2016-17 Rookie Watch thread

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

Who will make the All Rookie 1st Team?

Brogdon
100
19%
Brown
25
5%
Chriss
43
8%
Embiid
94
18%
Ferrell
5
1%
WILLY Hernangomez
36
7%
Hield
64
12%
Ingram
14
3%
Murray
39
7%
Saric
106
20%
 
Total votes: 526

maisenza13
Junior
Posts: 265
And1: 65
Joined: Oct 27, 2015
   

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#841 » by maisenza13 » Tue Jan 24, 2017 12:20 pm

Dunn looks like Kawhi? surely less phisically
islanders11040
Head Coach
Posts: 7,418
And1: 6,978
Joined: Jun 16, 2008
Location: New York
       

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#842 » by islanders11040 » Tue Jan 24, 2017 4:08 pm

User avatar
Lauri_Legend
Analyst
Posts: 3,017
And1: 1,667
Joined: Dec 13, 2010
 

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#843 » by Lauri_Legend » Tue Jan 24, 2017 4:13 pm

Paul Zipser leapfrogged over two lottery picks (McDermott/Valentine) to become a starter for a few games. He's ahead of them in the rotation too. Stay woke.
Admin of DieHardChicagoBullsFans: https://www.facebook.com/DieHardChicagoBullsFans
User avatar
youngthegiant
Head Coach
Posts: 6,770
And1: 5,705
Joined: Aug 31, 2011
     

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#844 » by youngthegiant » Wed Jan 25, 2017 6:48 am

Murray pulled a jordan!

Image
User avatar
youngthegiant
Head Coach
Posts: 6,770
And1: 5,705
Joined: Aug 31, 2011
     

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#845 » by youngthegiant » Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:03 am

diebieber wrote:Paul Zipser leapfrogged over two lottery picks (McDermott/Valentine) to become a starter for a few games. He's ahead of them in the rotation too. Stay woke.
Hoiberg has been changing his rotation on a game to game basis.
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#846 » by skones » Wed Jan 25, 2017 2:26 pm

GimmeDat wrote:There are so many instances in this draft of guys that fell that I'm not sure why. The main two that come to mind are -

Dejounte Murray (projected borderline lottery, fell to 29)
Deyonta Davis (projected lottery, fell to 32)
Baldwin (projected 10~ish, went at 17)
Ellenson (projected 10~ish, went at 18)

I would also point out Skal, Zubac, McCaw, Felder as guys I was surprised to see drop so far.

Some of these guys have already proved to some extent that they shouldn't have dropped, some haven't had the opportunity yet, but when there was reaches like Thon at 10, Papagiannis at 13, Yabusele at 16, etc., who don't look like the greatest picks at their position at this very early stage, you have to scratch your head a bit.

Just find it interesting how a guy like Murray, with such clear tools and ability, fell to the Spurs given there were no major red flags. Same with Davis, I remember seeing him keep on slipping and slipping despite no major red flags, I think he was even in the green room! I found it a weird draft.


Guys certainly fell in this draft, but for the most part I just don't agree with the reasoning on this.

I'm not sure what makes guys like Thon, Papagiannis, and Yabusele poor picks at their position when the guys you mentioned haven't really done much to make them worthy of their projections to this point. With that being said, the draft was primed for this. The consensus seemed to be that were 5-7 top guys and the next 20-25 guys were all kind of clustered on this same tier, which is why you see such dramatic differences in projection vs. draft position.

As far as Murray, I know MKE liked him quite a bit though I wasn't a fan at all. Thin, poor shooter, poor decision making, inflated numbers on the fastest paced team in basketball, score first. Those things don't particularly stand out to me as traits of a "winning player." Davis had red flags surrounding his overall work ethic.
Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,135
And1: 33,831
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#847 » by Slava » Wed Jan 25, 2017 3:04 pm

Good thing Thon Maker has Australian dual citizenship, Trump is banning all visas issues to Sudan nationals.
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:
islanders11040
Head Coach
Posts: 7,418
And1: 6,978
Joined: Jun 16, 2008
Location: New York
       

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#848 » by islanders11040 » Wed Jan 25, 2017 3:49 pm

Gfycat Video - Click to Play

Gfycat Video - Click to Play
gaspar
Suns Forum Stat Stuffer
Posts: 6,761
And1: 5,479
Joined: Jun 21, 2009

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#849 » by gaspar » Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:56 pm

Read on Twitter
User avatar
GimmeDat
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 23,929
And1: 16,926
Joined: Sep 27, 2013
Location: Australia
 

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#850 » by GimmeDat » Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:05 pm

skones wrote:
GimmeDat wrote:There are so many instances in this draft of guys that fell that I'm not sure why. The main two that come to mind are -

Dejounte Murray (projected borderline lottery, fell to 29)
Deyonta Davis (projected lottery, fell to 32)
Baldwin (projected 10~ish, went at 17)
Ellenson (projected 10~ish, went at 18)

I would also point out Skal, Zubac, McCaw, Felder as guys I was surprised to see drop so far.

Some of these guys have already proved to some extent that they shouldn't have dropped, some haven't had the opportunity yet, but when there was reaches like Thon at 10, Papagiannis at 13, Yabusele at 16, etc., who don't look like the greatest picks at their position at this very early stage, you have to scratch your head a bit.

Just find it interesting how a guy like Murray, with such clear tools and ability, fell to the Spurs given there were no major red flags. Same with Davis, I remember seeing him keep on slipping and slipping despite no major red flags, I think he was even in the green room! I found it a weird draft.


Guys certainly fell in this draft, but for the most part I just don't agree with the reasoning on this.

I'm not sure what makes guys like Thon, Papagiannis, and Yabusele poor picks at their position when the guys you mentioned haven't really done much to make them worthy of their projections to this point. With that being said, the draft was primed for this. The consensus seemed to be that were 5-7 top guys and the next 20-25 guys were all kind of clustered on this same tier, which is why you see such dramatic differences in projection vs. draft position.

As far as Murray, I know MKE liked him quite a bit though I wasn't a fan at all. Thin, poor shooter, poor decision making, inflated numbers on the fastest paced team in basketball, score first. Those things don't particularly stand out to me as traits of a "winning player." Davis had red flags surrounding his overall work ethic.


It's far too early to say if anyone's proved anything one way or another, but those sort of moves were head scratchers from the moment they were made, and no red flags emerged to suggest certain players falling was somehow logical.

D.Davis, for instance, has great size, length, athleticism and potential as a rim protector as a C. How does that slip to the 2nd round?
Blame Rasho
On Leave
Posts: 42,174
And1: 9,915
Joined: Apr 25, 2002

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#851 » by Blame Rasho » Thu Jan 26, 2017 2:40 am

Knickstape1214 wrote:Can any Spurs fan (or someone who has watched their games) talk to me a bit about Murray? Myself and a bunch of other posters on the Knicks forum wanted us to find a way to get him in last year's draft, so I'm a fan. Watched his highlights against the Cavs and Nuggets and he looked good.


He is stupidly raw, has been in and out of dleague but Pop doesn't mind giving him mins with the starters given that it gives him confidence and we have a player in Patty Mills that is better suited to come off the bench. In fact made basically the game winning basket vs the Raptors the othernight.

He has had several good outings vs Denver,Cleveland and Toronto, but no one has tape of him. He has a nice floater, can move off the ball quite well, but his shooting and basketball IQ leaves alot to be desired.

He reminds me of Jamal Crawford and plays a very unspursy type game and sometimes you need that in order to break the mold of the same old same old.
Dan Z
RealGM
Posts: 18,459
And1: 9,144
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Chicago
 

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#852 » by Dan Z » Thu Jan 26, 2017 4:18 am

Malachi Richardson had 12 points tonight on 83.3% shooting. How did he look?
TheTrooper
Senior
Posts: 727
And1: 570
Joined: Jan 16, 2015
     

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#853 » by TheTrooper » Thu Jan 26, 2017 7:41 am

Ivica Zubac with another double double

The good : 12p 10r 2a 3b +/- +13 Lakers highest
The bad : 3ba and 4to
The ugly : 5/15 fga
User avatar
youngthegiant
Head Coach
Posts: 6,770
And1: 5,705
Joined: Aug 31, 2011
     

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#854 » by youngthegiant » Thu Jan 26, 2017 7:43 am

gaspar wrote:
Read on Twitter


How is Exum in this game. This is year 3 for him.
islanders11040
Head Coach
Posts: 7,418
And1: 6,978
Joined: Jun 16, 2008
Location: New York
       

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#855 » by islanders11040 » Thu Jan 26, 2017 8:33 am

Willy Hernangomez

24 mins 8 pts 16 rebs 3 stls vs Bogut
TheTrooper
Senior
Posts: 727
And1: 570
Joined: Jan 16, 2015
     

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#856 » by TheTrooper » Thu Jan 26, 2017 8:45 am

TheTrooper wrote:Ivica Zubac with another double double

The good : 12p 10r 2a 3b +/- +13 Lakers highest
The bad : 3ba and 4to
The ugly : 5/15 fga

Gilles
Rookie
Posts: 1,093
And1: 70
Joined: Jun 17, 2005

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#857 » by Gilles » Thu Jan 26, 2017 9:12 am

Dan Z wrote:Malachi Richardson had 12 points tonight on 83.3% shooting. How did he look?
Like in the second half vs Virginia. :D
Excellent decision-making for a rookie, which is kinda opposite to what we saw in Syracuse, though more space and not being focused on by defense helps a lot. Competed on defense, both chasing guys and getting deflections.
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#858 » by skones » Thu Jan 26, 2017 2:06 pm

GimmeDat wrote:
D.Davis, for instance, has great size, length, athleticism and potential as a rim protector as a C. How does that slip to the 2nd round?


Don't get me wrong, I see it. Davis was actually the guy I wanted at 10. With that being said, if I were a GM and a guy like Izzo came out and said this about a prospect I liked in April:

“It was treat to coach this kid. He was a good kid,” Izzo said. “He learned to work harder – he doesn’t work hard enough, but he’s learning to work harder. He made some progress.”


I'd be doing more digging and I'd put it to the test. You can have all the tools in the world, but if you're not willing to really hone your craft, all they are is tools. Given where he was projected vs where he eventually went and worked out, I'd say a lot of teams got the exact same impression Izzo did. Definite red flag.
Dan Z
RealGM
Posts: 18,459
And1: 9,144
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Location: Chicago
 

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#859 » by Dan Z » Thu Jan 26, 2017 5:02 pm

Gilles wrote:
Dan Z wrote:Malachi Richardson had 12 points tonight on 83.3% shooting. How did he look?
Like in the second half vs Virginia. :D
Excellent decision-making for a rookie, which is kinda opposite to what we saw in Syracuse, though more space and not being focused on by defense helps a lot. Competed on defense, both chasing guys and getting deflections.


It seems like he's done well when given a chance (which hasn't been that much this season).
yanuary
Rookie
Posts: 1,069
And1: 608
Joined: Apr 29, 2016
 

Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread 

Post#860 » by yanuary » Fri Jan 27, 2017 6:15 am

Zubac is coming.

Zubac has played over 20 minutes 3 times now in his rookie year, and has a double-double in each of the games.
clyde21 wrote:sell high on Ingram, this is Zion's team now, there is no room for that black hole that is BI


clyde21 wrote:bench Ingram for NAW, already a better player

Return to The General Board