Rockets match Nets offer for Donuts (Updte Pg 17: Offer Pulled, DMo UFA)

Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid

User avatar
K_chile22
RealGM
Posts: 16,746
And1: 8,631
Joined: Jul 15, 2015
   

Re: RE: Re: Rockets match Nets offer for Donuts 

Post#21 » by K_chile22 » Tue Dec 6, 2016 12:19 am

HartfordWhalers wrote:
K_chile22 wrote:Dmo couldn't get Morey to go that high without another team giving Dmo leverage, it wasn't a case of Morey trying to get Dmo to agree to something that low


I feel like I am missing something here. Filling in the numbers, doesn't that basically read: Dmo couldn't get Morey to go up to a starting 8.5m salary, it wasn't a case of Morey trying to get Dmo to agree to a 7m starting salary.

Yeah, that was worded terribly on my part lol Slava was making it seem like Morey couldn't get Dmo to agree to a deal like the one he got from Brooklyn when that wasn't even on the table from Morey because he wasn't going to bid against himself. It's not like they were making similar offers and Morey just couldn't negotiate him down like Marks did

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
Johnny Bball
RealGM
Posts: 54,980
And1: 59,361
Joined: Feb 01, 2015
 

Re: Rockets match Nets offer for Donuts 

Post#22 » by Johnny Bball » Tue Dec 6, 2016 12:35 am

That's dumb. They've tried to trade him, alienated him and don't let him go. Its not like hes going to see lots of the floor ever. I shake my head at Morey's decisions often though.
TinmanZBoy
General Manager
Posts: 7,807
And1: 5,123
Joined: Jul 11, 2015
         

Re: Rockets match Nets offer for Donuts 

Post#23 » by TinmanZBoy » Tue Dec 6, 2016 12:43 am

paulbball wrote:
BBall Loyalty wrote:
Slava wrote:Sean Marks helped Morey get a better deal than Morey could negotiate himself. Brooklyn's front office is amateur and D-Mo is a dummy for signing that offer sheet after holding out for so long instead of playing on the QO.

D-Mo misplayed it and was banking on the Rockets sucking without him and being desperate to sign him. Once he saw that we were fine without him he had to give in. No team wanted him or else they could have had him. The threat of Morey matching also discouraged suitors during free agency. Morey played this perfectly.


Pretty simple tbh.

What he should have done:
Sign QO for $4.4 million.
If healthy, become UFA next year, get big $$$ contract.
If not healthy, gets $4.4m total

What happened:
Let QO expire. Signed Nets deal 35m/4 year or 8.75m/year or so, read on. This deal is really bad.
If healthy, locked into a bargain basement deal for less than 9m per year for 4 years.
If not healthy, Rockets can actually cut him by January 10, 2017. He only gets 5m for 2016-2017. Rockets can even decide to keep him in January, then elect to not pickup his second year by March 1, 2017. So Rockets can keep him on the roster until March for $8.5m this year.

And his last two years are fully unguaranteed (with decision dates of July 7, 2017 and July 7, 2018).

What did his gamble get him? Probably approximately 4m in guaranteed money, but lost an opportunity to get the real big bucks in FA. Motiejunas needs to fire his agent.

This deal is a disaster: http://sports.yahoo.com/news/sources-houston-matches-nets-offer-sheet-for-donatas-motiejunas-221704984.html


second this... i am happy that D-Mo is going to play, but bewildered by his contract
Hi Clutchie, I love you... :kiss
User avatar
BallerTalk
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,712
And1: 6,816
Joined: Jul 01, 2013

Re: Rockets match Nets offer for Donuts 

Post#24 » by BallerTalk » Tue Dec 6, 2016 12:51 am

FNQ wrote:Donatas can't be happy, he seemed aggravated at how the Rockets negotiated with him. ...


Hmm...I'm curious about the basis of this comment.
Has Motiejunas made a statement expressing discontent?
Is there an interview or something that gave you this impression?
You checkin' for the sound of the beast
I'm the hound, I'ma creep, I get down, I'ma eat
I'ma keep somethin' to lay a naysayer to sleep
-
pr0wler
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,248
And1: 3,378
Joined: Jun 04, 2007
     

Re: Rockets match Nets offer for Donuts 

Post#25 » by pr0wler » Tue Dec 6, 2016 12:54 am

Johnny Bball wrote:That's dumb. They've tried to trade him, alienated him and don't let him go. Its not like hes going to see lots of the floor ever. I shake my head at Morey's decisions often though.


lol. Very insightful and accurate analysis imo
User avatar
K_chile22
RealGM
Posts: 16,746
And1: 8,631
Joined: Jul 15, 2015
   

Re: RE: Re: Rockets match Nets offer for Donuts 

Post#26 » by K_chile22 » Tue Dec 6, 2016 12:55 am

BallerTalk wrote:
FNQ wrote:Donatas can't be happy, he seemed aggravated at how the Rockets negotiated with him. ...


Hmm...I'm curious about the basis of this comment.
Has Motiejunas made a statement expressing discontent?
Is there an interview or something that gave you this impression?

All of these comments are merely conjecture. There have been no reports or quotes that say anything to suggest this kind of thing is true

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using RealGM mobile app
MemphisX
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,827
And1: 3,744
Joined: Nov 10, 2011

Re: Rockets match Nets offer for Donuts 

Post#27 » by MemphisX » Tue Dec 6, 2016 12:59 am

paulbball wrote:
BBall Loyalty wrote:
Slava wrote:Sean Marks helped Morey get a better deal than Morey could negotiate himself. Brooklyn's front office is amateur and D-Mo is a dummy for signing that offer sheet after holding out for so long instead of playing on the QO.

D-Mo misplayed it and was banking on the Rockets sucking without him and being desperate to sign him. Once he saw that we were fine without him he had to give in. No team wanted him or else they could have had him. The threat of Morey matching also discouraged suitors during free agency. Morey played this perfectly.


Pretty simple tbh.

What he should have done:
Sign QO for $4.4 million.
If healthy, become UFA next year, get big $$$ contract.
If not healthy, gets $4.4m total

What happened:
Let QO expire. Signed Nets deal 35m/4 year or 8.75m/year or so, read on. This deal is really bad.
If healthy, locked into a bargain basement deal for less than 9m per year for 4 years.
If not healthy, Rockets can actually cut him by January 10, 2017. He only gets 5m for 2016-2017. Rockets can even decide to keep him in January, then elect to not pickup his second year by March 1, 2017. So Rockets can keep him on the roster until March for $8.5m this year.

And his last two years are fully unguaranteed (with decision dates of July 7, 2017 and July 7, 2018).

What did his gamble get him? Probably approximately 4m in guaranteed money, but lost an opportunity to get the real big bucks in FA. Motiejunas needs to fire his agent.

This deal is a disaster: http://sports.yahoo.com/news/sources-houston-matches-nets-offer-sheet-for-donatas-motiejunas-221704984.html


I will assume his agent, the Rockets and he know that his injury is a little more dicey than he lets on.
Check out my Memphis Grizzlies Youtube Channel --->>> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbB6yGykQEUwl9hqWYVp45g
Blame Rasho
On Leave
Posts: 42,248
And1: 10,014
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

Re: Rockets match Nets offer for Donuts 

Post#28 » by Blame Rasho » Tue Dec 6, 2016 1:32 am

They match a guy who they didn't care enough to ensure was on the on the roster at the start of the year.
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 92,967
And1: 32,420
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: Rockets match Nets offer for Donuts 

Post#29 » by tsherkin » Tue Dec 6, 2016 1:36 am

Blame Rasho wrote:They match a guy who they didn't care enough to ensure was on the on the roster at the start of the year.


Depth, I'm guessing? They got him on a decent detail.
pootbrah
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,392
And1: 897
Joined: Feb 09, 2016

Re: Rockets match Nets offer for Donuts 

Post#30 » by pootbrah » Tue Dec 6, 2016 1:40 am

terrible deal for d-mo. cmon how can rockets not match that kind of contract.
SF_Warriors
General Manager
Posts: 7,507
And1: 3,795
Joined: Jul 12, 2012

Re: Rockets match Nets offer for Donuts 

Post#31 » by SF_Warriors » Tue Dec 6, 2016 1:42 am

Matching the contract was a no brainer even though dmo didnt want to stay and it seems as if hou has solid depth at PF/C.

At under 9 mill a year, dmo can be traded for an asset rather than being lost for nothing. If they cant find a trade partner, they have a guy who in case of injury can come in and he also has something to prove for the future giving him incentive to play hard.

If they get a second rounder from bkn or some other team, it is a win for morey.
User avatar
BallerTalk
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,712
And1: 6,816
Joined: Jul 01, 2013

Re: RE: Re: Rockets match Nets offer for Donuts 

Post#32 » by BallerTalk » Tue Dec 6, 2016 1:49 am

K_chile22 wrote:
BallerTalk wrote:
FNQ wrote:Donatas can't be happy, he seemed aggravated at how the Rockets negotiated with him. ...


Hmm...I'm curious about the basis of this comment.
Has Motiejunas made a statement expressing discontent?
Is there an interview or something that gave you this impression?

All of these comments are merely conjecture. There have been no reports or quotes that say anything to suggest this kind of thing is true


Lol, Why are you ruining my fun?
You checkin' for the sound of the beast
I'm the hound, I'ma creep, I get down, I'ma eat
I'ma keep somethin' to lay a naysayer to sleep
-
kenwood3333
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,667
And1: 3,655
Joined: Dec 10, 2013

Re: Rockets match Nets offer for Donuts 

Post#33 » by kenwood3333 » Tue Dec 6, 2016 2:05 am

Agreed with the analysis; he needs a better agent to handle the business side of things.
User avatar
ken6199
Forum Mod - Rockets
Forum Mod - Rockets
Posts: 13,436
And1: 18,742
Joined: Jan 05, 2015
Location: Bill O'Brien is GOAT
     

Re: Rockets match Nets offer for Donuts 

Post#34 » by ken6199 » Tue Dec 6, 2016 2:39 am

He needs to fire his agent. He should have signed that 4.4m QO and hit the market next summer as UFA.

Instead his agent managed to talk him into letting the QO expire, and getting stuck in this awkward situation where he has little to no bargaining chips.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
RealGM loves you, Melissa.
User avatar
FNQ
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,963
And1: 20,008
Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Location: EOL 6/23
   

Re: Rockets match Nets offer for Donuts 

Post#35 » by FNQ » Tue Dec 6, 2016 3:48 am

BallerTalk wrote:
FNQ wrote:Donatas can't be happy, he seemed aggravated at how the Rockets negotiated with him. ...


Hmm...I'm curious about the basis of this comment.
Has Motiejunas made a statement expressing discontent?
Is there an interview or something that gave you this impression?


When they pulled their offer, the rumor was he was upset. It may have just been a logical connecting of dots, but I tend to think it's more logical than expecting a public statement from an unsigned non-star player grousing about not getting signed.
User avatar
FNQ
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,963
And1: 20,008
Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Location: EOL 6/23
   

Re: Rockets match Nets offer for Donuts 

Post#36 » by FNQ » Tue Dec 6, 2016 3:52 am

User avatar
K_chile22
RealGM
Posts: 16,746
And1: 8,631
Joined: Jul 15, 2015
   

Re: RE: Re: Rockets match Nets offer for Donuts 

Post#37 » by K_chile22 » Tue Dec 6, 2016 3:59 am

FNQ wrote:https://www.google.com/amp/www.cbssports.com/nba/news/donatas-motiejunas-upset-that-rockets-undervalued-him/amp/

Besides the title, where does it say he's upset?
Even then it's one thing to be upset that they can't reach a deal and another for the situation to be toxic and him not wanting to be in Houston. Especially since he hasn't stopped wearing Rockets gear in all his snapchat videos the whole time and still likes Rockets tweets on Twitter.
People are also acting like a Gm-player relationship is the only one a player has with a team. He has said considered Houston his second home, he is a fan favorite here and he knows it, he likes MDA and I believe smitty himself along with local guys said he is excited to play in that system, and he is friends with alot of guys on the team and has been talking to Bev throughout the whole process

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
FNQ
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,963
And1: 20,008
Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Location: EOL 6/23
   

Re: RE: Re: Rockets match Nets offer for Donuts 

Post#38 » by FNQ » Tue Dec 6, 2016 4:04 am

K_chile22 wrote:
FNQ wrote:https://www.google.com/amp/www.cbssports.com/nba/news/donatas-motiejunas-upset-that-rockets-undervalued-him/amp/

Besides the title, where does it say he's upset?
Even then it's one thing to be upset that they can't reach a deal and another for the situation to be toxic and him not wanting to be in Houston. Especially since he hasn't stopped wearing Rockets gear in all his snapchat videos the whole time and still likes Rockets tweets on Twitter.
People are also acting like a Gm-player relationship is the only one a player has with a team. He has said considered Houston his second home, he is a fan favorite here and he knows it, he likes MDA and I believe smitty himself along with local guys said he is excited to play in that system, and he is friends with alot of guys on the team and has been talking to Bev throughout the whole process

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using RealGM mobile app


Canned response aside, it says in the article he was upset. I think cbs sports is legit enough of a publication to take it semi-serious.

I get that you and other Rockets fans probably had a response to anyone questioning whether or not DMo is happy locked and loaded, but acting like it's not a logical talking point is lightweight denial. Considering they tried to deal him last year and then lowballed him and matched a RFA deal in December, I'd say speculation of the situation - after credible outlets reported he's upset - is merited.
User avatar
BallerTalk
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,712
And1: 6,816
Joined: Jul 01, 2013

Re: Rockets match Nets offer for Donuts 

Post#39 » by BallerTalk » Tue Dec 6, 2016 4:05 am

FNQ wrote:
BallerTalk wrote:
FNQ wrote:Donatas can't be happy, he seemed aggravated at how the Rockets negotiated with him. ...


Hmm...I'm curious about the basis of this comment.
Has Motiejunas made a statement expressing discontent?
Is there an interview or something that gave you this impression?


When they pulled their offer, the rumor was he was upset. It may have just been a logical connecting of dots, but I tend to think it's more logical than expecting a public statement from an unsigned non-star player grousing about not getting signed.


So your statement that "he seemed aggravated..." is based solely on a rumor you allegedly read/heard that suggested Motiejunas probably should be upset about an otherwise standard restricted free agency process that he and his agent dragged out.

Is that the gist of it?
You checkin' for the sound of the beast
I'm the hound, I'ma creep, I get down, I'ma eat
I'ma keep somethin' to lay a naysayer to sleep
-
User avatar
FNQ
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,963
And1: 20,008
Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Location: EOL 6/23
   

Re: Rockets match Nets offer for Donuts 

Post#40 » by FNQ » Tue Dec 6, 2016 4:12 am

BallerTalk wrote:
FNQ wrote:
BallerTalk wrote:
Hmm...I'm curious about the basis of this comment.
Has Motiejunas made a statement expressing discontent?
Is there an interview or something that gave you this impression?


When they pulled their offer, the rumor was he was upset. It may have just been a logical connecting of dots, but I tend to think it's more logical than expecting a public statement from an unsigned non-star player grousing about not getting signed.


So your statement that "he seemed aggravated..." is based solely on a rumor you allegedly read/heard that suggested Motiejunas probably should be upset about an otherwise standard restricted free agency process that he and his agent dragged out.

Is that the gist of it?


Mainly. But let me subtract the denial out of it and say it back to you:

My statement that "he seemed aggravated" is solely based on a report by CBS Sports that I definitely read because I linked it, and it suggested that he was upset and felt unwanted because a uniquely long and drawn out restricted free agency that rarely ever happens, ever.

I mean both statements are slanted, I just have no problem admitting it, and no dog in the fight.

Return to The General Board