2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
-
- Junior
- Posts: 265
- And1: 65
- Joined: Oct 27, 2015
-
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
Dunn looks like Kawhi? surely less phisically
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,418
- And1: 6,978
- Joined: Jun 16, 2008
- Location: New York
-
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
- Lauri_Legend
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,017
- And1: 1,667
- Joined: Dec 13, 2010
-
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
Paul Zipser leapfrogged over two lottery picks (McDermott/Valentine) to become a starter for a few games. He's ahead of them in the rotation too. Stay woke.
Admin of DieHardChicagoBullsFans: https://www.facebook.com/DieHardChicagoBullsFans
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
- youngthegiant
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,770
- And1: 5,705
- Joined: Aug 31, 2011
-
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
Murray pulled a jordan!


Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
- youngthegiant
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,770
- And1: 5,705
- Joined: Aug 31, 2011
-
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
Hoiberg has been changing his rotation on a game to game basis.diebieber wrote:Paul Zipser leapfrogged over two lottery picks (McDermott/Valentine) to become a starter for a few games. He's ahead of them in the rotation too. Stay woke.
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 37,108
- And1: 17,267
- Joined: Jul 20, 2004
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
GimmeDat wrote:There are so many instances in this draft of guys that fell that I'm not sure why. The main two that come to mind are -
Dejounte Murray (projected borderline lottery, fell to 29)
Deyonta Davis (projected lottery, fell to 32)
Baldwin (projected 10~ish, went at 17)
Ellenson (projected 10~ish, went at 18)
I would also point out Skal, Zubac, McCaw, Felder as guys I was surprised to see drop so far.
Some of these guys have already proved to some extent that they shouldn't have dropped, some haven't had the opportunity yet, but when there was reaches like Thon at 10, Papagiannis at 13, Yabusele at 16, etc., who don't look like the greatest picks at their position at this very early stage, you have to scratch your head a bit.
Just find it interesting how a guy like Murray, with such clear tools and ability, fell to the Spurs given there were no major red flags. Same with Davis, I remember seeing him keep on slipping and slipping despite no major red flags, I think he was even in the green room! I found it a weird draft.
Guys certainly fell in this draft, but for the most part I just don't agree with the reasoning on this.
I'm not sure what makes guys like Thon, Papagiannis, and Yabusele poor picks at their position when the guys you mentioned haven't really done much to make them worthy of their projections to this point. With that being said, the draft was primed for this. The consensus seemed to be that were 5-7 top guys and the next 20-25 guys were all kind of clustered on this same tier, which is why you see such dramatic differences in projection vs. draft position.
As far as Murray, I know MKE liked him quite a bit though I wasn't a fan at all. Thin, poor shooter, poor decision making, inflated numbers on the fastest paced team in basketball, score first. Those things don't particularly stand out to me as traits of a "winning player." Davis had red flags surrounding his overall work ethic.
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 61,135
- And1: 33,831
- Joined: Oct 15, 2006
-
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
Good thing Thon Maker has Australian dual citizenship, Trump is banning all visas issues to Sudan nationals.



Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,418
- And1: 6,978
- Joined: Jun 16, 2008
- Location: New York
-
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
Gfycat Video - Click to Play
Gfycat Video - Click to Play
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
-
- Suns Forum Stat Stuffer
- Posts: 6,761
- And1: 5,479
- Joined: Jun 21, 2009
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
- GimmeDat
- Forum Mod - Bulls
- Posts: 23,929
- And1: 16,926
- Joined: Sep 27, 2013
- Location: Australia
-
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
skones wrote:GimmeDat wrote:There are so many instances in this draft of guys that fell that I'm not sure why. The main two that come to mind are -
Dejounte Murray (projected borderline lottery, fell to 29)
Deyonta Davis (projected lottery, fell to 32)
Baldwin (projected 10~ish, went at 17)
Ellenson (projected 10~ish, went at 18)
I would also point out Skal, Zubac, McCaw, Felder as guys I was surprised to see drop so far.
Some of these guys have already proved to some extent that they shouldn't have dropped, some haven't had the opportunity yet, but when there was reaches like Thon at 10, Papagiannis at 13, Yabusele at 16, etc., who don't look like the greatest picks at their position at this very early stage, you have to scratch your head a bit.
Just find it interesting how a guy like Murray, with such clear tools and ability, fell to the Spurs given there were no major red flags. Same with Davis, I remember seeing him keep on slipping and slipping despite no major red flags, I think he was even in the green room! I found it a weird draft.
Guys certainly fell in this draft, but for the most part I just don't agree with the reasoning on this.
I'm not sure what makes guys like Thon, Papagiannis, and Yabusele poor picks at their position when the guys you mentioned haven't really done much to make them worthy of their projections to this point. With that being said, the draft was primed for this. The consensus seemed to be that were 5-7 top guys and the next 20-25 guys were all kind of clustered on this same tier, which is why you see such dramatic differences in projection vs. draft position.
As far as Murray, I know MKE liked him quite a bit though I wasn't a fan at all. Thin, poor shooter, poor decision making, inflated numbers on the fastest paced team in basketball, score first. Those things don't particularly stand out to me as traits of a "winning player." Davis had red flags surrounding his overall work ethic.
It's far too early to say if anyone's proved anything one way or another, but those sort of moves were head scratchers from the moment they were made, and no red flags emerged to suggest certain players falling was somehow logical.
D.Davis, for instance, has great size, length, athleticism and potential as a rim protector as a C. How does that slip to the 2nd round?
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
-
- On Leave
- Posts: 42,174
- And1: 9,915
- Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
Knickstape1214 wrote:Can any Spurs fan (or someone who has watched their games) talk to me a bit about Murray? Myself and a bunch of other posters on the Knicks forum wanted us to find a way to get him in last year's draft, so I'm a fan. Watched his highlights against the Cavs and Nuggets and he looked good.
He is stupidly raw, has been in and out of dleague but Pop doesn't mind giving him mins with the starters given that it gives him confidence and we have a player in Patty Mills that is better suited to come off the bench. In fact made basically the game winning basket vs the Raptors the othernight.
He has had several good outings vs Denver,Cleveland and Toronto, but no one has tape of him. He has a nice floater, can move off the ball quite well, but his shooting and basketball IQ leaves alot to be desired.
He reminds me of Jamal Crawford and plays a very unspursy type game and sometimes you need that in order to break the mold of the same old same old.
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,459
- And1: 9,144
- Joined: Feb 19, 2002
- Location: Chicago
-
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
Malachi Richardson had 12 points tonight on 83.3% shooting. How did he look?
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
-
- Senior
- Posts: 727
- And1: 570
- Joined: Jan 16, 2015
-
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
Ivica Zubac with another double double
The good : 12p 10r 2a 3b +/- +13 Lakers highest
The bad : 3ba and 4to
The ugly : 5/15 fga
The good : 12p 10r 2a 3b +/- +13 Lakers highest
The bad : 3ba and 4to
The ugly : 5/15 fga
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
- youngthegiant
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,770
- And1: 5,705
- Joined: Aug 31, 2011
-
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,418
- And1: 6,978
- Joined: Jun 16, 2008
- Location: New York
-
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
Willy Hernangomez
24 mins 8 pts 16 rebs 3 stls vs Bogut
24 mins 8 pts 16 rebs 3 stls vs Bogut
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
-
- Senior
- Posts: 727
- And1: 570
- Joined: Jan 16, 2015
-
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
TheTrooper wrote:Ivica Zubac with another double double
The good : 12p 10r 2a 3b +/- +13 Lakers highest
The bad : 3ba and 4to
The ugly : 5/15 fga
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,093
- And1: 70
- Joined: Jun 17, 2005
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
Like in the second half vs Virginia.Dan Z wrote:Malachi Richardson had 12 points tonight on 83.3% shooting. How did he look?

Excellent decision-making for a rookie, which is kinda opposite to what we saw in Syracuse, though more space and not being focused on by defense helps a lot. Competed on defense, both chasing guys and getting deflections.
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 37,108
- And1: 17,267
- Joined: Jul 20, 2004
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
GimmeDat wrote:
D.Davis, for instance, has great size, length, athleticism and potential as a rim protector as a C. How does that slip to the 2nd round?
Don't get me wrong, I see it. Davis was actually the guy I wanted at 10. With that being said, if I were a GM and a guy like Izzo came out and said this about a prospect I liked in April:
“It was treat to coach this kid. He was a good kid,” Izzo said. “He learned to work harder – he doesn’t work hard enough, but he’s learning to work harder. He made some progress.”
I'd be doing more digging and I'd put it to the test. You can have all the tools in the world, but if you're not willing to really hone your craft, all they are is tools. Given where he was projected vs where he eventually went and worked out, I'd say a lot of teams got the exact same impression Izzo did. Definite red flag.
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,459
- And1: 9,144
- Joined: Feb 19, 2002
- Location: Chicago
-
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
Gilles wrote:Like in the second half vs Virginia.Dan Z wrote:Malachi Richardson had 12 points tonight on 83.3% shooting. How did he look?![]()
Excellent decision-making for a rookie, which is kinda opposite to what we saw in Syracuse, though more space and not being focused on by defense helps a lot. Competed on defense, both chasing guys and getting deflections.
It seems like he's done well when given a chance (which hasn't been that much this season).
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,069
- And1: 608
- Joined: Apr 29, 2016
-
Re: 2016-17 Rookie Watch thread
Zubac is coming.
Zubac has played over 20 minutes 3 times now in his rookie year, and has a double-double in each of the games.
Zubac has played over 20 minutes 3 times now in his rookie year, and has a double-double in each of the games.
clyde21 wrote:sell high on Ingram, this is Zion's team now, there is no room for that black hole that is BI
clyde21 wrote:bench Ingram for NAW, already a better player