ImageImageImage

Hinkie in Hindsight?

Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, sixers hoops, Foshan, Sixerscan

LongLiveHinkie
RealGM
Posts: 14,263
And1: 3,963
Joined: May 04, 2005

Re: Hinkie in Hindsight? 

Post#201 » by LongLiveHinkie » Thu Jan 26, 2017 5:18 am

I love when people say "Hinkie got lucky with Embiid, he wanted Wiggins!" without any proof to those claims, but then on the other hand, say when people claim Okafor was forced on Hinkie and he wanted Porzingis, that it's BS.

Total hypocrisy to fit the agenda.
HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,330
And1: 20,926
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Re: Hinkie in Hindsight? 

Post#202 » by HartfordWhalers » Thu Jan 26, 2017 5:20 am

LongLiveHinkie wrote:I love when people say "Hinkie got lucky with Embiid, he wanted Wiggins!" without any proof to those claims, but then on the other hand, say when people claim Okafor was forced on Hinkie and he wanted Porzingis, that it's BS.

Total hypocrisy to fit the agenda.


I equally believe none of them.
marcush
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,441
And1: 3,214
Joined: May 11, 2013
Location: Melbourne
 

Re: Hinkie in Hindsight? 

Post#203 » by marcush » Thu Jan 26, 2017 5:22 am

Hinkie clearly deserves the credit for Embiid and the blame for Okafor.
Ericb5
RealGM
Posts: 10,303
And1: 3,377
Joined: Jan 08, 2014
       

Re: Hinkie in Hindsight? 

Post#204 » by Ericb5 » Thu Jan 26, 2017 12:25 pm

TTP wrote:
Ericb5 wrote:
TTP wrote:
Ilyasova trade was decent at the time, very good in retrospect.

Luwawu pick was one of my ideal picks. Korkmaz pick was alright (preferred a few others there but didn't hate it). Hate that he didn't buy the pick to draft McCaw like the Warriors did - I wanted McCaw at 24 or 26.

I liked the Sergio signing at the time even if the results haven't been great. Henderson signing was not great but not terrible. Bayless contract was and still is terrible though. He ran ridiculously hot from 3 last year, tends to heroball on offense, and is a poor defender.


I actually like the Bayless signing the best of the three. He just got hurt. When he comes back I think he will be good with Simmons.

Sergio and Henderson are legit NBA veterans, but we will be replacing them soon with draft picks or trades most likely.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Bayless is just inferior to so many other options. He's an above average but not exceptional 3 point shooter and he's a defensive liability. Those are arguably the most important requirements for an optimal PG next to Simmons.

"Legit NBA veterans" sounds like what someone would say when they don't have anything specifically good to say about a player. Prior to the season, Sergio had fewer NBA minutes played than some of our young guys.


I don't think Bayless is a starter, but I like him as a role player.

"Legit NBA veterans" IS sort of me saying that I can't say anything good about them. Lol

I meant though that they are legit NBA players, as opposed to the dleague cycle that we have been on. Henderson for example strikes me as a guy that would be an absolute star in Europe. He can actually play the game on both offense and defense. He just isn't very good at the NBA level.

Sergio, Henderson, and Bayless are three guys that I would have been completely against signing during the tank years, but were all reasonable signings for this year. I suspect that Hinkie would have signed similar players.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
kriss73
Analyst
Posts: 3,452
And1: 1,938
Joined: Jul 25, 2015
       

Re: Hinkie in Hindsight? 

Post#205 » by kriss73 » Thu Jan 26, 2017 8:33 pm

Today:

Read on Twitter


Two years ago:

Image
Adam Silver wrote:"Gross incompetence is acceptable; strategic gaming of a flawed system is not."
dkj5061
Junior
Posts: 288
And1: 177
Joined: Jan 17, 2016
     

Re: Hinkie in Hindsight? 

Post#206 » by dkj5061 » Thu Jan 26, 2017 9:55 pm

HartfordWhalers wrote:
LongLiveHinkie wrote:I love when people say "Hinkie got lucky with Embiid, he wanted Wiggins!" without any proof to those claims, but then on the other hand, say when people claim Okafor was forced on Hinkie and he wanted Porzingis, that it's BS.

Total hypocrisy to fit the agenda.


I equally believe none of them.


I agree to an extent that saying "Sam wanted Porzingis" is an easy answer to defend the man we all love and miss, but the only reason I half believe it is because almost every single other one of his picks shared similar qualities. They were long, athletic, protected the rim and mobile (Noel, Embiid, MCW, KJ, Holmes, Roco(not a pick but still counts), Jerami). Okafor (and Saric to an extent) was the only one who didn't fit this model of drafting players.
User avatar
Arsenal
RealGM
Posts: 17,090
And1: 11,985
Joined: Jun 05, 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
 

Re: Hinkie in Hindsight? 

Post#207 » by Arsenal » Thu Jan 26, 2017 10:20 pm

Not sure whether he wanted to take Porzingis over Okafor or not, but we'll likely never know.

What I DO know is F Porzingis and his POS agent Andy Miller. I'll take great pleasure in Embiid and the Sixers dynasty b!tch processing that punk for the next decade winning multiple titles, while he wins nothing and wastes his career with a bad team.
bedjawII
Pro Prospect
Posts: 775
And1: 160
Joined: Jun 22, 2014
 

Re: Hinkie in Hindsight? 

Post#208 » by bedjawII » Fri Jan 27, 2017 2:22 pm

LongLiveHinkie wrote:I love when people say "Hinkie got lucky with Embiid, he wanted Wiggins!" without any proof to those claims, but then on the other hand, say when people claim Okafor was forced on Hinkie and he wanted Porzingis, that it's BS.

Total hypocrisy to fit the agenda.


To be fair (because I say both) Hinkie did luck into JoJo but not because he wanted Wiggins. I believe he preferred Wiggins after JoJo and he truly believed JoJo would go #1. Which he would have if not for the injury! So he did luck into the pick. But I don't hold that against Hinkie. He saw an opportunity and took advantage of it.
jbent87
Veteran
Posts: 2,670
And1: 1,202
Joined: Jul 02, 2015
       

Re: Hinkie in Hindsight? 

Post#209 » by jbent87 » Fri Jan 27, 2017 4:29 pm

bedjawII wrote:
LongLiveHinkie wrote:I love when people say "Hinkie got lucky with Embiid, he wanted Wiggins!" without any proof to those claims, but then on the other hand, say when people claim Okafor was forced on Hinkie and he wanted Porzingis, that it's BS.

Total hypocrisy to fit the agenda.


To be fair (because I say both) Hinkie did luck into JoJo but not because he wanted Wiggins. I believe he preferred Wiggins after JoJo and he truly believed JoJo would go #1. Which he would have if not for the injury! So he did luck into the pick. But I don't hold that against Hinkie. He saw an opportunity and took advantage of it.


I'm hearing more and more about how Hinkie lucked into Embiid over the last couple weeks, as yet again people try to minimize his impact. Why wasn't it such a no brainer for MIL to take him at 2? We have no idea how far he could've slid in the top 10 if Hinkie passed on him bc now everyone is coming out via hindsight. If three teams pass on a high upside injury prone prospect like that, that tends to make people panic and he could have fallen.

Also, Embiids rehabilitation here is different than other places. Hinkie sent Embiid to f'ng Qatar to rehab. What other team would have done that? How don't we know that another team would have rushed him back, because they wanted to save face on the pick? Hinkie had the patience to wait. And it's being vindicated with every second #21 plays on the court.

Embiid = Hinkie. Anything this guy does in his career, bring it back to SH. Because he's the one that invested all of his resources into making sure he was healthy and waiting to build the team around this guy. He didn't just sit back and take the sure thing pick. He wasn't a sure thing at all. But the way he was handled, by SH, he became one.
HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,330
And1: 20,926
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Re: Hinkie in Hindsight? 

Post#210 » by HartfordWhalers » Fri Jan 27, 2017 5:08 pm

jbent87 wrote:
bedjawII wrote:
LongLiveHinkie wrote:I love when people say "Hinkie got lucky with Embiid, he wanted Wiggins!" without any proof to those claims, but then on the other hand, say when people claim Okafor was forced on Hinkie and he wanted Porzingis, that it's BS.

Total hypocrisy to fit the agenda.


To be fair (because I say both) Hinkie did luck into JoJo but not because he wanted Wiggins. I believe he preferred Wiggins after JoJo and he truly believed JoJo would go #1. Which he would have if not for the injury! So he did luck into the pick. But I don't hold that against Hinkie. He saw an opportunity and took advantage of it.


I'm hearing more and more about how Hinkie lucked into Embiid over the last couple weeks, as yet again people try to minimize his impact. Why wasn't it such a no brainer for MIL to take him at 2? We have no idea how far he could've slid in the top 10 if Hinkie passed on him bc now everyone is coming out via hindsight. If three teams pass on a high upside injury prone prospect like that, that tends to make people panic and he could have fallen.

Also, Embiids rehabilitation here is different than other places. Hinkie sent Embiid to f'ng Qatar to rehab. What other team would have done that? How don't we know that another team would have rushed him back, because they wanted to save face on the pick? Hinkie had the patience to wait. And it's being vindicated with every second #21 plays on the court.

Embiid = Hinkie. Anything this guy does in his career, bring it back to SH. Because he's the one that invested all of his resources into making sure he was healthy and waiting to build the team around this guy. He didn't just sit back and take the sure thing pick. He wasn't a sure thing at all. But the way he was handled, by SH, he became one.


Boston was taking him at 5 if he slid. Orlando, no idea. But Embidd wasn't getting past Boston. Thats been pretty well documented, and even when it looked like it was a bad mistake by Boston to have that strategy.
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 65,965
And1: 26,933
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: Hinkie in Hindsight? 

Post#211 » by 76ciology » Fri Jan 27, 2017 5:28 pm

Fwiw, Benett was one of the three guys we were looking at with the Jrue deal.

Exum seems like a serious candidate for the third pick in 2014. Some of the experts were fine with Exum with 3rd overall.

Hinkie is not perfect but the end more than justified the means IMO.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
APettyJ
Junior
Posts: 444
And1: 223
Joined: Mar 22, 2015
       

Re: Hinkie in Hindsight? 

Post#212 » by APettyJ » Sun Jan 29, 2017 4:37 pm

marcush wrote:Hinkie clearly deserves the credit for Embiid and the blame for Okafor.



Not if JC had anything to do with stopping the rumored trade of Okafor to Boston for the Nets pick.
Ericb5
RealGM
Posts: 10,303
And1: 3,377
Joined: Jan 08, 2014
       

Re: Hinkie in Hindsight? 

Post#213 » by Ericb5 » Sun Jan 29, 2017 8:32 pm

HartfordWhalers wrote:
jbent87 wrote:
bedjawII wrote:
To be fair (because I say both) Hinkie did luck into JoJo but not because he wanted Wiggins. I believe he preferred Wiggins after JoJo and he truly believed JoJo would go #1. Which he would have if not for the injury! So he did luck into the pick. But I don't hold that against Hinkie. He saw an opportunity and took advantage of it.


I'm hearing more and more about how Hinkie lucked into Embiid over the last couple weeks, as yet again people try to minimize his impact. Why wasn't it such a no brainer for MIL to take him at 2? We have no idea how far he could've slid in the top 10 if Hinkie passed on him bc now everyone is coming out via hindsight. If three teams pass on a high upside injury prone prospect like that, that tends to make people panic and he could have fallen.

Also, Embiids rehabilitation here is different than other places. Hinkie sent Embiid to f'ng Qatar to rehab. What other team would have done that? How don't we know that another team would have rushed him back, because they wanted to save face on the pick? Hinkie had the patience to wait. And it's being vindicated with every second #21 plays on the court.

Embiid = Hinkie. Anything this guy does in his career, bring it back to SH. Because he's the one that invested all of his resources into making sure he was healthy and waiting to build the team around this guy. He didn't just sit back and take the sure thing pick. He wasn't a sure thing at all. But the way he was handled, by SH, he became one.


Boston was taking him at 5 if he slid. Orlando, no idea. But Embidd wasn't getting past Boston. Thats been pretty well documented, and even when it looked like it was a bad mistake by Boston to have that strategy.


Boston had the 6th pick, but I agree.

A huge part of "the process" was how the players were dealt with AFTER they were drafted. Hinkie deserves credit for all of it.

The whole thing is silly really. If someone won't give him credit for Embiid and Simmons then they just aren't credible. The argument could be that they weren't worth the downsides of tanking, but they sure as hell represent the highest hopes of tanking on the positive side.

Hinkie accomplished what he needed to accomplish over the 3 seasons that he was here.

How many times in the history of the NBA have two players of that caliber been drafted in a 3 year period?

You have the Thunder from the mid 2000's, and the Magic of the early 90's, but who else?

Maybe Larry Johnson and Alonzo Mourning?

It's extremely rare, and Hinkie did it with a team of mediocre talent, and 2 of the next 4 first round picks owed to other teams.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
HartfordWhalers
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - 76ers and NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 47,330
And1: 20,926
Joined: Apr 07, 2010
 

Re: Hinkie in Hindsight? 

Post#214 » by HartfordWhalers » Sun Jan 29, 2017 8:39 pm

Ericb5 wrote:
HartfordWhalers wrote:
jbent87 wrote:
I'm hearing more and more about how Hinkie lucked into Embiid over the last couple weeks, as yet again people try to minimize his impact. Why wasn't it such a no brainer for MIL to take him at 2? We have no idea how far he could've slid in the top 10 if Hinkie passed on him bc now everyone is coming out via hindsight. If three teams pass on a high upside injury prone prospect like that, that tends to make people panic and he could have fallen.

Also, Embiids rehabilitation here is different than other places. Hinkie sent Embiid to f'ng Qatar to rehab. What other team would have done that? How don't we know that another team would have rushed him back, because they wanted to save face on the pick? Hinkie had the patience to wait. And it's being vindicated with every second #21 plays on the court.

Embiid = Hinkie. Anything this guy does in his career, bring it back to SH. Because he's the one that invested all of his resources into making sure he was healthy and waiting to build the team around this guy. He didn't just sit back and take the sure thing pick. He wasn't a sure thing at all. But the way he was handled, by SH, he became one.


Boston was taking him at 5 if he slid. Orlando, no idea. But Embidd wasn't getting past Boston. Thats been pretty well documented, and even when it looked like it was a bad mistake by Boston to have that strategy.


Boston had the 6th pick, but I agree.


At 5? I meant directly after 5. :roll: :roll: :roll:

Okay I screwed that one up! But the point stands. There absolutely are prospects that could go 8 or 28 (see SKal last draft). For those that want tp trumpet Hinkie for picking Embiid, Embiid wasn't sliding past 6.

That said, Ainge isn't a moron, and all of that doesn't take away the courage of risking a top 3 pick on a guy who doesn't play until you are fired ( sad face emoji).
bedjawII
Pro Prospect
Posts: 775
And1: 160
Joined: Jun 22, 2014
 

Re: Hinkie in Hindsight? 

Post#215 » by bedjawII » Sun Jan 29, 2017 9:02 pm

jbent87 wrote:
bedjawII wrote:
LongLiveHinkie wrote:I love when people say "Hinkie got lucky with Embiid, he wanted Wiggins!" without any proof to those claims, but then on the other hand, say when people claim Okafor was forced on Hinkie and he wanted Porzingis, that it's BS.

Total hypocrisy to fit the agenda.


To be fair (because I say both) Hinkie did luck into JoJo but not because he wanted Wiggins. I believe he preferred Wiggins after JoJo and he truly believed JoJo would go #1. Which he would have if not for the injury! So he did luck into the pick. But I don't hold that against Hinkie. He saw an opportunity and took advantage of it.


I'm hearing more and more about how Hinkie lucked into Embiid over the last couple weeks, as yet again people try to minimize his impact. Why wasn't it such a no brainer for MIL to take him at 2? We have no idea how far he could've slid in the top 10 if Hinkie passed on him bc now everyone is coming out via hindsight. If three teams pass on a high upside injury prone prospect like that, that tends to make people panic and he could have fallen.

Also, Embiids rehabilitation here is different than other places. Hinkie sent Embiid to f'ng Qatar to rehab. What other team would have done that? How don't we know that another team would have rushed him back, because they wanted to save face on the pick? Hinkie had the patience to wait. And it's being vindicated with every second #21 plays on the court.

Embiid = Hinkie. Anything this guy does in his career, bring it back to SH. Because he's the one that invested all of his resources into making sure he was healthy and waiting to build the team around this guy. He didn't just sit back and take the sure thing pick. He wasn't a sure thing at all. But the way he was handled, by SH, he became one.


Lol at Hinkie getting credit for everything JoJo does from here on out. Are you willing to Harris credit? After all, those resources Hinkie invested belong to him. The time invested was Josh. Who paid for him to go to Qatar?
Unbreakable99
General Manager
Posts: 8,752
And1: 3,993
Joined: Jul 04, 2014

Re: Hinkie in Hindsight? 

Post#216 » by Unbreakable99 » Sun Jan 29, 2017 9:37 pm

HartfordWhalers wrote:
Ericb5 wrote:
HartfordWhalers wrote:
Boston was taking him at 5 if he slid. Orlando, no idea. But Embidd wasn't getting past Boston. Thats been pretty well documented, and even when it looked like it was a bad mistake by Boston to have that strategy.


Boston had the 6th pick, but I agree.


At 5? I meant directly after 5. :roll: :roll: :roll:

Okay I screwed that one up! But the point stands. There absolutely are prospects that could go 8 or 28 (see SKal last draft). For those that want tp trumpet Hinkie for picking Embiid, Embiid wasn't sliding past 6.

That said, Ainge isn't a moron, and all of that doesn't take away the courage of risking a top 3 pick on a guy who doesn't play until you are fired ( sad face emoji).


And that's why picking high helps. People always say having the worst record doesn't guarantee you get the top pick. No kidding. Being awful at least gets you in the top 5. If we were picking 8th we don't get Embiid because he is taking at least by Boston at 6.
User avatar
Arsenal
RealGM
Posts: 17,090
And1: 11,985
Joined: Jun 05, 2002
Location: Arlington, VA
 

Re: Hinkie in Hindsight? 

Post#217 » by Arsenal » Sun Jan 29, 2017 9:47 pm

HartfordWhalers wrote:
Ericb5 wrote:
HartfordWhalers wrote:
Boston was taking him at 5 if he slid. Orlando, no idea. But Embidd wasn't getting past Boston. Thats been pretty well documented, and even when it looked like it was a bad mistake by Boston to have that strategy.


Boston had the 6th pick, but I agree.


At 5? I meant directly after 5. :roll: :roll: :roll:

Okay I screwed that one up! But the point stands. There absolutely are prospects that could go 8 or 28 (see SKal last draft). For those that want tp trumpet Hinkie for picking Embiid, Embiid wasn't sliding past 6.

That said, Ainge isn't a moron, and all of that doesn't take away the courage of risking a top 3 pick on a guy who doesn't play until you are fired ( sad face emoji).


I understand there is a story that Ainge would have taken Embiid at #6. I personally believe it. There are also stories that Ainge was ready to trade his 2016 BKN pick (ended up #3 - took Jaylen Brown) for Jahlil Okafor at the deadline, and also a story that Hinkie was ready to make the deal but Jerry Colangelo quashed it.

I'm not sure why the 1st story has more credibility than the 2nd and the 3rd stories. All 3 were reported by the "legitimate" media.
Sixerscan
Senior Mod - 76ers
Senior Mod - 76ers
Posts: 33,946
And1: 16,327
Joined: Jan 25, 2005

Re: Hinkie in Hindsight? 

Post#218 » by Sixerscan » Sun Jan 29, 2017 10:13 pm

I try not to believe anything Danny Ainge says.

Of course he lucked into Embiid. That was part of the point. If you're around the top enough chances are you'll eventually get a good result. Trust the process and all that.
Ericb5
RealGM
Posts: 10,303
And1: 3,377
Joined: Jan 08, 2014
       

Re: Hinkie in Hindsight? 

Post#219 » by Ericb5 » Mon Jan 30, 2017 3:41 am

bedjawII wrote:
jbent87 wrote:
bedjawII wrote:
To be fair (because I say both) Hinkie did luck into JoJo but not because he wanted Wiggins. I believe he preferred Wiggins after JoJo and he truly believed JoJo would go #1. Which he would have if not for the injury! So he did luck into the pick. But I don't hold that against Hinkie. He saw an opportunity and took advantage of it.


I'm hearing more and more about how Hinkie lucked into Embiid over the last couple weeks, as yet again people try to minimize his impact. Why wasn't it such a no brainer for MIL to take him at 2? We have no idea how far he could've slid in the top 10 if Hinkie passed on him bc now everyone is coming out via hindsight. If three teams pass on a high upside injury prone prospect like that, that tends to make people panic and he could have fallen.

Also, Embiids rehabilitation here is different than other places. Hinkie sent Embiid to f'ng Qatar to rehab. What other team would have done that? How don't we know that another team would have rushed him back, because they wanted to save face on the pick? Hinkie had the patience to wait. And it's being vindicated with every second #21 plays on the court.

Embiid = Hinkie. Anything this guy does in his career, bring it back to SH. Because he's the one that invested all of his resources into making sure he was healthy and waiting to build the team around this guy. He didn't just sit back and take the sure thing pick. He wasn't a sure thing at all. But the way he was handled, by SH, he became one.


Lol at Hinkie getting credit for everything JoJo does from here on out. Are you willing to Harris credit? After all, those resources Hinkie invested belong to him. The time invested was Josh. Who paid for him to go to Qatar?


Hinkie gets credit for Embiid being on the team. He also gets credit for hiring the right coaches and sports science guys, and picking the right doctors, and all sorts of things that led to Embiid being healthy today.

He isn't he only person to get credit, but if five years from now the Sixers win the title with Embiid and Simmons leading then a large part of the credit will go to Hinkie.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
jbent87
Veteran
Posts: 2,670
And1: 1,202
Joined: Jul 02, 2015
       

Re: Hinkie in Hindsight? 

Post#220 » by jbent87 » Mon Jan 30, 2017 2:31 pm

bedjawII wrote:
jbent87 wrote:
bedjawII wrote:
To be fair (because I say both) Hinkie did luck into JoJo but not because he wanted Wiggins. I believe he preferred Wiggins after JoJo and he truly believed JoJo would go #1. Which he would have if not for the injury! So he did luck into the pick. But I don't hold that against Hinkie. He saw an opportunity and took advantage of it.


I'm hearing more and more about how Hinkie lucked into Embiid over the last couple weeks, as yet again people try to minimize his impact. Why wasn't it such a no brainer for MIL to take him at 2? We have no idea how far he could've slid in the top 10 if Hinkie passed on him bc now everyone is coming out via hindsight. If three teams pass on a high upside injury prone prospect like that, that tends to make people panic and he could have fallen.

Also, Embiids rehabilitation here is different than other places. Hinkie sent Embiid to f'ng Qatar to rehab. What other team would have done that? How don't we know that another team would have rushed him back, because they wanted to save face on the pick? Hinkie had the patience to wait. And it's being vindicated with every second #21 plays on the court.

Embiid = Hinkie. Anything this guy does in his career, bring it back to SH. Because he's the one that invested all of his resources into making sure he was healthy and waiting to build the team around this guy. He didn't just sit back and take the sure thing pick. He wasn't a sure thing at all. But the way he was handled, by SH, he became one.


Lol at Hinkie getting credit for everything JoJo does from here on out. Are you willing to Harris credit? After all, those resources Hinkie invested belong to him. The time invested was Josh. Who paid for him to go to Qatar?


Josh Harris wouldn't know what a basketball was if TJ McConnell gave him a no look pass in the face. He is signing the checks down there but he has no input to basketball related decisions. Which is why it was so easy for him to fold from the outside pressure once the NBA told him to backdoor his guy. He wanted to take this team/asset and maximize it's value via Hinkies plan. To sign up for that then to bail on Hinkie in the 11th hour is incredibly weasley.

Return to Philadelphia 76ers