Duke4life831 wrote:jrob23 wrote:Duke4life831 wrote:
Man you seem to love attack people's knowledge a lot on here when they disagree with you, maybe they just you know have a difference of opinion. I have known about Trae Young for a very long time and yes I still say this is a weak class. If Trae Young went lotto in the 18 draft I think it would back up the point that 18 is a weak class. Young is 6'1, very skinny, average athlete on the college level and will be a below average athlete in the NBA. Hes a good shooter but has bad shot selection and has really struggled with his shot against good athletes and size. Have a hard time seeing him as a better prospect as say Tyus Jones and Tyus went mid 20s. I highly doubt Young comes out after one year. Youd have to take him that early hoping he can be Steph Curry 2.0 and his shot is nowhere near Curry.
well....yeah. I mean, you think the 2016 and 2018 draft classes are weak. You think Tatum lacks explosion despite evidence to the contrary provided. You think the 5 star recruit Trae Young who has measured 6'2" in shoes and is growing and filling out is not a great prospect. These all point to a lack of knowledge. You literally quote scout and draftxpress opinions/anecdotal evidence and pass it off as your own. In time you'll be proven wrong I just need you to point it out now so it won't be the case of saying it after the fact.
Did you just try to denigrate Young by saying he isn't the shooter Steph is...arguably the best shooter in NBA history? c'mon man smh
Young, like most high school kids is a chucker no doubt. In a college system playing with better players, spacing and coaching he'll mostly be taking better/open shots. He is lightning quick, has a good handle, willing defender with quick hands and a good passer. After next season imo he'll be considered a 1st rounder if he chooses to come out and a reason why it's not a weak draft class. The fact that you don't even factor him in that class is why you are wrong about the class' strength. Time will tell of course.
I point to things like Scout and Draftexpress as things to back up my arguments. You know that's usually a good way to present an argument, you give your view point and give some things that backup your view point, instead of just saying if you don't agree with my view point you don't know what you're talking about.
Me saying the 2016, 2018 draft classes are weak (18 not nearly as weak as 16) and Tatum having question marks about his explosion aren't wild out there opinions. Many guys have been saying that about Tatum for a long time, I've actually admitted my Duke bias probably kept myself from seeing it for awhile. 2016 draft class has been looked at as a horrible class for a few years now and so far it has lived up to it 1 year in.
When it comes to Trae Young how is he a better prospect than Tyus Jones? Jones better shooter, much better playmaker, similar athleticism and similar built with Tyus being thicker. Tyus couldn't of really had a better 1 year in college mid still went mid 20s in his draft and has struggled to get legit playing time because his lack of size and athleticism.
I just find it weird how the draft board seems to always have so many differences of opinions but seems to have the most civil discussions on this site. But with you,
if someone disagrees with you, you seem the need to call them out even if you have no evidence to back up what you say and it's just your opinion. This is the draft thread, 99% of this stuff is going to be opinion based stuff and projections, it's okay if people have differences of opinions. Doesn't mean anyone lacks knowledge.
that's pretty funny because I'm the one who references measurements and provides videos proving my points and you just state your opinions using absolutes. Case in point, Tatum. I've provided several videos of him jumping off one and two feet, dunking over dudes, to prove he's a great athlete and you provide.....crickets...except you believe he struggles on layups because....reasons.
Trae Young scored 62 points recently.
http://www.scout.com/college/oklahoma/story/1754312-highlights-trae-young-s-62-point-performanceHe has a completely different mindset than Tyus. I think you let TJ's good tournament cloud your Duke fanboy mind into believing he's a good shooter lol. He averaged 8 shots a game and didn't exactly shoot the lights out when he did. I expect Trae Young to have a similar season to Fultz and DSJ. He's an attacking PG and if he's only averaging 8 shots a game and averaging 12 ppg like TJ I'll eat as much crow as you can dish out.
My issue with you and others is you have these very strong opinions, are presented with evidence that shows you are wrong, but don't ever just admit it and move on. I even predicted you'd still spout that Tatum nonsense after I posted the videos. It'd take him posterizing Embid or entering the Dunk contest for you to admit you're wrong. If I come hard at you over Tatum, or dudes who claim Ntilikina can't play SG, it's because you are wrong and you need to be corrected. I myself admit when I'm wrong when new information is presented (like with Ntilikina).
The problem with our current debates is I can't yet prove 2016 was a strong draft class for another couple of years. But then even when some of these raw players who will take awhile to make an impact...do make an impact...you'll never admit you were wrong. Same with 2018. It's a loaded class rivaling 2017 and as we get closer to it and more information than what can be regurgitated from draft sites comes to light...people will begin to realize this. I made the same prediction about 2017 class before the 2016 and it took until the fall before everyone agreed. Eventually, even the draft sites will come around on the 2018 class. But I have a strong feeling you'll suddenly stop quoting them in regards to that lol because it counters your opinion (and theirs currently) We'll see.
You are much too sensitive so I'll just laugh from afar and leave you be to debate posters that don't question when you post nonsense. Have fun. You and Frischella deserve each other.