ImageImageImage

Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

User avatar
BRUNiNHO91
RealGM
Posts: 30,423
And1: 23,553
Joined: Mar 04, 2009
Location: Rio De Janeiro, Brasil...
     

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1361 » by BRUNiNHO91 » Thu Apr 20, 2017 8:37 pm

ALL HAIL wrote:Crowder, Smart, and Zeller for Kevin Love.


If Cleveland would accept that, it would have been done a long time ago. Danny could only dream of something like this.
WHAT THEY GON’ SAY NOW? ‎ THANK YOU TRUTH!
ALL HAIL
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,474
And1: 1,213
Joined: Dec 27, 2005

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1362 » by ALL HAIL » Thu Apr 20, 2017 8:42 pm

BRUNiNHO91 wrote:
ALL HAIL wrote:Crowder, Smart, and Zeller for Kevin Love.


If Cleveland would accept that, it would have been done a long time ago. Danny could only dream of something like this.

I actually think this improves Cleveland a lot, they need a player like Smart, with an edge, at third guard, and Crowder is a major upgrade defensively over Love, but I suppose some middling picks could be added as sweetener.
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,847
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1363 » by SmartWentCrazy » Thu Apr 20, 2017 8:48 pm

knicksup19 wrote:
SmartWentCrazy wrote:
knicksup19 wrote:
he does have positive trade value if you need what he provides. melo is worth 5 draft spots for a team with title contentions and tons of assets. if not your looking at paul george for maybe both picks plus fillers and no picks in return, i dont think melos value is high at all i just think its the best case scenario for both teams. You guys are really willing to gut most your assest to get pg/butler and hope it works out? signing g hayward would be the best option.. but in the event that isnt possible i would seriously consider melo..

it would suck to gut for butler and still not be good enough..

but honestly tho you guys would pass on 2 and fillers for 7 melo oquinn and fillers?


It would suck even more to gut for Melo and get worse. I'm sorry you don't want to believe he has no trade value, but it's the truth. He's declining, he's overpaid, and he's no longer the guy he once was. Your GM is actively trying to trade him for anything and Melo, through his NTC, is actively whittling down his market. There are rumors he's gunna force a buy out. He is no where near a positive.

Yes, we'd pass. We're not trading a top pick for that overpaid jerk.


melo does have value his ntc is the only hiccup and doesnt have to cost you a top pick melo is worth one of jaylen brown pick swap or next year bk pick.. you guys would honestly rather pass up on melo and give up the farm for butler or george? thats really a better scenario? butler/george is going to cost you at least two of this year pick next year pick and brown..

melo could be had for brown, pick swap this year or next year bk pick which might not be that good with a healthy lin and free agency..

maybe you guys really just think melo is that bad lol hes no best player on a championship level player but he could help you guys.


Yes. Emphatically. Like it's not even remotely close.

You're way overvaluing Melo. He won't get near that, certainly not from us.
User avatar
Stadium5
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,863
And1: 3,556
Joined: May 04, 2013

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1364 » by Stadium5 » Thu Apr 20, 2017 8:51 pm

SmartWentCrazy wrote:
knicksup19 wrote:
SmartWentCrazy wrote:
It would suck even more to gut for Melo and get worse. I'm sorry you don't want to believe he has no trade value, but it's the truth. He's declining, he's overpaid, and he's no longer the guy he once was. Your GM is actively trying to trade him for anything and Melo, through his NTC, is actively whittling down his market. There are rumors he's gunna force a buy out. He is no where near a positive.

Yes, we'd pass. We're not trading a top pick for that overpaid jerk.


melo does have value his ntc is the only hiccup and doesnt have to cost you a top pick melo is worth one of jaylen brown pick swap or next year bk pick.. you guys would honestly rather pass up on melo and give up the farm for butler or george? thats really a better scenario? butler/george is going to cost you at least two of this year pick next year pick and brown..

melo could be had for brown, pick swap this year or next year bk pick which might not be that good with a healthy lin and free agency..

maybe you guys really just think melo is that bad lol hes no best player on a championship level player but he could help you guys.


Yes. Emphatically. Like it's not even remotely close.

You're way overvaluing Melo. He won't get near that, certainly not from us.

Melo, even in his prime, I deemed a career loser. I'm not sure I can put my finger on exactly what it is with him...but he's just not an ingredient to a winning basketball team
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 59,508
And1: 36,484
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1365 » by jbk1234 » Thu Apr 20, 2017 9:24 pm

ALL HAIL wrote:
BRUNiNHO91 wrote:
ALL HAIL wrote:Crowder, Smart, and Zeller for Kevin Love.


If Cleveland would accept that, it would have been done a long time ago. Danny could only dream of something like this.

I actually think this improves Cleveland a lot, they need a player like Smart, with an edge, at third guard, and Crowder is a major upgrade defensively over Love, but I suppose some middling picks could be added as sweetener.


Cavs aren't trading Love to Boston - at least as not as long as LBJ is wearing a Cavs jersey. He'd be a perfect for them. Also, that's a garbage package. Cavs already watched the original Zeller sucks movie. The sequel wasn't any better.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
FlatearthZorro
RealGM
Posts: 20,599
And1: 12,343
Joined: Feb 12, 2010
Location: Somewhere in Boston
     

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1366 » by FlatearthZorro » Thu Apr 20, 2017 10:30 pm

jmr07019 wrote:I wanted Whiteside last offseason and still think he'd be a great fit on this team. Not sold Miami is building with that team. I think we could get him but we'd have to give a little.


If yuou check my posts, he's been my guys for a while too. Freakishly long with pretty good athletic ability. Danny is not adding a rebounder he'd rather get embarassed by a career 5.5 boards a game in the playoffs(yes BLopez averages 5.5 rb a game for his career).
Good assessment:

PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
bucknersrevenge
RealGM
Posts: 11,441
And1: 15,546
Joined: Jul 05, 2012
Location: Southern Maryland
Contact:
         

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1367 » by bucknersrevenge » Thu Apr 20, 2017 11:01 pm

Boston34Bg wrote:
jmr07019 wrote:I wanted Whiteside last offseason and still think he'd be a great fit on this team. Not sold Miami is building with that team. I think we could get him but we'd have to give a little.


If yuou check my posts, he's been my guys for a while too. Freakishly long with pretty good athletic ability. Danny is not adding a rebounder he'd rather get embarassed by a career 5.5 boards a game in the playoffs(yes BLopez averages 5.5 rb a game for his career).


I'm sorry but this is the kind of 98.5 talk show argument that has been rebuffed by people with even an inkling of understanding of how to construct a roster. Danny hasn't denied us of anything but the short term benefits of an ill-conceived roster.
and that's "MR. Irrelevant" to you!!

Founder of The Red's Disciples Podcast
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKArn8FGRYRxGqNDg8J4IAQ/featured
FlatearthZorro
RealGM
Posts: 20,599
And1: 12,343
Joined: Feb 12, 2010
Location: Somewhere in Boston
     

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1368 » by FlatearthZorro » Thu Apr 20, 2017 11:05 pm

bucknersrevenge wrote:
Boston34Bg wrote:
jmr07019 wrote:I wanted Whiteside last offseason and still think he'd be a great fit on this team. Not sold Miami is building with that team. I think we could get him but we'd have to give a little.


If yuou check my posts, he's been my guys for a while too. Freakishly long with pretty good athletic ability. Danny is not adding a rebounder he'd rather get embarassed by a career 5.5 boards a game in the playoffs(yes BLopez averages 5.5 rb a game for his career).


I'm sorry but this is the kind of 98.5 talk show argument that has been rebuffed by people with even an inkling of understanding of how to construct a roster. Danny hasn't denied us of anything but the short term benefits of an ill-conceived roster.


Robin is averaging 6.4 rebounds a game this season. So my point still stands.
Good assessment:

PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,847
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1369 » by SmartWentCrazy » Thu Apr 20, 2017 11:12 pm

Boston34Bg wrote:
bucknersrevenge wrote:
Boston34Bg wrote:
If yuou check my posts, he's been my guys for a while too. Freakishly long with pretty good athletic ability. Danny is not adding a rebounder he'd rather get embarassed by a career 5.5 boards a game in the playoffs(yes BLopez averages 5.5 rb a game for his career).


I'm sorry but this is the kind of 98.5 talk show argument that has been rebuffed by people with even an inkling of understanding of how to construct a roster. Danny hasn't denied us of anything but the short term benefits of an ill-conceived roster.


Robin is averaging 6.4 rebounds a game this season. So my point still stands.


Look at his ORB%, he's a fantastic offensive rebounder and doing what he's always done this series.
bucknersrevenge
RealGM
Posts: 11,441
And1: 15,546
Joined: Jul 05, 2012
Location: Southern Maryland
Contact:
         

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1370 » by bucknersrevenge » Thu Apr 20, 2017 11:16 pm

Boston34Bg wrote:
bucknersrevenge wrote:
Boston34Bg wrote:
If yuou check my posts, he's been my guys for a while too. Freakishly long with pretty good athletic ability. Danny is not adding a rebounder he'd rather get embarassed by a career 5.5 boards a game in the playoffs(yes BLopez averages 5.5 rb a game for his career).


I'm sorry but this is the kind of 98.5 talk show argument that has been rebuffed by people with even an inkling of understanding of how to construct a roster. Danny hasn't denied us of anything but the short term benefits of an ill-conceived roster.


Robin is averaging 6.4 rebounds a game this season. So my point still stands.


I'm not sure what your point is though. During a year that in the grand scheme of things doesn't matter as much as this coming offseason, as a GM you can't overreact to things like this. You don't burn assets to fix problem "c" when problems "a" and "b" are bigger issues and need to be filled first. That is how you become the Atlanta Hawks or the Memphis Grizzlies.
and that's "MR. Irrelevant" to you!!

Founder of The Red's Disciples Podcast
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKArn8FGRYRxGqNDg8J4IAQ/featured
User avatar
Green89
RealGM
Posts: 28,416
And1: 27,983
Joined: Apr 01, 2013

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1371 » by Green89 » Fri Apr 21, 2017 2:30 am

Paul George seems like he's been very frustrated, but I'm not so sure Bird will ever give into Danny's deals. Time to overpay a little, Danny.
reload141
RealGM
Posts: 11,778
And1: 23,436
Joined: Jan 21, 2012
       

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1372 » by reload141 » Fri Apr 21, 2017 4:24 am

Any PG melts from todays game? Damn he must be fuming right now..
FlatearthZorro
RealGM
Posts: 20,599
And1: 12,343
Joined: Feb 12, 2010
Location: Somewhere in Boston
     

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1373 » by FlatearthZorro » Fri Apr 21, 2017 11:01 am

Green89 wrote:Paul George seems like he's been very frustrated, but I'm not so sure Bird will ever give into Danny's deals. Time to overpay a little, Danny.


Problem is Bird seems too stubborn. As I wrote many times I don't know Bird, but he seems like the type of guy who will basically let George go(meaning lose him in FA) in hopes of signing him to a 200$ mil deal.
Good assessment:

PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
FlatearthZorro
RealGM
Posts: 20,599
And1: 12,343
Joined: Feb 12, 2010
Location: Somewhere in Boston
     

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1374 » by FlatearthZorro » Fri Apr 21, 2017 11:03 am

bucknersrevenge wrote:
Boston34Bg wrote:
bucknersrevenge wrote:
I'm sorry but this is the kind of 98.5 talk show argument that has been rebuffed by people with even an inkling of understanding of how to construct a roster. Danny hasn't denied us of anything but the short term benefits of an ill-conceived roster.


Robin is averaging 6.4 rebounds a game this season. So my point still stands.


I'm not sure what your point is though. During a year that in the grand scheme of things doesn't matter as much as this coming offseason, as a GM you can't overreact to things like this. You don't burn assets to fix problem "c" when problems "a" and "b" are bigger issues and need to be filled first. That is how you become the Atlanta Hawks or the Memphis Grizzlies.


I tell you what brotha. To me if we at least rebound better we make it to the ECF despite our woes on offense in the playoffs.
Good assessment:

PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
SmartWentCrazy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 20,749
And1: 34,847
Joined: Dec 29, 2014

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1375 » by SmartWentCrazy » Fri Apr 21, 2017 11:15 am

Boston34Bg wrote:
Green89 wrote:Paul George seems like he's been very frustrated, but I'm not so sure Bird will ever give into Danny's deals. Time to overpay a little, Danny.


Problem is Bird seems too stubborn. As I wrote many times I don't know Bird, but he seems like the type of guy who will basically let George go(meaning lose him in FA) in hopes of signing him to a 200$ mil deal.


The decision to trade PG will rest in the hands of the owner. If he tells Bird to trade him rather than risk losing him for nothing, he's gone. If he tells Bird to keep him and gamble on the early supermax, he stays.

Their owner is obviously a tremendous business man -- I can't see him taking this risk. Especially if George says he wants out. Losing George for nothing will take years to recover in regards to revenue generated. Getting a top pick and another prospect greatly accelerates the recovery and allows for you to field a fun/competitive team while still generating tremendous revenue.
User avatar
Green89
RealGM
Posts: 28,416
And1: 27,983
Joined: Apr 01, 2013

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1376 » by Green89 » Fri Apr 21, 2017 12:58 pm

They tried improving the team a little and rejoining Stephenson with George, in an effort to show they are going to try and get him help. However, George was already calling out Lance for not keeping his cool, so that reunion doesn't seem to help Indy gain any leverage in helping George want to stay.
Banks2Pierce
RealGM
Posts: 15,783
And1: 5,324
Joined: Feb 23, 2004
   

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1377 » by Banks2Pierce » Fri Apr 21, 2017 1:08 pm

What intrigues me is that All-NBA teams are sort of important to us and there is an awards show on June 26. Fairly late in the game if that is the first anyone officially hears about it and it's also after the draft. It's not one of the categories listed on the official website for it so guessing they might release them sooner rather than later instead.

Melo ship looks like a non-starter to me because of salary matching.
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,847
And1: 70,934
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1378 » by Celts17Pride » Fri Apr 21, 2017 1:22 pm

Danny Ainge is not using the Celtics cap space on Carmelo Anthony. Not happening.
RR9
Starter
Posts: 2,461
And1: 157
Joined: Jul 14, 2011
       

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1379 » by RR9 » Fri Apr 21, 2017 2:25 pm

I've been ignorant throughout the season thinking we're good enough with Bradley and Crowder as our wings...but playoffs are showing we're not. I think Smart/Bradley would be great for our backcourt and Bradley should still make sense as an SG starter. Crowder's a 6-man with how he's playing offensively. It's very clear now the difference PG or Butler would have made had we gotten one of them. If it were on the table (maybe not), 2018 BKN 1st + Crowder + Smart +Amir (yuck) for PG and Butler I'd easily do now.
RR9
Starter
Posts: 2,461
And1: 157
Joined: Jul 14, 2011
       

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1380 » by RR9 » Fri Apr 21, 2017 3:12 pm

Read on Twitter

Return to Boston Celtics