ImageImageImage

All Things 2017 Draft

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

Gomes3PC
General Manager
Posts: 7,701
And1: 3,752
Joined: Feb 10, 2006

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#181 » by Gomes3PC » Fri Mar 24, 2017 2:23 am

greenroom31 wrote:
greenroom31 wrote:These games have been fugly. College basketball is rough on the eyes.


Case in point, that last 30 seconds for West Virginia. An air ball, a near air ball and then failing to even get a shot off with 12 seconds on the clock.

That whole game was a travesty for the eyes, mainly due to the officiating.
PierceFan4ever
RealGM
Posts: 35,807
And1: 41,926
Joined: Dec 17, 2011

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#182 » by PierceFan4ever » Fri Mar 24, 2017 3:16 am

Josh Jackson...man
return2glory
RealGM
Posts: 17,017
And1: 10,735
Joined: Feb 24, 2005

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#183 » by return2glory » Fri Mar 24, 2017 3:21 am

15 points, 8 rebounds and 4 steals for Josh Jackson so far.
return2glory
RealGM
Posts: 17,017
And1: 10,735
Joined: Feb 24, 2005

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#184 » by return2glory » Fri Mar 24, 2017 3:24 am

Kansas was my favorite to take it all. Frank Mason is one of the best college players in the country. And we all know about Josh Jackson. Graham is also a really good player for them.
rmal8852
Pro Prospect
Posts: 873
And1: 929
Joined: Jan 20, 2013
       

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#185 » by rmal8852 » Fri Mar 24, 2017 3:53 am

Frank MasonIII AND Devonte Graham 52 points for that backcourt! WOW

Mason, like Kennard at Duke, many times looked like the best player on the floor this year.

Kansas outscored Purdue something like 73-33 from later in the first half onward.

Juggernaut.
peachbucket
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,613
And1: 663
Joined: Feb 02, 2005

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#186 » by peachbucket » Fri Mar 24, 2017 4:19 am

leper-con wrote:I went and listened to the Mannix podcast. Said IT wants vets not young guys. It's nothing against Fultz


That's nice...I want fat free bacon.
ViperGTS
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,385
And1: 4,398
Joined: Jul 04, 2016

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#187 » by ViperGTS » Fri Mar 24, 2017 4:36 am

peachbucket wrote:
leper-con wrote:I went and listened to the Mannix podcast. Said IT wants vets not young guys. It's nothing against Fultz


That's nice...I want fat free bacon.


Yup, sorry IT. What you want is irrelevant. There are no vets worth trading any assets for available.
Writebloc
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,075
And1: 5,615
Joined: May 20, 2015
         

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#188 » by Writebloc » Fri Mar 24, 2017 5:39 am

ViperGTS wrote:
peachbucket wrote:
leper-con wrote:I went and listened to the Mannix podcast. Said IT wants vets not young guys. It's nothing against Fultz


That's nice...I want fat free bacon.


Yup, sorry IT. What you want is irrelevant. There are no vets worth trading any assets for available.


Really?

Just because deals didn't get done at the deadline for Ainge I don't think that meant that there were no vets worth trading for? Heck, many on this board and around the NBA thought Boogie might be worth trading for, likely IT and obviously Ainge did not, but he was worth trading for. The can has already been kicked on Butler many times, after this disastrous finish by the Bulls the asking price is bound to come down for Jimmy. Of course there is always PG13 whom Bird is going to have to make a difficult decision on. Writing in absolutes about ambiguous assumptions, especially in the amorphous NBA is an easy way to look foolish. Danny will do what's right for the team whether that is to keep whatever pick the lottery gods give the Celtics or send it packing for a player of more immediate impact.
ViperGTS
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,385
And1: 4,398
Joined: Jul 04, 2016

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#189 » by ViperGTS » Fri Mar 24, 2017 5:52 am

Writebloc wrote:
ViperGTS wrote:
peachbucket wrote:
That's nice...I want fat free bacon.


Yup, sorry IT. What you want is irrelevant. There are no vets worth trading any assets for available.


Really?

Just because deals didn't get done at the deadline for Ainge I don't think that meant that there were no vets worth trading for? Heck, many on this board and around the NBA thought Boogie might be worth trading for, likely IT and obviously Ainge did not, but he was worth trading for. The can has already been kicked on Butler many times, after this disastrous finish by the Bulls the asking price is bound to come down for Jimmy. Of course there is always PG13 whom Bird is going to have to make a difficult decision on. Writing in absolutes about ambiguous assumptions, especially in the amorphous NBA is an easy way to look foolish. Danny will do what's right for the team whether that is to keep whatever pick the lottery gods give the Celtics or send it packing for a player of more immediate impact.


This team needs a true point guard. They don't need another wing. The draft will give them that.
Writebloc
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,075
And1: 5,615
Joined: May 20, 2015
         

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#190 » by Writebloc » Fri Mar 24, 2017 9:33 am

ViperGTS wrote:
Writebloc wrote:
ViperGTS wrote:
Yup, sorry IT. What you want is irrelevant. There are no vets worth trading any assets for available.


Really?

Just because deals didn't get done at the deadline for Ainge I don't think that meant that there were no vets worth trading for? Heck, many on this board and around the NBA thought Boogie might be worth trading for, likely IT and obviously Ainge did not, but he was worth trading for. The can has already been kicked on Butler many times, after this disastrous finish by the Bulls the asking price is bound to come down for Jimmy. Of course there is always PG13 whom Bird is going to have to make a difficult decision on. Writing in absolutes about ambiguous assumptions, especially in the amorphous NBA is an easy way to look foolish. Danny will do what's right for the team whether that is to keep whatever pick the lottery gods give the Celtics or send it packing for a player of more immediate impact.


This team needs a true point guard. They don't need another wing. The draft will give them that.


There are no true point guards left. Fultz isn't a true point guard? Ball is more of a true point guard but he is also a combo guard. If Brad wanted IT to distribute the ball more he would, the Celtics don't have enough superior shooters to do that. If you are talking size for defensive purposes there are plenty of questions regarding both Fultz and Ball in that arena. Fultz his heart, and Ball his foot speed, the assumption is that these rookies will step right in and be better than Thomas, unless they are special, special talents the players coming out of the draft aren't ready for those types of minutes. On top of all of that you are referring to the top two players in the draft, if the lottery porks the Celtics, like it traditionally has, then you are looking at another wing, although Taytum is possibly just a big. Unless you are referring to a Malik Monk, Fox, or Smith Jr. type and if so than measurables are negligible over IT. Aside from all of that, and Ainge has said this on multpile occasions what the Celtics need is another player who can break down a defense and put the ball in the basket. Fultz definitely fits that mold, the rest, we'll see. Ping pong balls, it all comes down to ping pong balls.
reload141
RealGM
Posts: 11,752
And1: 23,401
Joined: Jan 21, 2012
       

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#191 » by reload141 » Fri Mar 24, 2017 10:14 am

Ridiculous saying we need a PG. Come on man.
Trade for PG13
Add Hayward

=== Profit and the best shot at a championship
FlatearthZorro
RealGM
Posts: 20,585
And1: 12,326
Joined: Feb 12, 2010
Location: Somewhere in Boston
     

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#192 » by FlatearthZorro » Fri Mar 24, 2017 11:14 am

reload141 wrote:Ridiculous saying we need a PG. Come on man.
Trade for PG13
Add Hayward

=== Profit and the best shot at a championship


Danny will not trade the #1 overall for George. Probably not #2. Who knows maybe if Hayward is a sure thing and George is willing to resign straight up. Scarry part is that Hayward has been much better than George last 2 years and no1 has noticed. :lol:
Good assessment:

PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,848
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#193 » by SmartWentCrazy » Fri Mar 24, 2017 11:27 am

reload141 wrote:Ridiculous saying we need a PG. Come on man.
Trade for PG13
Add Hayward

=== Profit and the best shot at a championship


Not sure if true, TBH.

An IT/Hayward/PG/Horford core is worse in every way compared to Curry/Klay/KD/Dray. I think we're better off long term keeping Fultz/Ball/Jackson/Tatum and trying to grow organically.
Writebloc
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,075
And1: 5,615
Joined: May 20, 2015
         

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#194 » by Writebloc » Fri Mar 24, 2017 11:35 am

SmartWentCrazy wrote:
reload141 wrote:Ridiculous saying we need a PG. Come on man.
Trade for PG13
Add Hayward

=== Profit and the best shot at a championship


Not sure if true, TBH.

An IT/Hayward/PG/Horford core is worse in every way compared to Curry/Klay/KD/Dray. I think we're better off long term keeping Fultz/Ball/Jackson/Tatum and trying to grow organically.


Save for the fact that it is going to be increasingly difficult to keep that core four of Curry/Klay/KD/Dray together, not to mention the bench pieces that surround those four are likely to be worse than what Ainge has accumulated to position around the Celtics. I'm not to be honest if Ainge could swing a deal for George and still pay Hayward max money? If they Wyc and ownership are willing to go way over the cap maybe, but that would be difficult. There will be salary implications in any of these scenarios that people ignore.
User avatar
jmr07019
General Manager
Posts: 8,532
And1: 8,447
Joined: Oct 29, 2009
       

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#195 » by jmr07019 » Fri Mar 24, 2017 11:45 am

The Heat didn't win it all 4 years they had their big 3 and that team broke up much earlier than anyone expected. You can't be afraid to go for it
Show Love Spread Love
User avatar
greenroom31
General Manager
Posts: 7,936
And1: 11,423
Joined: Nov 06, 2004

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#196 » by greenroom31 » Fri Mar 24, 2017 12:05 pm

Update from yesterday's games re: the college prospects...

Xavier vs. Arizona
Markannen: 9 points on 3/9 shooting (1/6 from three), 8 rebounds, 0 assists and 1 steal in 40 minutes
Bluiett: 25 points on 9/17 shooting (3/8 from three), 2 rebounds, 2 assists, 1 steal in 35 minutes

Michigan vs. Oregon
Wilson: 12 points on 4/10 shooting (4/8 from three), 6 rebounds, 1 assist, 2 steals, 2 blocks in 27 minutes
Brooks: 12 points on 5/13 shooting (2/4 from three), 4 rebounds, 5 assists, 1 block in 36 minutes
Bell: 16 points on 7/10 shooting (0/0 from three), 13 rebounds, 1 assist, 1 steal, 2 blocks in 32 minutes

Purdue vs. Kansas
Swanigan: 18 points on 6/11 shooting (3/4 from three), 7 rebounds, 4 assists, 1 steal (6 TOs) in 35 minutes
Mason: 26 points on 9/11 shooting (4/5 from three), 7 rebounds, 7 assists, 1 steal in 35 minutes
Graham: 26 points on 7/15 shooting (5/9 from three), 0 rebounds, 2 assists, 1 steal in 35 minutes
Jackson: 15 points on 6/13 shooting (2/5 from three), 12 rebounds, 2 assists, 4 steals, 1 block, 4 TOs in 36 minutes
Gomes3PC
General Manager
Posts: 7,701
And1: 3,752
Joined: Feb 10, 2006

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#197 » by Gomes3PC » Fri Mar 24, 2017 1:00 pm

Trevon Bluiett was always a guy I liked as a potential NBA backup SG, and he's really blowing up. Reminds me of Gary Harris. Deadeye shooter, good rebounder, smart defender, enough length to defend the bigger SGs in the NBA.
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,848
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#198 » by SmartWentCrazy » Fri Mar 24, 2017 1:06 pm

Writebloc wrote:
SmartWentCrazy wrote:
reload141 wrote:Ridiculous saying we need a PG. Come on man.
Trade for PG13
Add Hayward

=== Profit and the best shot at a championship


Not sure if true, TBH.

An IT/Hayward/PG/Horford core is worse in every way compared to Curry/Klay/KD/Dray. I think we're better off long term keeping Fultz/Ball/Jackson/Tatum and trying to grow organically.


Save for the fact that it is going to be increasingly difficult to keep that core four of Curry/Klay/KD/Dray together, not to mention the bench pieces that surround those four are likely to be worse than what Ainge has accumulated to position around the Celtics. I'm not to be honest if Ainge could swing a deal for George and still pay Hayward max money? If they Wyc and ownership are willing to go way over the cap maybe, but that would be difficult. There will be salary implications in any of these scenarios that people ignore.


It's easy to keep the core together, less easy to keep the auxiliary pieces. They'll be able to replace them on cheap money deals though.

I personally think our best bet is to draft and develop. I think it is the path that gives us the best shot at winning a title.
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,848
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#199 » by SmartWentCrazy » Fri Mar 24, 2017 1:09 pm

jmr07019 wrote:The Heat didn't win it all 4 years they had their big 3 and that team broke up much earlier than anyone expected. You can't be afraid to go for it


There's a reason the Spurs didn't trade Kawhi for a 30+ year old star in 2012. You don't sell your house to bet on a number in roulette.
Gant
RealGM
Posts: 11,013
And1: 15,513
Joined: Mar 16, 2006

Re: '17 Draft Thread 3.0 

Post#200 » by Gant » Fri Mar 24, 2017 1:19 pm

I'm rooting for Butler tonight. In separate areas of the country Brad n' Gordon will see that final score and have to wipe away something from their eyes. Feelings.

Go Bulldog nostalgia!

Return to Boston Celtics