The_Hater wrote:laika wrote:The_Hater wrote:
It might actually be his running mate Andrew Wiggins. Wiggins is less effcient, more selfish and far worse in the advanced stats on both sides of the ball.
This is not true.
Wiggins leads in PER, 15.2 to 14.7
Wiggins is far ahead in raw On/Off, positive 2.8 to negative 7.2
Wiggins leads in DRPM, -2.11 to -3.02
Wiggins leads in RPM, -1.49 to -1.85
Most importantly, Wiggins without Lavine is way better than Lavine without Wiggins.
Wiggins without Lavine- positive 4.8
Lavine without Wiggins- negative 4.4
Wiggins has been somewhat disappointing, but I'd much rather try to build a team with him than Lavine.
That's fair although Zach leads in VORP, OPdM, DPBM and a few other stars as well
And since Wiggins has always been considered the better prospect, he has been more overrated imo.
Zach puts up efficient individual numbers and has an aesthetically pleasing style of play.
Andrew looks uninterested on the court, but has a far greater impact on team play and wins.
The wolves can win if Zach is bad, but they can't win when Wiggins is bad.
When Wiggins is good, he can carry a team.
When lavine is good, they still lose.
So basically, Zach has more impact on his own numbers with less responsibilities while Wiggins has more impact on team numbers with more responsibilities.
Both players are good and have high ceilings. Just depends on want you want.




























