ImageImageImage

Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice!

Moderators: bisme37, Darthlukey, canman1971, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob

User avatar
BigSleep333
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,718
And1: 1,632
Joined: Dec 30, 2011
   

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1541 » by BigSleep333 » Sun Jan 22, 2017 7:35 pm

SmartWentCrazy wrote:
BigSleep333 wrote:http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=zjfuzro

BOS out: Crowder,Johnson, Zeller, BKN17
BOS in: Carmelo, Noel

NYK out: Carmelo
NYK in: Johnson, Zeller, BKN17

PHI out: Noel
PHI in: Crowder


thoughts?


We're just as eager to trade that pick for Melo as you are to trade Simmons for him, for reference.


difference is, you try to compete already, no? yeah thats not a good trade longterm for you, but this trade pretty much assure you the ECF and gives you a chance to beat the cavs. i mean, why did you sign the 30y old horford? to surround him NEXT year with rookies? imo, the time is NOW for you, not in 3 years (yall know the sixers will dominate by that time :P )..
Andrew McCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 23,153
And1: 8,549
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
 

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1542 » by Andrew McCeltic » Sun Jan 22, 2017 7:56 pm

What about Melo and DJ? Feel like that moves the needle for Ainge, depending on price.
GreenFor3
Pro Prospect
Posts: 764
And1: 388
Joined: Dec 06, 2013
   

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1543 » by GreenFor3 » Sun Jan 22, 2017 8:04 pm

BigSleep333 wrote:
SmartWentCrazy wrote:
BigSleep333 wrote:http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=zjfuzro

BOS out: Crowder,Johnson, Zeller, BKN17
BOS in: Carmelo, Noel

NYK out: Carmelo
NYK in: Johnson, Zeller, BKN17

PHI out: Noel
PHI in: Crowder


thoughts?


We're just as eager to trade that pick for Melo as you are to trade Simmons for him, for reference.


difference is, you try to compete already, no? yeah thats not a good trade longterm for you, but this trade pretty much assure you the ECF and gives you a chance to beat the cavs. i mean, why did you sign the 30y old horford? to surround him NEXT year with rookies? imo, the time is NOW for you, not in 3 years (yall know the sixers will dominate by that time :P )..

We signed Horford because we had cap room and it gave us a shot at Durant. No one wants to trade away the future for a long shot chance at making the finals.
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,847
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1544 » by SmartWentCrazy » Sun Jan 22, 2017 8:11 pm

BigSleep333 wrote:
SmartWentCrazy wrote:
BigSleep333 wrote:http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=zjfuzro

BOS out: Crowder,Johnson, Zeller, BKN17
BOS in: Carmelo, Noel

NYK out: Carmelo
NYK in: Johnson, Zeller, BKN17

PHI out: Noel
PHI in: Crowder


thoughts?


We're just as eager to trade that pick for Melo as you are to trade Simmons for him, for reference.


difference is, you try to compete already, no? yeah thats not a good trade longterm for you, but this trade pretty much assure you the ECF and gives you a chance to beat the cavs. i mean, why did you sign the 30y old horford? to surround him NEXT year with rookies? imo, the time is NOW for you, not in 3 years (yall know the sixers will dominate by that time :P )..


Aren't you guys trying to compete too? You've been winning a ton and Melo could carry you to the playoffs. After all, your chance of winning it all with Melo will be the same as ours. Why wouldn't you want to trade your best asset for that?
User avatar
BigSleep333
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,718
And1: 1,632
Joined: Dec 30, 2011
   

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1545 » by BigSleep333 » Sun Jan 22, 2017 8:17 pm

SmartWentCrazy wrote:
BigSleep333 wrote:
SmartWentCrazy wrote:
We're just as eager to trade that pick for Melo as you are to trade Simmons for him, for reference.


difference is, you try to compete already, no? yeah thats not a good trade longterm for you, but this trade pretty much assure you the ECF and gives you a chance to beat the cavs. i mean, why did you sign the 30y old horford? to surround him NEXT year with rookies? imo, the time is NOW for you, not in 3 years (yall know the sixers will dominate by that time :P )..


Aren't you guys trying to compete too? You've been winning a ton and Melo could carry you to the playoffs. After all, your chance of winning it all with Melo will be the same as ours. Why wouldn't you want to trade your best asset for that?


we have zero 30y borderline allstars on the roster, nor an actual allstar, nor good vets to surround them...so no, the situations are completely different.
fallguy
General Manager
Posts: 7,859
And1: 12,714
Joined: Jun 12, 2009

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1546 » by fallguy » Sun Jan 22, 2017 8:25 pm

Dear Non-Celtics fans,

It is completely pointless to posit trades for the Brooklyn picks that don't return a guaranteed, surefire top-10 player to Boston - someone who can headline a title team for years to come.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,847
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1547 » by SmartWentCrazy » Sun Jan 22, 2017 8:28 pm

BigSleep333 wrote:
SmartWentCrazy wrote:
BigSleep333 wrote:
difference is, you try to compete already, no? yeah thats not a good trade longterm for you, but this trade pretty much assure you the ECF and gives you a chance to beat the cavs. i mean, why did you sign the 30y old horford? to surround him NEXT year with rookies? imo, the time is NOW for you, not in 3 years (yall know the sixers will dominate by that time :P )..


Aren't you guys trying to compete too? You've been winning a ton and Melo could carry you to the playoffs. After all, your chance of winning it all with Melo will be the same as ours. Why wouldn't you want to trade your best asset for that?


we have zero 30y borderline allstars on the roster, nor an allstar-starter, nor good vets to surround them...so no, the situations are completely different.


I guess I have to spell it out for you.

We're not going to win a title this season. A 32 year old Melo isn't going to change that. We're not going to make short sighted franchise decisions because we signed a 30 year old fringe all-star. IT is a nice player, but, to this point, he's yet to lead us beyond 2 wins in the first round. Sacrificing the unprotected pick of the by far worst team in the league to try to win now via a 32 year old declining player is absolutely moronic and I seriously question the intelligence of anyone who advocates that path.

For what it's worth, it's also a gigantic overpay. Melo is 32 and has been declining for 4 straight years. He's not worth the BKN17 pick. He's not worth the BKN18 pick. He's not worth Jaylen Brown.

Now I need to ask you: are you seriously advocating we dramatically overpay for an old and declining Melo to try to beat Durant/Curry/Klay/Dray with IT/Horford/Melo? GTFO
User avatar
BigSleep333
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,718
And1: 1,632
Joined: Dec 30, 2011
   

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1548 » by BigSleep333 » Sun Jan 22, 2017 8:38 pm

you sound like melo is hot garbage. yeah he isnt in his prime, but still good enough to have a huge impact. and lets keep this fair. nobody beats the dubs on paper. but anything can happen..who thought the cavs would win when 1-3 down?
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,847
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1549 » by SmartWentCrazy » Sun Jan 22, 2017 8:41 pm

BigSleep333 wrote:you sound like melo is hot garbage. yeah he isnt in his prime, but still good enough to have a huge impact. and lets keep this fair. nobody beats the dubs on paper. but anything can happen..who thought the cavs would win when 1-3 down?


I never said he was. He's just not elite. He's not going to command an elite asset back. I don't know what else to tell you. Your trade was terrible for the Celtics.
User avatar
ConstableGeneva
RealGM
Posts: 50,575
And1: 101,365
Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Location: Parody Account
 

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1550 » by ConstableGeneva » Sun Jan 22, 2017 8:53 pm

If non-Celtics fans don't want to believe us, hear it from Trader Dan himself...

"We value [the Brooklyn pick]. Even the chance, even a small chance to get a very talented player is worth [keeping the pick] because you have some chance. And you can’t just give up a chance to get a really good player unless [it's] for another really good player. ... It would have to be, certainly, a very good player. And also it probably wouldn't be someone in their 30s. That would have to be a good young player because again, even if we had a 5 percent or a 10 percent or a 15 percent chance at one of the top picks in the draft, that’s worth keeping."


The upcoming Brooklyn pick's gonna end up even better than last year's. Let's all save ourselves keystrokes, Ainge is not trading either Brooklyn pick for Melo.
░N░0░0░D░S░ ░I░N░ ░B░I░O░
User avatar
BleedGreen1989
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,023
And1: 3,904
Joined: May 18, 2013

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1551 » by BleedGreen1989 » Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:09 pm

brackdan70 wrote:
BleedGreen1989 wrote:I know the horse is dead, but I'm gonna keep hitting him.

Andrew Bogut makes a ton of sense for this team, all things considered.


I don't disagree but I am afraid Bogut may be that dead horse. worth a shot if it doesn't cost more than the Minny 2nd.


For sure. I think Zeller and MIN 2nd is pretty damn close.

If he does stay healthy, he provides elite rebounding and paint protection and a solid passer for a big.

If he doesn't stay healthy, than big whoop we moved one of our pile of 2nds...
Curmudgeon
RealGM
Posts: 42,205
And1: 25,986
Joined: Jan 20, 2004
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1552 » by Curmudgeon » Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:11 pm

BigSleep333 wrote:you sound like melo is hot garbage. yeah he isnt in his prime, but still good enough to have a huge impact


Yes, but it's a negative impact. Ball hog. Loafs on defense.
"Numbers lie alot. Wins and losses don't lie." - Jerry West
"You are what your record says you are."- Bill Parcells
"Offense sells tickets. Defense wins games. Rebounding wins championships." Pat Summit
User avatar
ConstableGeneva
RealGM
Posts: 50,575
And1: 101,365
Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Location: Parody Account
 

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1553 » by ConstableGeneva » Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:12 pm

I wonder how Knicks fans would feel about a Horford-for-Porzingis swap. They could give up their best asset and just "go for it" with that move. ;) I'm actually underselling Horf here 'cos he's more impactful than Melo at this stage in their careers.
░N░0░0░D░S░ ░I░N░ ░B░I░O░
jfs1000d
RealGM
Posts: 28,099
And1: 14,948
Joined: Jun 25, 2004

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1554 » by jfs1000d » Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:18 pm

SmartWentCrazy wrote:
BigSleep333 wrote:
SmartWentCrazy wrote:
Aren't you guys trying to compete too? You've been winning a ton and Melo could carry you to the playoffs. After all, your chance of winning it all with Melo will be the same as ours. Why wouldn't you want to trade your best asset for that?


we have zero 30y borderline allstars on the roster, nor an allstar-starter, nor good vets to surround them...so no, the situations are completely different.


I guess I have to spell it out for you.

We're not going to win a title this season. A 32 year old Melo isn't going to change that. We're not going to make short sighted franchise decisions because we signed a 30 year old fringe all-star. IT is a nice player, but, to this point, he's yet to lead us beyond 2 wins in the first round. Sacrificing the unprotected pick of the by far worst team in the league to try to win now via a 32 year old declining player is absolutely moronic and I seriously question the intelligence of anyone who advocates that path.

For what it's worth, it's also a gigantic overpay. Melo is 32 and has been declining for 4 straight years. He's not worth the BKN17 pick. He's not worth the BKN18 pick. He's not worth Jaylen Brown.

Now I need to ask you: are you seriously advocating we dramatically overpay for an old and declining Melo to try to beat Durant/Curry/Klay/Dray with IT/Horford/Melo? GTFO

Yes.

As long as we don't give up Jaylen and Brook picks. I think a cooperative Melo and a big could challenge Cleveland now while not losing the future.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
User avatar
BleedGreen1989
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,023
And1: 3,904
Joined: May 18, 2013

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1555 » by BleedGreen1989 » Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:19 pm

Yeah, ask literally anybody outside of New York and they all say Melo is not getting a good asset back. Never mind a great one...
Andrew McCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 23,153
And1: 8,549
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
 

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1556 » by Andrew McCeltic » Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:21 pm

I thought Blake for Porzingis was the best move for both teams a year ago..

Would Butler/DJ be feasible?
radcot
General Manager
Posts: 7,745
And1: 11,466
Joined: May 07, 2012
 

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1557 » by radcot » Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:37 pm

I wouldn't part with Brown or the Brk picks for Melo, but his offense hasn't fallen off as much as some suggest. He's scoring 22.5 per game compared to his career average of 24.8, but he's doing it in 3 fewer minutes (33 compared to 36). He's shooting the 3 at 37% which is better than his career average of 34%. His free throw attempts are down by 2, but his percentage is 84, which is 3 points higher than his career average. His rebounds and assists are roughly at his career averages (6 & 3 respectively). His eFG is .490, which is somewhat higher than his career average of .482. And his PER is 19.6, which is down by a point and half from his career average but still higher than anyone on the Celtics whose initials are not IT.
User avatar
Roddy
Head Coach
Posts: 6,010
And1: 10,808
Joined: Jun 19, 2010
Location: France
 

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1558 » by Roddy » Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:39 pm

Andrew McCeltic wrote:I thought Blake for Porzingis was the best move for both teams a year ago..

Would Butler/DJ be feasible?


You will have to give half our team + draft picks.

IT / Smart or AB / Butler / Horford / DJ

Great starting 5, but bench must sucks.
User avatar
LarryBirdsFingr
RealGM
Posts: 12,377
And1: 18,686
Joined: Jan 27, 2012
     

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1559 » by LarryBirdsFingr » Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:43 pm

This thread is beginning to tread in the waters of craziness. Enough with this Melo rubbish talk.
I don't believe in statistics. There are too many factors that can't be measured. You can't measure a ballplayer's heart. -Red Auerbach

Marcus Smart is an underrated shooter
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Andrew McCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 23,153
And1: 8,549
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
 

Re: Trade Thread 2017: Not Once, Not twice, But Thrice! 

Post#1560 » by Andrew McCeltic » Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:52 pm

Roddy wrote:
Andrew McCeltic wrote:I thought Blake for Porzingis was the best move for both teams a year ago..

Would Butler/DJ be feasible?


You will have to give half our team + draft picks.

IT / Smart or AB / Butler / Horford / DJ

Great starting 5, but bench must sucks.


Well that's the question, right. Could Crowder/Amir/Rozier/non-BKN 1sts get you DJ, and could Bradley/Jerebko/Young/BKN 18 get you Butler?

IT/Smart/Jackson
Butler/Green
Brown/Nader
Horford/Olynyk/Mickey
DJ/Zeller, plus BKN 17 this year, Zizic coming over in the summer.

Return to Boston Celtics