ImageImageImage

Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

London2Boston
RealGM
Posts: 10,128
And1: 13,003
Joined: Apr 14, 2014
     

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1201 » by London2Boston » Mon Apr 3, 2017 7:21 pm

Griffin is a far better need imo. We can live without Hayward tbh as he will just take mins and opportunities away from Jaylen and Fultz/Ball/Jackson. I mean I won't be pissed if we sign him, but I'm not exactly pumped for him either.
User avatar
mbsnmisc
Starter
Posts: 2,008
And1: 3,721
Joined: Feb 13, 2012
Location: Murrells Inlet SC
     

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1202 » by mbsnmisc » Mon Apr 3, 2017 9:53 pm

chrisab123 wrote:
dei1c3 wrote:Gah! I really hope the Nets continue to suck next year. All I really want is a superstar big man.


Superstar big isn't on the list. They'd rather grab the best wing in the draft. Rebounding is not a concern for the team in regards to building a roster. They just care if 12 players can jack up 3s if needed.

I think Brad is one of the few coaches with enough intellect to not just run a "system". He has concepts that he favors, but if a "Shaq" like talent was available in the draft, I think he could modify what he runs and be successful.
User avatar
Asian Celtic
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,819
And1: 7,002
Joined: Jun 10, 2016
 

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1203 » by Asian Celtic » Mon Apr 3, 2017 10:58 pm

London2Boston wrote:Griffin is a far better need imo. We can live without Hayward tbh as he will just take mins and opportunities away from Jaylen and Fultz/Ball/Jackson. I mean I won't be pissed if we sign him, but I'm not exactly pumped for him either.



Agree with your POV. Griffin would fit like a glove into Stevens system from day 1. He's like a more athletic, less defensive Horford that would compliment everyone with spacing, passing, rebounding. If Hayward is a longshot, then I don't know our chances on Griffin though, he's also injury prone. I don't like to see Griffin and Bradley taking turns on the injured list.
Wes-J
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,977
And1: 3,769
Joined: Feb 19, 2012
 

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1204 » by Wes-J » Tue Apr 4, 2017 2:49 am

London2Boston wrote:Griffin is a far better need imo. We can live without Hayward tbh as he will just take mins and opportunities away from Jaylen and Fultz/Ball/Jackson. I mean I won't be pissed if we sign him, but I'm not exactly pumped for him either.


Sorry that's an awful reason not to sign a FA lol. That's like saying going after KD is a bad idea, he'll take opportunities away from other young players.
User avatar
jmr07019
General Manager
Posts: 8,526
And1: 8,440
Joined: Oct 29, 2009
       

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1205 » by jmr07019 » Tue Apr 4, 2017 3:07 pm

Bradley to Philly
Saric to Orlando
Gordon to Boston
Show Love Spread Love
lon3lytoaster
General Manager
Posts: 7,688
And1: 6,524
Joined: Oct 03, 2011

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1206 » by lon3lytoaster » Tue Apr 4, 2017 3:11 pm

jmr07019 wrote:Bradley to Philly
Saric to Orlando
Gordon to Boston


I would do that on the contingency we have an agreement with Hayward.

Gordon would fit nicely here and he was really high on Danny's board during his draft class.
Valid
RealGM
Posts: 13,263
And1: 12,656
Joined: Jul 07, 2012
Location: New Jersey

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1207 » by Valid » Wed Apr 5, 2017 5:14 pm

jmr07019 wrote:Bradley to Philly
Saric to Orlando
Gordon to Boston

I do this in a heartbeat.

Still not sure why Orlando would give up on Gordon, though, but then again, it is the Magic we are talking about here.
User avatar
jmr07019
General Manager
Posts: 8,526
And1: 8,440
Joined: Oct 29, 2009
       

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1208 » by jmr07019 » Wed Apr 5, 2017 10:59 pm

lon3lytoaster wrote:
jmr07019 wrote:Bradley to Philly
Saric to Orlando
Gordon to Boston


I would do that on the contingency we have an agreement with Hayward.

Gordon would fit nicely here and he was really high on Danny's board during his draft class.


Even if we don't there's a 50% chance we get Fultz or Ball and I would say a 90% chance we draft a perimeter player with only a 10% chance we draft Markkanen or Issac. Gotta move one of IT, Bradley, Smart
Show Love Spread Love
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 41,048
And1: 27,921
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1209 » by Fencer reregistered » Wed Apr 5, 2017 11:06 pm

lon3lytoaster wrote:
jmr07019 wrote:Bradley to Philly
Saric to Orlando
Gordon to Boston


I would do that on the contingency we have an agreement with Hayward.

Gordon would fit nicely here and he was really high on Danny's board during his draft class.


Timing could probably be worked out. We just wouldn't have this year's 2nd round picks to include in the deal.

And yeah -- I'm not trading Bradley for a currently not very effective young guy in a vacuum. But I'd trade him for the young guy to rebalance the roster after other moves are made.
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
User avatar
GimmeDat
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 23,929
And1: 16,926
Joined: Sep 27, 2013
Location: Australia
 

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1210 » by GimmeDat » Thu Apr 6, 2017 12:00 pm

Teetering back on Butler trade talks, would you guys have interest in Robin Lopez, either as part of a Butler deal, or seperately?
FlatearthZorro
RealGM
Posts: 20,585
And1: 12,326
Joined: Feb 12, 2010
Location: Somewhere in Boston
     

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1211 » by FlatearthZorro » Thu Apr 6, 2017 12:21 pm

GimmeDat wrote:Teetering back on Butler trade talks, would you guys have interest in Robin Lopez, either as part of a Butler deal, or seperately?


Obviously we're mostly speculating, but lately it seems as tho Ainge and Brad don't focus on rebounding at all. :lol: Like literally at all. :lol: So I somewhat doubt we're interested in Robin. Honestly unless something dramatic happens as I wrote probably 6-7 times already, I don't expect you guys to trade Butler. I think you might even let him walk. Your ownership just cares about playoff money, not the future of your team. Pretty awful situation to be in.
Good assessment:

PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
FlatearthZorro
RealGM
Posts: 20,585
And1: 12,326
Joined: Feb 12, 2010
Location: Somewhere in Boston
     

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1212 » by FlatearthZorro » Thu Apr 6, 2017 12:22 pm

redbeamer wrote:PG13 is a stud! I hope we can work something out in the off season.


I don't know Bird much and I haven't watched him, but he seems super stubborn the kind of stubborn where he might fool himself into thinking George will stay and have him leave a year from now.
Good assessment:

PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
redbeamer
Junior
Posts: 398
And1: 669
Joined: May 16, 2010

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1213 » by redbeamer » Thu Apr 6, 2017 1:20 pm

Boston34Bg wrote:
redbeamer wrote:PG13 is a stud! I hope we can work something out in the off season.


I don't know Bird much and I haven't watched him, but he seems super stubborn the kind of stubborn where he might fool himself into thinking George will stay and have him leave a year from now.


I get the feeling you might be right. He strikes me as the type of guy who would refuse to admit things did not work out and move on.
TheOGJabroni
Head Coach
Posts: 6,475
And1: 1,994
Joined: Jul 28, 2007
       

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1214 » by TheOGJabroni » Thu Apr 6, 2017 3:17 pm

I love how we have a dedicated trade thread even though we're at a point in the year where trades are not currently allowed. It just shows how forward thinking Celtics' fans are.

I think we're aiming too high for trade targets. It seems like Ainge is leaving the appropriate amount of cap space flexibility open to sign a max free agent (hopefully Hayward). He wouldn't need that much flexibility if we were looking to trade for one.

It gets to the point where if we are successful in signing a max free agent, a decision needs to be made on Bradley & Olynyk. While I like Bradley as a player more, if we draft & sign another guard & wing player, he's the one that needs to go. I would move him and Rozier for a solid big with a smaller salary (Kyle O'Quinn) & maybe a future draft pick so we are able to bring over our stashed rookies from last season.

Thomas / Fultz / Jackson
Hayward / Smart
Crowder / Brown / Nader
O'Quinn / Olynyk / Yabusele
Horford / Zizic
reload141
RealGM
Posts: 11,751
And1: 23,401
Joined: Jan 21, 2012
       

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1215 » by reload141 » Thu Apr 6, 2017 9:28 pm

GimmeDat wrote:Teetering back on Butler trade talks, would you guys have interest in Robin Lopez, either as part of a Butler deal, or seperately?


Not really, I imagine if we traded for Butler it would be for him and him alone.
What's your take on the Butler situation? Do you want them to trade him, build around him?
User avatar
ConstableGeneva
RealGM
Posts: 50,514
And1: 101,230
Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Location: Parody Account
 

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1216 » by ConstableGeneva » Thu Apr 6, 2017 9:32 pm

I'd like the Pacers to not make the playoffs please. And for Paul George to not make any of the All-NBA teams. Thanks.
░N░0░0░D░S░ ░I░N░ ░B░I░O░
User avatar
GimmeDat
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 23,929
And1: 16,926
Joined: Sep 27, 2013
Location: Australia
 

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1217 » by GimmeDat » Thu Apr 6, 2017 11:14 pm

reload141 wrote:
GimmeDat wrote:Teetering back on Butler trade talks, would you guys have interest in Robin Lopez, either as part of a Butler deal, or seperately?


Not really, I imagine if we traded for Butler it would be for him and him alone.
What's your take on the Butler situation? Do you want them to trade him, build around him?


Very hard to say, everything is very speculative at this point. What I would rule out is a situation where they're committed to moving him for the highest bidder - I don't think they'll evaluate what offers are and the strength of that direction versus the prospects of re-tooling around Butler in the next few years.

He's obviously playing well enough to be 'the guy', and when our supporting cast plays well and hits shots we look like a legit playoff team, but the roster is so full of young guys and inconsistent players that it gets ugly often. I think with a re-tool that actually builds around Jimmy we can be a really good team, but we are somewhat limited with assets/upside, so if a heavy deal presents itself for Butler, I'd do it. To be honest, the worst move we made last off-season was Wade - Butler plays a lot better without him, and he's clogging up some big time cap room.
User avatar
ConstableGeneva
RealGM
Posts: 50,514
And1: 101,230
Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Location: Parody Account
 

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1218 » by ConstableGeneva » Fri Apr 7, 2017 3:11 am

Read on Twitter

Proving to be the prudent move.
░N░0░0░D░S░ ░I░N░ ░B░I░O░
User avatar
Asian Celtic
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,819
And1: 7,002
Joined: Jun 10, 2016
 

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1219 » by Asian Celtic » Fri Apr 7, 2017 3:50 am

I'm highly leaning on the bye2x Bradley wagon. As much as he's and All NBA Defender, he's also hurt every year. Can't seem to get healthy in a full season. I'd like to get him for a Solid Bigman who can play 28-32 minutes a night.
bucknersrevenge
RealGM
Posts: 11,267
And1: 15,178
Joined: Jul 05, 2012
Location: Southern Maryland
Contact:
         

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1220 » by bucknersrevenge » Fri Apr 7, 2017 4:19 am

Rexperez wrote:I'm highly leaning on the bye2x Bradley wagon. As much as he's and All NBA Defender, he's also hurt every year. Can't seem to get healthy in a full season. I'd like to get him for a Solid Bigman who can play 28-32 minutes a night.


Feeling a lot of Nik Vucevic fitting the bill. After we sign Hayward, we'll need to match up salaries. AB, maybe Terry and filler should do the trick. I think Danny laid groundwork at the deadline when there were whispers. Nik checks off all the boxes that Brad likes in his bigs. Good passer at the high post, solid perimeter shooter, can rebound well. Only on the books at 25 mil for the next 2 years. Pushes l to the 4. He's my odds on favorite right now.
and that's "MR. Irrelevant" to you!!

Founder of The Red's Disciples Podcast
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKArn8FGRYRxGqNDg8J4IAQ/featured

Return to Boston Celtics