ALL HAIL wrote:Crowder, Smart, and Zeller for Kevin Love.
If Cleveland would accept that, it would have been done a long time ago. Danny could only dream of something like this.
Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts
ALL HAIL wrote:Crowder, Smart, and Zeller for Kevin Love.
BRUNiNHO91 wrote:ALL HAIL wrote:Crowder, Smart, and Zeller for Kevin Love.
If Cleveland would accept that, it would have been done a long time ago. Danny could only dream of something like this.

knicksup19 wrote:SmartWentCrazy wrote:knicksup19 wrote:
he does have positive trade value if you need what he provides. melo is worth 5 draft spots for a team with title contentions and tons of assets. if not your looking at paul george for maybe both picks plus fillers and no picks in return, i dont think melos value is high at all i just think its the best case scenario for both teams. You guys are really willing to gut most your assest to get pg/butler and hope it works out? signing g hayward would be the best option.. but in the event that isnt possible i would seriously consider melo..
it would suck to gut for butler and still not be good enough..
but honestly tho you guys would pass on 2 and fillers for 7 melo oquinn and fillers?
It would suck even more to gut for Melo and get worse. I'm sorry you don't want to believe he has no trade value, but it's the truth. He's declining, he's overpaid, and he's no longer the guy he once was. Your GM is actively trying to trade him for anything and Melo, through his NTC, is actively whittling down his market. There are rumors he's gunna force a buy out. He is no where near a positive.
Yes, we'd pass. We're not trading a top pick for that overpaid jerk.
melo does have value his ntc is the only hiccup and doesnt have to cost you a top pick melo is worth one of jaylen brown pick swap or next year bk pick.. you guys would honestly rather pass up on melo and give up the farm for butler or george? thats really a better scenario? butler/george is going to cost you at least two of this year pick next year pick and brown..
melo could be had for brown, pick swap this year or next year bk pick which might not be that good with a healthy lin and free agency..
maybe you guys really just think melo is that bad lol hes no best player on a championship level player but he could help you guys.
SmartWentCrazy wrote:knicksup19 wrote:SmartWentCrazy wrote:
It would suck even more to gut for Melo and get worse. I'm sorry you don't want to believe he has no trade value, but it's the truth. He's declining, he's overpaid, and he's no longer the guy he once was. Your GM is actively trying to trade him for anything and Melo, through his NTC, is actively whittling down his market. There are rumors he's gunna force a buy out. He is no where near a positive.
Yes, we'd pass. We're not trading a top pick for that overpaid jerk.
melo does have value his ntc is the only hiccup and doesnt have to cost you a top pick melo is worth one of jaylen brown pick swap or next year bk pick.. you guys would honestly rather pass up on melo and give up the farm for butler or george? thats really a better scenario? butler/george is going to cost you at least two of this year pick next year pick and brown..
melo could be had for brown, pick swap this year or next year bk pick which might not be that good with a healthy lin and free agency..
maybe you guys really just think melo is that bad lol hes no best player on a championship level player but he could help you guys.
Yes. Emphatically. Like it's not even remotely close.
You're way overvaluing Melo. He won't get near that, certainly not from us.

ALL HAIL wrote:BRUNiNHO91 wrote:ALL HAIL wrote:Crowder, Smart, and Zeller for Kevin Love.
If Cleveland would accept that, it would have been done a long time ago. Danny could only dream of something like this.
I actually think this improves Cleveland a lot, they need a player like Smart, with an edge, at third guard, and Crowder is a major upgrade defensively over Love, but I suppose some middling picks could be added as sweetener.
jmr07019 wrote:I wanted Whiteside last offseason and still think he'd be a great fit on this team. Not sold Miami is building with that team. I think we could get him but we'd have to give a little.
PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
Boston34Bg wrote:jmr07019 wrote:I wanted Whiteside last offseason and still think he'd be a great fit on this team. Not sold Miami is building with that team. I think we could get him but we'd have to give a little.
If yuou check my posts, he's been my guys for a while too. Freakishly long with pretty good athletic ability. Danny is not adding a rebounder he'd rather get embarassed by a career 5.5 boards a game in the playoffs(yes BLopez averages 5.5 rb a game for his career).
bucknersrevenge wrote:Boston34Bg wrote:jmr07019 wrote:I wanted Whiteside last offseason and still think he'd be a great fit on this team. Not sold Miami is building with that team. I think we could get him but we'd have to give a little.
If yuou check my posts, he's been my guys for a while too. Freakishly long with pretty good athletic ability. Danny is not adding a rebounder he'd rather get embarassed by a career 5.5 boards a game in the playoffs(yes BLopez averages 5.5 rb a game for his career).
I'm sorry but this is the kind of 98.5 talk show argument that has been rebuffed by people with even an inkling of understanding of how to construct a roster. Danny hasn't denied us of anything but the short term benefits of an ill-conceived roster.
PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.

Boston34Bg wrote:bucknersrevenge wrote:Boston34Bg wrote:
If yuou check my posts, he's been my guys for a while too. Freakishly long with pretty good athletic ability. Danny is not adding a rebounder he'd rather get embarassed by a career 5.5 boards a game in the playoffs(yes BLopez averages 5.5 rb a game for his career).
I'm sorry but this is the kind of 98.5 talk show argument that has been rebuffed by people with even an inkling of understanding of how to construct a roster. Danny hasn't denied us of anything but the short term benefits of an ill-conceived roster.
Robin is averaging 6.4 rebounds a game this season. So my point still stands.
Boston34Bg wrote:bucknersrevenge wrote:Boston34Bg wrote:
If yuou check my posts, he's been my guys for a while too. Freakishly long with pretty good athletic ability. Danny is not adding a rebounder he'd rather get embarassed by a career 5.5 boards a game in the playoffs(yes BLopez averages 5.5 rb a game for his career).
I'm sorry but this is the kind of 98.5 talk show argument that has been rebuffed by people with even an inkling of understanding of how to construct a roster. Danny hasn't denied us of anything but the short term benefits of an ill-conceived roster.
Robin is averaging 6.4 rebounds a game this season. So my point still stands.
Green89 wrote:Paul George seems like he's been very frustrated, but I'm not so sure Bird will ever give into Danny's deals. Time to overpay a little, Danny.
PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
bucknersrevenge wrote:Boston34Bg wrote:bucknersrevenge wrote:
I'm sorry but this is the kind of 98.5 talk show argument that has been rebuffed by people with even an inkling of understanding of how to construct a roster. Danny hasn't denied us of anything but the short term benefits of an ill-conceived roster.
Robin is averaging 6.4 rebounds a game this season. So my point still stands.
I'm not sure what your point is though. During a year that in the grand scheme of things doesn't matter as much as this coming offseason, as a GM you can't overreact to things like this. You don't burn assets to fix problem "c" when problems "a" and "b" are bigger issues and need to be filled first. That is how you become the Atlanta Hawks or the Memphis Grizzlies.
PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.

Boston34Bg wrote:Green89 wrote:Paul George seems like he's been very frustrated, but I'm not so sure Bird will ever give into Danny's deals. Time to overpay a little, Danny.
Problem is Bird seems too stubborn. As I wrote many times I don't know Bird, but he seems like the type of guy who will basically let George go(meaning lose him in FA) in hopes of signing him to a 200$ mil deal.