Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico

payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,759
And1: 9,168
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#721 » by payitforward » Tue Nov 22, 2016 10:10 pm

Illmatic12 wrote:
Ruzious wrote:Now that Beal appears on the right track...

...if Beal can continue his ascent as an All-Starish caliber player...

LOL! Brad had a tremendous game last night, no question about it. And to us Wizards fans, who have wandered in such darkness so much of the time for so long, any point of light at all seems like the sun-rise! :)

So let me join the party. Now that Brad has shown that he can put up a Michael Jordan level game, if he continues his ascent to doing that regularly, he'll justify his max salary and we won't want to trade him.
User avatar
dangermouse
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,628
And1: 814
Joined: Dec 08, 2009

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#722 » by dangermouse » Wed Nov 23, 2016 8:17 am

Illmatic12 wrote:
Ruzious wrote:Now that Beal appears on the right track, the chances of a mid-year trade to get Cousins goes from non-existent to possible. I guess the question is - what else needs to happen to make it more likely?

I think the Wiz are more much more likely to make a big trade if they continue to stay below .500. And Sac is more likely to trade as they continue to lose - and WCS languishes on the bench - their fans and local media (and Shaq) saying isn't he the type of player who should be getting PT on a losing team?

The more time passes, the lower Cousins value will be and the increased likelihood of a trade.

Interesting to look at some of these proposals - if Beal can continue his ascent as an All-Starish caliber player the Wizards could put together one of the more attractive offers for Boogie:


Every NBA team’s best (hypothetical) trade proposal to land DeMarcus Cousins

http://www.foxsports.com/nba/gallery/demarcus-cousins-kings-trade-rumors-proposals-lakers-bulls-cavs-warriors-heat-thunder-112116


Cousins + Collison for Beal + two 1sts? (I'd even throw in Oubre or Sato if need be)

Then trade Gortat for a wing player, say to Houston for Ariza.

Wall/Sato
McClellan/Thornton (or any vet min)
Porter/Ariza
Kieff/Nicholson
Cousins/Mahinmi


In that scenario I'd probably run with Porter or Ariza at PF. Kieff as the first guy off the bench. Where does Collison go in this? I think getting Collison might be a bit much, hasn't he been their PG leader this year over Lawson? Sato would be pushed to backup, or starting SG, in that lineup.


I think asking for McLemore might be more obvious.
Image
long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:
NatP4 wrote:but why would the pacers want Mahinmi's contract


Well, in fairness, we took Mike Pence off their hands. Taking back Mahinmi is the least they can do.
User avatar
BigA
Analyst
Posts: 3,091
And1: 999
Joined: Oct 05, 2005
Location: Arlington, VA
 

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#723 » by BigA » Wed Nov 23, 2016 11:08 am

payitforward wrote:
Illmatic12 wrote:
Ruzious wrote:Now that Beal appears on the right track...

...if Beal can continue his ascent as an All-Starish caliber player...

LOL! Brad had a tremendous game last night, no question about it. And to us Wizards fans, who have wandered in such darkness so much of the time for so long, any point of light at all seems like the sun-rise! :)

So let me join the party. Now that Brad has shown that he can put up a Michael Jordan level game, if he continues his ascent to doing that regularly, he'll justify his max salary and we won't want to trade him.

User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,478
And1: 2,131
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#724 » by Dark Faze » Wed Nov 23, 2016 2:04 pm

Gotta give Brad credit. Those numbers are rising in a hurry, and I would never have thought he was capable of coming even close to 50--and honestly it didn't look terribly hard for him. If he'd forced it he could have gotten there.

That's huge. I've never seen that from him with the eye test before. Gives me a degree of pause.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,405
And1: 22,813
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#725 » by nate33 » Wed Nov 23, 2016 2:26 pm

Dark Faze wrote:Gotta give Brad credit. Those numbers are rising in a hurry, and I would never have thought he was capable of coming even close to 50--and honestly it didn't look terribly hard for him. If he'd forced it he could have gotten there.

That's huge. I've never seen that from him with the eye test before. Gives me a degree of pause.

Good point. This was his first scoring explosion that passed "the eye test". In most of his other big scoring nights, it was mostly just a matter of him getting an unusually high number of catch-and-shoot opportunities that he happened to make. He was highly productive, but not necessarily dominate.

He dominated Phoenix. They really couldn't stop him.
User avatar
long suffrin' boulez fan
General Manager
Posts: 7,878
And1: 3,657
Joined: Nov 18, 2005
Location: Just above Ted's double bottom line
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#726 » by long suffrin' boulez fan » Wed Nov 23, 2016 4:05 pm

payitforward wrote:
Illmatic12 wrote:
Ruzious wrote:Now that Beal appears on the right track...

...if Beal can continue his ascent as an All-Starish caliber player...

LOL! Brad had a tremendous game last night, no question about it. And to us Wizards fans, who have wandered in such darkness so much of the time for so long, any point of light at all seems like the sun-rise! :)

So let me join the party. Now that Brad has shown that he can put up a Michael Jordan level game, if he continues his ascent to doing that regularly, he'll justify his max salary and we won't want to trade him.


Labradford Smith
In Rizzo we trust
BealsLegs
Freshman
Posts: 51
And1: 7
Joined: Nov 17, 2016
         

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#727 » by BealsLegs » Wed Nov 23, 2016 7:23 pm

Honestly if we get Cousins I'd rather he start at the 4 and we make kief the super-sub, cuz seems to do well with a traditional center next to him plus hes shooting 3s now
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,405
And1: 22,813
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#728 » by nate33 » Wed Nov 23, 2016 7:38 pm

BealsLegs wrote:Honestly if we get Cousins I'd rather he start at the 4 and we make kief the super-sub, cuz seems to do well with a traditional center next to him plus hes shooting 3s now

Watching Cousins defend opposing PF's would be painful. Twin Towers lineups don't work in today's NBA. There is too much floor spacing.
BealsLegs
Freshman
Posts: 51
And1: 7
Joined: Nov 17, 2016
         

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#729 » by BealsLegs » Thu Nov 24, 2016 2:42 am

nate33 wrote:
BealsLegs wrote:Honestly if we get Cousins I'd rather he start at the 4 and we make kief the super-sub, cuz seems to do well with a traditional center next to him plus hes shooting 3s now

Watching Cousins defend opposing PF's would be painful. Twin Towers lineups don't work in today's NBA. There is too much floor spacing.

Cant cousins shoot 3s tho?
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,405
And1: 22,813
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#730 » by nate33 » Thu Nov 24, 2016 2:47 am

BealsLegs wrote:
nate33 wrote:
BealsLegs wrote:Honestly if we get Cousins I'd rather he start at the 4 and we make kief the super-sub, cuz seems to do well with a traditional center next to him plus hes shooting 3s now

Watching Cousins defend opposing PF's would be painful. Twin Towers lineups don't work in today's NBA. There is too much floor spacing.

Cant cousins shoot 3s tho?

He can, but that's not why you get Cousins. If you want a PF to shoot 3's get a guy like Channing Frye who won't cost a fortune and who has the mobility to chase other PF's out on the perimeter.

I'm fine with acquiring Cousins. But you absolutely must trade one of Gortat/Mahinmi and use that value to shore up the depth at forward.
User avatar
dangermouse
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,628
And1: 814
Joined: Dec 08, 2009

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#731 » by dangermouse » Thu Nov 24, 2016 5:09 am

Lets say a Cousins for Beal deal goes through...

We'd likely be ringing teams shopping Gortat. What about Gortat + filler for Portland's Allen Crabbe?

I feel like he is definitely far more overpaid than Beal is, but as a catch and shoot guy next to Wall with Cousins in the middle, he could fill in that gap that Beal leaves.
Image
long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:
NatP4 wrote:but why would the pacers want Mahinmi's contract


Well, in fairness, we took Mike Pence off their hands. Taking back Mahinmi is the least they can do.
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,558
And1: 1,990
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#732 » by gambitx777 » Thu Nov 24, 2016 8:31 am

dangermouse wrote:Lets say a Cousins for Beal deal goes through...

We'd likely be ringing teams shopping Gortat. What about Gortat + filler for Portland's Allen Crabbe?

I feel like he is definitely far more overpaid than Beal is, but as a catch and shoot guy next to Wall with Cousins in the middle, he could fill in that gap that Beal leaves.

I feel like the smarter thing would be to offer one of our centers to denver, they desperately need some center help. One of our bigs for will barton and wilson chandler. They have a lot of young wings and they would not mind dumping that contract on chandler.
deneem4
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,917
And1: 1,263
Joined: Dec 26, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#733 » by deneem4 » Thu Nov 24, 2016 7:02 pm

Can we please trade for ersan before Ben comes back...
The guy has been a major offensive weapon for the sixers maybe the biggest after embiid...I been saying for years hes Kevin love lite....he's showing it right now
Pay your beals....or its lights out!!!
Bron, Bosh, Wade is like Mike, Hakeem, barkley...3 top 5 picks from same draft
mike, hakeem and Barkley on the same team!!!!
Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,165
And1: 7,937
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#734 » by Dat2U » Thu Nov 24, 2016 7:50 pm

gambitx777 wrote:
dangermouse wrote:Lets say a Cousins for Beal deal goes through...

We'd likely be ringing teams shopping Gortat. What about Gortat + filler for Portland's Allen Crabbe?

I feel like he is definitely far more overpaid than Beal is, but as a catch and shoot guy next to Wall with Cousins in the middle, he could fill in that gap that Beal leaves.

I feel like the smarter thing would be to offer one of our centers to denver, they desperately need some center help. One of our bigs for will barton and wilson chandler. They have a lot of young wings and they would not mind dumping that contract on chandler.


Someone mentioned Gortat for Trevor Ariza a few pages back. That would be my preference. I think Porter & Ariza can play together effectively.

Crabbe makes entirely too much money as a one trick pony. Unless Smith & Nicholson are being sent back in a deal I have no interest.

Barton is a poor fit with Wall. He's a slasher with a shaky jumper and he's generally been disengaged defender. His on/off numbers have consistently been poor as well.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,405
And1: 22,813
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#735 » by nate33 » Thu Nov 24, 2016 8:42 pm

Dat2U wrote:
gambitx777 wrote:
dangermouse wrote:Lets say a Cousins for Beal deal goes through...

We'd likely be ringing teams shopping Gortat. What about Gortat + filler for Portland's Allen Crabbe?

I feel like he is definitely far more overpaid than Beal is, but as a catch and shoot guy next to Wall with Cousins in the middle, he could fill in that gap that Beal leaves.

I feel like the smarter thing would be to offer one of our centers to denver, they desperately need some center help. One of our bigs for will barton and wilson chandler. They have a lot of young wings and they would not mind dumping that contract on chandler.


Someone mentioned Gortat for Trevor Ariza a few pages back. That would be my preference. I think Porter & Ariza can play together effectively.

Crabbe makes entirely too much money as a one trick pony. Unless Smith & Nicholson are being sent back in a deal I have no interest.

Barton is a poor fit with Wall. He's a slasher with a shaky jumper and he's generally been disengaged defender. His on/off numbers have consistently been poor as well.

Agreed. It's really hard to have too many versatile forwards in today's NBA. Ariza, Porter and Morris would form a pretty solid trio at forward, capable of defending most matchups, and switching onto anyone. Meanwhile, they'll spread the floor on offense and exploit mismatches when available. Nicholson gets the minutes at backup center. He's less of a defensive disaster there.

The only concern is that neither Mahinmi nor Nicholson are particularly good screeners. It could impact the effectiveness of the high screen and roll we use as the foundation to many of our offensive sets. (Actually, I don't really know how good of a screener Mahinmi is. I just know that Gortat is really good at it.)
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,558
And1: 1,990
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#736 » by gambitx777 » Thu Nov 24, 2016 11:14 pm

nate33 wrote:
Dat2U wrote:
gambitx777 wrote:I feel like the smarter thing would be to offer one of our centers to denver, they desperately need some center help. One of our bigs for will barton and wilson chandler. They have a lot of young wings and they would not mind dumping that contract on chandler.


Someone mentioned Gortat for Trevor Ariza a few pages back. That would be my preference. I think Porter & Ariza can play together effectively.

Crabbe makes entirely too much money as a one trick pony. Unless Smith & Nicholson are being sent back in a deal I have no interest.

Barton is a poor fit with Wall. He's a slasher with a shaky jumper and he's generally been disengaged defender. His on/off numbers have consistently been poor as well.

Agreed. It's really hard to have too many versatile forwards in today's NBA. Ariza, Porter and Morris would form a pretty solid trio at forward, capable of defending most matchups, and switching onto anyone. Meanwhile, they'll spread the floor on offense and exploit mismatches when available. Nicholson gets the minutes at backup center. He's less of a defensive disaster there.

The only concern is that neither Mahinmi nor Nicholson are particularly good screeners. It could impact the effectiveness of the high screen and roll we use as the foundation to many of our offensive sets. (Actually, I don't really know how good of a screener Mahinmi is. I just know that Gortat is really good at it.)

Nate would you be more inclined to trade mahinmi to a place like denver. for Will barton and wilson chandler? Then say we move beal for DC or move him to Philly for a big and some bench guys.
We then have Gortat, chandler coming off the bench that helps out our bench a **** ton.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,405
And1: 22,813
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#737 » by nate33 » Thu Nov 24, 2016 11:47 pm

gambitx777 wrote:
nate33 wrote:
Dat2U wrote:
Someone mentioned Gortat for Trevor Ariza a few pages back. That would be my preference. I think Porter & Ariza can play together effectively.

Crabbe makes entirely too much money as a one trick pony. Unless Smith & Nicholson are being sent back in a deal I have no interest.

Barton is a poor fit with Wall. He's a slasher with a shaky jumper and he's generally been disengaged defender. His on/off numbers have consistently been poor as well.

Agreed. It's really hard to have too many versatile forwards in today's NBA. Ariza, Porter and Morris would form a pretty solid trio at forward, capable of defending most matchups, and switching onto anyone. Meanwhile, they'll spread the floor on offense and exploit mismatches when available. Nicholson gets the minutes at backup center. He's less of a defensive disaster there.

The only concern is that neither Mahinmi nor Nicholson are particularly good screeners. It could impact the effectiveness of the high screen and roll we use as the foundation to many of our offensive sets. (Actually, I don't really know how good of a screener Mahinmi is. I just know that Gortat is really good at it.)

Nate would you be more inclined to trade mahinmi to a place like denver. for Will barton and wilson chandler? Then say we move beal for DC or move him to Philly for a big and some bench guys.
We then have Gortat, chandler coming off the bench that helps out our bench a **** ton.

If we traded Beal for Cousins, that would require a whole series of follow-up moves to balance the roster. Yes, Gortat for Chandler plus Barton would make sense in that scenario.
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,558
And1: 1,990
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#738 » by gambitx777 » Fri Nov 25, 2016 1:40 am

nate33 wrote:
gambitx777 wrote:
nate33 wrote:Agreed. It's really hard to have too many versatile forwards in today's NBA. Ariza, Porter and Morris would form a pretty solid trio at forward, capable of defending most matchups, and switching onto anyone. Meanwhile, they'll spread the floor on offense and exploit mismatches when available. Nicholson gets the minutes at backup center. He's less of a defensive disaster there.

The only concern is that neither Mahinmi nor Nicholson are particularly good screeners. It could impact the effectiveness of the high screen and roll we use as the foundation to many of our offensive sets. (Actually, I don't really know how good of a screener Mahinmi is. I just know that Gortat is really good at it.)

Nate would you be more inclined to trade mahinmi to a place like denver. for Will barton and wilson chandler? Then say we move beal for DC or move him to Philly for a big and some bench guys.
We then have Gortat, chandler coming off the bench that helps out our bench a **** ton.

If we traded Beal for Cousins, that would require a whole series of follow-up moves to balance the roster. Yes, Gortat for Chandler plus Barton would make sense in that scenario.

Why do you and a lot of people want to move gortat over mahinmi? I see gortat as the better player, and hes on a better contract. Why not keep gortat and tell him look we want to win you are coming off the bench. play hard and lets go win games.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,405
And1: 22,813
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#739 » by nate33 » Fri Nov 25, 2016 2:30 am

gambitx777 wrote:
nate33 wrote:
gambitx777 wrote:Nate would you be more inclined to trade mahinmi to a place like denver. for Will barton and wilson chandler? Then say we move beal for DC or move him to Philly for a big and some bench guys.
We then have Gortat, chandler coming off the bench that helps out our bench a **** ton.

If we traded Beal for Cousins, that would require a whole series of follow-up moves to balance the roster. Yes, Gortat for Chandler plus Barton would make sense in that scenario.

Why do you and a lot of people want to move gortat over mahinmi? I see gortat as the better player, and hes on a better contract. Why not keep gortat and tell him look we want to win you are coming off the bench. play hard and lets go win games.

Gortat has more trade value because he's got a cheaper contract. I don't think Denver would trade Chandler and Barton for Mahinmi. (Indeed, I don't think Denver trades for a big man at all because they have two of them in Jokic and Nurkic.)

Also, I think, chemistry-wise, it would be hard for Gortat to adapt to a bench role. It would also be redundant because Gortat, like Cousins, is a more offensive minded player. I think Mahinmi is a better complement to Cousins because he brings something to the table that Cousins cannot (defense).
User avatar
dangermouse
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,628
And1: 814
Joined: Dec 08, 2009

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXXI 

Post#740 » by dangermouse » Fri Nov 25, 2016 2:36 am

Gortat would feast on backup C's if he came off the bench.

I'd be down for an Ersan trade also, but what would the Sixers want in a trade that we'd be willing to part with?
Image
long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:
NatP4 wrote:but why would the pacers want Mahinmi's contract


Well, in fairness, we took Mike Pence off their hands. Taking back Mahinmi is the least they can do.

Return to Washington Wizards