ImageImageImage

The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0)

Moderators: bisme37, Darthlukey, canman1971, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob

Writebloc
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,075
And1: 5,615
Joined: May 20, 2015
         

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#41 » by Writebloc » Thu Feb 16, 2017 3:41 am

Captain_Caveman wrote:
jfs1000d wrote:
Parliament10 wrote:Are there really?


Most IT skeptics have a long history of hating the original trade because we started to win. They were wrong, been proven wrong, and they just don't want to admit it. Everything is off that initial deal where we were supposed to be a treadmill team because we went 40-42.

Then, they thought he was better off the bench despite him making an all-star appearance.

Those wanting him to be a sixth man look dumb.


He also goes against everything tankers thought. If the 60th player in the draft is a star, it destroys the thought you have to have a top 2 pick or don't bother.

The truth is, Isaiah Thomas is likely the best second round pick in NBA history and if he dies this for 3-4 more years, one of the most unique players in NBA history.






Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


Meh. The Nets trade is nearly 100% of the reason we have a shot to be a contender one day.

Without the Nets completely bottoming out, this rebuild is complete fool's gold. And I mean all of it. Stevens, IT, the rest of the starting lineup... none of it would matter at all. Let's be perfectly clear that, realistically speaking, IT would not be a top 3 player on the Warriors, and would certainly not start for them.

Channel your inner Patriots fans and think of how silly it is for fans of teams like the Raiders to brag about 5th place, and having an MVP "candidate" in Derek Carr.

You may think you are giving a gotcha here, but I read this stuff from the IT fanboys and just shake my head. You don't get it. Any of it. You see 5th place as an accomplishment, and I see it as failure.


This is so wrong on so many levels it is laughable.

It takes a big man to admit they're wrong, well I guess we have the answer to that question right there. You'll bring out the David Lee, Jerry West pu pu platter because that's what you do, but it is all bs.

This team as currently constructed with only limited contributions from James Young and Jaylen Brown, the boon from the Nets trade thus far, are in second place in the East with a real opportunity to take the top seed in the Eastern Conference. The current run they've been on has been accomplished without one of their key contributors and this team has weathered every injury sent their way to continue to play at a high level.

You've been wrong about the soft tank and you've doubled and tripled down on it on subsequent seasons. IT is now tied with Celtics' legend John Havlichek for the most 20+ games in the history of the franchise. He's having an epic season, an MVP season and for some reason you want to throw salt at the "fan boys." Please, maybe you should recognize the fact that Ainge pulled off another heist of a deal when he grabbed this guy at the deadline. Instead you'll whine and throw shade that anybody could have had IT at any time. Guess what that's why the majority of the GM's in the league aren't very good. Possibly you could acknowledge that IT the player has developed and evolved his game to be in the conversation as one of the best players in the league. You won't because it's all sour grapes. Your forecast was wrong from the start. Get over it. There are no points for being right on a message board.

It won't matter because you'll trot out the KG trade, and whatever other crap you hang your hat on, like anyone freaking cares. You're trying to tell the board that Brad Stevens doesn't matter - he does. You're trying to tell the rest of the board that the development of Smart, Crowder, Kelly, Avery doesn't matter - it does. You've been trying to say that developing the winning mindset doesn't matter, well as they've battled through the adversity this year it is clear - it does.

Channeling my inner Patriots fan I can recognize what Brady and Belichek built is special and unique. I also know the NBA is a far different animal than the NFL and there really isn't a comparison to be drawn. So your quip about Derek Carr is just more shade seemingly drawn from a never ending reserve. If the Celtics capture the first seed in the Eastern Conference, IT has every right to the MVP trophy and he's certainly and rightfully in the discussion throughout the entire league nationally and otherwise.

So here bring your fire and your venom, I'm ready for your brimstone, but it's time you just admit you were wrong and have been wrong for three seasons. Just get over yourself. If you think this team is a failure you have a fundamental misunderstanding about the nature of sports and the NBA and you lose all credibility. It takes a big man to admit they were wrong, be a bigger man.
Marvel
RealGM
Posts: 26,164
And1: 14,716
Joined: Apr 23, 2010
 

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#42 » by Marvel » Thu Feb 16, 2017 3:46 am

Lou Will would be so good coming off our bench but would he fit with AB back and with Smart coming off the bench?
Marvel
RealGM
Posts: 26,164
And1: 14,716
Joined: Apr 23, 2010
 

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#43 » by Marvel » Thu Feb 16, 2017 3:47 am

The IT doubters are running out of excuses, quick.
DarkAzcura
General Manager
Posts: 8,876
And1: 7,337
Joined: Apr 21, 2006

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#44 » by DarkAzcura » Thu Feb 16, 2017 3:48 am

I think what is important to note is there was no right direction. There are multiple ways to do anything and everything. The Celtics could have been successful had they gone in a different direction back in 2015, but they are just as good (maybe better) where they are right now. The Celtics gambled right back then.
User avatar
Captain_Caveman
RealGM
Posts: 25,904
And1: 38,513
Joined: Jun 25, 2007
       

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#45 » by Captain_Caveman » Thu Feb 16, 2017 3:49 am

DarkAzcura wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:
jfs1000d wrote:
Most IT skeptics have a long history of hating the original trade because we started to win. They were wrong, been proven wrong, and they just don't want to admit it. Everything is off that initial deal where we were supposed to be a treadmill team because we went 40-42.

Then, they thought he was better off the bench despite him making an all-star appearance.

Those wanting him to be a sixth man look dumb.


He also goes against everything tankers thought. If the 60th player in the draft is a star, it destroys the thought you have to have a top 2 pick or don't bother.

The truth is, Isaiah Thomas is likely the best second round pick in NBA history and if he dies this for 3-4 more years, one of the most unique players in NBA history.

Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


Meh. The Nets trade is nearly 100% of the reason we have a shot to be a contender one day.

Without the Nets completely bottoming out, this rebuild is complete fool's gold. And I mean all of it. Stevens, IT, the rest of the starting lineup... none of it would matter at all. Let's be perfectly clear that, realistically speaking, IT would not be a top 3 player on the Warriors, and would certainly not start for them.

Channel your inner Patriots fans and think of how silly it is for fans of teams like the Raiders to brag about 5th place, and having an MVP "candidate" in Derek Carr.

You may think you are giving a gotcha here, but I read this stuff from the IT fanboys and just shake my head. You don't get it. Any of it. You see 5th place as an accomplishment, and I see it as failure.


What does this even mean? Like how is it relevant at all. Like great, Kyrie wouldn't start on the Warriors either. Neither would Lowry. Or Chris Paul. Or several other great point guards. I have no idea why you love to do it, but I think it may be time to stop diminishing IT with comparisons that aren't even relevant honestly.

Just because he can't be a top 3 player on an already established championship team doesn't mean he can't be one himself on a championship team here. No one was saying 'well Pierce wouldn't be a top 2 player on those Shaq Laker teams, guess he can't be a top option on a championship team.' Or 'well Pierce wouldn't have started on those Bulls teams with Pippen and Jordan if he played in the 90s, guess he can't start at all.' Well duh, the teams are already built up championship teams.

FYI, for a period of time you were calling out a lot of people for being 'wrong' about not committing a soft tank in 2015 after we got swept by the Cavs. I think it's alright if the opposite happens now as IT has built himself into the conversation for MVP whether you think it's deserved or not.


I don't mind that dude is trying to go in on me. I'm going right back. Personally, I think there's a lot of IT fanboys who absolutely do not care if we win a title or not. They are perfectly content with 5th place. Same kinda dudes who brag about winning the Atlantic. IMO, they have lower expectations and that's why we differ.

Anyhow, I don't even think the issue was trading for IT, per se. Just not tanking in 2014-15 after we started 16-30. Cost us a valuable asset and has very likely impeded our ability to make major trades since. Trade for IT after that season, and it's all good for now.
User avatar
Captain_Caveman
RealGM
Posts: 25,904
And1: 38,513
Joined: Jun 25, 2007
       

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#46 » by Captain_Caveman » Thu Feb 16, 2017 3:53 am

Marvel wrote:The IT doubters are running out of excuses, quick.


Nah. I live in NorCal and watch the Warriors regularly. They would dickslap us to Mars and back.

We are two top All-Stars away from being a true contender, and aren't even in the same universe as those guys.

If you are in this for other reasons other than contending, have at it.
Marvel
RealGM
Posts: 26,164
And1: 14,716
Joined: Apr 23, 2010
 

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#47 » by Marvel » Thu Feb 16, 2017 3:56 am

Captain_Caveman wrote:
Marvel wrote:The IT doubters are running out of excuses, quick.


Nah. I live in NorCal and watch the Warriors regularly. They would dickslap us to Mars and back.

We are two top All-Stars away from being a true contender, and aren't even in the same universe as those guys.

If you are in this for other reasons other than contending, have at it.


LMAO, no one's saying we'd beat GS but if you want to put words in mouths have at it.
DarkAzcura
General Manager
Posts: 8,876
And1: 7,337
Joined: Apr 21, 2006

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#48 » by DarkAzcura » Thu Feb 16, 2017 3:56 am

Captain_Caveman wrote:
DarkAzcura wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:
Meh. The Nets trade is nearly 100% of the reason we have a shot to be a contender one day.

Without the Nets completely bottoming out, this rebuild is complete fool's gold. And I mean all of it. Stevens, IT, the rest of the starting lineup... none of it would matter at all. Let's be perfectly clear that, realistically speaking, IT would not be a top 3 player on the Warriors, and would certainly not start for them.

Channel your inner Patriots fans and think of how silly it is for fans of teams like the Raiders to brag about 5th place, and having an MVP "candidate" in Derek Carr.

You may think you are giving a gotcha here, but I read this stuff from the IT fanboys and just shake my head. You don't get it. Any of it. You see 5th place as an accomplishment, and I see it as failure.


What does this even mean? Like how is it relevant at all. Like great, Kyrie wouldn't start on the Warriors either. Neither would Lowry. Or Chris Paul. Or several other great point guards. I have no idea why you love to do it, but I think it may be time to stop diminishing IT with comparisons that aren't even relevant honestly.

Just because he can't be a top 3 player on an already established championship team doesn't mean he can't be one himself on a championship team here. No one was saying 'well Pierce wouldn't be a top 2 player on those Shaq Laker teams, guess he can't be a top option on a championship team.' Or 'well Pierce wouldn't have started on those Bulls teams with Pippen and Jordan if he played in the 90s, guess he can't start at all.' Well duh, the teams are already built up championship teams.

FYI, for a period of time you were calling out a lot of people for being 'wrong' about not committing a soft tank in 2015 after we got swept by the Cavs. I think it's alright if the opposite happens now as IT has built himself into the conversation for MVP whether you think it's deserved or not.


I don't mind that dude is trying to go in on me. I'm going right back. Personally, I think there's a lot of IT fanboys who absolutely do not care if we win a title or not. They are perfectly content with 5th place. Same kinda dudes who brag about winning the Atlantic. IMO, they have lower expectations and that's why we differ.

Anyhow, I don't even think the issue was trading for IT, per se. Just not tanking in 2014-15 after we started 16-30. Cost us a valuable asset and has very likely impeded our ability to make major trades since. Trade for IT after that season, and it's all good for now.


I get what you mean in 2014-2015. I really do. But I still stand by my point that trading for IT in the summer probably wouldn't have happened. What happened here in Boston could have happened in Phoenix just as easily. Dragic got traded. If they kept IT, they don't trade for Knight. IT probably goes off for them like he did for us, and he comes off the trade market, and we lose out on Horford, a shot at Durant, and a player in the conversation for MVP (even though it is 100% going to be Harden unless the Celtics continue to go bonkers in the W column).

We have a different opinion about this going back two years, but I always felt like you make that trade when the offer is up..not hope it will still be there a few months later when Phoenix realizes he is actually really good and worth keeping.

If there was an issue in 2015, it's not dumping Bass and making it difficult for IT to force wins, but what can you do? Players are very rarely that impactful in mid season trades.
User avatar
GoCeltics123
RealGM
Posts: 17,503
And1: 33,509
Joined: May 05, 2015
         

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#49 » by GoCeltics123 » Thu Feb 16, 2017 3:59 am

spearsy23 wrote:You guys want a Russell Westbrook? Be aware we've done unspeakable things to him and there may be some ptsd from all the bricks that have caromed towards his head this season.

Is this a trick question? Of course we do!
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#50 » by sully00 » Thu Feb 16, 2017 4:06 am

Captain_Caveman wrote:
Marvel wrote:The IT doubters are running out of excuses, quick.


Nah. I live in NorCal and watch the Warriors regularly. They would dickslap us to Mars and back.

We are two top All-Stars away from being a true contender, and aren't even in the same universe as those guys.

If you are in this for other reasons other than contending, have at it.


See this is BS. The Warriors deconstructed are not what they are as a whole.

Steph Curry on the Sixers or the Magic looks like bad left overs. I love the Warriors because prior to this season they were a compilation of 2nd tier stars, Durant has changed that. But whether it is Curry, Thompson, of Green these guys would not be who they are now on a different roster or situation.

This isn't just the Warriors I think you can say the same thing about the Spurs.

Boston is doubling down on this idea and lets face it this is the way to do it.
gocelts
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,089
And1: 1,966
Joined: Jan 23, 2004
Location: Illadelphia

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#51 » by gocelts » Thu Feb 16, 2017 4:14 am

I believe Smart has hit almost untouchable status. He's reminding me of DJ. Brown is another whom I wouldn't risk moving now either.

It's getting time to start thinking about moving on from Bradley and Crowder while their value is soaring... It's only a matter of time where our younger talent needs to play ahead of them.
~gocelts
User avatar
Captain_Caveman
RealGM
Posts: 25,904
And1: 38,513
Joined: Jun 25, 2007
       

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#52 » by Captain_Caveman » Thu Feb 16, 2017 4:22 am

sully00 wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:
Marvel wrote:The IT doubters are running out of excuses, quick.


Nah. I live in NorCal and watch the Warriors regularly. They would dickslap us to Mars and back.

We are two top All-Stars away from being a true contender, and aren't even in the same universe as those guys.

If you are in this for other reasons other than contending, have at it.


See this is BS. The Warriors deconstructed are not what they are as a whole.

Steph Curry on the Sixers or the Magic looks like bad left overs. I love the Warriors because prior to this season they were a compilation of 2nd tier stars, Durant has changed that. But whether it is Curry, Thompson, of Green these guys would not be who they are now on a different roster or situation.

This isn't just the Warriors I think you can say the same thing about the Spurs.

Boston is doubling down on this idea and lets face it this is the way to do it.


The 2-team MVP looks like "bad left overs" on the Sixers or Magic?

The Warriors who won a title and then made the Finals with a 73-win team last year, but they were a compilation of "2nd tier stars"?

Just delete that one, man.
Banks2Pierce
RealGM
Posts: 15,783
And1: 5,324
Joined: Feb 23, 2004
   

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#53 » by Banks2Pierce » Thu Feb 16, 2017 4:32 am

The Isaiah naysayer journey

Nate Robinson
Lou Williams
6th Man on a good team only
Kyrie
Can't do it against the good teams

Next up: doing it in the playoffs
User avatar
Captain_Caveman
RealGM
Posts: 25,904
And1: 38,513
Joined: Jun 25, 2007
       

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#54 » by Captain_Caveman » Thu Feb 16, 2017 4:50 am

Writebloc wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:
jfs1000d wrote:
Most IT skeptics have a long history of hating the original trade because we started to win. They were wrong, been proven wrong, and they just don't want to admit it. Everything is off that initial deal where we were supposed to be a treadmill team because we went 40-42.

Then, they thought he was better off the bench despite him making an all-star appearance.

Those wanting him to be a sixth man look dumb.


He also goes against everything tankers thought. If the 60th player in the draft is a star, it destroys the thought you have to have a top 2 pick or don't bother.

The truth is, Isaiah Thomas is likely the best second round pick in NBA history and if he dies this for 3-4 more years, one of the most unique players in NBA history.






Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


Meh. The Nets trade is nearly 100% of the reason we have a shot to be a contender one day.

Without the Nets completely bottoming out, this rebuild is complete fool's gold. And I mean all of it. Stevens, IT, the rest of the starting lineup... none of it would matter at all. Let's be perfectly clear that, realistically speaking, IT would not be a top 3 player on the Warriors, and would certainly not start for them.

Channel your inner Patriots fans and think of how silly it is for fans of teams like the Raiders to brag about 5th place, and having an MVP "candidate" in Derek Carr.

You may think you are giving a gotcha here, but I read this stuff from the IT fanboys and just shake my head. You don't get it. Any of it. You see 5th place as an accomplishment, and I see it as failure.


This is so wrong on so many levels it is laughable.

It takes a big man to admit they're wrong, well I guess we have the answer to that question right there. You'll bring out the David Lee, Jerry West pu pu platter because that's what you do, but it is all bs.

This team as currently constructed with only limited contributions from James Young and Jaylen Brown, the boon from the Nets trade thus far, are in second place in the East with a real opportunity to take the top seed in the Eastern Conference. The current run they've been on has been accomplished without one of their key contributors and this team has weathered every injury sent their way to continue to play at a high level.

You've been wrong about the soft tank and you've doubled and tripled down on it on subsequent seasons. IT is now tied with Celtics' legend John Havlichek for the most 20+ games in the history of the franchise. He's having an epic season, an MVP season and for some reason you want to throw salt at the "fan boys." Please, maybe you should recognize the fact that Ainge pulled off another heist of a deal when he grabbed this guy at the deadline. Instead you'll whine and throw shade that anybody could have had IT at any time. Guess what that's why the majority of the GM's in the league aren't very good. Possibly you could acknowledge that IT the player has developed and evolved his game to be in the conversation as one of the best players in the league. You won't because it's all sour grapes. Your forecast was wrong from the start. Get over it. There are no points for being right on a message board.

It won't matter because you'll trot out the KG trade, and whatever other crap you hang your hat on, like anyone freaking cares. You're trying to tell the board that Brad Stevens doesn't matter - he does. You're trying to tell the rest of the board that the development of Smart, Crowder, Kelly, Avery doesn't matter - it does. You've been trying to say that developing the winning mindset doesn't matter, well as they've battled through the adversity this year it is clear - it does.

Channeling my inner Patriots fan I can recognize what Brady and Belichek built is special and unique. I also know the NBA is a far different animal than the NFL and there really isn't a comparison to be drawn. So your quip about Derek Carr is just more shade seemingly drawn from a never ending reserve. If the Celtics capture the first seed in the Eastern Conference, IT has every right to the MVP trophy and he's certainly and rightfully in the discussion throughout the entire league nationally and otherwise.

So here bring your fire and your venom, I'm ready for your brimstone, but it's time you just admit you were wrong and have been wrong for three seasons. Just get over yourself. If you think this team is a failure you have a fundamental misunderstanding about the nature of sports and the NBA and you lose all credibility. It takes a big man to admit they were wrong, be a bigger man.



IT : Andy Dalton :: Curry : Brady

There's nothing wrong with Andy Dalton,and I'm sure that Bengals fans are happy with the guy. Carried his team to the playoffs time and again, and has even been an "MVP candidate" a couple of times (if being 5th in the voting = candidate).

But it's not good enough.

Our team has won 17 titles with guys like Russell, Bird, Cowens and KG. If you don't have guys of that caliber, and we most certainly do not, you are not winning a title, and that's all there is to it.

Underline those last two sentences and read them again and again and again if you need to. That should not even need to be explained to a Boston sports fan, IMO. Everything you do in rebuilding should be geared towards getting one of those guys.

Not IT. Not the "10th best player" in Jimmy Butler. Not a crazy cancer in DeMarcus Cousins. And most certainly not David Lee.

Anything else is picking out the curtains before you buy the house. Anything else gives you a non-contending ceiling like the Toronto Raptors and Cincinnati Bengals.

I can still watch and enjoy it, and the rest of you are perfectly allowed to do so. I'm not the one calling people out, or trying to turn a victory cigar thread that is so clearly about Smart into a talk about IT.

You can have all that. Never throwing the first punch, as always. But I will respond when called out by people happy with 5th place.
User avatar
Captain_Caveman
RealGM
Posts: 25,904
And1: 38,513
Joined: Jun 25, 2007
       

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#55 » by Captain_Caveman » Thu Feb 16, 2017 5:01 am

Banks2Pierce wrote:The Isaiah naysayer journey

Nate Robinson
Lou Williams
6th Man on a good team only
Kyrie
Can't do it against the good teams

Next up: doing it in the playoffs


My opinion on this dude hasn't moved an inch. Can't win a title with him in a starring role, because you have to marry yourself to a ceiling just to do that. He can be on the floor to help close games like Jamal Crawford is, but like Crawford, the dude is best suited to a 6th man role on a real team.

And resigning him to $25-30m a year contract that will play out on the wrong side of 30 years old? That's debatable.
CelticFaninLBC
RealGM
Posts: 10,166
And1: 3,258
Joined: Aug 16, 2004

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#56 » by CelticFaninLBC » Thu Feb 16, 2017 5:12 am

Captain_Caveman wrote:Meh. The Nets trade is nearly 100% of the reason we have a shot to be a contender one day.

Without the Nets completely bottoming out, this rebuild is complete fool's gold. And I mean all of it. Stevens, IT, the rest of the starting lineup... none of it would matter at all. Let's be perfectly clear that, realistically speaking, IT would not be a top 3 player on the Warriors, and would certainly not start for them.

Channel your inner Patriots fans and think of how silly it is for fans of teams like the Raiders to brag about 5th place, and having an MVP "candidate" in Derek Carr.

You may think you are giving a gotcha here, but I read this stuff from the IT fanboys and just shake my head. You don't get it. Any of it. You see 5th place as an accomplishment, and I see it as failure.


This is pretty hyperbolic man and unrealistic. Ainge couldn't have foreseen GSW signing KD back when he traded for IT, and Stevens wouldn't be the coach if they did a multi-year tank. Also, I suspect the most of the owners & coaches frown on multi-year tanking.. They want to win and make money.

If Ainge is able to sign Hayward in the offseason, Boston is top 3 in the league, and is on nearly par with Cleveland, and can take GSW, if Curry gets hurt.
CelticFaninLBC
RealGM
Posts: 10,166
And1: 3,258
Joined: Aug 16, 2004

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#57 » by CelticFaninLBC » Thu Feb 16, 2017 5:14 am

Captain_Caveman wrote:
Banks2Pierce wrote:The Isaiah naysayer journey

Nate Robinson
Lou Williams
6th Man on a good team only
Kyrie
Can't do it against the good teams

Next up: doing it in the playoffs


My opinion on this dude hasn't moved an inch. Can't win a title with him in a starring role, because you have to marry yourself to a ceiling just to do that. He can be on the floor to help close games like Jamal Crawford is, but like Crawford, the dude is best suited to a 6th man role on a real team.

And resigning him to $25-30m a year contract that will play out on the wrong side of 30 years old? That's debatable.


Can you provide a list of "real teams?"
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 41,115
And1: 28,001
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#58 » by Fencer reregistered » Thu Feb 16, 2017 5:14 am

Captain_Caveman wrote:Our team has won 17 titles with guys like Russell, Bird, Cowens and KG. If you don't have guys of that caliber, and we most certainly do not, you are not winning a title, and that's all there is to it.

Underline those last two sentences and read them again and again and again if you need to. That should not even need to be explained to a Boston sports fan, IMO. Everything you do in rebuilding should be geared towards getting one of those guys.
.


The 3 Pistons titles and the recent Warriors one were won without any players much better than IT.

However, those teams each had a second-best player far ahead of Bradley/Crowder/Horford/Smart.
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
User avatar
Captain_Caveman
RealGM
Posts: 25,904
And1: 38,513
Joined: Jun 25, 2007
       

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#59 » by Captain_Caveman » Thu Feb 16, 2017 5:15 am

CelticFaninLBC wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:
Banks2Pierce wrote:The Isaiah naysayer journey

Nate Robinson
Lou Williams
6th Man on a good team only
Kyrie
Can't do it against the good teams

Next up: doing it in the playoffs


My opinion on this dude hasn't moved an inch. Can't win a title with him in a starring role, because you have to marry yourself to a ceiling just to do that. He can be on the floor to help close games like Jamal Crawford is, but like Crawford, the dude is best suited to a 6th man role on a real team.

And resigning him to $25-30m a year contract that will play out on the wrong side of 30 years old? That's debatable.


Can you provide a list of "real teams?"


There are no moves that put us above healthy Warriors, Spurs or Cavs teams this year.
User avatar
Captain_Caveman
RealGM
Posts: 25,904
And1: 38,513
Joined: Jun 25, 2007
       

Re: The (Quintessential) Trade Thread, 2017 (Part 5.0) 

Post#60 » by Captain_Caveman » Thu Feb 16, 2017 5:16 am

Fencer reregistered wrote:
Captain_Caveman wrote:Our team has won 17 titles with guys like Russell, Bird, Cowens and KG. If you don't have guys of that caliber, and we most certainly do not, you are not winning a title, and that's all there is to it.

Underline those last two sentences and read them again and again and again if you need to. That should not even need to be explained to a Boston sports fan, IMO. Everything you do in rebuilding should be geared towards getting one of those guys.
.


The 3 Pistons titles and the recent Warriors one were won without any players much better than IT.

However, those teams each had a second-best player far ahead of Bradley/Crowder/Horford/Smart.


Total disrespect to Steph Curry.

Guy made the HOF by age 28 and could easily pass Larry Bird in the pantheon sooner rather than later.

Return to Boston Celtics