BCS wrote:But I can assure you one or two of those players would need to be gone if we are going to acquire George plus our pick this year and that is as the minimum.
The original question was about picking up George on the FA market.
..
Moderators: ChosenSavior, UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass
BCS wrote:But I can assure you one or two of those players would need to be gone if we are going to acquire George plus our pick this year and that is as the minimum.
drsd wrote:BCS wrote:But I can assure you one or two of those players would need to be gone if we are going to acquire George plus our pick this year and that is as the minimum.
The original question was about picking up George on the FA market.
..
I think if you put McGee back then, he would get those blocks just as easily as Russell did. Russell's athleticism was well ahead of the players of his time, and that's about it.
j-ragg wrote:Skin wrote:Let me guess... Henny's master plan is to lure PG based on warm weather, no state taxes and Disney World...
I think Henny's master plan was to make himself a laughing stock around the league. Screwed up the draft. Screwed up trades. Screwed up FA. 5 years of rebuilding and our biggest hope is now Terrence Ross.
Ever since the Ibaka trade you've said this in almost every post. The horse is dead bro.
Skin wrote:j-ragg wrote:Skin wrote:Let me guess... Henny's master plan is to lure PG based on warm weather, no state taxes and Disney World...
I think Henny's master plan was to make himself a laughing stock around the league. Screwed up the draft. Screwed up trades. Screwed up FA. 5 years of rebuilding and our biggest hope is now Terrence Ross.
Ever since the Ibaka trade you've said this in almost every post. The horse is dead bro.
I will try to be more positive, but that move put it over the top for me. Instead of a clear positive direction forward, we're reeling and spiraling backwards just trying to salvage something so that we don't have to start over from scratch.
BadMofoPimp wrote:Durant thinks Vooch is one of the Best Centers in the NBA. I will take his word over a couch-GM yelling at a TV.
LBPTarHeel27 wrote:Skin wrote:LBPTarHeel27 wrote:It would be silly to "plan" around this idea but it is certainly something you explore the hell out of. If it can be done, you pull the trigger...as long as our 2017 is heavily protected. George isn't going to turn us in to a contender but he turns us in to a team with a real direction and would allow us to actually build a coherent team.
I know it can be tempting... but I disagree. Giving up a ton of assets for him would be another mistake.
Our direction is building through the draft. We have a better chance right now of drafting Josh Jackson or Jonathan Isaac. That would get us back on track with a real direction.
I disagree in the sense that Paul George is a proven commodity. Anyone we draft is just more potential and optimism...not something tangible.
What assets would be too much? There isn't a single player that I am attached to when talking about a deal for Paul George. Our most valuable asset is our pick this year...and I agree that you don't trade it if it is unprotected. Give me Top 7 protected this year, 5 next, 3 the following, and then unprotected. Send out the Lakers pick before it loses the allure of being a "1st round pick". Send out our 2019 pick with some Top 3 protection.
You break the bank for someone like George.
I think the bigger problem is that they are not going to trade him for those very reasons. You don't just give up on a guy like that until you absolutely have to. They are going to trade picks and try to get him some help, rather than trying to rebuild.
Skin wrote:LBPTarHeel27 wrote:Skin wrote:I know it can be tempting... but I disagree. Giving up a ton of assets for him would be another mistake.
Our direction is building through the draft. We have a better chance right now of drafting Josh Jackson or Jonathan Isaac. That would get us back on track with a real direction.
I disagree in the sense that Paul George is a proven commodity. Anyone we draft is just more potential and optimism...not something tangible.
What assets would be too much? There isn't a single player that I am attached to when talking about a deal for Paul George. Our most valuable asset is our pick this year...and I agree that you don't trade it if it is unprotected. Give me Top 7 protected this year, 5 next, 3 the following, and then unprotected. Send out the Lakers pick before it loses the allure of being a "1st round pick". Send out our 2019 pick with some Top 3 protection.
You break the bank for someone like George.
I think the bigger problem is that they are not going to trade him for those very reasons. You don't just give up on a guy like that until you absolutely have to. They are going to trade picks and try to get him some help, rather than trying to rebuild.
It's going to take A TON of assets because we'd have to overbid a team like Boston who can give Jaylen Brown, BRK picks, etc.
THEN.... we'd have 1 season to build a team around him that is a winner in order to get him to stay. ...and when that doesn't happen...
THEN... we'd be just like we were with Ibaka... Nobody wanting to pay a high price for a rental and end up selling him for pennies on the dollar and trying to salvage something, and coming away hoping we recovered.
A big part of our rebuild mess up is because we tried to shortcut it and trade for Ibaka. We can't do that dance again.
LBPTarHeel27 wrote:Skin wrote:LBPTarHeel27 wrote:
I disagree in the sense that Paul George is a proven commodity. Anyone we draft is just more potential and optimism...not something tangible.
What assets would be too much? There isn't a single player that I am attached to when talking about a deal for Paul George. Our most valuable asset is our pick this year...and I agree that you don't trade it if it is unprotected. Give me Top 7 protected this year, 5 next, 3 the following, and then unprotected. Send out the Lakers pick before it loses the allure of being a "1st round pick". Send out our 2019 pick with some Top 3 protection.
You break the bank for someone like George.
I think the bigger problem is that they are not going to trade him for those very reasons. You don't just give up on a guy like that until you absolutely have to. They are going to trade picks and try to get him some help, rather than trying to rebuild.
It's going to take A TON of assets because we'd have to overbid a team like Boston who can give Jaylen Brown, BRK picks, etc.
THEN.... we'd have 1 season to build a team around him that is a winner in order to get him to stay. ...and when that doesn't happen...
THEN... we'd be just like we were with Ibaka... Nobody wanting to pay a high price for a rental and end up selling him for pennies on the dollar and trying to salvage something, and coming away hoping we recovered.
A big part of our rebuild mess up is because we tried to shortcut it and trade for Ibaka. We can't do that dance again.
I get your thought process and it makes sense to a degree...I just think you are afraid to take a risk and don't seem to think trying to build through the draft is a risk, in itself.
There is no doubt that we would have to break the bank for him but if you can get away with trading for a player of that caliber + keeping a solid protection on the 2017 pick...there is 0 reason to not do it. Nothing on our roster is too valuable to not include in such a deal. The only asset we have worth hanging on to is the pick this summer...so you trade whatever else it takes to make it happen.
I get the Ibaka comparison but they really aren't the same. You are talking a franchise player vs. a role player. You take the risk for a franchise player.
I do have to ask....what part of the rebuild did we miss out on by acquiring Ibaka? We wouldn't be any better off without the Dipo trade.