ImageImageImage

Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough

Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts

Curmudgeon
RealGM
Posts: 42,195
And1: 25,972
Joined: Jan 20, 2004
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1541 » by Curmudgeon » Thu Apr 27, 2017 7:57 pm

Darth Celtic wrote:
Curmudgeon wrote:Olynyk is restricted, so the Knicks can always keep him if they want. As for Brown, yes, I'd probably do it.


NBA doesn't work that way. KO can't be traded until after the draft as it would have to be a sign and trade.


Yep, that's right. It would have to be another player or group of players.
"Numbers lie alot. Wins and losses don't lie." - Jerry West
"You are what your record says you are."- Bill Parcells
"Offense sells tickets. Defense wins games. Rebounding wins championships." Pat Summit
sam_I_am
RealGM
Posts: 16,737
And1: 9,529
Joined: Jul 10, 2004

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1542 » by sam_I_am » Thu Apr 27, 2017 9:18 pm

Celts17Pride wrote:Crowder is a one trick pony. Crowder either hits the three point shot or he is useless. His mid range game is awful and he is even worst taking the ball to the hoop. Nice role player but that's it.

If Ainge can package Crowder, Smart and the Brooklyn 2018 pick for a star he should do it in a heartbeat.


I sometimes feel that way too but when he moves to 4 he holds his own defensively and creates space offensively. When he and IT are on the floor together our team is at its best. He also is only player that brings both toughness and composure.
"I think the criticism's stupid," Stevens said. "So I don't care. I'm with Jaylen (Brown) on that. Those two had achieved more than most 25 and 26 year olds ever had. I'd rather be in the mix and have my guts ripped out than suck."
CelticsPride18
General Manager
Posts: 9,474
And1: 11,513
Joined: Oct 31, 2013
       

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1543 » by CelticsPride18 » Fri Apr 28, 2017 3:19 am

I think the only way Hayward woul consider joining us is if we came at the table with another Star(PG or Butler) on board.
User avatar
Captain_Caveman
RealGM
Posts: 25,904
And1: 38,513
Joined: Jun 25, 2007
       

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1544 » by Captain_Caveman » Fri Apr 28, 2017 7:00 am

BigTrade92 wrote:
Banks2Pierce wrote:
165bows wrote:He's going to be more expensive over the long haul but Bradley reinforcing over and over again he's a much better player than Crowder.


AB's had great games 3 and 5, but I'm not seeing this at all.


Crowder has done virtually nothing this entire series.

His shooting is abysmal and is getting abused defensively by Wade.

Meanwhile Bradley has been the second best scorer on the C's behind Isaiah and has locked down Butler in 4 out of the 6 games, one of the two because he was in foul trouble for cheap, cheap calls.

Bradley has clearly been the second best player on the team, while Crowder has easily been one of the worst, and the most obvious disappointment.


Both are great complementary players to put around the stars we don't have yet. I too prefer Bradley, but Crowder is cost-controlled and as versatile defensively. On the real team, Crowder will probably be the first forward off the bench. His contract reflects that. We likely won't be able to afford to resign both Bradley and IT if we add stars the summer, and guess who likely goes there?

Based on the other thread we were just in, I am way more open to considering scenarios where it is Bradley instead of IT who stays, but you obviously don't just give IT away. Maybe there is a scenario or two where we resign both IT and Bradley, but that's unlikely unless we just stand pat, which I am fine with long-term based on the Nets picks, but it isn't good enough to win a title anytime soon.
User avatar
CeltsfanSinceBirth
RealGM
Posts: 23,818
And1: 34,893
Joined: Jul 29, 2003
     

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1545 » by CeltsfanSinceBirth » Fri Apr 28, 2017 3:01 pm

Edug27 wrote:
Curmudgeon wrote:I don't think Porzingis for #1 is all that far-fetched. I've read in a couple of places that Phil covets Fultz. Maybe it's just hype, but maybe not.

My proposed draft night trade would be Olynyk, rights to Yabusele or Nader and #1 for Porzingis and #7. I think that helps both teams.


Phil would never be able to show his face at the Garden again.


Phil is probably ok with that. He's such a lazy GM. Isola kills him on NBA radio whenever he gets the chance. Part of me wonders if Phil will try to trade Porzingis this summer in an effort to get fired. You know he just wants to sit in his teepee in Montana, smoking peyote all day.
User avatar
Zaschrona
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,932
And1: 1,362
Joined: Dec 10, 2011
Location: Czechia
       

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1546 » by Zaschrona » Fri Apr 28, 2017 5:30 pm

Crowder, Bradley and BKN '17 pick for Paul George.
Sign Blake Griffin.
Re-sign IT.

IT/Rozier
Brown/Smart
George/Nader
Griffin/Yabusele
Horford/Zizic
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 41,108
And1: 27,994
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1547 » by Fencer reregistered » Fri Apr 28, 2017 7:33 pm

Zaschrona wrote:Crowder, Bradley and BKN '17 pick for Paul George.


If the pick is in the 3-4 range, that's not crazy.
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
London2Boston
RealGM
Posts: 10,128
And1: 13,003
Joined: Apr 14, 2014
     

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1548 » by London2Boston » Fri Apr 28, 2017 8:02 pm

The return of Blake Griffin to the Los Angeles Clippers in free agency is less certain than Chris Paul's, according to sources.

Griffin will be a free agent for the first time in his career this summer. Griffin signed a super-max extension in July of 2012 a year before he would have become a restricted free agent.

Griffin's personality could lend him to consider the decision privately instead of taking a series of public meetings.

The Clippers can offer Griffin one additional guaranteed season and 7.5 percent raises.

According to Steve Ballmer, the Clippers don't have any interest in blowing up their roster.

"I love those guys, and I want those guys back," Ballmer said.

KEVIN ARNOVITZ/ESPN



Image
Andrew McCeltic
RealGM
Posts: 23,153
And1: 8,549
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
 

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1549 » by Andrew McCeltic » Sat Apr 29, 2017 2:40 am

So after the false start, we beat the piss out of the Bulls. This ends Phil's "Maybe Boston will settle for Melo now" scenario, and possibly the Bulls' "Maybe our team isn't stuck" fantasy.

We can beat Washington. Don't know if we will, but we can.

So the lotto pick position is another domino to fall. But it looks like we'll go into the offseason with better leverage than Chicago, New York - and Atlanta, if we wanted Milsapp.

Hoping LA comes back to beat Utah, to help our chances of Gordon leaving.

But after superhero ball from PG, an 0-4 loss, and Bird stepping down as president, it looks like George will be the bullseye.

19.5 million salary on July 1, so you could theoretically swap a pick for him outright. We'd have plenty of flexibility to get him and add someone like Vucevic or Butler, too.

Should be interesting. Lakers will go hard at George, so could Sixers if they gamble. Lakers' pick is major variable.
fallguy
General Manager
Posts: 7,859
And1: 12,714
Joined: Jun 12, 2009

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1550 » by fallguy » Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:41 pm

A quick we-told-you-so:

Holding off on Butler/George trades was the right move. Whatever they were worth then, they're worth less now.
fallguy
General Manager
Posts: 7,859
And1: 12,714
Joined: Jun 12, 2009

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1551 » by fallguy » Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:49 pm

I'm also pro-Crowder but he's a *clear* tier below Bradley as a player on both sides of the ball. At least right now.
User avatar
ParticleMan
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,077
And1: 9,097
Joined: Sep 16, 2004
     

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1552 » by ParticleMan » Sat Apr 29, 2017 2:36 pm

bird stepping down is huge. makes a pg13 trade much more plausible. i think larry just didn't want to get taken by of all people danny ainge.

assuming we don't get fultz, i expect that we will try something like crowder+rozier+pick, plus a couple of sweeteners. or brown instead of the pick. that's low value but the pacers have to realize they aren't going anywhere with this group and pg13 wants out.
robdog_5
Veteran
Posts: 2,872
And1: 2,319
Joined: Feb 03, 2017
   

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1553 » by robdog_5 » Sat Apr 29, 2017 4:23 pm

I also agree with Bird stepping down, the PG13 deal move makes more sense as something the Pacers would do. I'm not sure he's worth Bradley, Crowder and First pick unless it's #3 or 4. If it's the #1 or 2 pick I'd be more inclined to add NJ 18 and maybe a 2nd to see if that would be enough.

Heyward will be tough, but if the Clips win game 7 then Heyward maybe pretty frustrated. I think George Hill factors into things a lot there. He stays I think they will be able to convince Heyward to stay, he leaves I think Heyward is much more likely to look around.
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,829
And1: 70,907
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1554 » by Celts17Pride » Sat Apr 29, 2017 6:05 pm

Fencer reregistered wrote:
Zaschrona wrote:Crowder, Bradley and BKN '17 pick for Paul George.


If the pick is in the 3-4 range, that's not crazy.

Trading Bradley in a Paul George trade makes no sense. You would want to end up with IT/AB/George backcourt.

And please don't anyone say Jaylen Brown or Fultz because they are light years away
bucknersrevenge
RealGM
Posts: 11,441
And1: 15,546
Joined: Jul 05, 2012
Location: Southern Maryland
Contact:
         

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1555 » by bucknersrevenge » Sat Apr 29, 2017 6:20 pm

Celts17Pride wrote:
Fencer reregistered wrote:
Zaschrona wrote:Crowder, Bradley and BKN '17 pick for Paul George.


If the pick is in the 3-4 range, that's not crazy.

Trading Bradley in a Paul George trade makes no sense. You would want to end up with IT/AB/George backcourt.

And please don't anyone say Jaylen Brown or Fultz because they are light years away


I think it would be Crowder and one of those two though because they are young and Indy would be starting over. Otherwise agree. Afterward you trade for or sign a vet big to play next to Al. then again, maybe you move AB if you don't want to pay him 18-20mil per after next season and you're wiling to open up space for Jaylen.

How does an IT/Jaylen/PG13 threesome strike you?
and that's "MR. Irrelevant" to you!!

Founder of The Red's Disciples Podcast
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKArn8FGRYRxGqNDg8J4IAQ/featured
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,829
And1: 70,907
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1556 » by Celts17Pride » Sat Apr 29, 2017 6:22 pm

bucknersrevenge wrote:
Celts17Pride wrote:
Fencer reregistered wrote:
If the pick is in the 3-4 range, that's not crazy.

Trading Bradley in a Paul George trade makes no sense. You would want to end up with IT/AB/George backcourt.

And please don't anyone say Jaylen Brown or Fultz because they are light years away


I think it would be Crowder and one of those two though because they are young and Indy would be starting over. Otherwise agree. Afterward you trade for or sign a vet big to play next to Al. then again, maybe you move AB if you don't want to pay him 18-20mil per after next season and you're wiling to open up space for Jaylen.

How does an IT/Jaylen/PG13 threesome strike you?

Jaylen won't be ready for 3-4 years. IT and George are not going to wait that long
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 41,108
And1: 27,994
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1557 » by Fencer reregistered » Sat Apr 29, 2017 6:36 pm

ParticleMan wrote:bird stepping down is huge. makes a pg13 trade much more plausible. i think larry just didn't want to get taken by of all people danny ainge.

assuming we don't get fultz, i expect that we will try something like crowder+rozier+pick, plus a couple of sweeteners. or brown instead of the pick. that's low value but the pacers have to realize they aren't going anywhere with this group and pg13 wants out.


Best of both worlds, actually, if he really remains a consultant. You still have the trust between friends, but you don't have the ego of not wanting to do worse than the other, nor the ego of having chosen (and failed with) the previous strategy.
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
lon3lytoaster
General Manager
Posts: 7,693
And1: 6,540
Joined: Oct 03, 2011

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1558 » by lon3lytoaster » Sat Apr 29, 2017 6:38 pm

Zaschrona wrote:Crowder, Bradley and BKN '17 pick for Paul George.
Sign Blake Griffin.
Re-sign IT.

IT/Rozier
Brown/Smart
George/Nader
Griffin/Yabusele
Horford/Zizic


Rather find a way to keep AB. I'd feel much better about our matchup with Steph/Durant and Kyrie /LeBron with both George and Bradley.
Homerclease
RealGM
Posts: 30,682
And1: 32,715
Joined: Dec 09, 2015

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1559 » by Homerclease » Sat Apr 29, 2017 6:40 pm

Celts17Pride wrote:
Fencer reregistered wrote:
Zaschrona wrote:Crowder, Bradley and BKN '17 pick for Paul George.


If the pick is in the 3-4 range, that's not crazy.

Trading Bradley in a Paul George trade makes no sense. You would want to end up with IT/AB/George backcourt.

And please don't anyone say Jaylen Brown or Fultz because they are light years away

It makes sense if you're bringing in Hayward too.

Hayward/Brown
George/Smart
Thomas/Rozier
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 41,108
And1: 27,994
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

Re: Trade Post-Mortem 2017: Eight is Enough 

Post#1560 » by Fencer reregistered » Sat Apr 29, 2017 6:40 pm

Celts17Pride wrote:
Fencer reregistered wrote:
Zaschrona wrote:Crowder, Bradley and BKN '17 pick for Paul George.


If the pick is in the 3-4 range, that's not crazy.

Trading Bradley in a Paul George trade makes no sense. You would want to end up with IT/AB/George backcourt.

And please don't anyone say Jaylen Brown or Fultz because they are light years away


I agree directionally, for both teams -- Indy should want our youngest talent, if they trade PG, and we should be biased that way too. Still, IT/Smart/Rozier/Brown isn't bad as the rest of the perimeter.

That said, I do want to keep Avery. Yes, he lacks star talent in ISO scoring. But he's a star to me even so, on and off the court alike.
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".

Return to Boston Celtics